Les cultures des littoraux
au haut Moyen Âge
Cadres et modes de vie
dans l’espace maritime Manche-mer du Nord
du IIIe au Xe s.
Textes réunis par
Inès Leroy et Laurent Verslype
REVUE DU NORD
Hors série. Collection Art et Archéologie. N° 24. 2016.
Université de Lille. Sciences humaines et sociales
PIETERJAN DECKERS*
Economy, identity and power.
The Yser estuary in the early Middle Ages
INTRODUCTION
1. THE PHYSICAL LANDSCAPE
The early medieval history and archaeology of the
western part of coastal Flanders remain poorly
known. Nonetheless, excavations and other archaeological research over the past 150 years have brought
to light a body of evidence that, at the very least,
allows us to assess the position of this area within its
economic, social and cultural contexts - the southern
North Sea area on the one hand and Merovingian and
Carolingian Francia on the other.
The refutation of the so-called « transgression paradigm » and the current understanding of the geomorphologic formation processes of the Flemish coastal
plain have been extensively expounded elsewhere1,
and will only be repeated here in a summary fashion.
Generally speaking, by the 6th or 7th century AD the
western coastal plain mostly consisted of intertidal
mudflats and meandering tidal channels. From this
point onwards, continuing sedimentation caused a
gradual, but locally variable raising of the land toward
supratidal levels. The « final fill » -stage of the tidal
channels is dated between 550 and 750 AD although
there is significant variation in datings, some as late as
the 14th-15th century2.
The aim of the present paper is to give a review of
the evidence from this region in view of this question.
Special attention will be given to a few key sites and
areas that are being studied as part of the author’s
ongoing PhD research. The subject area of this paper
is the stretch of coast bounded by the French border in
the west and the river Yser in the east. The southern
boundary of this area is formed by the edge of the
Pleistocene soils consisting of sand and sandy silt.
However, occasional reference will be made to sites
beyond these geographical limits.
Chronologically, this paper roughly concerns the
second half of the first millennium AD. The focus will
lie on the least understood part of that period, namely
the Merovingian and Carolingian periods (respectively 500-750 and 750-900 AD). From the late ninth
century onwards, written evidence concerning the
area begins to appear, supplementing the archaeological evidence.
Given this state of knowledge, the archaeologist is
confronted with a basic problem. Although the formation of the coastal plain during the period concerned is
known in general terms, a detailed insight in the landscape at a smaller scale is mostly lacking. This is true
both in a spatial sense, in that the lay of the land at a
given locality remains in most cases unknown, and in
a chronological sense, in that the both the methods
(C14, OSL) and the materials (shells, organic material, sand) available for dating come with considerable interpretive problems and inaccuracies. The
resulting chronology of landscape change may be relatively precise within a geological framework, but for
an archaeologist, numerous questions about the natural surroundings of early medieval settlements may
*. — Pieterjan DECkERS, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Vakgroep
kunstwetenschappen en Archeologie, Pleinlaan 5 5C432, B - 1050
Brussel.
1. — e.g. ERVYNCk e.a. 1999 ; BAETEMAN, SCOTT, VAN STRYDONCk
2002 ; BAETEMAN 2005, 2008a, 2008b.
2. — BAETEMAN 2008a, p. 1225.
REVUE DU NORD - N° 24 HORS SÉRIE COLLECTION ART ET ARCHÉOLOGIE - 2016, P. 77-88
78
PIETERjAN DECkERS
only be answered through detailed field observations,
which are mostly lacking for the sites concerned.
One such question is that of accessibility. Although
there is little doubt that, before the start of embankment, any location in the coastal plain generally was
easily accessible via tidal channels, the practical
organization and perceived importance of access to a
particular site are difficult to assess. How far could
seagoing ships penetrate through these channels ? was
transhipment necessary, and how was it organized ?
were the inhabitants of the coastal wetlands of
Flanders actively involved in maritime activity such
as fishing and trading ? was access to a navigable
waterway a determining factor in the location of a settlement ? How does this relate to settlement function ?
A particular example is the site of LampernisseLeenhof ter wissche (cf. infra), which in its earliest
phase was located along a small tidal channel. It is not
known whether this channel was still active at this
time, but it had certainly silted up by the 10th century,
when the settlement expanded over it.
Even the major axes of movement through the area
are poorly understood. Most significantly, the river
Yser is known to have shifted to the present course
from an earlier position in its Pleistocene paleo-valley, mouthing into the large inlet between Veurne and
wulpen3. The exact timing of this shift, which would
have significantly altered the transport routes through
this area and to the Pleistocene hinterland, remains
unknown. However, a terminus ante quem around
1000AD may be assumed, as the earliest dike-building along the banks of the present-day mouth of the
Yser probably dates to that time4.
2. ASPECTS OF HISTORY AND HISTORIOGRAPHY
Early conceptions of the western part of the
Flemish coastal plain during the Merovingian and
Carolingian period were exclusively based on scarce
historical sources, referring to sheep pastures
(marisci) and wool production, controlled by large
ecclesiastical institutions such as the abbey of St.
Bertin (Sithiu) at St. Omer. Given the (near-) absence
of historical indications for settlement within the
coastal plain, this sheep-rearing was thought to have
3. — BAETEMAN 1999, p. 44, 68.
4. — TYS 2004, p. 48-49.
5. — e.g. VERHULST 1962, p. 91-92 ; VERHULST 1981, p. 131 ;
VERHULST 1995, p. 90.
6. — VERHULST 1995, p. 118.
7. — e.g. HILLEwAERT, HOLLEVOET 2006.
8. — DE MEULEMEESTER 1977 ; DE MEULEMEESTER 1981, p. 46-53.
9. — TERMOTE 2008, p. 93.
been organized in a transhumantic system based at
agricultural estates on the edge of the Pleistocene
sandy region5. Indeed, numerous 6th-7th century
toponyms, in particular of «-(inga)heim » -type, are
situated in the immediate hinterland of the coastal
plain6 (fig. 1).
From an archaeological point of view, the intensity
of Merovingian settlement on the Pleistocene edge of
the Flemish coastal plain is particularly apparent further east, between Oudenburg and Bruges7. In the
west, such evidence is largely lacking for now.
However, in the immediate surroundings of a village
bearing an «-ingaheim » -toponym, Alveringem, four
large round structures have been identified, possibly
the remains of circular fortresses built in the late 9th or
10th century8. Although no excavations have taken
place and Alveringem only appears in the written
record much later (1066 AD), a central role is further
implied by its status as a mother parish for settlements
within the coastal plain9. The recent find at Bulskamp
further west of a Merovingian tremissis, dateable to
575-675 AD, in association with Merovingian and
Carolingian metal artefacts10 presumably indicates
the location of a cemetery overlooking the coastal
plain.
Occupation of the coastal plain itself was thought
to have started only in the second half of the 9th century, when the first place-names are attested there11.
Interestingly, these earliest historical attestations
occur in the western coastal plain ; place-names further east generally appear in the written record from
the second half of the 10th century onwards.
In the past decade, however, increasing archaeological finds and the aforementioned new understanding
of the geomorphological history of the coastal plain
have led to the realization that early medieval presence in the coastal wetlands was stronger than previously thought12. A first review of the early medieval
archaeology of the western part of the coastal plain
already pointed in this direction13. Regional surface
surveys and excavations as well as historical-geographic research have revealed intensive early
medieval activity in the Oudland areas of the coastal
plain from, at least, c. 700 AD onwards14. Not surpri-
10. — VERBOVEN 2008.
11. — VERHULST 1962, p. 92-94.
12. — ERVYNCk e.a. 1999.
13. — TERMOTE 1990a.
14. — Concerning surface surveys : e.g. DE DECkER, BOURGEOIS 1999 ;
PIETERS e.a. 2006 ; concerning excavations : e.g. PYPE, DEwILDE 2001 ;
about historical-geographic research : TYS 2003.
ECONOMY, IDENTITY AND POwER. THE YSER ESTUARY IN THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES
79
FIG. 1. —Western part of the Flemish coastal plain, with Merovingian toponyms and places mentioned in the text.
Layout of tidal channels redrawn from Baeteman (2008a).
singly, a tendency has arisen to interpret such evidence as indicative of permanent settlement, rather
than the seasonal exploitation envisioned by Verhulst.
The lack of written sources concerning this early settlement was now interpreted as an indication of its
autonomous, allodial character. Thus, the inhabitants
have been depicted as free landholders with access to
the overseas exchange system and well-integrated
into a social network of coastal communities around
the North Sea15.
brought to light for salt production and other activities
during the Iron Age and Roman period16. The early
medieval objects from the site, including thirteen
coins17 and a number of bronze brooches18, are all
surface finds. In spite of claims that this site, like the
rest of the coastal plain was abandoned in the late 3rd
century19, a few 4th century glass sherds and some 5th6th century objects render a continuous use of this
location possible20.
The most significant finds assemblage from the
Merovingian period in the study area stems from the
dune area between De Panne and the French town of
Bray-Dunes. Excavations at this site, situated on one
of the few remaining « Old Dune » areas, have
The site has generally been presented as a wic-like
trading settlement21, but there is little evidence to corroborate this interpretation. Early medieval pottery is
virtually absent, in sharp contrast with that of earlier
periods. The artefacts, including the coins, are thus
best interpreted as grave goods. In fact, a few inhumation graves have been found by amateur archaeologists in the 1970s.
15. — LOVELUCk, TYS 2006.
16. — FAVOREL 1961 ; DE CEUNYNCk, THOEN 1981 ; THOEN 1978, 1987.
17. — CUMONT 1907 ; VAN GANSBEkE-GROTHAUSEN 1968, p. 61-63 ; OP
DEN VELDE, DE BOONE, POL 1984, 143 ; SCHEERS 1991, p. 40.
18. — Partly described in VAN BELLINGEN 1988 ; THöRLE 2001.
19. — THOEN 1978, p. 201.
20. — DECkERS 2010, p. 160.
21. — TERMOTE 1990a, p. 109-110 ; 1992, p. 39-40.
3. THE MEROVINGIAN PERIOD (500-750 AD)
80
PIETERjAN DECkERS
Although the primary function of this site was
demonstrably as a cemetery, some of the finds point to
the integration of this community into overseas social
and economic networks throughout the early
medieval period. A few sherds « of Anglo-Saxon
type »22 and, allegedly23, a button brooch are amongst
the earliest of such finds, showing affinity with
England and the northern French littoral. In the late
7th and 8th centuries, twelve sceattas of Frisian types, a
denarius from Limoges and a small number of glass
sherds24 indicate contact with the North Sea trading
network in which the great emporia were the central
nodes.
The cemetery at De Panne, a place of social and
ideological significance, may well have become a
meeting and trading place for coastal communities
living in the immediate vicinity (including, at this
stage, in the coastal wetlands – cf. infra) and further
away25. Occasional interaction with the North Sea
trading network at or nearby such a location seems
likely and would explain the presence of objects
belonging in this network, notably coins and glass.
However, this interaction may have consisted of other
activities than monetary exchange, such as rendering
certain services (provisioning, pilotage) as well as
piracy and salvaging from wrecks26.
In a more general sense, this burial site is indicative
of the occupation of the now-eroded coastal barrier
throughout the Merovingian period. Other stray finds
along the coast, such as the tremisses from
Nieuwpoort27 and Raversijde28, confirm this view.
The situation in Flanders was therefore not unlike that
in the western Netherlands, where intensive occupation of the coastal barrier has been attested during the
Merovingian period29.
4. LANDSCAPE AND SETTLEMENT (700-1000AD) :
THE CASE OF WULPEN
By the beginning of the eighth century, occupation
of the tidal areas of the coastal plain had begun. A
good insight into settlement development on a microregional scale is offered by the territory of the present
village of wulpen, based on a surface survey report30
and analyzed using the present state of knowledge on
early medieval ceramics and landscape development.
22. — TERMOTE 1985a, p. 3.
23. — This find was identified by an amateur metal detectorist, but is
now lost.
24. — DECkERS 2010, p. 161.
25. — e.g. wILLIAMS 2004, p. 127 ; SEMPLE 2004, p. 139.
26. — DECkERS 2010, p. 161-164.
27. — VANHOUDT 1988, p. 78 ; SCHEERS 1991, p. 40.
28. — DE BOE 1967 ; VANHOUDT 1988, p. 73 ; SCHEERS 1991, p. 40.
Plotting only those find spots which, due to the
number and density of sherds, can be identified as
« sites » and « probable sites », and dating these sites
according to the presence and absence of chronologically diagnostic pottery types31, it is possible to reconstruct the development of settlement in this area. The
earliest site (w161/162) is dateable (at the latest) in
the first half of the 8th century and is located on a
raised bank of the wide tidal channel area forming the
lower Yser. By the end of the ninth century, several
other sites and probable sites have emerged, all
located on the banks of tidal inlets and filled-in
smaller channels, surrounding an open expanse of
tidal deposits (fig. 2A).
During the 10th-11th centuries, this tendency to settle preferably on roddons and raised banks continued.
However, in this period the first finds appear on the
heavy clay soils of the tidal area, indicating that these
had reached a supratidal level by now and, perhaps,
that local embankment had started (fig. 2B). The general spread of other find spots with diagnostic pottery
types largely confirms this chronological sequence,
with more intensive use or occupation of the lowlying tidal area only starting in the 10th century.
It must be stressed that, without excavation, it is
impossible to ascertain the function of these find
spots. As mentioned earlier, recent research has
tended to underline the permanent nature of early settlement in the coastal plain. This settlement mostly
took the form of single farmsteads, as recent excavations at Oostduinkerke-Hof ter Hille have shown32.
On the other hand, it is far from improbable that all or
some of these sites were (initially ?) used on a seasonal basis, aimed at specialist activities such as sheep
rearing and salt production33.
whether or not there was permanent occupation
from the Late Merovingian period onwards, it may be
inferred from the significant rise in the number of
sites from the 8th-9th to the 10th-11th centuries that the
population growth of this area far exceeded that
posited for this period in general34. Clearly, the
wulpen area attracted people from the outside during
the 8th to 10th centuries.
Even disregarding the small survey area, these tendencies cannot be extrapolated to the entire western
29. — BAzELMANS, DIjkSTRA, DE kONING 2004.
30. — VANCOUILLIE 1986.
31. — In this case, burnished wares were considered representative for
the 8th-9th century and hand-made pottery with dark core for the 10th11th century (cf. infra).
32. — A. LEHOUCk pers. comm.
33. — See RIPPON 2000, p. 50-53.
34. — FOSSIER 1999, p. 62.
ECONOMY, IDENTITY AND POwER. THE YSER ESTUARY IN THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES
81
FIG. 2. — Survey area of Wulpen, with find spots dating between 750-900 (A) and 900-1050 AD (B),
based on original data from Vancouillie (1986). The darkly shaded area represents deposits from a tidal channel
active until at least the 11th century. Geomorphological data from the Soil Map of Flanders.
part of the coastal plain. wulpen appears to stand out
as a relatively densely populated area from early on.
Perhaps local differences in tidal influence and sedimentation processes rendered this area available for
early exploitation and settlement. Certainly, access to
a major transport corridor, the lower Yser, immediately to the west, as well as the availability of peat at
shallow depth beneath the clay soils made this a suitable area for settlement.
This early attractiveness is probably reflected in the
historical record, as a document from 1116 concerning a conflict with the religious community of
St. walburga in Veurne may imply that property
claims of St. Bertin in wulpen precede the foundation
of the former in the early 10th century35. Furthermore,
it has been postulated that wulpen was the mother
parish of St. walburga36, although some scholars disagree37.
5. LATE MEROVINGIAN AND CAROLINGIAN
SETTLEMENT
Early sites elsewhere in the western coastal plain
appear to follow the pattern set by wulpen, situated
on raised banks or roddons and with access to both
peat in the tidal zones and the channel system of the
35. — See MEIjNS 2000, p. 339-340.
36. — HUYGHEBAERT 1981.
37. — e.g. CARNIER 1996, p. 631 n. 823.
38. — TERMOTE 1985a, p. 13-16.
39. — F. VERHAEGHE pers. comm. ; TERMOTE 1993, p. 16 n. 19.
lower Yser. Furthermore, like wulpen, the locations
of these sites are often consistent with the earliest
historical attestations in the region. VeurneBeoosterpoort, for instance, is situated just south of
the survey area of wulpen, and a small rescue excavation here yielded 8th-9th century as well as later pottery38.
The territory of zoutenaaie too reportedly features
finds of 8th century pottery39. A late 10th or 11th century vita Audomari has the saint perform one of his
miracles on an estate at zoutenaaie in the 7th century,
although the historicity of this claim is debatable40.
Lampernisse, until recently the most extensively
excavated site of this period within the area of
study41, is first mentioned in historical sources in
857 AD as property of the abbey of St. Bertin42. The
site’s phasing and chronology are not entirely clear,
but following a first occupation period in the (late ?)
8th-9th century, it was abandoned for some time before
being re-occupied as a moated site, probably by the
10th century43.
The abbey of St. Bertin thus held considerable
property along the eastern bank of the Yser estuary.
There is less evidence available for the western bank,
40. — CARNIER 1996, p. 425 n. 15.
41. — VERHAEGHE 1977, 1980.
42. — GYSSELING, kOCH 1950, p. 57.
43. — ERVYNCk e.a. 1999, p. 111.
82
PIETERjAN DECkERS
both archaeologically and historically, although
Veurne (cf. infra) and possibly Steenkerke44 were
early possessions of the abbey. Further west, a
Carolingian brooch was found nearby a dedicated to
St. Audomar at Adinkerke45, perhaps indicating
9th century origins.
Burnished wares (also called black and grey wares)
are the most characteristic pottery type at archaeological sites from this period. Various geographical origins have been proposed for this (mostly) fine, highquality pottery type46, but a northern French origin
seems most likely. Burnished wares disappeared by
the end of the 9th century47, providing an approximate
terminus ante quem for sites where pottery from this
group is found. Their date of appearance is less certain, but they were probably first produced in the 6th
or 7th century. Certainly, given their prevalence in
Middle Saxon London and Hamwic, production and
trade of these wares reached a peak during the late 7th
to mid-9th centuries48.
Another dating argument for the sites in the western coastal plain, although one ex silentio, is the (virtual) absence of the usual Merovingian pottery types
of the Flemish coastal area and Scheldt Valley, handmade pottery with organic and grog tempering respectively49. The exception is the already mentioned site
at wulpen, where a small quantity of grog-tempered
pottery has been reported. It cannot be ruled out that
the Merovingian pottery of this area was sand-tempered, and therefore difficult to distinguish from the
reduced sandy wares that dominated the Flemish pottery assemblages from the 9th to 13th centuries.
However, a more likely explanation for the nearabsence of chaff- and grog-tempered wares is that the
occupation of western part of the coastal plain only
started, at the earliest, around the mid-8th century.
This may be significantly later than areas further east,
where chaff-tempered pottery is rather abundant.
The absence of Rhenish imports, notably Badorftype pottery, is another feature distinguishing the
western and central/eastern coastal plain. Badorf
sherds were found50 on the beach near Middelkerke
44. — TERMOTE 2008, p. 95.
45. — TERMOTE 1985b.
46. — HODGES 1981, p. 21-28.
47. — DEMOLON, VERHAEGHE 1993, p. 394.
48. — For London : BLACkMORE 2003, p. 238-239 ; and Hamwic :
TIMBY 1988, p. 92-98.
49. — HAMEROw e.a. 1994 ; VAN DOORSELAER, ROGGE 1991.
50. — Some caution is needed, however, as whitewares of northern
French origin may in the past have been mistaken for Rhenish pottery.
51. — Discoveries in Middelkerke (TYS 2003, p. 231), Leffinge
(PIETERS e.a. 2006 ; TYS 2003, p. 232-242) and Uitkerke (HERMANS in
prep.).
and on several sites in the vicinity of Leffinge and
Uitkerke and Rhenish imports are well-attested at the
aforementioned excavations in the BrugesOudenburg-area51. The western and central/eastern
parts of the Flemish coastal area appear to belong to
different distribution zones – a possibility already
referred to, in a more general sense52.
This hypothesis may be expanded towards the
locally produced wares, albeit in a more tentative
fashion. whereas the central and eastern parts of the
coastal area appear to belong to an « Anglo-Saxon »
cultural zone characterized by the production of
chaff-tempered pottery, the latter’s absence and the
presence of a small quantity of grog-tempered pottery
in the west perhaps indicates a stronger continental
affiliation. As such, the Flemish coastal plain may
have been divided into two spheres of influence
which were both economic and social in nature ; one
North Sea/Rhenish, the other northern French. This
socio-economic boundary roughly coincides with that
between the pagi Isseretius and Mempiscus (belonging to the bishopric of Thérouanne) in the west and
the pagus Flandrensis (bishopric of Tournai) in the
east53, perhaps implying that the differences between
the two areas are reflected in the political and administrative organisation.
6. INTERACTION WITH THE HINTERLAND
Only one site on the edge of the Pleistocene sandy
region has featured extensive excavation54, shedding
light on the interaction between the coastal plain and
the interior. werken appears first in the written record
in 828AD55. Archaeological excavation here brought
to light a rich 8th-9th century settlement underlying a
motte-and-bailey of 10th to 12th century date56. The
site is situated along the Handzamevaart, the nowcanalized tributary of the river Yser, at the crossing
point of the Roman « Steenstraat » towards Bruges, a
diverticulum of the road Cassel-Tournai57.
A recent study of the pottery from the bailey area58
has shown that, amongst the imports, black- and greywares are numerically the most important, followed
52. — DEMOLON, VERHAEGHE 1993, p. 393.
53. — DECLERCq 1995, p. 11.
54. — A small-scale excavation has been undertaken at woumen,
revealing evidence for 8/9th-century and later activity at a motte-andbaily site perhaps not dissimilar to werken (TERMOTE 1990b).
55. — BERINGS 1985, p. 71.
56. — VANTHOURNOUT 1991 ; VAN STRYDONCk, VANTHOURNOUT 1996.
57. — THOEN 1978, p. 74-75.
58. — VAN BELLINGEN 2008.
ECONOMY, IDENTITY AND POwER. THE YSER ESTUARY IN THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES
by a group of white, rouletted pottery similar to the La
Londe production59 and therefore dateable to the 8th
or 9th century. Rhenish imports occur, but far less
abundantly.
The earliest dateable finds are a sceatta of Interlace
type, 710-750 AD60 and Merovingian handmade pottery, mostly grog-tempered. From this, it may be concluded that werken was contemporaneous with the
earliest stage of settlement within the coastal plain.
Following the line of thought presented in the previous section, this is a site mostly belonging to a
Neustrian socio-economic sphere of influence.
However, small amounts of « North Sea/Rhenish »
items (including some chaff-tempered pottery) are not
out of place, in view of both the site’s location near
the boundary of this sphere of influence and its location on an overland route parallel to the coast.
Given this strategic location and the presence of
numerous imports, werken presumably functioned as
a small trading or transhipment site. As such, there
may have been connections with the royal fisc at
Roeselare (first mentioned in 821 AD) and with the
monasterium at Torhout, which was established in the
mid-7th century61. This religious establishment is usually brought into connection with a landing place at
Bruges62. However, given the shorter distance (c.
15 km, a day’s return journey63 it seems plausible that,
at least in the 8th century, werken fulfilled this role64.
Bearing in mind the distribution zones identified
above, it may be possible to shed more light on this
issue by considering the proportions of northern
French vs. Rhenish imported pottery at future excavations at Torhout.
7. POST-CAROLINGIAN DEVELOPMENTS
Politically, the late 9th century sees the rise of the
counts of Flanders who, partly through usurpation of
existing estates, partly through reclamation of new
land in the coastal plain, amass a huge domain by the
end of the 10th century65. The products of this expansive property, primarily wool, obviously required an
59. — ROY 1993.
60. — VANTHOURNOUT 1990.
61. — HUYGHEBAERT 1960 ; BERINGS 1985, p. 52-55.
62. — RYCkAERT 1995, p. 123.
63. — NAYLOR 2004, p. 22.
64. — Unfortunately, it is unclear to which pagus Torhout belonged.
Both the pagus Isseretius and the pagus Flandrensis have been argued
for (MEIjNS 2000, p. 320 n. 886).
65. — TYS 2004.
66. — e.g. VERHULST 1999, p. 70.
67. — wATTENBACH 1887, 1, p. 509.
68. — See Niermeyer (1976, s.v. portus). De Panne too has occasionally been identified as Iserae Portus (e.g. DE MEULEMEESTER 1996,
p. 380-381 ; TERMOTE 1992, p. 60). The name is used again in the mid-
83
outlet. It is within this context that the emergence of
Veurne is usually set, although its roots probably go
back to the mid-9th century.
Veurne has regularly been identified as Iserae portus66, the place where, according to the Miracula
Sancti Bertini, a Viking band landed in 860 AD on
their way to the abbey of St. Bertin67. However, this
relies on a mistranslation of the word « portus » as
trading port – the text itself leaves little doubt that it
refers to a geographical feature, the estuary of the
river Yser (which undoubtedly featured many natural
landing places)68.
The early documentary evidence for Veurne is
extremely limited. The toponym Furna is first
recorded in 877 AD, when « sedilia » are mentioned
amongst the possessions of the abbey of St. Bertin69.
within the context of this document70, the term
« sedilia » may be interpreted as a place of some economic and/or administrative importance to the abbey,
as it is used to refer to only two further locations, both
situated on the waterfront : Loom ad Sentinas (LoonPlage,
Grande-/Petite-Synthe)
and
Merkisa
(Marquise)71.
The centre of the town consists of a circular fortification measuring almost 240 m across72, which, it is
generally assumed, is one of the castella recens facta
built by the Count to defend against the Viking
threat73. There has been some debate about the location of early Furna and its relation with the fortress,
since no pottery predating the 10th century has been
found in Veurne74. For now, however, the most likely
location for Furna in the second half of the 9th century
is present-day Veurne, all the more so because the
above-mentioned early 12th century written source75
mentions old property of St. Bertin both within and
next to the circular fortress.
Nonetheless, Furna remains a somewhat paradoxical place, lacking all evidence for occupation, but
clearly holding great interest for the political elite.
Therefore, it may be interpreted as a logistic and
12th century for the newly-founded harbour town of Nieuwpoort at the
mouth of the river Yser – which, by then, has shifted to its present-day
course (AUGUSTYN 1992, p. 265-267).
69. — GYSSELING, kOCH 1950, p. 77.
70. — « Sedilia » is usually translated as « built-up plots in an urban
settlement » (e.g. MEIjNS 2000, p. 334 n. 922 ; kOCH 1970, p. 321),
although in this case a more cautious interpretation is appropriate.
71. — kOCH 1970, p. 320.
72. — TERMOTE 1993, p. 16-20 ; DE MEULEMEESTER 2002, p. 224-226.
73. — HENDERIkx 1995, p. 94-96.
74. — LEHOUCk 2001, p. 34-35 ; LEHOUCk, DE MEULEMEESTER 2006,
p. 218-219.
75. — MEIjNS 2000, p. 339-340.
84
PIETERjAN DECkERS
administrative centre, for instance a transhipment site
where the produce of the surrounding area was
stored76 and tolls were collected, but initially with few
other functions. As such, it is perhaps telling that, in a
document dating to c. 885 AD, Veurne neither
receives the status of vicus like Bruges and Antwerp,
nor that of an agricultural villa77.
Only in the course of the 10th century, a settlement
with urban characteristics emerges78. Around 918, the
Count donates the important relics of St. walburga – a
saint commonly associated with trading settlements
along rivers and estuaries – to the collegiate church
inside the fortress79. Archaeological evidence remains
scarce, however, although hand-made dark-core80 and
shell-tempered wares attest to activity in this period.
Also indicative of investment and expansion is the
construction of a raised plateau of about 4 ha along
the eastern access road to the fortress, which, judging
by a few sherds tempered with coarse shell fragments,
may be dated to the same period81.
This coarsely tempered shelly ware occurs at several rural sites during this period, notably the aforementioned Leenhof Ter wissche at Lampernisse and
Veurne-Beoosterpoort. A particular type of vessel is
characteristic for this fabric : a form of cauldron with
steep walls and a flat base. Many sherds appear to
show burn marks or sooting on the inside of the walls,
particularly near the base, giving rise to some speculation as to its function. An artisanal purpose, in particular related to salt production, has been proposed82.
whatever the case, as similar finds have been made in
northern France, the presence of these vessels attests
to continuing ties between the two areas.
CONCLUSIONS
Two main strands of thought may be identified in
this brief review of the early medieval archaeology of
the western part of the Flemish coastal plain. A first
concerns the pottery of the region ; a second has to do
with the development of settlement in the landscape,
and its relationship with power.
1. Through a preliminary analysis of the variation
through space and time of the origins and relative
importance of imported pottery, two spheres of influence may be identified in the Flemish coastal plain in
the 8th and 9th century : a western distribution zone
connected with northern France, and an eastern zone
76. — Cf. COOLS 1994, p. 55.
77. — GYSSELING, kOCH 1950, p. 138 ; kOCH 1949.
78. — DE MEULEMEESTER 2002, p. 226-228.
79. — MEIjNS 2000, p. 336-337.
more closely linked with the North Sea/Rhenish trading network. The same distinction may well apply to
the locally produced pottery, with both Merovingian
and 10th century wares seemingly conforming to this
pattern.
However, this research needs to be expanded
throughout a wider area of the coastal plain as well as
its Pleistocene hinterland. This will have implications
for the identification of regional exchange networks
and the trading places that formed the nodes of these
networks, for the social as well as economic nature of
the interaction occurring along these networks, and
even for the perception of and values associated with
exchanged goods. Furthermore, the technological and
morphological idiosyncrasies of locally and regionally produced pottery need to be studied, in order to
strengthen or refute the hypothesis of differing cultural spheres of influence, and the degree to which
these coincided with economic distribution zones.
2. The western part of the coastal plain differs from
the central and eastern area not just in its economic
and – possibly – cultural affiliations, but also in its
chronology of settlement. whereas chaff-tempered
wares appear quite profusely in the east, contemporaneous wares are virtually absent in the west.
Conversely, historical evidence for activity in the west
is relatively early, and spatially consistent with the
archaeological data. This not only allows to identify a
core area of settlement in particular on the eastern
bank of the former Yser estuary, but also raises questions about the relationship between the inhabitants of
this landscape and the socio-political elite whose
interest is reflected in the written record. whereas the
lack of historical evidence for early activity in the
central and eastern coastal plain is usually seen as an
indicator of the autonomous, allodial status of those
involved, the converse may thus be true for the area
under study. In particular, the abbey of St. Bertin
appears to have been closely involved from early on,
perhaps even forming a principal instigator of the
exploitation and occupation of the coastal wetlands
surrounding the Yser estuary.
As a concluding remark, the interrelated nature of
power, economy and culture may be explored. Is it
possible that the 8th-9th century settlers of the western
part of the Flemish coastal plain were affiliated with
the abbey of St. Bertin, as opposed to the free land-
80. — DE GROOTE 2008, p. 325-333.
81. — TERMOTE 1993, p. 20.
82. — ROUTIER 2006, p. 269-270 ; DEMOLON, VERHAEGHE 1993, p. 397.
ECONOMY, IDENTITY AND POwER. THE YSER ESTUARY IN THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES
holders further east, who were able to maintain a distinct identity reflected in their integration into a socioeconomic network spanning both sides of the North
Sea ? How were landholding institutions like St.
Bertin able to directly or indirectly influence economic networks and material culture ? To what extent
was access to imported goods dependent on patronage
by, in this case, ecclesiastical establishments ? was
there a relationship between political or administrative divisions on the one hand, and local identities and
the access to certain networks of exchange on the
other ?
Lastly, how does the micro-region studied here tie
in to the larger framework of the socio-cultural configuration of the whole Channel/southern North Sea
zone in the 8th and 9th centuries ? Differences in political allegiances, economic exchange as well as cultural affiliations allow to distinguish between a
Frankish/Merovingian area along the Channel coasts
(e.g. wood 1983), and a Frisian/Anglo-Saxon zone
further north (Hodges 1982, 39-46 ; Hines 1996, 57).
As such, the differences identified between the western and eastern coastal area of Flanders, which are
examined here mostly within a regional context, may
well have significance on a much grander scale.
Keywords : Merovingian and Carolingian periods,
coastal Flanders, pottery, wetland exploitation and
occupation.
Acknowledgements
The research reported in this paper is part of the author’s doctoral research at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (2014), funded
by FwO – Research Foundation Flanders. I am grateful to my
supervisor, Dries Tys, and to Cecile Baeteman, Georges
Declercq, Ben jervis, Alexander Lehouck, johan Termote and
Frans Verhaeghe for useful remarks regarding aspects of this
paper. The responsibility for any mistakes of course remains
my own.
Bibliography
Augustyn 1992 : AUGUSTYN B., Zeespiegelrijzing, transgressiefasen en stormvloeden in maritiem Vlaanderen tot het einde
van de XVIde eeuw. Een landschappelijke, ecologische en klimatologische studie in historisch perspektief, Brussel, vols. 1-2
1992. (Algemeen Rijksarchief)
BAetemAn 1999 : BAETEMAN C., « The Holocene depositional
history of the Ijzer palaeovalley (western Belgian coastal
plain) with reference to the factors controlling the formation of
intercalated peat beds », Geologica Belgica, 2 (1-2).
BAetemAn 2005 : BAETEMAN C., « How subsoil morphology
and erodibility influence the origin and pattern of late
Holocene tidal channels : case studies from the Belgian coastal
lowlands », Quaternary Science Reviews, 24, 2005, p. 21462162.
85
BAetemAn 2008a : BAETEMAN C., « Radiocarbon-dated sediment sequences from the Belgian coastal plain : testing the
hypothesis of fluctuating or smooth late-Holocene relative sealevel rise », The Holocene, 18 (8), 2008, p. 1219-1228.
BAetemAn 2008b : BAETEMAN C., De Holocene Geologie van
de Belgische Kustvlakte, Geological Survey of Belgium.
Professional Paper, Brussel, 2008b. (koninklijk Belgisch
Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen - Belgische Geologische
Dienst)
BAetemAn, scott, VAn strydonck 2002 : BAETEMAN C.,
SCOTT D., VAN STRYDONCk M., « Changes in coastal zone
processes at a high sea-level stand : a late Holocene example
from Belgium », Journal of Quaternary Science, 17 (5-6),
2002, p. 547-559.
BAzelmAns, dijkstrA, de koning 2004 : BAzELMANS j.,
DIjkSTRA M. DE kONING j., « Holland during the first millennium », in LODEwIjCkx M. (Red.), Bruc ealles well.
Archaeological essays concerning the peoples of North-West
Europe in the first millennium AD, Acta Archaeologica
Lovaniensia, Monographiae, Leuven, 2004, p. 3-36.
Berings 1985 : BERINGS G., « Het oude land aan de rand van
het vroeg-middeleeuwse overstromingsgebied van de
Noordzee. Landname en grondbezit tijdens de middeleeuwen », Handelingen van de Maatschappij voor Geschiedenis
en Oudheidkunde te Gent, 39, 1985, p. 37-84.
BlAckmore 2003 : BLACkMORE L., « The pottery », dans
MALCOLM G., BOwSHER D. (Red.), Middle Saxon London.
Excavations at the Royal Opera House 1989-99, MoLAS
Monograph, London, Museum of London Archaeology
Service, 2003, p. 225-241.
cArnier 1996 : CARNIER M., Parochies en Bidplaatsen in het
bisdom Terwaan voor 1300 : een institutionele studie
(Onuitgegeven doctoraatsthesis), katholieke Universiteit
Leuven, 1996.
cools 1994 : COOLS E., « kustvlaanderen in de
Noormannentijd. Historische feiten en archeologische vondsten in hun militaire context », Westvlaamse Archaeologica,
10, 1994, p. 23-33.
cumont 1907 : CUMONT G., « Monnaies trouvées dans les
gisements côtiers de la Panne (Flandre Occidentale) », Annales
de la Société d’Archéologie de Bruxelles, 21, 1907, p. 73-79.
de Boe 1967 : DE BOE G., « Middelkerke : Frankische triëns »,
Archeologie, 1, 1967, p. 39-40.
de ceunynck, thoen 1981 : DE CEUNYNCk R., THOEN H.,
« The Iron Age settlement at De Panne-westhoek. Ecological
and geological context », Helinium, 21, 1981, p. 21-42.
de decker, Bourgeois 1999 : DE DECkER S., BOURGEOIS j.,
Archeologische inventaris van de Uitkerkse Polder (gem.
Uitkerke-Blankenberge, Wenduine-De Haan, NieuwmunsterZuienkerke), Prov. West-Vlaanderen. Deelstudie in het kader
van een haalbaarheidsstudie van een natuurinrichtingsproject
(Onuitgegeven Rapport). Vlaamse Landmaatschappij Afdeling Brugge & Aminal - Afdeling Natuur, 1999.
de groote 2008 : DE GROOTE k., Middeleeuws aardewerk in
Vlaanderen. Techniek, typologie, chronologie en evolutie van
het gebruiksgoed in de regio Oudenaarde in de volle en late
middeleeuwen (10de-16de eeuw), Relicta Monografieën (vols.
1-2), Brussel, 2008. (Vlaams Instituut voor het Onroerend
Erfgoed)
de meulemeester 1977 : DE MEULEMEESTER j., « Een circulaire versterking te Alveringem », Archaeologia Belgica, 96,
1977, p. 73-77.
de meulemeester 1981 : DE MEULEMEESTER j., Circulaire
86
PIETERjAN DECkERS
vormen in het Vlaamse kustgebied, Archaeologia Belgica,
Brussel, 1981. (Nationale Dienst voor Opgravingen)
de meulemeester 1996 : DE MEULEMEESTER j., « Comment
s’est-on défendu au Ixe siècle...? », in LODEwIjCkx M. (Red.),
Archaeological and Historical Aspects of West-European
Societies, Acta Archaeologica Lovaniensia Monographia,
Leuven, 1996, p. 371-387.
de meulemeester 2002 : DE MEULEMEESTER j., « Étude d’un
cas particulier de peuplement médiéval de la côte flamande.
Furnes », in ETTEL P., FRIEDRICH R., SCHIER w. (Red.),
Interdisziplinäre
Beiträge
zur
Siedlungsarchäologie.
Gedenkschrift für Walter Janssen, Internationale Archäologie,
Studia Honoria, 2002, p. 221-233.
deckers 2010 : DECkERS P., « An illusory emporium ? Small
trading places around the southern North Sea », in wILLEMSEN
A., kIk H. (Red.), Dorestad in an International Framework.
New Research into Centres of Trade and Coinage in
Carolingian Times, Turnhout, 2010, p. 159-168.
declercq 1995 : DECLERCq G., « Vlaanderen en de
Vlaanderengouw in de vroege middeleeuwen », Vlaanderen
(= Licht in de middeleeuwen. 1250 jaar Roksem en de kerstening in westelijk Vlaanderen), 44 (3), 1995, p. 162-168.
demolon, VerhAeghe 1993 : DEMOLON P., VERHAEGHE F.,
« La céramique du Ve au xe siècle dans le nord de la France et
la Flandre Belge : état de la question », in PITON D. (Red.),
Travaux du groupe de recherches et d’études sur la céramique
dans le Nord-Pas-de-Calais. Actes du colloque d’Outreau (1012 avril 1992). La céramique du Ve au Xe siècle dans l’Europe
du Nord-Ouest, Nord-Ouest Archéologie, 1993, p. 385-407.
erVynck, BAetemAn et al. 1999 : ERVYNCk A., BAETEMAN C.,
DEMIDDELE H., HOLLEVOET Y., PIETERS M., SCHELVIS j., TYS
D., e.a., « Human occupation because of a regression or the
cause of a transgression ? A critical view on the interaction
between geological events and human occupation history in the
Belgian coastal plain during the first millennium AD »,
Probleme der Küstenforschung im südlichen Nordseegebiet,
26, 1999, p. 97-121.
FAVorel 1961 : FAVOREL P., « La région de La Panne à l’époque Préromaine, Romaine et Franque », Handelingen
Koninklijke Geschied- en Oudheidkundige Kring van Kortrijk,
33, 1961, p. 5-223.
Fossier 1999 : FOSSIER R., « Rural economy and country
life », in REUTER T. (Red.), The New Cambridge Medieval
History Volume III c. 900-c. 1024, Cambridge, 1999, p. 27-63.
gysseling, koch 1950 : GYSSELING M., kOCH A., Diplomata
Belgica ante annum millesimum centesimum scripta,
Bouwstoffen en studiën voor de geschiedenis en de lexicografie van het Nederlands (vols. 1-2), Brussel, 1950.
hAmerow, holleVoet, Vince 1994 : HAMEROw H.,
HOLLEVOET Y., VINCE A., « Migration Period Settlements and
“Anglo-Saxon” Pottery from Flanders », Medieval
Archaeology, 38, 1994, p. 1-18.
henderikx 1995 : HENDERIkx P., « De ringwalburgen in het
mondingsgebied van de Schelde in historisch perspectief », in
VAN HEERINGEN R., HENDERIkx P., MARS A. (Red.), VroegMiddeleeuwse ringwalburgen in Zeeland, Amersfoort-Goes,
ROB, 1995, p. 71-112.
hermAns 2012 : HERMANS M., « Analyse van het aardewerk
uit de vroegmiddeleeuwse site Uitkerke-Groenwaecke », Terra
Incognita. Annual Review of Archaeological Master Research
in Flanders (Belgium), 5, 2012, p. 77-90.
hillewAert, holleVoet 2006 : HILLEwAERT B., HOLLEVOET
Y., « Andermaal Romeins en vroegmiddeleeuws langs de
zandstraat te Sint-Andries/Brugge (prov. west-Vlaanderen) »,
Relicta, 1, 2006, p. 121-140.
hines 1996 : HINES j., « Coins and runes in England and Frisia
in the seventh century », in LOOIjENGA T., qUACk A. (Red.),
Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions. Proceedings of the
first international symposium on Frisian runes at the Fries
Museum, Leeuwarden 26-29 januari 1994, Amsterdamer
Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik, Amsterdam-Atlanta, 1996,
p. 47-62.
hodges 1981 : HODGES R., The Hamwih pottery : the local
and imported wares from 30 years’ excavations at Middle
Saxon Southampton and their European context, CBA
Research Reports, London, 1981. (Published for the
Southampton Archaeological Research Committee by the
Council for British Archaeology)
hodges 1982 : HODGES R., Dark Age Economics. The origins
of towns and trade A.D. 600-1000, London, 1982.
huygheBAert 1960 : HUYGHEBAERT N., « Monastère de
Torhout », in BERLIèRE U., HUYGHEBAERT N., DANHIEUx L.,
FAVOREL P. (Red.), Monasticon Belge, 3. Province de Flandre
occidentale, Liège, vol. 1, 1960, p. 208-210.
huygheBAert 1981 : Huyghebaert N., « Furnes », in
Dictionnaire d’histoire et de géographie ecclésiastique, vol.
19, 1981, p. 454-455.
koch 1949 : kOCH A., « De ouderdom van de Stad Brugge »,
Handelingen van het Genootschap voor Geschiedenis gesticht
onder de benaming « Société d’émulation » te Brugge, (86),
1949, p. 145-150.
koch 1970 : kOCH A., « Phasen in der Entstehung von
kaufmannsniederlassungen zwisschen Maas und Nordsee in
der karolingerzeit », in DROEGE G., SCHöLLER P.,
SCHüTzEICHEL R., zENDER M. (Red.), Landschaft und
Geschichte. Festschrift für Franz Petri zu seinem 65.
Geburtstag am 22. Februar 1968, Bonn, 1970, p. 312-324.
lehouck 2001 : LEHOUCk A., Onder de deklaag.
Archeologische bijdrage tot de ontwikkeling en historische
topografie van middeleeuws Veurne, (Onuitgegeven licentiaatsthesis), Universiteit Gent, 2001.
lehouck, de meulemeester 2006 : LEHOUCk A., DE
MEULEMEESTER j., « Castra caroligiens de la plaine maritime
flamande. Nouvelles approches des éléments spatiaux de peuplement », in ETTEL P., FLAMBARD HÉRICHER A., MCNEILL T.
(Red.), Château et Peuplement. Actes du colloque international de Voiron (Isère, France), 27 août-4 septembre, Château
Gaillard, Caen, 2006, p. 217-222.
loVeluck, tys 2006 : LOVELUCk C., TYS D., « Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern
North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600-1000 », Journal of
Maritime Archaeology, 2006, p. 140-169.
meijns 2000 : MEIjNS B., Aken of Jeruzalem ? Het ontstaan en
de hervorming van de kanonikale instellingen in Vlaanderen
tot circa 1155, Leuven, 2000.
nAylor 2004 : NAYLOR j., An Archaeology of Trade in Middle
Saxon England, Oxford, British Archaeological Reports,
British Series, 2004.
niermeyer 1976 : NIERMEYER j., Mediae Latinitatis lexicon
minus, Leiden 1976.
op den Velde, de Boone, pol 1984 : OP DEN VELDE w., DE
BOONE w., POL A., « A survey of sceatta finds from the Low
Countries », in HILL D., METCALF D. (Red.), Sceatta’s in
England and on the Continent. The Seventh Oxford Symposium
on Coinage and Monetary History, Oxford, BAR British
Series, 1984, p. 117-145.
ECONOMY, IDENTITY AND POwER. THE YSER ESTUARY IN THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES
pieters, schietecAtte et al. 2006 : PIETERS M.,
SCHIETECATTE L., zEEBROEk I., BAETEMAN C., DEFORCE k.,
jANSEN I., MEYLEMANS E., e.a., « The Belgian Polders,
Flanders : a test case 2002-2006 », in DYSON L., jOHNSON C.,
HEPPELL E., PIETERS M. (Red.), Archaeological Evaluations of
Wetlands in the Planarch Area of North West Europe, 2006,
p. 39-54.
pype, dewilde 2001 : PYPE P., DEwILDE M., « Archeologisch
onderzoek langs de Schaapstraat te Uitkerke (Blankenberge)
(w.-Vl.) », Archaeologia Medievalis, 24, p. 57-58.
rippon 2000 : RIPPON S., The Transformation of Coastal
Wetlands. Exploitation and management of Marshland landscapes in North West Europe during the Roman and medieval
periods, Oxford, 2000.
routier 2006 : ROUTIER j., « Céramiques médiévales des xe et
xIe siècles en Flandre et sur le littoral du Nord-Pas-de-Calais »,
in HINCkER V., HUSI P. (Red.), La céramique du Haut Moyen
Âge dans le Nord-Ouest de l’Europe, Ve-Xe siècles. Actes du
colloque de Caen 2004. Bilan et perspectives dix ans après le
colloque d’Outreau, Condé-sur-Noireau, 2006, p. 267-286.
roy 1993 : ROY N., « Un atelier de potier du haut Moyen Âge
en forêt de La Londe, près de Rouen (Seine-Maritime) : état de
la recherché », in PITON D. (Red.), Travaux du groupe de
recherches et d’études sur la céramique dans le Nord-Pas-deCalais. Actes du colloque d’Outreau (10-12 avril 1992). La
céramique du Ve au Xe siècle dans l’Europe du Nord-Ouest,
Nord-Ouest Archéologie, Berck-sur-Mer, 1993, p. 341-355.
ryckAert 1995 : RYCkAERT M., « Les origines et l’histoire
ancienne de Bruges : l’état de la question et quelques données
nouvelles », in DUVOSqUEL j., THOEN E. (Red.), Peasants and
Townsmen in Medieval Europe : Studia in Honorem Adriaan
Verhulst, Gent, 1995, p. 117-134.
scheers 1991 : SCHEERS S., « De Merovingische munten in
west-Vlaanderen », Westvlaamse Archaeologica, 7, 1991,
p. 31-42.
semple 2004 : SEMPLE S., « Locations of assembly in early
Anglo-Saxon England », in PANTOS A., SEMPLE S. (Red.),
Assembly Places and Practices in Medieval Europe, Dublin,
2004, p. 135-154.
termote 1985a : TERMOTE j., « Het archeologisch onderzoek
in de westhoek in 1985 », WAVO-Berichten, 5, 1985a, p. 3-35.
termote 1985b : TERMOTE j., « Adinkerke (w.Vl.) : vroegmiddeleeuwse mantelspeld », Archeologie, 1, 1985b, p. 28.
termote 1990a : TERMOTE j., « De bewoningsgeschiedenis
van de Noordelijke westhoek in de Vroege en volle
Middeleeuwen (5de-12de eeuw) », in HERREGAT j. (Red.),
Getuigen in polderklei. Huldeboek dr. Hist. Godgaf Dalle,
Veurne, 1990a, p. 103-118.
termote 1990b : TERMOTE j., « Archeologisch onderzoek in
en om de Sint-Andreaskerk te woumen (gem. Diksmuide) »,
West-Vlaamse Archaeologica, 6 (1), 1990b, p. 18-30.
termote 1992 : TERMOTE j. (Red.), Tussen land en zee. Het
duingebied van Nieuwpoort tot De Panne, Tielt, 1992.
termote 1992 : TERMOTE j., « wonen op het duin. De bewoningsgeschiedenis van het duingebied tot aan de Franse
Revolutie », in TERMOTE j. (Red.), Tussen land en zee. Het
duingebied van Nieuwpoort tot De Panne, Tielt, 1992, p. 4685.
termote 1993 : TERMOTE j., « Het stadsarcheologisch en het
historisch-topografisch onderzoek in Veurne in de periode
1982 tot 1992 », Westvlaamse Archaeologica, 9 (1), 1993,
p. 11-29.
termote 2008 : TERMOTE j., « Dankzij de dijken », Archi-
87
krant, 18 (3), 2008, p. 71-99.
thoen 1978 : THOEN H., De Belgische kustvlakte in de
Romeinse tijd : bijdrage tot de studie van de landelijke bewoningsgeschiedenis, Verhandelingen van de koninklijke academie voor wetenschappen, letteren en schone kunsten van
België, klasse der letteren, Brussel 1978.
thoen 1987 : THOEN H. (Red.), De Romeinen langs de
Vlaamse kust, Brussel, 1987.
thörle 2001 : THöRLE S., Gleicharmige Bügelfibeln des frühen Mittelalters, Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen
Archäologie, Bonn, 2001.
timBy 1988 : TIMBY j., « The Middle Saxon Pottery », in
ANDREwS P. (Red.), Southampton Finds, Volume 1 : The Coins
and Pottery from Hamwic, Southampton - Gloucester,
Southampton Archaeology Monographs, 1988, p. 73-124.
tys 2003 : TYS D., Een middeleeuws landschap als materiële
cultuur : De interactie tussen macht en ruimte in een kustgebied en de wording van een laatmiddeleeuws tot vroegmodern
landschap. Kamerlings Ambacht, 500-1200/1600, Brussel,
2003. (Onuitgegeven doctoraatsthesis, Vrije Universiteit
Brussel)
tys 2004 : TYS D., « Domeinvorming in de “wildernis” en de
ontwikkeling van de vorstelijke macht - Het voorbeeld van het
bezit van de graven van Vlaanderen in het Ijzerestuarium tussen 900 en 1100 », Jaarboek voor Middeleeuwse Geschiedenis,
7, 2004, p. 31-83.
VAn Bellingen 1988 : VAN BELLINGEN S., Gelijkarmige fibulae uit de merovingische en karolingische periode in België en
Noord-Frankrijk, Brussel, 1988. Onuitgegeven licentiaatsverhandeling, Vrije Universiteit Brussel)
VAn Bellingen 2008 : VAN BELLINGEN S., « Het archeologische materiaal afkomstig van het voorhof van de karolingische
vlaknederzetting te werken », in Jaarboek Spaenhiers 2007,
vol. 15, 2008, p. 24-76.
VAn doorselAer, rogge 1991 : VAN DOORSELAER A.,
ROGGE M., « Late Roman and Migration Period Hand-Made
Pottery from the Area between the Scheldt and the North Sea »,
in HäSSLER H. (Red.), Studien zur Sachsenforschung, 7,
Veröffentlichungen des urgeschichtlichen Sammlungen des
Landesmuseums zu Hannover, Hildesheim, 1991, p. 113-120.
VAn gAnsBeke-grothAusen 1968 : VAN GANSBEkEGROTHAUSEN M., « De muntenverzameling van de
Duinenabdij », De Duinen, 6 (11), 1968, p. 51-67.
VAn strydonck, VAnthournout 1966 : VAN STRYDONCk M.,
VANTHOURNOUT C., « Dating the “Hoge Andjoen” motte at
werken (prov. w. Fl.) », in LODEwIjCkx M. (Red.),
Archaeological and Historical Aspects of West-European
Societies. Album Amicorum André Van Doorselaer, Acta
Archaeologica Lovaniensia Monographiae, 1966, p. 441-452.
VAncouillie 1986 : VANCOUILLIE E., Archeologisch onderzoek in de gemeente Wulpen. Prospectie - analyse - synthese,
Gent,
1986.
(Onuitgegeven
licentiaatsverhandeling,
Universiteit Gent)
VAnhoudt 1988 : VANHOUDT H., « De muntvondsten in België
uit de Merovingische periode », Revue belge de numismatique
et de sigillographie, 134, 1988, p. 41-88.
VAnthournout 1990 : VANTHOURNOUT C., « Een
karolingische sceatta gevonden te werken (gem.
kortemark) », West-Vlaamse Archaeologica, 6 (1), 1990, p. 32.
VAnthournout 1991 : VANTHOURNOUT C., « The “Hoge
Andjoen” motte at werken-kortemark : Mode of Construction,
Function and Chronology », in TAUBER j. (Red.), Methoden
und Perspektiven der Archäologie des Mittelalters -
88
PIETERjAN DECkERS
Tagungsberichte zum Interdisciplinären Kolloquium vom 2730 September 1989 in Liestal (Schweiz), Archäologie und
Museum. Berichte aus der Arbeit des Amtes für Museen und
Archäologie des kantons Baselland, Liestal, 1991, p. 187-207.
VerBoVen 2008 : VERBOVEN k., « A Merovingian tremissis
found at Bulskamp », Revue belge de numismatique et de sigillographie, 154, 2008, p. 183.
VerhAeghe 1977 : VERHAEGHE F., De middeleeuwse landelijke bewoningssites in een deel van Veurne-Ambacht. Bijdrage
tot de middeleeuwse archeologie, Gent, 1977. (Onuitgegeven
doctoraatsthesis, Rijksuniversiteit Gent)
VerhAeghe 1980 : VERHAEGHE F., « Bijdrage tot het archeologisch onderzoek van de middeleeuwse rurale bewoning in de
Belgische kustvlakte », in VERHULST A., GOTTSCHALk M.
(Red.), Transgressies en occupatiegeschiedenis in de kustgebieden van Nederland en België, Gent, 1980, p. 37-64.
Verhulst 1962 : VERHULST A., « L’évolution de la plaine
maritime flamande au Moyen Âge », Revue de l’Université de
Bruxelles, 1962-1963, p. 89-106.
Verhulst 1981 : VERHULST A., « De kustgebieden », in
Algemene Geschiedenis der Nederlanden, 1. Middeleeuwen,
Haarlem, 1981, p. 126-135.
Verhulst 1995 : VERHULST A., Landschap en landbouw in
middeleeuws Vlaanderen, Brussel, 1995.
Verhulst 1999 : VERHULST A., Fasen in de stadsontwikkeling
tijdens de vroege middeleeuwen (6de-9de eeuw), C.j.C.
Reuvenslezing, Amsterdam, 1999. (Stichting voor Nederlandse
Archeologie)
wAttenBAch 1887 : wATTENBACH w. (Red.), Monumenta
Germaniae Historica, Scriptores XV, Hannover, vol. 1, 1887.
(Monumenta Germaniae Historica)
williAms 2004 : wILLIAMS H., « Assembling the dead », in
PANTOS A., SEMPLE S. (Red.), Assembly Places and Practices
in Medieval Europe, Dublin, 2004, p. 109-134.
wood 1983 : wOOD I., The Merovingian North Sea, Alingsås,
Viktoria Bokförlag.
Les cultures des littoraux au haut Moyen Âge.
Cadres et mode de vie dans l’espace maritime
Manche-mer du Nord du IIIe au xe s.
Textes réunis par Inès Leroy et Laurent Verslype
Sommaire
Introduction.
9
Stéphane Révillion
Du littoral au fleuve. Cadres de vie, contextes et méthodes
Modifications du paysage et possibilité d’activités
humaines pendant l’Holocène dans la plaine maritime belge.
L’environnement littoral du Pas-de-Calais à l’Holocène.
Interactions et occupations des milieux côtier et fluvial
dans la longue durée : sources confluentes en Canche.
15
29
Cecile Baeteman
Murielle Meurisse-Fort
Virginie Serna,
Inès Leroy
41
Face à la mer. Modes de vie et d’occupation des contrées littorales
Emporia and their hinterlands in the 7th to 9th centuries AD :
some comments and observations from England.
Entre Frisons, Francs et Anglo-Saxons :
la Flandre maritime au haut Moyen Âge.
Economy, identity and power.
The Yser estuary in the early Middle Ages.
« Barreau Saint-Georges » - Desserte ferroviaire.
Une occupation de la fin du xe-début xIe s. à
Saint-Georges-sur-l’Aa (Nord).
L’occupation carolingienne et post-carolingienne
de la plaine maritime flamande française.
Premier bilan.
John Naylor
59
Yann Hollevoet (†)
69
Pieterjan Deckers
77
Patrice Herbin, Tarek Oueslati,
avec la coll. de Brad White
89
Samuel Desoutter,
Emmanuel Elleboode, Mathieu Lançon,
Jean-Claude Routier
127
Les opérations archéologiques préventives entre Canche et Authie
Nouvelles problématiques de recherches en basse vallée de l’Authie.
L’occupation tardo-antique de la Rue du Warnier, commune de
Nempont-Saint-Firmin (Pas-de-Calais).
L’occupation du haut Moyen Âge sur le site de La Calotterie
« Chemin de Visemarais » (France, Pas-de-Calais).
Premiers résultats de la fouille
réalisée sur les parcelles AC 40 et AC 3p.
Bilan des opérations archéologiques de
l’Inrap à La Calotterie (2005-2007).
Samuel Lelarge
169
Delphine Cense-Bacquet
Jean-Claude Routier, Pierre Barbet,
avec la coll. de Bruno Foucray
187
217
Indicateurs culturels et économiques : productions artisanales
Une fosse de rejet de l’atelier de bronzier
mérovingien d’Hames-Boucres (Pas-de-Calais).
L’officine de potiers de La Calotterie (Pas-de-Calais).
Ier s.-début du IVe s. ap. J.-C.
Les sites antiques de consommation : Quend (80)
et Attin (62). Vers la définition d’un faciès céramique
du littoral de la Manche pour la période
valentino-théodosienne.
Le mobilier de type anglo-saxon provenant de la nécropole de
« La Fontaine aux Linottes » à La Calotterie (Pas-de-Calais).
Témoins des contacts entre le sud-est de l’Angleterre
anglo-saxonne et la vallée de la Canche (VIe-VIIe s.).
Les productions céramiques médiévales de
La Calotterie (62).
Résumés.
ISSN : 1295-1315
ISBN : 979-10-93095-06-6
Sophie François
255
Jérémie Ketels
269
Cyrille Chaidron,
Sonja Willems
275
Jean Soulat avec la coll. de
Anne Bocquet-Lienard,
Xavier Savary
Anne Bocquet-Liénard,
Jean-Claude Routier
295
311
327
Prix : 45 Є