14th International Congress
on Mathematical Education
July 11-18, 2021, Shanghai
Proceedings of the
ICME-14 Topic Study Group 1
Mathematics education at preschool level
Marja van den Heuvel-Panhuizen
Angelika Kullberg
Editors
TSG 1. Mathematics education at preschool level
Chair:
Marja van den Heuvel-Panhuizen
Nord University, Norway / Utrecht University, Netherlands
m.vandenheuvel-panhuizen@nord.no / m.vandenheuvel-panhuizen@uu.nl
Co-chair:
Angelika Kullberg
Gothenburg University, Sweden
angelika.kullberg@ped.gu.se
Team members:
Ineta Helmane
University of Latvia, Latvia
Xin Zhou
East China Normal University, China
IPC Liaison person: Marta Civil
The University of Arizona, USA
2021, Shanghai, China: ICME-14
ICME-14 TSG 1 Mathematics education at preschool level
i
CONTENTS
Introduction
Marja van den Heuvel-Panhuizen & Angelika Kullberg
Mathematics education at preschool level
Papers on investigations of children’s learning
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Xiaoting Zhao & Xiaohui Xu
Application of number line estimation strategy for 5-6 years old children: Effect of
reference point marking
Marja van den Heuvel-Panhuizen & Iliada Elia
Unraveling the quantitative competence of kindergartners
Yuly Vanegas, Carla Rosell & Joaquin Giménez
Insights about constructing symmetry with 5-year-old children in an artistic context
Joanne Mulligan & Gabrielle Oslington
Kindergartners’ use of symmetry and mathematical structure in representing
SELF-portraits
Nicole Fletcher, Diego Luna Bazaldúa & Herbert P. Ginsburg
Investigating evidence of girls’ and boys’ early symmetry knowledge through multiple
modes of assessment
Fang Tian & Jin Huang
4-Year-olds children’s understanding of repeating patterns: A report from China
Insook Chung
Investigating how kindergartners represent data with early numeracy and literacy skills
through a performance task
Papers on investigations of children’s learning environment
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
ii
Dina Tirosh, Pessia Tsamir, Ruthi Barkai, & Esther S. Levenson
Counting activities for young children: Adults’ perspectives
Miriam M. Lüken & Anna Lehmann
Asking early childhood teachers about their use of finger patterns
Catherine Walter-Laager, Manfred R. Pfiffner, Xin Zhou, Douglas H. Clements, Julie Sarama,
Linh Nguyen Ngoc, Lars Eichen & Karoline Rettenbacher
Performance expectations in the area of “Shapes and Spaces” of early childhood
educators in an international comparison
Ronald Keijzer, Marjolijn Peltenburg, Martine van Schaik, Annerieke Boland, & Eefje van der Zalm
Mathematics in play
Oliver Thiel
Does preservice teacher training change prospective preschool teachers’ emotions
about mathematics?
Audrey Cooke & Jenny Jay
Bishop’s (1988, 1991) mathematical activities reframed for pre-verbal young children’s actions
Jianqing Wen
When math meets games—The active construction of children's core mathematics experience
in games
Birgitte Henriksen
Analysing a Danish kindergarten class teacher’s instructional support in mathematics
with the tool Class
Øyvind Jacobsen Bjørkås, Dag Oskar Madsen, Anne Grethe Baustad, & Elisabeth Bjørnestad
Mathematical learning environments in Norwegian ECEC child groups
Ann LeSage & Robyn Ruttenberg-Rozen
“More Gooder”: children evaluate early numeracy apps
iii
1
6
11
16
21
26
31
36
41
46
51
60
65
70
75
80
89
ICME-14 TSG 1 Mathematics education at preschool level
INVESTIGATING EVIDENCE OF GIRLS’ AND BOYS’ EARLY SYMMETRY KNOWLEDGE
THROUGH MULTIPLE MODES OF ASSESSMENT
Nicole Fletcher
Herbert Ginsburg
Diego Luna Bazaldúa
Fairfield University Teachers College, Columbia University
The World Bank
Intervention using software to teach symmetric transformations— reflection, translation,
and rotation—to young children
Prior study (Fletcher, 2015) found intervention group was better able to identify, explain,
and create symmetric transformations than control group
Purpose of current study:
(1) to explore the convergence of qualitative and quantitative evidence collected in the study
(2) to explore any potential differences between girls and boys in this convergence
Results:
(1) Moderate positive correlations were found. Children who demonstrated conceptual
understanding in explanations of symmetric transformations at post-test also scored higher
on paper-and-pencil post-test tasks.
(2) Similar correlations were found for girls and for boys.
Discussion:
Importance of multiple means of assessment when assessing knowledge of young children
Verbal tasks may reveal understanding not observed in traditional written assessments
Early exposure to symmetry concepts can benefit both girls and boys
nsf2109@tc.columbia.edu
21
The 14th International Congress on Mathematical Education
Shanghai, 11th ‒18th July, 2021
INVESTIGATING EVIDENCE OF GIRLS’ AND BOYS’ EARLY SYMMETRY
KNOWLEDGE THROUGH MULTIPLE MODES OF ASSESSMENT
Nicole Fletcher
Fairfield University
Diego Luna Bazaldúa
The World Bank Group
Herbert P. Ginsburg
Teachers College, Columbia University
Symmetry is a fundamental geometric concept that receives minimal attention in early childhood
curriculum. This study sought to explore the relationships between children’s accurate identification
and explanation of symmetric transformations after a symmetry software intervention and children’s
performance on a post-test that asked students to draw symmetric transformations and identify lines
of symmetry. This study also sought to explore whether the relationships between these measures
differed for girls and for boys. Positive correlations between accurate symmetry identification and the
domains assessed at post-test and between explanations of symmetries and the domains assessed at
post-test were found for participants overall, and similar patterns were found for girls and for boys.
The findings have implications for software learning opportunities and modes of assessment for all
children.
INTRODUCTION
A computer program was developed to expand young children’s understanding of three symmetric
transformations—reflection, translation, and rotation. Results from a previous study evaluating the
program’s effectiveness showed that children assigned to the experimental condition, in which they
used the software, were better able to accurately identify and explain symmetric transformations and
had higher post-test translation scores and overall scores than the control group, which did not use the
software, controlling for pre-existing ability (Fletcher, 2015). The purpose of the current study is to
explore the convergence of the qualitative and quantitative evidence collected in the study and to
explore any potential differences between girls and boys in this convergence. To achieve its purpose,
this study sought to answer the following questions: (1) Is there a relationship between children’s
identification and explanation of symmetric transformations after the symmetry software intervention
and post-test performance on key measures of symmetry understanding? (2) Does the relationship
between children’s accurate identification and explanation of symmetric transformations, on the one
hand, and post-test performance, on the other, differ for girls and for boys?
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Symmetry is present in everyday life, and the cognitive processes linked to it develop over the lifespan.
Children begin to develop the ability to perceive symmetry in infancy (e.g., Bornstein, Ferdinandsen,
& Gross, 1981), and symmetry aids adults in processing visual information (Bornstein and StilesDavis, 1984). Preschool-aged children often experiment with ideas of shape, pattern, and spatial
relationships in their play. Such activities in early childhood help to build a foundation for concepts
important in later mathematics (Clements and Sarama, 2007). Despite symmetry’s relevance across
mathematics, learning standards addressing symmetry do not appear in the United States’ Common
Core State Standards until grade four (National Governors Association, 2010).
ICME-14 TSG 1 Mathematics education at preschool level
Fletcher, Luna Bazaldúa, and Ginsburg
Because geometry is often taught in a cursory manner in early childhood (Clements, 2004), children’s
experiences with symmetry often occur in informal contexts. Gender differences favoring boys in
symmetry-related spatial tasks such as mental rotation have been documented (e.g., Maeda & Yoon,
2013), but some researchers argue that these gender differences are likely substantially attributable to
socio-cultural or experiential factors (Fennema & Sherman, 1977; Terlecki & Newcombe, 2005) rather
than biological factors. Certain informal play experiences may help children develop understanding of
symmetry, but gender differences in the frequency of these types of play may contribute to gender
differences in symmetry understanding.
METHODS
Materials: Symmetry Software
A computer program was designed to teach three symmetric transformations—reflection, translation,
and rotation—to young children. Cognitive principles for the design of mathematics software for
young children (Ginsburg, Jamalian, & Creighan, 2013) guided the software development. The
program’s exploratory mode allows children to move, stretch, or shrink shapes on the screen and
observe corresponding changes in the symmetric transformation. In prediction mode, the program
prompts the child to place a shape on the screen to create a specified symmetric transformation. Visual
and audio feedback identify mistakes and provide solution strategies.
Setting and Participants
A study of the computer program’s effectiveness was conducted in one urban public elementary school
in the Eastern United States. Participants included 86 first and second grade children—43 were
randomly assigned to the experimental group (24 females and 19 males) and 43 were assigned to the
control group (21 females and 22 males). Participants’ ages ranged from 5.8 to 7.8 years.
Research Design and Procedure
The study utilized a pre- and post-test between-subjects randomized experimental design with
exposure to the symmetry software as the treatment condition and a control group that experienced
non-symmetry math software and was conducted over 9 weeks. A video transformation task was
implemented at post-test to assess children’s ability to identify and explain symmetries. The treatment
condition consisted of 9 symmetry software sessions (three each for reflection, translation, and
rotation); the control condition had 9 sessions using a non-symmetry-related mathematics software.
Measures
A paper-and-pencil instrument designed by the primary investigator to measure children’s
understanding of reflection, translation, and rotation was used for pre- and post-testing. The instrument
included items that asked students to draw symmetric transformations and identify lines of symmetry.
The instrument included explanations or examples for the symmetric transformations to ensure that it
assessed symmetry concept understanding rather than familiarity with relevant vocabulary.
A task designed by the primary investigator to measure participants’ ability to identify and explain
reflection, translation, and rotation was implemented at post-test. Participants were shown six short
videos of symmetric transformations of shapes. Participants were then asked to identify the symmetric
transformation and explain their reasoning for selecting the stated symmetry (“How do you know?”).
ICME-14 TSG 1 Mathematics education at preschool level
Fletcher, Luna Bazaldúa, and Ginsburg
Participants’ identification of the symmetric transformations in each video were scored for accuracy
(0 for incorrect or 1 for correct). Participants’ explanations of each symmetric transformation were
coded for the presence of words or phrases indicating conceptual understanding of the symmetric
transformation. This emergent coding scheme was developed by reviewing children’s explanations
and identifying words and phrases appearing in student responses that indicated conceptual
understanding of that symmetric transformation. Explanations were scored 1 for indicating conceptual
understanding or 0 for not indicating conceptual understanding of the symmetric transformation.
RESULTS
Previous research found that there was a statistically significant treatment effect when controlling for
pre-intervention symmetry knowledge (Fletcher, 2015). Previous research also found that there was a
statistically significant difference benefitting the treatment group in accurate identification and
explanation of symmetric transformations at post-test. In order to explore the relationship between
children’s identification or explanation of symmetric transformations and post-test performance, the
accuracy and explanation scores were correlated with the mean post-test scores on the paper-andpencil instrument. With the exception of rotation post-test scores, there are moderate positive
correlations between accuracy or explanation and the domains assessed by the post-test, indicating that
children who accurately identified symmetric transformations or provided explanations indicating
conceptual understanding of the symmetric transformations also tended to reach higher scores on posttest reflection and translation tasks as well as post-test total score (see Table 1). A similar relationship
between children’s accurate identification and explanation of symmetric transformations and post-test
performance was found for girls and for boys (see Table 1).
Accuracy
Post-Test Total
Score
Post-Test
Reflection
Post-Test
Translation
Post-Test
Rotation
Explanation
All
(N = 43)
0.423*
Girls
(N = 24)
0.418*
Boys
(N = 19)
0.430*
All
(N = 43)
0.365*
Girls
(N = 21)
0.383*
Boys
(N = 22)
0.342*
0.360*
0.342*
0.381*
0.317*
0.314*
0.308
0.475*
0.483*
0.469*
0.449*
0.489*
0.421*
0.243*
0.351*
0.107
0.057
0.208
-0.088
Table 1: Correlations among dependent variables and post-test scores by group (Note. * p < .05)
DISCUSSION
In examining the relationships between post-test performance, accuracy of symmetric transformation
identification, and explanations of symmetric transformations, moderate positive correlations were
found between post-test reflection and translation scores and accuracy or explanations on the video
transformation task. Children who achieved higher scores on reflection and translation items at posttest also tended to identify symmetric transformations accurately and demonstrate conceptual
understanding in their explanations. Because prior research has found gender differences favoring boys
ICME-14 TSG 1 Mathematics education at preschool level
Fletcher, Luna Bazaldúa, and Ginsburg
in symmetry-related spatial tasks, we separated the data by gender to see if the pattern we discovered
in our results was being driven by boys’ performance on the measures. We found the relationships
between post-test scores, accurate symmetry identification, and conceptual understanding of
symmetric transformations conveyed in explanations to be similar for girls and boys.
The convergence of the post-test scores, accuracy of symmetry identification, and explanations of
symmetries points to the importance of multiple means of assessment—and in particular, the use of
interview-like questions—when assessing the skills and knowledge of young children. While some
children may feel comfortable completing a paper-and-pencil task, others may not yet have the skills
or confidence to accurately complete a written task. Including verbal tasks that allow children to
explain their thinking when assessing children provides an important opportunity to reveal
understanding that may not observed in traditional written assessments.
In this study, qualitative and quantitative evidence of girls’ and boys’ symmetry knowledge shows
similar patterns of convergence, suggesting that early exposure to symmetry concepts can benefit both
girls and boys. Teaching symmetry concepts to young children — either as part of the standard
curriculum or through supplementary educational tools such as the computer program utilized in this
study — allows teachers to build on children’s natural interest in symmetry and prepare children for
success in higher level mathematics and career opportunities both in and out of mathematics.
References
Bagirova, R. E. (2012). Teaching of symmetry at mathematics lessons in the first forms of Azerbaijan primary
schools. Asian Social Science, 8, 285-291.
Bornstein, M. H., Ferdinandsen, K., & Gross, C. G. (1981). Perception of symmetry in infancy. Developmental
Psychology, 17, 82-86.
Bornstein, M. H., & Stiles-Davis, J. (1984). Discrimination and memory for symmetry in young children.
Developmental Psychology, 20, 637-649.
Clements, D. H. (2004). Geometric and spatial thinking in early childhood education. In D. H. Clements & J.
Sarama (Eds.), Engaging Young Children in Mathematics: Standards for Early Childhood Mathematics
Education (pp. 267-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Early childhood mathematics learning. In F. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second
handbook on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 461-555).
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization
and affective factors. American educational research journal, 14(1), 51-71.
Fletcher, N. (2015). Development and evaluation of a computer program to teach symmetry to young children
(doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Order No. 3702436)
Ginsburg, H. P., Jamalian, A., & Creighan, S. (2013). Cognitive guidelines for the design and evaluation of
early mathematics software: The example of MathemAntics. In L. T. English & J. T. Mulligan (Eds.),
Reconceptualizing Early Mathematics Learning (pp. 83-120). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured
by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT: R). Educational Psychology
Review, 25(1), 69-94.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2010). Common core state standards for
mathematics. Retrieved from http://corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
Terlecki, M. S., & Newcombe, N. S. (2005). How important is the digital divide? The relation of computer and
videogame usage to gender differences in mental rotation ability. Sex Roles, 53(5), 433-441.
ICME-14 TSG 1 Mathematics education at preschool level