Journal of Scientific Research & Reports
28(2): 7-14, 2022; Article no.JSRR.84852
ISSN: 2320-0227
Response of Lettuce Cultivars to Inoculation with
Trichoderma spp.
Rejayne Barbosa Lima a, Cleia Santos Cabral b, Lincon Rafael da Silva c,
Luis Alberto Martins Palhares de Melo c, Paulo Henrique Pereira Costa Muniz d
and Sueli Corrêa Marques de Mello c*
a
Department of Phytopathology, University of Brasilia, Brasília/Federal District, Brazil.
b
Unidesc University Center, Valparaíso de Goiás/Goiás, Brazil.
c
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília/Federal. District, Brazil.
d
Laboratory of Phytopathology, State University of Goiás, Ipameri/Goiás, Brazil.
Authors’ contributions
This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. All authors read and approved the final
manuscript.
Article Information
DOI: 10.9734/JSRR/2022/v28i230496
Open Peer Review History:
This journal follows the Advanced Open Peer Review policy. Identity of the Reviewers, Editor(s) and additional Reviewers,
peer review comments, different versions of the manuscript, comments of the editors, etc are available here:
https://www.sdiarticle5.com/review-history/84852
Original Research Article
Received 19 January2022
Accepted 24 March 2022
Published 29 March 2022
ABSTRACT
Fungi of the Trichoderma genus are present in practically all types of soil and they have the ability
to establish a beneficial relationship with plants. In addition to acting as direct biological control
agents, they also act as plant growth promoters, by an indirect biological control mechanism.
Because of these, many products containing Trichoderma strains are used to improve seed health,
providing better development of roots and aerial parts of plants. In view of this fact, research work
was carried out in a greenhouse with the aim of evaluating the effect of five Trichoderma strains,
belonging to the species T. virens, T. asperellum, T. asperelloides, in addition to a strain
unidentified at the species level T. koningiopsis, in three new crisp lettuce cultivars (BRS Lélia,
BRS Leila, and BRS Mediterrânea). A conidial suspension of each of the strains was prepared (1.0
7
-1
x 10 conidia mL ) and applied at the time of sowing the lettuce in pots. The experiment was
completely randomized in a factorial 5x3 design (Trichoderma spp. x cultivars). Control treatments
consisted of pots containing plants without any of the fungi. All Trichoderma strains applied
increased fresh mass and length of root, fresh mass of aerial part and lettuce height in comparison
to the controls treated just with water. The cultivar BRS Leila showed an increase of 44% in fresh
root mass, 45% in fresh mass of aerial part, with T. virens; 15% in plant height with T. koningiopsis,
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Corresponding author: E-mail: sueli.mello@embrapa.br;
Lima et al.; JSRR, 28(2): 7-14, 2022; Article no.JSRR.84852
and 23.94% in root length, with Trichoderma sp. For ‘BRS Lélia’ the highest values of fresh root
mass, fresh mass of aerial part and root length were 30%, 36.71%, and 13.33% with T. asperellum.
Trichoderma asperelloides provided 13.72% increase in height compared to the control. ‘BRS
Mediterrânea’ showed increments of 75% of fresh root mass, 78.45% of fresh mass of aerial part,
and 44.37% of height with T. virens. With T. asperelloides, 40.61% was observed in root length.
The strain T. virens performed better in all the analyzed variables, except for root length.
Keywords: Biological control; lettuce genotypes; antagonistic fungi; plant growth promotion; lactuca
sativa; microbiolization.
1. INTRODUCTION
same time. Among these mechanisms are the
synthesis of growth-stimulating substances, such
as phytohormones and the ability to solubilize
nutrients present in soil and make them available
to be absorbed by the roots of plants, while
reducing costs of mineral and organic fertilizers
[5]. Given the above, the purpose of work was to
analyze the effect of Trichoderma spp. applied in
the planting furrow, using distinct lettuce
cultivars.
Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is among the most
cultivated and consumed leafy vegetables
worldwide. Its short cycle allows planting
throughout the year in different production and
cultivation systems [1,2,3]. However, some
aspects influence the development of this
vegetable species, from the establishment of the
culture to the harvest. For example, good
germination generates vigorous seedlings for
transplanting and will have an effect on the
volume and quality of the product to be
marketed. Thus, the proper treatment of seeds
before being sown in the substrate is of great
importance [4].
In this context, a study was carried out in the
greenhouse with the aim of evaluating the effect
of five Trichoderma strains, belonging to the
species
T.
virens,
T. asperellum,
T. asperelloides, and T. koningiopsis, in addition
to a strain unidentified at the species level, in
three new crisp lettuce cultivars.
Among the products available for use in seed
treatment there are several biofungicides and
biostimulators based on Trichoderma. This
important genus contains more than 300
accepted species. Besides, these fungi are
considered cosmopolitan, inhabiting different
ecological niches, and they are able to colonize
practically all types of soil [5,6]. Several
Trichoderma species perform antagonism
against phytopathogenic agents, especially
bacteria and fungi. Their various mechanisms of
action have been widely studied in recent
decades, supporting the development and use of
these products with relative success among food
producers on farms [7]. Plant growth promotion is
an indirect biological control mechanism, by
which the action of these fungi improves
germination and seedling health in lettuce by
various paths. They promote the development of
roots and aerial parts and make plants more
resistant to invasion by phytopathogens [8].
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Lettuce Cultivars and Trichoderma
Strains used
The experiments were conducted under
greenhouse conditions with five strains of
Trichoderma spp. (Trichoderma sp., T. virens, T.
asperellum,
T.
koningiopsis,
and
T. asperelloides) and three crisp varietal types of
lettuce (‘BRS Leila’, ‘BRS Lélia’ and ‘BRS
Mediterrânea’). The strains used belong to the
Collection of Biological Control Agents from
Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology,
Brasilia, Federal District, Brazil. They were
multiplied in Petri dishes (90 x 15 mm) containing
Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) in a BOD incubator
®
(Nova Técnica ) at 25±1 ºC for seven days. After
this period, the spores were collected in sterilized
distilled water, by scraping the surface of the
colonized medium to obtain the full suspension.
Fungal suspensions were homogenized by
stirring in a magnetic stirrer (Vortex type). An
aliquot of 200 μL of this suspension was used to
fill the Neubauer chamber and count the spores
in each sample.
Numerous research papers report positive
effects of Trichoderma application as a plant
growth promoter in different cultivated plant
species [9,10,11,12]. Strains of this fungus are
able to establish interactions with plant roots,
enabling an increase in quality and quantity of
biomass, through different mechanisms at the
8
Lima et al.; JSRR, 28(2): 7-14, 2022; Article no.JSRR.84852
2.2 In vivo Growth Promotion Tests
root mass in cultivar BRS Leila was verified with
T. virens, whose average value of 11.97 g meant
an increase of 44% in relation to the control
(Table 1). This treatment differed from the
control, as well as from the treatment with
Trichoderma sp. For the cultivar BRS Lélia, there
was no statistical difference among species
used, for which the averages ranged from 7.43 to
9.92 g. Also, no differences were observed in
relation to the control treatment. As for the
cultivar BRS Mediterrânea, once again the
treatment with T. virens was higher, with a mean
value of 13.28 g, although it did not differ
statistically from T. koningiopsis, whose mean
value was 9.94. This last species, in turn, did not
differ significantly from the other three,
Trichoderma
sp.,
T.
asperelloides
and
T. asperellum, achieving averages of 7.26, 7.88
and 8.60 g, respectively, of fresh root mass.
Suspensions of Trichoderma spp. were
evaluated as described in the previous
paragraph and spore concentrations adjusted to
1 x 107 conidia mL-1. The lettuce seeds
disinfected by immersing them in 70% ethanol for
1 minute, a 2% sodium hypochlorite solution for 1
minute, were rinsed twice in distilled and
autoclaved water. Pots with a 1 L capacity were
filled with autoclaved substrate (BioPlant Plus®)
and three lettuce seeds were sown per pot.
Then, the substrate was inoculated with 2 mL of
suspension representing each treatment. The
pots containing lettuce plants with water were
used as control. The pots were randomly
distributed on the benches of the greenhouse.
Irrigation was daily and no fertilizer was used. In
order to keep one plant per pot, thinning was
conducted after germination of the seeds. The
plant height, root length, fresh mass of root and
aerial part were checked and measured with a
millimeter ruler and weighed on a precision
balance 30 days after inoculation of Trichoderma
spp. [11].
Considering the variable fresh mass of aerial
parts of lettuce plants, there was no significant
difference amount Trichoderma strains when
tested with the cultivars, except with ‘BRS
Mediterrânea’.
For this cultivar, a better
performance was observed (20.14 g) when
treated with T. virens, meaning an increase of
80% compared to the control treatment, also
differing from Trichoderma sp. The latter did not
differ from T. asperellum, T. asperelloides and T.
koningiopsis treatments, nor from the control
(Table 2).
2.3 Statistical Analysis
This trial was designed with 15 treatments,
consisting of three cultivars, five strains of
Trichoderma spp. Five repetitions were
performed for each treatment. The arrangement
adopted was a 3 x 5 factorial randomly
distributed. The values of root and fresh mass of
aerial part, plant height and root length were
subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and
the means were compared by the Tukey test
(P≤0.05), using the R software [13].
Regarding the variable height of plants, there
was no statistical difference amount the
treatments with Trichoderma, for the three
cultivars tested. The cultivar BRS Mediterrânea
was the only one for which there was a
significant difference in treatments with
Trichoderma spp. in relation to the control
treatment. Nonetheless, the height averages
ranged from 14.04 to 16.00 cm, meaning an
increase of 36 to 45%, compared to the
treatment without Trichoderma (Table 3).
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Thirty days after inoculation, positive differences
in root fresh mass, fresh mass of aerial part,
plant height and root length varied according to
cultivar, as well as in relation to Trichoderma
strains. The best performance in terms of fresh
Table 1. Fresh root mass (F.R.M) for different lettuce cultivars 30 days after inoculation (DAI)
with Trichoderma spp.
Strains of Trichoderma
Trichoderma sp.
T. virens
T. asperellum
T. asperelloides
T. koningiopsis
Control
F.R.M per cultivar (g)
BRS Lélia
BRS Mediterrânea
9.15±2.71a
7.26±2.27bc
7.43±3.13a
13.28±2.01a
9.92±1.77a
8.60±1.33b
8.85±2.03a
7.88±2.99b
8.53±2.22a
9.94±1.22ab
6.96±3.05a
3.30±1.79c
BRS Leila
6.80±1.66b
11.97±3.38a
7.90±1.19ab
8.18±2.37ab
8.30±2.23ab
6.72±2.38b
Means followed by the same letter in the same column do not differ significantly at the 5% level by the Tukey test
9
Lima et al.; JSRR, 28(2): 7-14, 2022; Article no.JSRR.84852
Table 2. Fresh mass of aerial part (F.M.A.P) of different lettuce cultivars 30 days after
inoculation (DAI) with Trichoderma spp.
Strains of Trichoderma
Trichoderma sp.
T. virens
T. asperellum
T. asperelloides
T. koningiopsis
Control
F.M.A.P per cultivar (g)
BRS Lélia
BRS Mediterrânea
11.57±4.80a
11.66±3.33bc
9.83±7.63a
20.14±4.66a
15.17±5.79a
16.30±4.35ab
12.58±3.05a
15.14±5.31ab
13.20±2.89a
16.54±3.69ab
9.60±4.54a
4.34±2.26c
BRS Leila
11.62±3.46a
13.70±2.02a
10.78±1.33a
10.90±3.73a
12.40±1.90a
7.48±2.52a
Means followed by the same letter in the same column do not differ significantly at the 5% level by the Tukey test
Table 3. Plant height (P.H) of different lettuce cultivars at 30 days after inoculation (DAI) with
Trichoderma spp.
Strains of Trichoderma
Trichoderma sp.
T. virens
T. asperellum
T. asperelloides
T. koningiopsis
Control
P.H per cultivar (cm)
BRS Lélia
BRS Mediterrânea
11.78±2.02a
14.04±1.44a
10.28±3.25a
16.00±1.15a
11.43±1.65a
15.30±1.10a
12.75±1.72a
15.30±1.60a
11.83±2.77a
15.06±0.44a
11.00±1.00a
8.90±1.02b
BRS Leila
13.00±0.00a
14.00±0.82a
11.50±1.29a
13.00±1.41a
14.25±0.96a
12.10±0.22a
Means followed by the same letter in the same column do not differ significantly at the 5% level by the Tukey test
Table 4. Root length (R.L) of different lettuce cultivars at 30 days after inoculation (DAI) with
Trichoderma spp.
Strains of Trichoderma
Trichoderma sp.
T. virens
T. asperellum
T. asperelloides
T. koningiopsis
Control
R.L per cultivar (cm)
BRS Lélia
15.25±0.76b
18.03±2.00ab
19.50±3.27a
17.33±0.52ab
17.00±1.26ab
16.90±3.13ab
BRS Leila
17.75±2.75a
15.75±2.22ab
16.50±1.29ab
15.75±2.22ab
15.75±1.50ab
13.50±1.94b
BRS Mediterrânea
16.24±2.15bc
16.58±1.43bc
17.02±1.15b
22.06±2.12a
15.46±1.34bc
13.10±3.25c
Means followed by the same letter in the same column do not differ significantly at the 5% level by the Tukey test
With respect to the length of the roots,
considering the cultivar BRS Leila, all treatments
with Trichoderma differed from the control,
although they did not differ from each other. For
the cultivar BRS Lélia, T. asperellum showed to
be statistically different from Trichoderma sp., the
latter presenting a lower mean value (15.25 g).
For the cultivar BRS Mediterrânea, the best
result was obtained with T. asperelloides, which
differed statistically from the others, with an
average value of 22.06 cm. This result showed
40% more root length compared to the control. T.
asperellum also showed a 23% increase in root
length (17.02 cm) and thus also differed
significantly from the control (Table 4).
germination, rooting, sprouting of cuttings,
growth of branches, increase in leaf area, delay
in senescence, accumulation of organic matter
(fresh and dry mass) and increase in crop yield
[12,14]. These effects are highly variable, due to
a number of factors, including crop type, growing
conditions, inoculum rate, and formulation type.
Ozdemir et al. [15] showed that the application of
T. harzianum in lettuce plants promotes higher
chlorophyll
content
in
the
leaves,
a
photosynthetic pigment that is directly related to
the production of plant biomass. This attests to
the growing interest in the study of Trichoderma
spp. both in the control of plant diseases and in
the promotion of plant growth by these fungi.
The effect of Trichoderma spp.
development can be observed
In this present study, there was a higher fresh
root mass in two of the cultivars tested, BRS
on
in
plant
seed
10
Lima et al.; JSRR, 28(2): 7-14, 2022; Article no.JSRR.84852
The data obtained here regarding the promotion
of root length in lettuce plants are in accordance
with Silva et al. [22]. These authors suggested
that Trichoderma spp. act as root growth
promoters as well. According to Altomare et al.
[26], there is a balance of nutrients in the soil that
is influenced by the microflora, directly affecting
nutrient absorption by plant roots. These authors
postulate that plant growth promoted by
Trichoderma may result from the ability of this
fungus to provide essential nutrients for the
plant`s healthy development.
Leila and BRS Mediterrânea. The fitness of
Trichoderma spp. in promoting plant root
development has been reported with other plant
species, including vegetables such as cucumber,
strawberry, tomato, pepper, cabbage and beet
[16-20). Yedidia et al. [16] suggest that this
effect of greater root growth in plants inoculated
with Trichoderma is due to the colonization of
the fungus in the rhizosphere, providing a
positive effect on the mycorrhizal interaction with
plants. More highly developed roots allow plants
to explore a greater volume of soil and
consequently absorb a higher amount of
available nutrients. Among all the cultivars
evaluated, only BRS Mediterrânea showed a
significant increase in fresh mass of the aerial
part compared to the control. This positive
effect of Trichoderma species is very important
for increasing lettuce yield, as the final
commercialized product is its leaves. The better
the appearance of the harvested product, the
greater the profits for producers. Pereira et al.
[14] obtained an increase in fresh mass with
T. harzianum and T. asperellum strains, where
the gain of fresh mass of the aerial part
was approximately 40% higher than the
control. Steffen et al. [21] evaluated the
potential of two non-commercial strains of
Trichoderma asperelloides and T. virens for
their ability to increase cabbage yield under
field conditions and verified an increase of
36.65% and 47.97% in leaf fresh mass
commercialized
in
the
first
harvest,
demonstrating the potential of this fungus in
other vegetables.
Several studies have been conducted with
species of Trichoderma to verify the relationship
of its inoculation with increased vegetative
growth and productivity. It was shown that growth
promotion by Trichoderma species was
dependent on their ability to colonize plant roots
[27]. When T. brevicrassum TC967 colonized the
surface of the cucumber roots, cucumber growth
was promoted [28]. Ousley et al. [29] observed
that some Trichoderma strains inhibited lettuce
seed germination but also promoted plant
growth, which may also depend on the strain,
method of preparation and application of the
inoculum.
The potential of Trichoderma spp. in plant growth
promotion, as in the case studied in this work,
may be related to the increase in the synthesis of
plant hormones such as auxins and ethylene
[30]. Auxins are important in plant development
and are associated with vital plant functions such
as cell division, multiplication and elongation.
Ethylene, on the other hand, can reorganize the
cell wall microfibrils. This reorganization reduces
height growth and provides greater radial growth
of plant tissues, making them more vigorous [31].
The best plant height performance obtained with
the BRS Mediterrânea cultivar is close to the
values verified with the Regina cultivar in the
study conducted by Silva et al. [22], in which they
reached an increase of 34% in relation to the
control without inoculation of Trichoderma. The
ability of Trichoderma to promote plant height
gains has been attributed to the production of
phytohormones and greater efficiency in the use
of nutrients [10]. The use of these fungi in crop
production is an interesting biotechnological tool
to increase productivity. Recent discoveries
reinforce the idea that some biological control
agents can have several positive effects on
plants, in addition to disease control. This effect
includes
the
stimulation
of
plant
growth, increased yield, greater bioavailability
and
nutrient
absorption,
as
well
as
improving the quality of the commercialized
products as a result of sustainable production
[7,23,24,25].
Many products containing Trichoderma have
been commercially available since the rise of
biological control in modern agriculture. Their
availability provided an opportunity for farmers
become familiar with the benefits of applying
these fungi on their crops. Plant growth
promotion microorganisms for agriculture,
biotechnology and nanotechnology exploit
actinomycetes,
bacteria,
fungi
and
cyanobacteria, and their usage makes it possible
to produce vegetables without chemical fertilizers
and phytosanitary products. Combining all their
natural
multidimensional
attributions
in
microbiology, based on the ability of Trichoderma
inoculation to increase plant growth and
stimulate
plant
defense
mechanisms,
researchers are continuing to explore these
11
Lima et al.; JSRR, 28(2): 7-14, 2022; Article no.JSRR.84852
species` effectiveness in controlling
transmitted fungal and bacterial diseases.
soil3.
The results achieved in this study demonstrated
the diversity of Trichoderma benefits and showed
a positive contribution to the growth of BRS Leila,
BRS Lélia and BRS Mediterrânea cultivars.
Lettuce growth promotion under greenhouse
conditions 30 days after inoculating the strains
was significant. The growth promotion resulting
from application of the strains tested here needs
further investigation for application in seedling
growth promotion as well. These results should
further contribute to knowledge about plant
nutrition and biological control of plant diseases,
through the direct and indirect mechanisms of
Trichoderma.
4.
5.
6.
4. CONCLUSION
1. Trichoderma virens was the species that
most contributed to an increment in the
analyzed variables.
2. Among the cultivars tested, BRS
Mediterrânea was the one that best
responded
to
the
inoculation
of
Trichoderma spp.
3. Among the tested cultivars, BRS Lélia was
the least responsive to Trichoderma spp.
inoculation, but showed increases in all
analyzed variables.
7.
8.
DISCLAIMER
The products used for this research are
commonly and predominantly used products in
our area of research and country. There is
absolutely no conflict of interest between the
authors and producers of the products because
we do not intend to use these products as an
avenue for any litigation but for the advancement
of knowledge. The research was not funded by
the producing company; instead, it was funded
by personal efforts of the authors.
9.
COMPETING INTERESTS
Authors have
interests exist.
declared
that
10.
no
competing
REFERENCES
1.
2.
Ryder EJ. Lettuce, Endive and Chicory:
th
crop production science in Horticulture. 1
ed. US Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Research Service, New York:
CABI Publishing;1999.
Sala FC, Costa CP. Melhoramento de
alface, In: Nick C, Bórem A, editors.
11.
12
Melhoramento de Hortaliças, Viçosa:
UFV;2016.
Azevedo Filho JA. A cultura da alface, In:
Collariccio A, Chaves ALR, editors.
Aspectos fitossanitários da cultura da
th
alface, São Paulo: Instituto Biológico, 29
ed;
2017.
Paula Júnior TJ, Venzon M. 101 Culturas:
th
Manual de tecnologia agrícola. 3 ed. Belo
Horizonte: Epamig;2019.
Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I,
Lorito
M.
Trichoderma
species
–
opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts.
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:43–56.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro79
7
Mycobank. Mycobank Database: Fungal
Databases, Nomenclatures & Species
Banks. Accessed 10 January 2012.
Available:<http://www.mycobank.org/Biolo
mics.aspx?Table=Mycobank&Rec=39566&
Fields=All>.
Srivastava M, Kumar V, Shahid M, Pandey
S, Singh A. Trichoderma a potential and
effective bio fungicide and alternative
source against notable phytopathogens: A
review. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2016;11:310316.
Available:https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR201
5.9568
Ethur LZ, da Rocha EK, Milanesi P, Muniz
MFB, Blume E. Sanidade de sementes e
emergência de plântulas de nabo
forrageiro,
aveia
preta
e
centeio
submetidas a tratamentos com bioprotetor
e fungicida. Ciênc. Nat. 2006;28(2):
17-27.
Available:https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X
9700
Monte E. Understanding Trichoderma:
between biotechnology and microbial
ecology. Int Microbiol. 2001;4:1-4.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s1012301
00001.
Lucon CMM. Promoção de crescimento de
plantas com o uso de Trichoderma spp.
(em
linha).
Infobibos,
Informações
Tecnológicas,
2009.
Accessed:
04
February 2019.
Available:<http://www.infobibos.com/Artigo
s/2009_1/Trichoderma/index.htm>.
Junges E, Muniz MF, Mezzomo R, Bastos
B, Machado RT. Trichoderma spp. na
produção de mudas de espécies florestais.
Floresta e Ambient. 2016;23(2):237-244.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1590/21798087.107614
Lima et al.; JSRR, 28(2): 7-14, 2022; Article no.JSRR.84852
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Montalvão SCL, Marques E, Silva JBT,
Silva JP, Mello SCM. Trichoderma Activity
in seed germination, promoting seedling
growth and rhizocompetence in tomato
plants. Journal of Agricultural Science.
2020;12:252-262.
Available:https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v12n1
0p252
Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model
selection and multimodel inference: A
practical information-theoretic approach;
2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2002;488.
Pereira FT, Oliveira JB, Muniz PHPC,
Peixoto GH, Guimarães RR, Carvalho
DDC. Growth promotion and productivity of
lettuce using Trichoderma spp. commercial
strains. Hortic. Bras. 2019;37:69-74.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102053620190111
Ozdemir Y, Polat Z, Ozkan M, Kosti RI.
Effects of selected bio-fungicide and
fungicide treatments on shelf life and
quality characteristics of romaine lettuce
(Lactuca sativa L.). Journal of Food Quality
2016;39:25-53.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/jfq.12174.
Yedidia I, Srivastava A, Kapulnik Y, Chet I.
Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on
microelement
concentrations
and
increased growth of cucumber plants.
Plant and Soil. 2001;235(2):235-242.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101199
0013955
Fontenelle ADB, Guzzo SD, Lucon CMM,
Harakava R. Growth promotion and
induction of resistance in tomato plant
against Xanthomonas euvesicatoria and
Alternaria solani by Trichoderma spp. Crop
Protection. 2011;30:1492-1500.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2
011.07.019
Topolovec-Pintaric S, Zutic I, Dermic E.
Enhanced growth of cabbage and red beet
by Trichoderma viride. Acta Agric. Slov.
2013;101:87-92.
https://doi.org/10.2478/acas-2013-0010
Li YT, Hwang SG, Huang YM, Huang CH.
Effets of Trichoderma asperellum on
nutrient uptake and Fusarium wilt of
tomato. Crop Protection. 2018;110:275282.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2
017.03.021
Lombardi N, Caira S, Troise AD, Scaloni A,
Vitaglione P, Vinale F, Marra R, Salzano
AM, Lorito M, Woo SL. Trichoderma
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
13
Applications
on
Strawberry
Plants
Modulate the Physiological Processes
Positively Affecting Fruit Production and
Quality. Front Microbiol. 2020;11(1364):117.
Available:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.202
0.01364
Steffen GPK, Steffen RB, Maldaner J,
Morais RM, Handte VG, Morais AF, Costa
AFP, Saldanha CW, Missio EL, Quevedo
AC. Increasing productivity of cabbage by
two species of Trichoderma fungi. Int. J.
Environ. Stud. 2020;78(5):797-803.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233
.2020.1845551
Silva GBP, Heckler LI, Santos RF, Durigon
MR, Blume E. Identificação e utilização de
Trichoderma spp. armazenados e nativos
no biocontrole de Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.
Rev. Caatinga. 2015;28(4):33-42.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1590/198321252015v28n404rc
Pascale A, Vinale F, Manganiello G, Nigro
M, Lanzuise S, Ruocco M, Marra R,
Lombardi N, Woo SL, Lorito M.
Trichoderma and its secondary metabolites
improve yield and quality of grapes. Crop
Prot. 2017;92:176–181.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2
016.11.010
Woo SL, Pepe O. Microbial consortia:
promising probiotics as plant biostimulants
for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci.
2018;9:1801.
Available:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.
01801
Marra R, Lombardi N, d’Errico G, Troisi J,
Scala G, Vinale F, et al. Application of
Trichoderma strains and metabolites
enhances soybean productivity and
nutrient content. J. Agric. Food Chem.
2019:67:1814–1822.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8
b06503.
Altomare C, Norvell WA, Björkman T,
Harman GE. Solubilization of phosphates
and micronutrients by the plant-growthpromoting
and
biocontrol
fungus
Trichoderma harzianum Rifai 1295-22.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999;65(7):29262933.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.65.7
.2926-2933.1999
Salas-Marina MA, Silva-Flores MA, UrestiRivera EE, Castro-Longoria E, HerreraEstrella A, Casaslores S. Colonization of
Arabidopsis
roots
by
Trichoderma
Lima et al.; JSRR, 28(2): 7-14, 2022; Article no.JSRR.84852
atroviride promotes growth and enhances 29. Ousley MA, Lynch JM, Whipps JM. Effect
systemic disease resistance through
of Trichoderma harzianum on plant growth;
jasmonic acid/ethylene and salicylic
a balance between toxicity and growth
acid pathways. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol.
promotion. Microb Ecol. 1993;26:277-285.
2011;131:15-26.
30. Estrada-Rivera M, Rebolledo-Prudencio
Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658OG, Pérez-Robles DA, Rocha-Medina
011-9782-6
MADC, González-López MDC, Casas28. Zhang Y, Zhuang WY. Trichoderma
Floresa
S.
Trichoderma
Histone
brevicrassum strain TC967 with capacities
Deacetylase HDA-2 modulates multiple
of diminishing cucumber disease caused
responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.
by Rhizoctonia solani and promoting plant
2019;179:1343-1361
growth. Biol. Control. 2019;142(104151):
Available:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.010
1-27.
92.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontr
31. Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant Physiology. 5th ed.
ol.2019.104151
Sinauer: Sunderland. 2013;952.
_______________________________________________________________________________
© 2022 Lima et al.; This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
Peer-review history:
The peer review history for this paper can be accessed here:
https://www.sdiarticle5.com/review-history/84852
14