Power, Authourity and Legitimacy; the similarities and Disperities

BASIC CONCEPTS OF POLITICAL SCIENCE Isa Ismail Bayero University, Kano. Nigeria QUESTION The relationship between the Concepts of Power, Authority and Legitimacy is believed by many scholars to be interwoven or in some cases even overlapping (as the case may be), depending on the context or situation or condition or even circumstance. DISCUSS. INTRODUCTION Interwoven, Inter-related, Conflicting or if you like say overlapping can be used to describe the relationship between the Concepts of Power, Authority and Legitimacy. Prior to the modern day study of political science, an even earlier scholar hold such thoughts and believes. Though to the layman, these three(3) essential parts or aspects of every society seems ordinarily the same, but a scholarly look at these attributes in a conceptual form shows that; in as much as there are similarities, there are more disparities. In political science, Concepts are essentially integral in the study of every field or aspect. Concepts in simple terms refer to a general idea derived or inferred from specific instance or occurrences. While discussing the Concepts of Power, Authority and Legitimacy separately, one realises that, hardly can you talk of one of them digestively, without venturing on the others. At the end of your study, you will realise that they are linked like a WEB: inter-linked at various points. In trying to examine the relationship between these three Concepts, let’s first of all look at them independently. POWER Power is the ability of a person to face or influence others to do what they would otherwise not have done. It is usually accompanied by the threat of sanctions. Power in any political system is in the hands of few people who use it either to reward or punish the people as they deem fit. Generally, in politics and social science, power is the ability to influence the behaviour of people. In the corporate environment, Power is often expressed as upward or downward. With Downward power, a company’s superior influence subordinates. When a company exerts upward Power, it is the subordinates who influence the Decision of the leader. (Greiner & Schein. 1988) The concept of power is also closely connected to that of realism. Since power provides a sense of security in holding with the logic that nobody can/will hurt/influence you when you have the ability to hurt/influence them. Therefore, each party should try to maximize and consolidate its power .(Zainab Khawaja, The Concept of ‘Power’ in Political Science, 2011, Politics University, USA.). The use of power need not involve coercion (force or the threat of force) at one extreme. Most of the recent sociological debate on power revolves around the issue of the enabling nature of power. A comprehensive can be found in Steven Luke’s Power. A radical view where he discourses the dimension of power. Thurs, power can be seen as various forms of constraint on human action, but also as that which makes action possible, although in a limited scope. Much of this debate is related to the works of a French philosopher Michel Foucault (1026-1984), who following the Italian political philosopher Nicolo Machiavelli (1469 – 1527), sees power as a “Complex strategic situation in a given society social setting”. Summarily, many scholars adopt the definition developed by German sociologist Max Weber, who said that power is the ability to exercise one’s will over others (Weber 1922). Power affects more than personal relationships; it shapes larger dynamics like social groups, professional organizations, and governments. Similarly, a government’s power is not necessarily limited to control of its own citizens. AUTHORITY Just as we have several Scholars of political science, so do we have several divergent definitions of Authority as a Concept. According to Mac lever, “ Herbert A. Simon defines authority as being in power. The power to command obedience”. According to Michaels, in the Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences, authority is the capacity, innate or acquired for exercising ascendancy over a group. Other scientists argue that authority is not a capacity but a relationship. It is power that is sanctioned and institutionalized. Wikipedia the Encyclopaedia quoted several scholars with different definitions of the concept. Thus; The word authority is derived from the Latin word auctoritas, meaning invention, advice, opinion, influence, or command. In English, the word authority can be used to mean power given by the state (in the form of Members of Parliament, judges, police officers, etc.) or by academic knowledge of an area (someone can be an authority on a subject). The word Authority with capital A refers to the governing body upon which such authority (with lower case a) is vested; for example, the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority or the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Max Weber, in his sociological and philosophical work, identified and distinguished three types of legitimate domination (Herrschaft in German, which generally means 'domination' or 'rule'), that have sometimes been rendered in English translation as types of authority, because domination isn't seen as a political concept in the first place. Weber defined domination (authority) as the chance of commands being obeyed by a specifiable group of people. Legitimate authority is that which is recognized as legitimate and justified by both the ruler and the ruled LEGITIMACY Simply speaking, Legitimacy is the acceptance of people of the Authority of those in power to rule. Here, in giving the layman understanding of what legitimacy means, we can say that legitimacy is ruling the people base on their approval. If legitimacy is interpreted descriptively, it refers to people's beliefs about political authority and, sometimes, political obligations. In his sociology, Max Weber put forward a very influential account of legitimacy that excludes any recourse to normative criteria (Mommsen 1989: 20). According to Weber, that a political regime is legitimate means that its participants have certain beliefs or faith (“Legitimitätsglaube”) in regard to it: “the basis of every system of authority, and correspondingly of every kind of willingness to obey, is a belief, a belief by virtue of which persons exercising authority are lent prestige” (Weber 1964: 382). In contrast to Weber's descriptive concept, the normative concept of political legitimacy refers to some benchmark of acceptability or justification of political power or authority and—possibly—obligation. On the broadest view, legitimacy both explains why the use of political power by a particular body—a state, a government, or a democratic collective, for example—is permissible and why there is a pro tanto moral duty to obey its commands. On this view, if the conditions for legitimacy are not met, political institutions exercise power unjustifiably and the commands they might produce do then not entail any obligation to obey. John Rawls, in Political Liberalism (1993), presents such an interpretation of legitimacy. John Locke put forward such an interpretation of legitimacy. Locke's starting-point is a state of nature in which all individuals are equally free in the sense that they possess equal political authority. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POWER, AUTHORITY & LEGITIMACY In government, the term authority is often used interchangeably with power. However, their meanings differ: while power is defined as "the ability to influence somebody to do something that he/she would not have done", authority refers to a claim of legitimacy, the justification and right to exercise that power. For example, while a mob has the power to punish a criminal, for example by lynching, people who believe in the rule of law consider that only a court of law has the authority to punish a criminal. Sociologists examine government and politics in terms of their impact on individuals and larger social systems. Power is an entity or individual’s ability to control or direct others, while authority is influence that is predicated on perceived legitimacy. Max Weber studied power and authority, differentiating between the two concepts and formulating a system for classifying types of authority. Power is the ability, whether personal or social, to get things done — either to enforce one’s own will or to enforce the collective will of some group over others. Legitimacy is a socially constructed and psychologically accepted right to exercise power. A person can have legitimacy but no actual power (the legitimate king might reside in exile, destitute and forgotten). A person can have actual power but not legitimacy (the usurper who exiled the king and appropriates the symbols of office). The role of Power becomes most effective when Power does not remain a source of coercion.  In-fact after getting legitimized it becomes Authority. Means the stability of Authority depends upon legitimacy. So in short Authority is a quality or capacity of a person, institution, rule or order which becomes important in defining whether Authority is correct or authentic, so that people can follow the rules and regulation without any hesitation. Because of the use of Authority official Governmental policies, rules and regulations get accepted in the society. Authority has two main components: Power and Legitimacy. Legitimacy of a rule or a decision signifies the fact that people reckon the decision as fruitful and in welfare of the society. Thus they are always ready to follow the rule or decision. Demonstration of Power does not become necessary as long as Legitimacy is attached to Power. It only comes out as a symbol. Like a judge with his black gown or a policeman with his uniform. Just like beauty lies in the eyes of beholder, Legitimacy lies in the eyes of beholder. There is no question, that without Power it will be very difficult to implement the official decision as well as rules, but only by the fear of punishment or by the coercion authority may not prove successful as far as long term benefits are concerned. In fact such a step becomes tyranny and works as a catalyst for the rebellion. According to Wiki Answers, 2013. Answers.com > Authority relies upon worldly law, or the amount of military troops one has, or power seized or given by others. Worldly authority can be acquired by inheritance, wealth, or even notoriety but not spiritual authority. Authority that is spiritual in scope is given to us by God and operates according to His laws. Spiritual authority like worldly authority must have the power to act in order for authority to be genuine. Worldly authority is not authentic if the one who possesses it doesn't also posses the power to enforcement his will. We would say that this one is just a figure head that possesses no real power. This is why we must not just speak about authority but also power. CONCLUSION Having taken a close look at these three(3) Concepts; Power, Authority and Legitimacy with a view to see how they are interwoven and to some extent overlapping looking from different contexts, situation or in some cases circumstances, we conclude that, power, Authority and Legitimacy, do not only inter-related but largely depend on each other for their systematic existence. The able use of Power always gets support from legitimacy. Most of the society follows the rules on the basis of legitimacy therefore using Power does not become necessary all the time. No one will follow the rule or a regulation if the legitimacy of that rule is ruined irrespective of the Power of Authority. REFRENCES Zainab Khawaja (2011) The Concept of ‘Power’ in Political Science, USA: Politics University. Easton David (1965) A frame work for political Analysis. New Jersey Anderson, James E (1975) public Policy making, Praeger: Publishers, Inc. Jones, Charles O. (1970) An Introduction to the study of Public literature Wikipedia the Encyclopaedia (2013), Power, Authourity and Legitimacy. www. Wikipedia.com Miliband, R (1969) The State in capitalist society. London: Weiden Simon Herbert A. (1945) Administrative behaviour. Glencoe: The free press. Remi A. And Francis C. Enemo (1999) Elements of Politics. Lagos: longman. H. Lasswel (1936) who gets what, when and How? New York