SPECIAL SECTION
BIOTROPICA 41(5): 532–534 2009
10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00574.x
Sharing Ecological Knowledge: Opportunities and Barriers to Uptake
Virginie Boreux, Julia Born
Ecosystem Management, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
and
Michael J. Lawes1
School for Environmental Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia
ABSTRACT
Conserving tropical ecosystems is one of the foremost challenges of the 21st century. Lately, conservation efforts have focused on advancing conservation through
dialogue and interaction with and among diverse stakeholders. Knowledge sharing, and specifically the transfer of scientific knowledge, can raise ecological awareness
among stakeholders and is necessary to facilitate dialogue, yet the communication of tropical scientific research to local stakeholders is rarely effectively implemented.
Such a communication gap potentially undermines the conservation and management of natural resources. The papers in this special section highlight the difficulties
and benefits of sharing ecological knowledge, as well as the underlying reasons for why a research–implementation gap has arisen.
Key words: communication; conservation practices; interdisciplinarity; knowledge transfer; local stakeholders; participatory research; peer-review system; research–
implementation gap.
IN ADDITION TO HARBOURING HIGH LEVELS OF BIODIVERSITY, tropical
ecosystems provide many services and goods crucial for both human and global wellbeing. Yet it is precisely this dependency by
human societies on, and their over-exploitation of, tropical ecosystem services and goods, that has caused the ongoing biodiversity
tragedy. Conserving biodiversity in the tropics is one of the foremost challenges of the 21st century, and it is as much about conserving indigenous cultures and their sustainable livelihoods
practices as it is about conserving tropical ecosystems (Bawa et al.
2004, Lovejoy 2009).
Despite a considerable body of scientific literature on resource use and the management and conservation of tropical environments, tropical deforestation continues at alarming rates
(Butler & Laurance 2008). The limited success of conservation
initiatives can be partly explained by researchers’ failure to adequately exchange knowledge and understanding with local communities in tropical regions. Even if the necessity of scientific
knowledge sharing is widely acknowledged, using it to increase
ecological awareness across a wide range of stakeholders is poorly
developed (du Toit et al. 2004), and indeed this deficiency has
been labeled the ‘research–implementation gap’ (Knight et al.
2008). This failure of communication may have also contributed
to society’s ignorance of the relevance of environmental degradation to human welfare. A research–implementation gap has been
recognized in other sectors, such as public health, but has been
adequately mitigated because the direct cost of communication
failure is high in these sectors (van Kerkhoff & Lebel 2006). In
Received 9 April 2009; revision accepted 6 July 2009.
1
Corresponding author; e-mail: michael.lawes@cdu.edu.au
532
ecology and conservation such failures in knowledge transfer hinder the translation of research outcomes into effective action, and
tackling this challenge should be a priority for ecological and conservation sciences in tropical environments.
Awareness of the research–implementation gap is growing,
and governments and funding agencies are increasingly demanding
verification of impact of scientific results in conservation and development sectors. Researchers are now expected to actively participate in the social discourse, take responsibility for their findings,
and share their knowledge with nonscientists as the first steps towards the appropriate application of knowledge (van Kerkhoff &
Lebel 2006). Integrating other kinds of knowledge into biological
research requires collaboration with other scientific disciplines, as
well as partnering with various stakeholders and civil society. Such
interdisciplinarity has proved challenging because of the difficulties
of communicating among disparate participants, but it is vital for
improving research relevance and the useful application of knowledge in meeting conservation objectives (Balmford & Bond 2005,
Balmford & Cowling 2006).
In this special section, authors discuss the difficulties and benefits of sharing knowledge, as well as the underlying reasons for the
research–implementation gap in tropical ecology and conservation
research. Understanding knowledge dissemination pathways is the
foundation for their improvement. What is the target audience of
scientific results? Are the communication pathways addressing this
audience? Are there suitable incentives to encourage the sharing of
knowledge, often after the research is completed? Shanley & López
(2009) discuss these concerns from the researcher’s perspective.
Currently, the scientific standing of researchers depends to a large
extent on the number of publications a scientist produces and the
r 2009 The Author(s)
Journal compilation r 2009 by The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation
SPECIAL SECTION
Introduction: Sharing Ecological Knowledge
impact factor of the journals in which articles are published, and
there is little recognition for transferring research findings to the
public domain. Lowman (2009) suggests that the ultimate aim of
research is, or at least should be, its useful application and implementation. In her article on canopy research, she highlights the
challenges associated with the need to create new metrics for gauging success in research.
The mitigation of increasingly complex human and environmental challenges requires effective collaboration among different
disciplines, such as the biological, social and political sciences (du
Toit et al. 2004, Balmford & Cowling 2006, Sunderland et al.
2009). Collaboration between ecologists and social scientists in
tropical environments is particularly beneficial to both science and
society, since humans and ecosystems are highly codependent in
tropical ecosystems. Are current research projects sufficiently interdisciplinary and aware of local realities to meet their conservation
goals? Do researchers communicate findings to local stakeholders,
who are usually the key decision makers, in such a way that decisions on resource use and conservation are made with the full benefit of research findings and acceptance from the stakeholders
involved? In addition, is conservation science open to valuable
feedback from practitioners who are tasked with implementing research results? Are we collaborating and assisting local tropical institutions and universities to tackle locally relevant complex
problems (Sunderland et al. 2009)?
Decisions on how to best manage natural resources and the
environment are often influenced by the costs and benefits of alternative land uses as perceived by different stakeholders. In most
of the tropics, local stakeholders’ livelihoods are closely associated
with the local ecosystems, and they are thus direct and ultimate
decision makers. Lovejoy (2009) highlights the importance of
sharing our knowledge with these stakeholders, who live in the
‘vicinity of our research’, because they have a very personal stake
and can be great advocates for conservation. Thus, partnering
with local communities and including their needs and interests in
research is crucial for conservation. A participatory approach is
advocated by several authors in this special section (Garnett et al.
2009, Kainer et al. 2009, Shackleton et al. 2009) to ensure research relevance in a social context. Participatory research encourages continued communication between scientists and
decision makers, which is needed for the acceptance and implementation of research findings and for transforming policy and
practice.
Kainer et al. (2009) reveals strategies for integrating local communities into the research process and sharing knowledge with
them. Shackleton et al. (2009) focus in particular on researchers
engaging with social learning processes through active participation. The aim is that learning through scientific processes will lead
to ongoing collective action and long-term changes on the ground.
Garnett et al. (2009) take a step further and present examples in
which community members were employed as coresearchers. The
particular benefit of the latter approach is that key individuals, who
could not otherwise participate because of other time and financial
constraints, are included in the research process giving them genuine influence over the research process.
533
Disseminating research results to a broad audience, handling
the demands of the various stakeholders without suppressing conservation issues, and establishing a partnership with local communities with the necessary respect and trust from both sides, are
three among many aspects that are critical to conducting research
in the tropics. Do scientists have the appropriate training to meet
this requirement for broad-based communication? Duchelle et al.
(2009) describe how graduate programs in tropical biology and
conservation can prepare the next generation of scientists with the
necessary education and skills for this challenge.
What is clear from all the contributions to this special section
is that it is high time for researchers to find ways to improve knowledge sharing for a sustainable future. The ball is in the researchers’
court.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This special section was inspired by the 2007 ATBC Annual Meeting (Morelia, Mexico) title ‘Linking tropical biology with human
dimensions’ and grew out of the symposia ‘Natural services in local
context: Opportunities and barriers to uptake’. We would like to
thank the symposium speakers, the authors, and many others who
contributed to shaping this issue, for sharing their insights and
knowledge with us. Their continued motivation and support made
this special section possible. We also would like to thank S. Krishnan, who organized the symposium with us. J. Ghazoul, H. Aslin
and L. P. Koh kindly reviewed this manuscript.
LITERATURE CITED
BALMFORD, A., AND R. M. COWLING. 2006. Fusion or failure? The future of
conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 20: 692–695.
BALMFORD, A., AND W. BOND. 2005. Trends in the state of nature and their
implications for human well-being. Ecol. Lett. 8: 1218–1234.
BAWA, K. S., W. J. KRESS, N. M. NADKARNI, AND S. LELE. 2004. Beyond paradise—Meeting the challenges in tropical biology in the 21st century.
Biotropica 36: 437–446.
BUTLER, R. A., AND W. F. LAURANCE. 2008. New strategies for conserving tropical forests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 469–472.
DUCHELLE, A. E., K. BIEDENWEG, C. LUCAS, A. VIRAPONGSE, J. RADACHOWSKY, D.
WOJCIK, M. LONDRES, W.-L. BARTELS, D. ALCIRA, AND K. A. KAINER.
2009. Graduate students and knowledge exchange with local stakeholders: Possibilities and preparation. Biotropica 41: 578–585.
DU TOIT, J. T., B. H. WALKER, AND B. M. CAMPBELL. 2004. Conserving
tropical nature: Current challenges for ecologists. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:
12–17.
GARNETT, S. T., G. M. CROWLEY, H. M. HUNTER-XENIE, W. KOZANAYI, B. SITHOLE, C. PALMER, R. SOUTHGATE, AND K. K. ZANDER. 2009. Transformative knowledge transfer through empowering and paying community
researchers. Biotropica 41: 571–577.
KAINER, K. A., M. DIGIANO, A. E. DUCHELLE, L. H. O. WADT, E. BRUNA, AND
J. L. DAIN. 2009. Partnering for greater success: Local stakeholders
and research in tropical biology and conservation. Biotropica 41:
555–562.
KNIGHT, A. T., R. M. COWLING, M. ROUGET, A. BALMFORD, A. T. LOMBARD, AND
B. M. CAMPBELL. 2008. Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conserv. Biol. 22:
610–617.
SPECIAL SECTION
534
Boreux, Born, and Lawes
LOVEJOY, T.E. 2009. Responsibilities of twenty-first century scientists.
Biotropica 41: 531.
LOWMAN, M. 2009. Canopy walkways for conservation—a tropical biologist’s
panacea or fuzzy metrics to justify ecotourism. Biotropica 41:
545–548.
SHACKLETON, C. M., G. CUNDILL, AND A. T. KNIGHT. 2009. Beyond just research: Experiences from Southern Africa in developing social learning
partnerships for resource conservation initiatives. Biotropica 41:
563–570.
View publication stats
SHANLEY, P., AND C. LÓPEZ. 2009. Out of the loop: Why research rarely reaches
policy makers and the public – and what can be done. Biotropica 41:
535–544.
SUNDERLAND, T., J. SUNDERLAND-GROVES, P. SHANLEY, AND B. CAMPBELL. 2009.
Bridging the gap: How can information access and exchange between
conservation biologists and field practitioners be improved for better conservation outcomes? Biotropica 41: 549–554.
VAN KERKHOFF, L., AND L. LEBEL. 2006. Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Ann. Rev. Env. Res. 31: 445–477.