Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
The Medieval Review 2000 <http://www.hti.umich.edu/t/tmr/>. 00.10.02.
John Scottus Eriugena: Treatise on Divine Predestination. trans. Mary Brennan, with an introduction to the English translation by Avital Wohlman. University of Notre Dame Press, 1998. The Medieval Review 2000 <http://www.hti.umich.edu/t/tmr/>. 00.10.02
Brill, 2020
This essay provides an overview of the doctrine of predestination in the Early Church, demonstrating that Origen and Augustine represent two major but contrasting trajectories, but also that eastern and western versions of the doctrine do not neatly fall into line behind these two thinkers. The essay analyzes sources and analogs for early Christian views in Judaism, Gnosticism, and the Christian Scriptures. It discusses Greek views of predestination, arguing that many thinkers, despite common expectations to the contrary, developed the doctrine positively. The essay analyzes the treatment of predestination in Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp of Smyrna, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus of Lyons, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Gregory of Nazianzus, John Chrysostom, Cyril of Alexandria, and John of Damascus. The essay also assesses Latin views of predestination, including the following figures: Tertullian, Hilary of Poitiers, Ambrose of Milan, Ambrosiaster, Jerome, Augustine, John Cassian, Faustus of Riez, Prosper of Aquitaine, Fulgentius of Ruspe, Caesarius of Arles, Leo the Great, and Boethius. The essay then considers reception of early Christian accounts of predestination in the medieval and early modern periods, ending with Karl Barth. In sum, the essay shows that the doctrine of predestination was far from latent outside of Augustine and the Reformation. Leading theologians addressed the theme in both East and West and saw it as an integral to the core of Christian belief. The essay also provides a historiography and bibliography on predestination in the Early Church.
Thomism and Predestination, 2017
My essay contributing to the volume Thomism and Predstination: Principles and Disputations, ed. by myself, Prof. Roger Nutt, and Fr. Thomas Joseph White, O.P.
This was the third installment of my history of the Catholic doctrine of predestination.
2021
Explores the views of Augustine and the Reformers Luther and Calvin on the subject of predestination.
My book contains the most detailed history of the controversy de auxiliis in the English language.
Roczniki Filozoficzne, 2017
Conference paper for Philosophy conference 2010
Oped News, 2010
The kind of approach to the subject of divine will and human freedom that dominates the religious outlook (belief system) of Muslims is that major events such as life, death, livelihood, etc., if not all that happens, are divinely preordained, fixed, and inevitable — i.e., unalterable by human effort. Such a belief is encouraged by the Hadith literature and the opinions of some Muslim theologians. However, the Quran does not support this belief. This article demonstrates, in light of the Quran, that this idea is a major misconception. The Quran strongly upholds human freedom, responsibility, and accountability. Destiny, of course, plays a part in human life. But that part often gets overemphasized to the virtual exclusion of human freedom. The truth is, as it has been throughout the history of human civilization, that man is largely the architect of his own destiny. If that is not the case, the whole foundation of religion falls apart.
2020
Contemporary conversations over the relationship between divine election and whether a person can lose his or her salvation often consider the unconditional or conditional nature of God’s predestination of individuals. A neglected element of this conversation, with strong historical precedence in scholastic approaches to the doctrine and which is only recently being recovered, concerns the relationship between God’s knowledge and will. This study examines the question of the irrevocable nature of salvation, arguing that greater clarity concerning what divides various positions is to be found in consideration of the divine knowledge and will dialectic. How one understands the way in which what God knows is determined by what God wills dictates the contours of how one approaches election, its conditionality, and whether it can be lost. This study therefore considers the relationship of God’s knowledge to his will in historical Calvinist, Arminian, and Molinist conceptions to conclude that in its approach to this dialectic Arminianism possesses problematic features towards the development of a consistent basis for assurance of salvation that the other two views do not possess.
Basta de Silencio, 2024
Robertson and Tang (eds), The Goals of Private Law , 2009
International education studies, 2024
Geovanni Prima Putra Pasulu, 20
Journal of Consumer Health On the Internet, 2008
IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 2015
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2018
Développement Humain, Handicap et Changement Social
Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work