Conflicting memories and
mutual representations: Italy
and Albania since 1989
by Luisa Chiodi - Rando Devole
Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso
Occasional Paper
January 2006
www.balcanicaucaso.org
OBC occasional paper - 2
Contents
Abstract....................................................................................................3
The background ........................................................................................3
The Cold War ............................................................................................4
The first few years: la mémoire retrouvée?....................................................8
Mutual representation after 1997................................................................11
References .............................................................................................17
OBC occasional paper - 3
Abstract1
This paper explores transformations of collective memories surrounding
Italian colonialist policies in Albania during the first part of the 20th century. It
does so looking at how the relationship between collective memories and mutual
representations formed in both Italy and Albania before and after the Cold War.
This paper aims to illustrate how public representations of Italian involvement in
Albania in both countries largely converged with the end of Italian imperialism
and argues why this is significant. This research draws on both existing literature
and various primary sources, including schoolbooks and mass media.
The background
Italian-Albanian relations in the first part of the century were shaped by
Italian imperialist drives. Rome played an active role in supporting the creation of
the Albanian state in 1912 for its own strategic political reasons and it occupied
the neighboring country during the First World War. In 1920, Giolitti’s government
confirmed its imperial project in the region but was forced to withdraw from the
Albanian southern port city of Vlore, a hold that Italy had intended to retain, due
to social unrest at home.
When Italy's Fascist government came to power, Italy gradually reestablished
its grip on Albania, establishing it as an informal protectorate that later gained full
protectorate status. During the ‘30s, Rome established near full control over the
Albanian economy, its foreign policy, and military matters. As a consequence,
Tirana stood little chance of spurring Rome when Mussolini decided to occupy the
country in 1939, declaring Albania part of the Italian Kingdom. Despite these
1 The
paper
was
first
presented
at the
conference
Conflicting
memories and
mutual
representations: Italy and the Balkans since 1989', Kingston University, London, UK, 4-5 June
2003
OBC occasional paper - 4
circumstances, Albania avoided bloodshed and even the later German occupation
of Albania, according to Fischer, was, generally speaking, a ‘benign’ occupation as
Hitler considered Albania ‘to be the last wild corner of Europe and Albanians as a
vital warrior mountain race’ (Fischer 2002b: 134). Furthermore, during the Axis
occupation of Albania, Tirana gained control for a few months of almost all
Albanian-populated areas in neighboring countries, thereby, for a short time,
realizing the national dream of a Great Albania.
In 1943, with Italy's signing of the armistice with the Allies, disbanded Italian
soldiers in Albania, like disbanded Italian soldiers elsewhere, either deserted the
army, were taken as war-prisoners by the Germans, or joined the new NaziFascist alliance. Fugitive soldiers were often protected by Albanian families and,
on occasion, joined the Albanian partisans in the fight for national liberation.
Albanian communist partisans, with Allied logistic and material support, liberated
Albania in 1944 and quickly took control of the country.
The Cold War
In Italy, the political coalition that brought the country out of the Second
World War built the Italian Republic around its democratic constitution, reshaping
national identity around the values of the anti-Fascist liberation movement. Public
memories that contrasted with the country's new identity were marginalized and,
in some cases, transformed, as was the case with Italian colonial experiments, or
suppressed, such as with the crimes against humanity committed by Italian
officials during the country's various military campaigns. As pointed out by
historians of Italian colonialism, the dominant anti-Fascist public collective
memory left no space for a critical review of colonialism. Instead, a reassuring
narrative of the Italian soldier, who was never brave but had a human face,
replaced the memories of Italian expansionist policies in the region. While
imperial justifications minimized Italy's colonial role in Albania, that country's
OBC occasional paper - 5
experience was nonetheless narrated from the angle of individual experiences of
the tragedy of war.
Interestingly, among the most famous book of the genre
recalling the tragedies of Italian soldiers during World War II was Rigoni Stern’s
Quota Albania (1971).
The take-over of the communist regime in postwar Albania broke the close
relationship between the two sides of the Adriatic for the second time since the
Ottoman conquest of Albania. The iron curtain became, in the Albanian case,
almost impenetrable and Enver Hoxha’s fight against revisionism only deepened
Albania's isolation further. The Hoxha regime's faithfulness to Stalinism meant
that, generally speaking, Albania did not represent an interesting political
laboratory for the Italian left. This only contributed to Albania's isolationist drift.
While Yugoslavia always found supporters in Italy, only small groups of Italian
Marxist-Leninists maintained connections with Albania.
Eventually, not only Italian memory of colonialism in Albania but the
neighboring
country
itself
gradually
disappeared
from
Italian
collective
representations. Only the Albanian-Italian minority, the Arbëresh, kept hold of
some ties with the other side of the Adriatic, mainly for its own genealogical
purposes, by participating in common cultural initiatives such as congresses on
the Albanian language. In fact, by the time of the regime change in Albania in
1991, Italian public opinion had almost completely forgotten the neighboring
country.
At the institutional level, Italy had almost no foreign policy towards Albania.
Only during the '80s did Italy eventually make some efforts to undermine the
Hoxha regime, but these were weaker than those of other western countries.
While Italian TV came to have an important role in Albania only circumstantially,
for years American, British, and German efforts engaged in informational
campaigns in Albania with the broadcasting of media programs such as Radio
Free Europe, BBC Albanian service, Deutsche Welle and the like with an aim at
undermining the communist regime.
OBC occasional paper - 6
As for Albania, there too the memory of the glorious national liberation war
from Axis power occupation became central after 1945. However, the creation of
an official narrative around this memory was shaped to serve the interests of the
new authoritarian regime. Memories that differed from the one imposed by the
national-communist regime were violently suppressed, just as those who
referenced these divergent memories – Albania's monarchists and republic
nationalists - were also physically repressed. In this way, personal memories that
contrasted with the official historical reconstruction were censored in the public
sphere and, even in the private realm, they could only be articulated with
extreme caution.
Albania's tragic experience of Italian expansionism before and after World
War II constituted the only encounter with Italy that most Albanians ever had.
Besides the direct experience of war and the Italian occupation, Albanians,
a
majority of whom in the 1950s were illiterate, acquired their knowledge of
“capitalist” Italy through the newly-introduced universal school system that,
under highly ideological schemes, allowed for widespread literacy for the first
time.
In this context, the narrative of Albanian heroic resistance against NaziFascists was perpetuated throughout the decades with minor transformations.
This narrative formed the topos of Albanian historiography which, emphatically
presented to every Albanian student for decades, was also reiterated in literature.
Kadare, the most eminent contemporary Albanian writer, helped keep alive, at
home as well as abroad, the memory of both the Second World War and Italian
expansionism and their impact on Albania with two stunning novels: the Chronicle
in Stone (1971) and The General of the Dead Army (1980). The refined prose of
the first book narrates, through the eyes of a child, the experience of war and
foreign occupation. The later book's celebration of generous and heroic Albanian
hospitality towards Italian defectors during WWII had even more resonance and
its plot was adapted to an acclaimed Albanian film.
OBC occasional paper - 7
During Hoxha’s regime, the Italian Fascist-era occupation's re-unification of
Albania with Kosovo
was generally not mentioned and, in certain cases, was
interpreted as a fascist strategy to deceive the Albanian people. Ultimately, other
than superficial rhetoric about Albanian “brothers” living outside the motherland,
Enver Hoxha never substantially questioned the status quo concerning the
borders of the country.
Among the representatives of the Albanian elite who joined the communist
struggle for national emancipation against imperial powers, many had spent time
in Italy for training, education, or business purposes during the inter-war period.
However, the great majority of the Albanian population had to wait until the early
Eighties to get any information about the neighboring country of Italy. It was
then, when fatigue
and disaffection towards the failed promises of the
revolutionary project had grown uncontainable, that Italian public television came
to constitute Albania's most important window to that forbidden, external world.
At that point, even the most rudimentary antenna allowed everyone to access this
alternative source of information and transformed Italy into a symbol of freedom
from oppression and poverty. Italian TV images of a prosperity unknown to
Albanians appeared at a time when Albania was facing a devastating economic
crisis and, at the beginning of the Nineties, made the regime's narrative of the
“misery of capitalism” seem like a terrible farce.
Even though what had become the paranoid rhetoric of foreign siege had an
historical rationale, Albanians' experience of oppression at home discredited in
their eyes any state propaganda about danger from neighbors. In any case, the
“capitalist enemy” of Albanian patriots turned out to be the people’s own
aspirations. It was Italy, in particular, that acquired a connotation opposite to the
one proposed by the regime: it came to be seen as the promised future. There
were high expectations for help from Italy. Albanians believed that as much as
Albanians had assisted Italians during the war, Italians would surely return the
favor.
This
expectation
met
with
eventual
disappointment
and
Western
OBC occasional paper - 8
governments, who had promised unconditional support to Albania in the time of
Hoxha, were forgotten as soon as the communist Hoxha regime collapsed.
The first few years: la mémoire retrouvée?
In 1990, as most Italians had forgotten Albania and their ‘common’ past,
Italians were totally unprepared for the disintegration of the Hoxha regime in
Albania.
The first refugee flows into Italy that resulted from Albania's regime
disintegration crystallized collective representations of Albanians in Italy. Initially,
Italian citizens mobilized to provide help to the newcomers as the images of
desperate ‘boat-people’ escaping the regime dominated the media. At the level of
foreign policy, the “Pellicano Operation” was organized to provide emergency aid
during the winter of 1990/1991.
Once the regime had collapsed in the Balkan country and after a long period
of isolation, people were finally granted freedom of movement and the situation in
Albania changed radically. At that point, Albanians in Italy were downgraded from
refugee status to economic migrant status. How things would evolve was made
clear in Bari during the summer 1991 when an infamous episode of mass forced
repatriation of Albanians to Albania took place after some days of detention in the
city stadium. Solidarity towards Albanians in Italy seemed unlikely after that. On
the contrary, as described by Vehbiu and Devole (1996), Albanians came to
constitute the first source of fear among Italians. They became synonymous with
violence, brutality, ignorance, and backwardness in Italian public perception.
At this point, the old refrain of Albania as “the unknown” mingled with
narratives representing its citizens as the real “other” and newly-formed
prejudices consolidated in the Italian public opinion. As Italy lacked a memory of
its neighbor, public representations of Albanians easily became representations of
needy but highly unwelcome people. Italians, on the other hand, were largely
represented as generously responding to the emergency, but substantially
OBC occasional paper - 9
menaced by these ‘uncontrolled’ flows of people. Various publications on Albania
and its inhabitants played to these two ideas: they focused on the aid that was
being provided to Albanians while aiming to depict the reasons why Albanians
were so attracted to Italy. The end result was a montage of the naiveté and
primitivism of the Albanian Other.
At the political level in Albania, a right-win coalition, dominated by the
Democratic Party (DP) of Sali Berisha came to power in 1992. The political climate
in the aftermath of the collapse of the Hoxha regime, after years of devastating
oppression, was very tense. For a while, a sort of anti-communist witch-hunt was
conducted by the new political powers towards internal enemies responsible for
the past “tragedy of the nation”. Together with other small parties, although
divided between pro and anti-monarchists, the DP did make use of nationalist
rhetoric in relation with the Kosovo issue and toward Greece. Berisha’s foreign
policy was a rather eclectic one: sometimes he played the “Islamist” card,
occasionally the nationalist card, and often the “friend-of-the-west” card. Italy, in
this context, was always presented as an important ally without referencing
Italy's past domination of Albania. At any rate, the DP-lead government held good
relations with Italian emissaries, even if it always privileged contacts with the
USA.
With the collapse of the regime in Albania, it was finally possible to rethink
the past free from influence of dogmatism and police control. This gave space to
the articulation of private memories. However, academic circles in the country
were heavily hit by the hardship of the economic transformations and had limited
space for new scholarly research. It was rather the Albanian émigré community,
generally speaking a carrier of nationalist ideology, that contributed most to the
new market in books and literature on Albania. In reviewing the communist
historiography, new books on national history remained focused on political
history and international relations, adding a new nationalist perspective.
At home, almost only mass media occupied the space of historiographical
OBC occasional paper - 10
discussions and, in this framework, the republican nationalist Balli Kombëtar’s
cooperation with the Axis powers and King Zog’s alliance with Rome occasionally
were re-evaluated. In this context, however, a review of the Italian-Fascist
occupation of Albania was not undertaken. Revising the King Zog figure,
negatively depicted by the communist regime, aimed instead at underlining his
patriotism and engagement against the Italian-Fascist occupation.
After the fall of the Hoxha regime, the story of Albanians providing help to
Italians after the capitulation of the Italian military in 1943 was also revived. The
first wave of Albanians migrating to Italy carried with them the stories of Albanian
farmers giving shelter to Italian soldiers fleeing from Nazi forces. The invocation
of these stories probably not only revealed Albanian expectations in the first
years after the collapse of the regime, but was probably also an attempt to
interpret the initial welcome of the Italian people as reciprocation for Albanian
hospitality almost five decades earlier. However, as mentioned above, Italian
hospitality was short-lived and here there was no collective memory of the unpleasant
involving Italian soldiers in Albania so many years before.
There was no reference to the Italian role in the construction of Great
Albania on the part of the Albanian communist regime, but after the regime's
collapse,
Albanian
consequences
of
history
Albania's
textbooks
began
then-re-unification
to
emphasize
with
the
the
other
positive
Albanian
communities. Having said that, it should be noted that no social movement of a
nationalist nature appeared in the Albanian public sphere. In this, Albania is
certainly an exception in the political developments of the region during the
Nineties. Besides Berisha’s verbal declarations about Kosovo’s national fight and
some political support to the neighboring province’s leaders, there was media
attention to the issue but no politically concrete engagement. Austerity and
sacrifices in the name of the nation were issues of the past. Now, Albanians were
mainly concerned with improving living standards, enjoying a personal dimension
of freedom from police control, and getting a taste of once-forbidden consumer
OBC occasional paper - 11
culture.
Italy incarnated the model of the Western quality of life and its stereotypical
features were imitated. New boutiques in Tirana used Italian names in their
marketing strategies with a bar in central Tirana even opening with the name
‘Berlusconi’. Italian food became fashionable in the new night life of the capital
city. Italy was no longer the imagined paradise of the years before, it was simply
considered a wealthier and technologically more advanced country that had
already reached a lifestyle that Albanians strived for. For those that experienced
migration, the ‘Italian myth’ had left space for a new awareness of the hardship of
the migrant experience, yet it was still a necessary one for many.
While during these years most Albanian immigrants in Italy faced the
hardship of integrating into the Italian economy, a few found considerable sources
of income in the new market of illegal trafficking. This opportunity generated new
representations of Italy as the country whose system had loopholes to be
exploited and offered the opportunity to get rich quick. Car smuggling, speedy
boat service for aspiring migrants, and even human trafficking boomed in the
Nineties. Albania's relationship with its affluent neighbor generated images of a
new potential Eldorado for those who had the courage to risk a life ‘out of
legality’. The implication of such a context has been socially disruptive in many
areas of the country heavily hit by economic transformation. Many destitute areas
in the country were targeted by various kind of illegal trafficking and some places,
such as the southern port of Vlora, saw much of their economies growing around
the informal sector.
Mutual representation after 1997
In Italy, political and military engagement with Albania's second major crisis
in 1997 was conceived as a burden that the country had to face. The center-left
wing government presented its choice to intervene as an assumption of
OBC occasional paper - 12
responsibility and gained widespread political consensus in favor of a military
operation. In the media, a common complaint was that Italy had been abandoned
by its European partners and that the EU had once more shown its failure to
formulate a common foreign policy. A ‘coalition of the willing’ was set up and
“Operazione Alba” was undertaken after a UN resolution endorsed it. Once it was
over, it was interpreted with general satisfaction as an accomplishment of a new
Italian foreign policy. Italy's imperialist past was barely recognized in public
debates as the democratic Italian Republic had rejected its connection with
previous historical experiences. Instead, after the first Albanian refugees reached
Italian coasts in 1997, a new invasion paranoia dominated the Italian media.
Italian television, broadly viewed in Albania as well, this time broadcast clear
messages of rejection to Albanian migrants during the whole crisis.
Italy's oblivion of the past, and/or dis-association from it, was manifest in
Italian public representations of policy-making towards Albania. It was rather on
the occasion of the third military operation carried out by Italy in Albania in the
framework of the NATO war on Yugoslavia in 1999 that some Italians protested
against military intervention. Demonstrators pointed at
Italy's violation of an
article in the Italian republican constitution that refers to the ‘repudiation of war
as a tool to solve international disputes’, one of the pillars of anti-Fascist Italian
democracy. By and large, they did not point to the history of Italian relations with
Albania nor did they establish a clear historical connection between present and
past foreign policy-making.
Conversely, supporters of the NATO intervention argued that it had a
humanitarian character and that it was compatible with a generous, just, and
democratic Europe. The European public's exaltation of its own magnanimity,
according to Pandolfi (2002), shaped the new relationship that the West
entertained towards the Balkans after the Cold War and should be regarded as a
‘supra-colonial project’. Thanks to hundred of stories in the national media, the
‘Missione Arcobaleno’, the Italian humanitarian aid delivered to Kosovar refugees
OBC occasional paper - 13
who fled Kosovo during the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, was presented as
if it covered almost the entire burden of assistance of the 500,000 refugees to
Albania. In fact, almost 80 percent of Kosovar refugees were hosted by Albanian
families on a voluntary basis without external assistance.
One should consider that Italian policy-making towards Albania has been
predominantly of a crisis-management kind. The Italian fear of Albanian migration
flows can serve as the main lens through which to analyze most of Italy's official
initiatives
there.
Not
by
chance,
the
most
widespread
Italian
collective
representations of Albanians during the Nineties were related to their nature as
migrants. But from the summer of 1998 onwards, Italian national papers were
forced to make a detour from coverage as usual. As Italy was involved in the
NATO war, Italian papers reported that Italy had intervened to save those
‘wretched and harmless refugees’ that, just a few weeks before, had been
presented as ‘dangerous immigrants’ menacing Italian coasts. Immigrants were
mostly called Kosovars and not Albanians in order to further distinguish between
them. Media representations of Albanian refugees from Kosovo had changed,
together with Italian policy towards Yugoslavia. In any case, at that point as
much as in 1997, the main reason for Italian support for relief operations was to
help Albanians to remain at home. As long as Albanians did not cross the sea, the
majority of Italians were happy to show solidarity with Albania in the framework
of the contested Operazione Arcobaleno.
Becoming objects of constant negative stereotyping has been humiliating for
Albanians abroad and at home. The experience of mis-recognition, however, did
not entail denunciation of presumed Italian neo-colonial projects. Today, the
Albanian public opinion, of its two most important EU neighbors –Greece and
Italy- generally fears the former more then the latter. Italy constitutes a problem
in as far as it does not allow the free movement of Albanian citizens and its public
opinion generally displays racist attitudes toward Albanians.
Greece contributes
to this by instituting policies such as sudden collective massive expulsions of
OBC occasional paper - 14
Albanians. Greek public opinion is fairly uniform in arguing that southern Albania
is nothing other than North Epirus and that all Albanian Orthodox are actually
Greek.
Even if Italians no longer question Albania's territorial independence, they
are nonetheless frequently reproached by Albanians for their ‘scandalous
ignorance’ of their neighbor’s context. In contrast, the Albanian public sphere
takes a strong interest in its neighboring countries and its media provides
meticulous accounts of the position of their governments on Albanian issues. The
media also often frequently comments on the pro-Greek or pro-Italian affiliation
of the main Albanian political representatives.
The Italian trend of maliciously ignoring the reality of its neighboring country
and deliberately humiliating it with negative portrayals has only one exception:
the film Lamerica by Gianni Amelio. The film constituted a rare example of
questioning the ‘otherness’ of Albanian migrants in Italy by intertwining the
history of the two countries, highlighting their common experiences of migration,
and recalling the Fascist invasion of Albania. The film also highlights the predatory
nature of Italian businesses in Albania in the post-communist context. However,
due to film's glim depiction of an impoverished Albania in the months following
the collapse of Albania's Hoxha regime, director Amelio’s portrayal of Albania was
perceived as insulting in Albania. The film-maker, in his book chronicling the
experience with the film and its reception in the country, explains how he realized
later the extent to which, contrary to his intentions to problematize the Italian
gaze of Albania, the film could represent a new invasion of Albania (Amelio 1994).
The
Italian
national
media
has
recently
down-toned
its
negative
representation of Albania and Albanian migrants to Italy. Some newspapers in
Tirana expressed a certain optimism concerning this transformation of the image
of the Albanians in Italy, underling that, on Italian TV, some Albanian characters
were gaining popularity. On the other hand, the positive image Italy enjoyed in
Albania as the first-choice destination for emigration in 1992 has slightly changed.
OBC occasional paper - 15
In 1999, Italy ranked only third as an emigration destination as most Albanians
stated a greater preference to emigrate to the USA or Canada.
In Albania, the impact of the devastating experience of 1997 encouraged the
emergence of ‘anti-nationalist’ narratives. As Albania's historic experience of
independence
had
been
catastrophic
after
1945,
and
afterwards,
the
transformation into a capitalist country a difficult one, the newly-elected prime
minister in 1997, Fatos Nano, publicly commented on the possible eventuality of
Albania
becoming
an
Italian
protectorate.
Violent
debates
followed
his
declarations but, judging from the number of people who fled Albania that year,
Nano's 1997 comments might be interpreted as reflecting a new, widespread
feeling of hopelessness among Albanians regarding the country's future.
In the Albanian political sphere, it has been the Democratic Party (DP) of Sali
Berisha to incarnate the populist wing. Their socialists have redesigned their
image as a technocratic modern left whose communist past should be forgotten
since they were the only ones who could bring the country back on track. Since
the 1997 crisis, the already-limited sovereignty of the country has further
declined and the socialists have had no reason whatsoever to come up with
strong nationalist rhetoric as they have been in need of Western financial and
political support. During an interview conducted by one of the paper's authors, a
high-ranking representative of the Socialist Party in power commented that
Italians left many positive signs of their presence in Albania: ‘look at the
architecture of Tirana, the best buildings were built by Italians’. Whether the
comment was made for reasons of captation benevolentiae or rather out of
sincere convictions or both, what this reveals is that the collective memory of
repeated Italian menaces to Albanian national sovereignty did not bring about an
explicit
condemnation of Italy's colonial past, at least no longer by those
currently in power.
According to Vehbiu (2003) Albanian public opinion is fuzzy in regard to the
period of the Italian-Fascist domination of Albania. This period is identified with
OBC occasional paper - 16
the years of occupation (1939-1943) even though this constitutes only the last
phase of the Italian-Fascist presence in Albania. In a sort of revisionist wave,
many in Albania underline the economic progress experienced by the country
under Italian hegemony. In this respect, Vehbiu, in the columns of the Albanian
weakly Java, recalled that reforms which occurred under Italian control cannot
not be analyzed without considering Mussolini's expansionist aims in the region.
In Vehbiu’s view, Albanian public opinion's widespread appreciation of the years of
Italian-Fascist domination is a sign of the regression of the Albanian collective
conscience.
After 1999, EU policy towards Albania has become a concrete though
demanding possibility. The EU project holds the aura of a promise, not only of
prosperity but also of security from regional hegemonic projects. At this point,
Albania's relationship with Italy has become a priority. Broad support for the
European project in Albania
is accompanied by the widespread belief that the
way to the European Union passes through Rome. Political alliances with the
neighboring power no longer follow ideological affiliation, as evidenced by the
Albanian
socialist-led
government's
enthusiasm
for
cooperation
with
the
Berlusconi-led Italian government since 2002. Nor has Rome’s engagement in
support of Albanian EU membership changed with the election of a right-wing
government.
The post-Cold War context shaped memories and mutual representations of
the two polities in different ways. The triumphal rhetoric of the Cold War winners
affected the Italian public capacity for self-reflection. Not much emerged in the
post-Cold War Italian public sphere's perceptions of Albania other than selfidentification as the country's savior and a fear of foreign menaces. As for the
Albanian public sphere, the devastating experiences of the past and the hardships
of the post-communist transformation dulled the opportunities offered by the
recent the opening up of the country's public sphere. Building a space for rethinking the past and imagining a common future for Albania and Italy beyond
OBC occasional paper - 17
hegemonic relations and drives to control remains a challenge that will hopefully
be confronted in the near future.
References
Amelio G., Lamerica. Film e storia del film, Torino, Einaudi, 1994.
Barjaba K., Ondate senza ritorno, Roma: OIM, 2002.
Blumi I., “The Commodification of Otherness and the Ethnic Unit in the Balkans.
How to Think About Albanians”, East European Politics and Societies, vol. 2,
n.3/Fall, pp.527-569, 1998.
Brossat A., Combe S. et al., (prefaced by Le Goff J.), À l’Est la mémoire
retrouvée, Paris, Éditions La Découverte, 1990.
Champseix J-P. & É., 57, boulevard Staline, Paris, La Découverte, 1990.
Chossudovsky M., “The Criminalization of Albania”, in Tariq A, (ed. by), Master of
the Universe? NATO's Bakan Crusade, London/New York, Verso, pp. 285316, 2000.
De Guttry A. & Pagani F., La crisi albanese del 1997, Milano, Franco Angeli, 1999.
Devole R., “La campagna d'Albania dei media italiani”, Limes, vol. 3, pp. 303-310,
1997.
Eichberg F., Il fascio littorio e l'aquila di Skanderbeg. Italia e Albania 1939-1945,
Roma, APES, 1997.
Ethnobarometer , “Albanian Immigration to Italy. A “Criminal” Invasion?”, Working
Paper n.1, October 1997, CCS-ERCOMER.
Fischer B. J., “Perception and Reality in Twentieth-Century Albanian Military
Prowess”, in Albanian Identities. Myth and History, ed. Stephanie
Schwander-Sievers and Bernd J. Fisher, London, Hurst, 2002b, pp. 134-142.
Fischer B. J., Albania at War 1939-1945, London, Hurst, 2002.
Fischer, B. J. ‘Italian Policy in Albania. 1894-1943’ Balkan Studies, v.26, n.1,
OBC occasional paper - 18
1985.
Historia e popullit shqiptar [History of Albanian people], Tirana, 1994.
Historia e popullit shqiptar [History of Albanian people], Tirana, Shblsh, 1999.
Historia e Shqipërisë [History of Albania], Tirana, Shtëpia botuese e librit shkollor,
1974.
Iordanova D., Cinema of Flames. Balkan Film, Culture and the Media London,
British Film Institute, 2001.
Kadaré I., Gjenerali i ushtrisë së vdekur, (Tirana: Naim Frashëri, 1980 iv
publication); Engl. transl.: The General of the Dead Army, London, Harvill
Press, 2000.
Kadare I., Kronikë në gur [Chronicle in Stone], Tirana, Naim Frashëri, 1971.
Kaloçi D., “Ja si i pritëm dhe i mbajtëm me bukë 11 mijë ushtarë italianë” [Here
as we welcomed and fed 11 thousand Italian soldiers], Gazeta Shqiptare,
Dossier, 27 November 2002.
Kaloçi D., “Ja si luftuan italianët në radhët partizane” [Here as Italians have
fought in the ranks of partisans], Gazeta Shqiptare, Dossier, 26 November
2002.
Kola, P., The Search for Greater Albania, London, Hurst & Co, 2003.
Korrieri “Zogu I: Si do ta mbroja Shqipërinë në 7 prill 1939” [As I would have
defended Albania on 7th of April 1939], 17 January 2003.
Limes Rivista Italiana di Geopolitica, Albania emergenza Italiana, Quaderni
Speciali 1/1997.
Lubonja F., “Albania: protettorato o stato sovrano?”, Koha Ditore, 22 January
(trad. it., Notizie Est, n.171, http://www.ecn.org/est/balcani) 1999.
Lubonja F., ‘Between the Glory of a Virtual World and the Misery of a Real World’,
Schwander-Sievers S. and Fisher B. J. Fisher ed., Albanian Identities. Myth
and History, London, Hurst, 2002.
Marini B., Albania oggi. Testimonianza di un giornalista, Rocca San Casciano,
Cappelli editore, 1964.
Meidani R., ‘Edhe njëherë mbi lëvizjen e lirë’, [Once again on freedom of
OBC occasional paper - 19
movement] Shekulli, 9 September 2002.
Montanelli I., Albania una e mille, G. B. Paravia, Torino, 1939.
Nicholson B., “Albanian society between the wars: a working bibliography”, Centre
for Scandinavian Studies Papers, n. 4, 1999.
Pandolfi M., “Myth and New Forms of Governance in Albania”, in SchwanderSievers S. & Fisher B. J., (ed. by), Albanian Identities. Myth and History,
ed., London, Hurst, pp. 203-114, 2002.
R Pollo S. & Puto A., The History of Albania: From its Origins to the Present Day
London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.
Resta P., Un popolo in cammino. Migrazioni albanesi in Italia, Besa, Lecce, 1996.
RFE/RL, ‘Albania: Nano Proposes Albania Be An Italian Protectorate’, Tirana, 11
December 1997,
http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/1997/12/F.RU.971211150922.html
Rodogno D., Il nuovo ordine mediterraneo, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri 2003.
Romano O., L'Albania nell'era televisiva. Le vie della demodernizzazione, Torino,
L'Harmattan Italia, 1999.
Rosselli A., Italia e Albania: relazioni finanziarie nel ventennio fascista, Bologna, Il
Mulino, 1986.
Schmidt F., “Albania’s Post-Communist Literary Deluge”, Transition, 10 January,
p.30, 1997.
Schwander-Sievers S. & Fisher B. J., (ed. by), Albanian Identities. Myth and
History, ed., London, Hurst, 2002.
Shkupi S., ‘A protectorate for Albania’, AIM, 26 February, 1999
Standish A. M. J., “Enver Hoxha's Role in the Development of Socialist Albanian
Myths ”, Schwander-Sievers S. & Fisher B. J., (ed. by), Albanian Identities.
Myth and History, ed., London, Hurst, pp.115-124, 2002.
Tessaro J., “«Siamo gli ex cattivi». La comunità albanese del vicentino dopo l’11
settembre 2001”, Migranews.net SPECIALI/Inchieste: 05/05/2003,
http://www.migranews.net/ultima2.asp?sottocategoria=Inchieste
Todorova M., Imagining the Balkans, New York, Oxford University Press, 1997.
OBC occasional paper - 20
Ushtelenca I., (1997), Diplomacia e Mbretit Zogu I-re (1912-1939), Tirana, Ermir,
1997.
Vehbiu A. and Devole R., La scoperta dell'Albania. Gli albanesi secondo i mass
media, Milano, Paoline, 1996.
Vehbiu A., “Fashizmi i rivështruar” [The revised fascism], Java, n. 37, 20 February
2003.
Luisa Chiodi – phd researcher in Social and Political
Science at the European University Institute (Florence).
From 2003 contract professor at the Faculty of Political
Science at the University of Bologna where she teaches
“Eastern European studies.” Her research interests focus
on civil society and the transnational social dynamics of
post-communism. Previously she carried out assignments
for international organizations such as the OCSE, the World
Bank and for international NGOs in the Balkans.
Rando Devole - is a sosocial scientist, translator and
journalist. He has studied in Rome and graduated from
Literature and Social Sciences university. He is the author,
among other works, of "La scoperta dell'Albania. Gli
albanesi secondo i mass media" (Ed. Paoline, 1996; with
Ardian Vehbiu) and "Albania. Fenomeni sociali e
rappresentazioni" (Agrilavoro, 1998). He conducts research
activities for various institutes and publishes articles in
Italian and Albanian newspapers. For his commitment in
favour of the emigrants, the President of the Republic of
Italy has conferred on him the title of honour
"Commendatore dell'Ordine della Stella della Solidariete
Italiana".
OBC occasional paper - 21
Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso (OBC)
Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso (OBC) is an online news provider and
research centre devoted to social and political change in South-East Europe,
Turkey and the Caucasus. The OBC team, based in Rovereto (Italy), cooperates
with a network of over 40 correspondents and local contributors to deliver online
articles and in-depth analyses on these areas on a daily basis.
The OBC website links information, research and international cooperation.
Every month, over 100,000 readers visit the website: scholars and researchers;
journalists; students; diplomats; local, regional and national government officials;
policymakers;
practitioners
of
development
cooperation;
business
people;
members of the diaspora from South-East Europe and the Caucasus; tourists and
travellers; people generally interested in these areas.
Besides publishing online news, OBC produces documentary films and
audiovisual material, and carries out reasearch and training activities. The OBC
team participates in university workshops and public events. All OBC products,
the footage and papers of events can be found in the Multimedia, Our Products,
Specials and OBC Events sections of the OBC website.
Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso is engaged in the main social networks on
the net, distributes all of its content with a copyleft license and employs open
source technologies.
Patrons:
Fondazione Opera Campana dei Caduti
Forum Trentino per la Pace e i Diritti Umani
Donors:
Provincia autonoma di Trento
Comune di Rovereto
Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Trento e Rovereto