Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
DOI 10.1186/s13002-018-0211-1
RESEARCH
Open Access
Diversity and use of wild and noncultivated edible plants in the Western
Himalaya
Kamal Prasad Aryal1,3*, Sushmita Poudel2, Ram Prasad Chaudhary1, Nakul Chettri3, Pashupati Chaudhary4, Wu Ning3
and Rajan Kotru3
Abstract
Background: Local people in the Himalayan region use a wide range of wild and non-cultivated edible plants
(WNEPs) for food, spice, medicinal, and cultural purposes. However, their availability, use, status and contribution to
livelihood security are poorly documented, and they have been generally overlooked in recent agro-biodiversity
conservation and management programmes. The study aimed to investigate WNEP diversity and current status in a
part of the Kailash Sacred Landscape—a transboundary landscape shared by Nepal, India and PR China—in terms
of collection, use, management and conservation initiatives.
Methods: Multiple methodologies and tools were used for data collection. A series of participatory tools (45 key
informant interviews, 10 focus group discussions, a crop diversity fair, direct observation of species through a
transect walk and rapid market assessments) was followed by a household survey (195 respondents) and
complemented by a literature review.
Results: The study recorded 99 WNEPs belonging to 59 families of which 96 were angiosperms, one gymnosperm
and two pteridophytes. Species were used for food, spice, medicine, rituals and income generation. Thirty-five species
had multiple uses, including these: 40 species were used for fruit and 31 for vegetables. WNEPs contribute significantly
to daily food requirements, especially the vegetables. The use value of Dryopteris cochleata was found highest (0.98)
among frequently used vegetable species. The values of informant consensus factor were found maximum for worms
in the stomach (0.99) and minimum for skin disease treatment (0.67). Nearly 85% of households depended exclusively
on WNEPs for at least more than a month per year. Results on the importance and use of different species, gender
roles in WNEP activities and conservation approaches are presented.
Conclusions: People living in the Kailash Sacred Landscape depend significantly on WNEPs, and this is especially critical
in times of food shortage. The WNEPs have considerable potential as an important supplement to cultivated food crops.
Farmers prioritise species with multiple use values and popular vegetables. However, there are numerous challenges and
interventions needed to ensure conservation and management of species and their continued availability to support
food security and local livelihoods.
Keywords: Wild and non-cultivated edible plants, Kailash Sacred Landscape, Traditional knowledge, Food security
* Correspondence: aryal.kamal@gmail.com; kamal.aryal@icimod.org
1
Research Centre for Applied Science and Technology, Tribhuvan University,
Kritipur, Kathmandu, Nepal
3
International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), GPO
Box 3226, Kathmandu, Nepal
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Background
The majority of rural communities living in mountain
and hill regions use wild and non-cultivated edible plant
species (WNEPs) for food, medicine and other purposes
[1–3]. WNEPs cover a wide range; they include wild
fruit, nuts, leaves, roots, shoots and whole plants collected from forests, hedges and grassland; plants growing naturally alongside the actual crop in cultivated and
fallow agricultural land; and plants established in the
wild or in fields from seed that has dispersed from previously grown crops [4–9]. On occasion, plants that grow
in the wild around some villages are collected as WNEPs
and may be protected and managed in home gardens or
agricultural fields in other villages where they count as
crops.
Throughout the Himalayan region, WNEPs contribute
substantially to food security, help maintain health and
offer economic opportunities for millions of mountain
people [10–12]. They are eaten in a myriad of ways—raw
in salads and pickle, boiled in curries and soups, fried
and steamed—depending on preference and taste [13,
14]. Many of these plants have cultural values, while
some are considered sacred and used in religious and
cultural events [11–13]. A number of studies in the
Himalaya have documented WNEP species used as regular food [1, 2, 10–12] and shown that WNEPs play a significant role in fulfilling daily food requirements,
especially in rural areas.
Notwithstanding the contribution to livelihoods and
well-being, WNEPs have received little attention in the
Himalayan region, with the exception to some extent of
medicinal plants. There have been only a few studies of
the diversity, use and local management practices of
WNEPs [2, 11, 13, 15] and none on status and availability. Little is known about household consumption patterns or their role in household-level food and nutrition
security and healthcare. Many studies have focussed
simply on listing wild edible species and noting their use
as food or medicine [1, 2, 9–13, 15, 16]. Furthermore,
most research and development interventions under
government programmes have paid little or no attention
to this important sector [17–19]. Quantitative information on the presence, abundance, use and management
of WNEPs is essential as a basis for developing effective
conservation and management strategies that ensure
that these species can continue to contribute to and,
where possible, be used to improve food security.
The Kailash Sacred Landscape (KSL) is a transboundary landscape culturally linked to the region around
Mount Kailash and shared by Nepal, India and the People’s Republic of China. It is home to many ethnic communities and is a rich repository of WNEPs. Local
people are known to rely heavily on these plant species
for their livelihoods [20], but the actual availability, use,
Page 2 of 18
contribution to livelihoods and engagement of household members are poorly documented. The present
study selected Khar Village Development Committee
(VDC) in Darchula District in KSL Nepal to investigate
the diversity of WNEPs, how each species is being used,
the role in and implications for livelihoods and local perceptions on conservation and management differentiated
by gender.
Methods
Study site and people
The study was conducted in all nine wards of Khar VDC
of Darchula District in the Far Western Development
Region of Nepal, located at 29.761128 to 29.817314 N
latitude and 80.597531 to 80.683363 E longitude (Fig. 1).
Khar VDC is a predominantly rural mid-hill area, with a
total area of 26 km2 at an elevation of 1353–3236 masl.
The vegetation is sub-tropical in the lower parts and
temperate at higher elevation with mostly fragmented
areas of deciduous, coniferous and mixed forest and
areas of cultivated land along the hill slopes (mostly
rain-fed terraces) and valley bottoms (mostly irrigated).
Close to half of the VDC area (51%) is covered by forest,
44% is agricultural land, 4% shrub land, 0.3% water bodies, 0.1% grassland and 0.07% settlement area [21]. The
VDC is about a 3-h walk from Khalanga Bazaar, the district headquarters of Darchula. It is also connected by a
rural road to the bazaar (ca. 14 km), but vehicular access
is only possible during winter and spring.
In 2010, the VDC had a population of 4272 (2056
male, 2216 female) in 698 households [22]; the average
household size of 7.1 is high compared to the national
average of 4.9. The literacy rate is low (61% of respondents were non-literate). The dominant castes are Chhetri and Brahmin with a few households of Dalits. The
major castes in the village include Manyal, Sitoli, Dobal,
Mahar, Tamata, Bisht, Dadal, Bohara and Thagunna.
Research approach and methodology
Figure 2 shows the research study framework. Three
broad approaches were used with multiple tools. Quantitative and qualitative primary data were collected using a
range of participatory tools followed by a household survey; the results were supplemented with secondary data
obtained from a literature review.
Participatory tools
A range of participatory rural appraisal tools was used to
gather a wide range of information. A total of 45 key informants (18 female, 27 male) aged from 28 to 78 and representing all nine wards were interviewed individually. Key
informants were selected at the village level with the help
of the Api-Nampa VDC level conservation committee
members, focussing on people expected to have extensive
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Page 3 of 18
Fig. 1 The study site: Khar VDC in Darchula District in KSL Nepal
knowledge of WNEPs. Nine were specifically selected as
local healers (one from each ward) who had been treating
people for various health-related problems. Key informants were interviewed about their perceptions of the
availability, uses and status of WNEPs and their contribution to local livelihoods.
Ten focus group discussions (one in each ward and one
with representatives from the nine wards and other key institutions) were organised with 7–12 people in each group
(82 participants: 40 women, 42 men). The discussions focussed on the general status and use of WNEPs in the
VDC and local issues and initiatives on WNEP
management.
Rapid market assessments were conducted at a local
market (Dallekh Bazar) and the market at district headquarters (Khalanga Bazar) to identify the WNEPs available
in different seasons, their market value and trends in use
from the viewpoint of buyers and sellers.
A VDC level local crop diversity fair was organised in
February 2015 to which farmers brought samples of all
the WNEP species that they use that were available at
the time. The aim was to make a rapid assessment of the
general richness and status of non-cultivated plants
available at that time. This fair provided a unique
opportunity for individuals and community members to
display their local plant material, as well as to share and
document associated knowledge. During the fair, specimens of uncultivated plant species were collected and
identified and herbarium were prepared.
WNEPs were also collected and identified in four field
visits held in winter (February 2015), spring (May 2015),
summer (July, 2016) and autumn (October 2016) by a
multidisciplinary team consisting of a socio-economist,
natural resources management expert, taxonomist and social mobiliser. Each field visit lasted for 15 days and covered all nine wards. The study team visited areas where
species were found extensively in situ with the help of a
social mobiliser and collected unidentified specimens for
discussion with key informants. Information about species
habitats was recorded, and photos were taken for future
reference. Specimens were identified, and recent family
and scientific names were assigned with the help of reference collections [23–27] and an expert taxonomist from
the Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University.
Household survey
A detailed household survey with a structured questionnaire was used to obtain information about the use of
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Page 4 of 18
Fig. 2 Research study framework
WNEPs and any local-level management initiatives and
the socio-economic and demographic features of the
local population. The information gathered using the
participatory tools was used in the survey design.
The sample size was determined using the following
formula:
was calculated to determine the homogeneity of the information and degree of overall agreement in using plant
species with medicinal values—the species that are used
for treating health-related problems at household level.
The following formula was used [28]
ICF ¼ Nur‐Nt=Nur‐1
Number of households to be interviewed
Z 2 N Pð1−PÞ
¼ 2 1−∝
ðe N Þ þ ðZ 21−∝ Pð1−PÞ
where N is the total number of households (N = 698),
Z is the level of confidence (assumed value for 90% level
of confidence is 1.65), P is the estimate of the indicator
to be measured (assumed value 50% in the absence of
any prior information) and e is the margin of error to be
attained (assumed level of precision is set at 5%).
This gave a sample size of 195 households. In order to
ensure proper representation from each ward, the sample was distributed proportionally according to the number of households in each ward. Within each ward,
households were selected by random sampling with the
help of computer-generated random numbers.
Analytical tools
Data was analysed using descriptive analysis and frequency calculation techniques, and results are presented
in figures. In addition, informant consensus factor (ICF)
Here, Nur is the number of use reports mentioned by
the informant for the given species and Nt is the number of taxa (species) used by majority of the households.
Use value (UV) was calculated for individual plant species to give quantitative measures of its relative importance to the informants objectively [29]. Use value was
calculated by using the following equation: UVs = ∑U/n,
where UV refers to the use value of a species, U is the
number of use reports mentioned by the respondents
and n is the total number of respondents interviewed.
Prior informed consent
Before the study commenced, we shared the purpose
and objectives with the community and relevant stakeholders in a half-day interactive meeting held in Dallekh
village in Khar VDC. Prior informed consent was taken
from the household respondents as well as all participants in the participatory interviews and discussions
about the documentation and dissemination of local
knowledge and use of WNEP species for study purposes.
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Results
Agriculture and food security
Agriculture was the major source of livelihoods for the
majority of households (92%); the major crops are maize,
barley, wheat, finger millet and potato. However, only 5%
of households were able to meet all their annual food requirements from their own production; the remainder
were only food sufficient for 10 months or less. Households adopted multiple coping strategies during the food
deficit months to meet their food requirements, including
seasonal migration for work to the district headquarters
and various parts of India, sale of agricultural and livestock products, collection and selling of yarsagumba (Cordyceps sinensis) and collection of WNEPs.
Page 5 of 18
the stomach (0.99) and minimum for skin disease treatment (0.67). Eight species were used to cure stomach
disorder having maximum (178) number of use reports
followed by cuts and wounds (160), and lowest use reports was found for skin disease (4) treatment (Table 2).
WNEPs used as vegetables for nutrition and food security
A total of 99 WNEPs belonging to 59 families were identified and documented (Table 1). They included 96 angiosperms, 1 gymnosperm and 2 pteridophytes, with 7
in the family Moraceae, 6 Rosaceae, 5 Urticaceae, 4 Polygonaceae and 3 each in Araceae, Dioscoreaceae, Amaranthaceae, Lamiaceae and Combretaceae. Herbs and
trees were the most common life forms (Fig. 3).
In terms of regular food, one of the most important contributions of WNEPs was as a vegetable (Fig. 4). All respondents reported that they regularly used WNEPs as a
vegetable. The most frequently collected species were
Dioscorea bulbifera L., Dioscorea deltoidea Wall. ex Griseb., Urtica dioica L., Fagopyrum esculentum Moench,
Dryopteris cochleata (D. Don) C. Chr. and Paeonia
emodi Royle. Almost all respondents (92%) used WNEPs
to meet their daily vegetable requirements, with 75% depending exclusively on WNEPs for 1–3 months of the
year and 10% for more than 3 months (Fig. 5).
The key perceptions of households on WNEPs and
reasons for using them as vegetables are summarised in
Fig. 6. The most common advantages of WNEPs were
considered to be that they were tasty and nutritious
(85%) and also freely available (68%).
Diversity of use
Annual extraction and use
All households were using a range of different WNEPs
for food, spice, medicinal and religious purposes. The
most common uses were as food (fruit 40 species, vegetables 31 species), medicine (30 species), others (16 species) and spice (10 species). In a few cases, WNEPs
formed the main meal for a short period (e.g. boiled
Dioscorea spp.). Other uses included religious and traditional rituals, making pickles, ripening bananas, extracting cooking oil, washing and dyeing, and income
generation; 35 species had multiple uses (Fig. 4, Table 1).
The most commonly used parts were the fruit (45),
leaves (31), and stems/shoots (17). Bark, buds, bulbs,
flowers, tubers and corms, roots and seeds were also
used (Table 1). Most uses (about 66%) were specific to a
particular plant part, although sometimes plant parts
had multiple uses (e.g. as religious offerings and as
medicine). In around two thirds of the species, only one
plant part was used; in the others, multiple parts were
used.
A total of 30 plant species have been used for
household-level healthcare (Table 1). Diseases cured
through the local knowledge system in the study sites
were grouped into eight major types, and ICF was calculated for those diseases and health-related problems
(Table 2). These include stomach disorder (diarrhoea/
dysentery), cuts and wounds, fever and headache, skin
diseases/skin irritation, worms in stomach, nausea and
vomiting, snake and scorpion bites and cough and cold.
The values of ICF was found maximum for worms in
The estimated annual mean harvested weight of eight important species is shown in Fig. 7. The largest harvest was
of P. emodi, a local seasonal vegetable locally known as
heto found in the forest (150 kg), followed by F. esculentum and D. cochleata. Species like D. bulbifera (a tuber
boiled as a vegetable) and U. dioica L. are also important
as sources of income as they can be sold in the local market. A few species have a significant local economic value,
and people have started collecting and marketing some
high-demand species like P. emodi, whose leaves are used
to treat diarrhoea, and D. cochleata, an edible fern shoot
which is even popular in big cities. Some 13% of households sell these plants, earning an average of US $150 per
season. However, WNEPs are not a major source of cash
income for most households.
The estimation of UV or relative importance of the
frequently used vegetable species in the study site revealed that although the mean annual harvest of the species like Paeonia emodi and Fagopyrum esculentum is
higher than Dryopteris cochleata (Fig. 7), the use value
of Dryopteris cochleata (0.98) is higher than Paeonia
emodi (0.96) and Fagopyrum esculentum (0.74). The use
value (UV) of most important species used as vegetables
in the study site is presented in Fig. 8.
Diversity of WNEP species
Gender roles in WNEP collection, utilisation, and
management
Respondents were asked who in the household did what
related to WNEP use. Overall, the roles and responsibilities
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Page 6 of 18
Table 1 Wild and non-cultivated edible plants identified in Khar VDC, Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal
Family
Botanical
name
English
name
Nepali
name
Local
name
Usea
Parts
usedb
Remarks
Specimen
number
1
Acoraceae
Acorus
calamus L.
Flag
root,
myrtle flag
Bojho
Bojho
M
R
Dried rhizome
used to treat
sore throat,
coughs and
colds
D142
2
Adoxaceae
Viburnum
erubescens
Wall.
Bajrang
Ganaule
F
F
Fruit eaten
D305
3
Adoxaceae
Viburnum
mullaha Buch.Ham.ex D. Don
Kavase
Titmelau
F
F
Fruit sour
but eaten
D278
4
Amaranthaceae
Amaranthus
lividus L.
Amaranth
Marshi
Latte
V
L, Sh
Leaves and
young shoots
eaten as a
green vegetable
D500
5
Amaranthaceae
Amaranthus
spinosus L.
Amaranth
Marshi
Kanya
marshi/
chuwa
V
L, Sh
Young leaves and
shoots eaten as a
green vegetable
D283
6
Amaranthaceae
Amaranthus
viridis L.
Amaranth
Marshi
Ghiya
marshi
V, O
L, Sh,
Se
Young shoots and
leaves eaten as a
green vegetable;
seeds ground to
flour and used to
make chapattis;
seeds fried in
ghee and honey
and made into
round balls to
be eaten (ladoo/geda)
D316
7
Amaryllidaceae
Allium
spp.
Dhunu
S
L
Dried plant leaves
used in curries
D160
8
Amaryllidaceae
Allium
wallichii Kunth
Jimbur or
Himalayan
onion
Jimbu Jhar
Sekkwa/
sekuwa
S
W
Dried plant used
in dal and curries
D50
9
Anacardiaceae
Pistacia
chinensis
subsp.
integerrima
(J.L. Stewart ex Brandis)
Rech.f.
Insect
gall in
Pistacia
Kakarsingee
Kakarsingee
M
Gall
Gall used to treat
snake and
scorpion bites
D294
Ganano
S, M
R, Se
Root ground and
made into soup to
treat stomach pain.
Seeds ground to
flour and used
as spice in curry
D101
Bako
Bako
V
T
Corms (tubers)
boiled in ash
and salt to
remove toxic
elements, cleaned,
made into a
paste and
mixed with
buckwheat flour
to prepare curry
D196
10 Apiaceae
Angelica archangelica L.
11 Araceae
Arisaema
flavum
(Forssk.)
Schott
12 Araceae
Arisaema
tortuosum
(Wall.)
Schott
Whipcord
cobra lily
Bako
Bako
V
T
Boiled tubers
eaten as vegetable
D412
13 Araceae
Colocasia
esculenta (L.)
Schott.
Taro
Pidaalu
Pidaalu
V
R, S, L
Rhizome boiled
and eaten as a
vegetable; young
stem and leaves
used as a vegetable
and in pickle
D119
14 Arecaceae
Phoenix
humilis
Royle
Thakal
Thakil/thakilo
F, O
F, S
Fruit eaten; pith
from stem eaten;
stem used to
make thatched roofs
D284
Kurilo
Jhijhirkani
V, M
R, Sh
Shoots and leaves
eaten as a vegetable;
D140
15 Asparagaceae
Asaparagus,
wild Asparagus
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Page 7 of 18
Table 1 Wild and non-cultivated edible plants identified in Khar VDC, Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal (Continued)
Family
Botanical
name
English
name
Nepali
name
Local
name
Usea
Parts
usedb
Asparagus
racemosus
Willd.
Remarks
Specimen
number
roots used
to treat
urinary and
liver problems
16 Asteraceae
Ageratina
adenophora
(Spreng.) R.M.
King & H. Rob.
Crofton
weed
Banmara
Banmara
M
L
Juice from crushed
leaves used to
treat wounds
and cuts
17 Asteraceae
Ageratum
conyzoides
(L.) L.
Billygoatweed
Gandhe
Gandhe
M
L
Leaves crushed
and juice used
to treat cuts
and wounds
D73
18 Asteraceae
Artemisia
indica
Willd.
Mug-wort,
Indian
worm
wood fleabane
Titepati
Kuljo
R, M
L
Leaves used in
death ceremonies;
leaves crushed and
juice used to treat
skin problems (irritation)
D506
19 Berberidaceae
Berberis
aristata DC.
Barberry/
Nepal
Barberry/
common
Barberry
Chutro
Chutro
F, O,
M
F, Ba
Fruit eaten; bark
used as a dye
and to treat
diarrhoea, piles
and malaria
D190
20 Berberidaceae
Berberis
asiatica
Roxb. ex DC.
Barberry/
Nepal
Barberry
Kirmando
Kirmada
F, O
F, Ba
Fruit eaten; bark
used as a dye
D116
21 Bombacaceae
Bombax
ceiba L.
Silk cotton
tree, Simal
tree
Simal
Simal
V
Fl
Flowers used in
a vegetable curry
D230
22 Cannabaceae
Cannabis
sativa L.
True hemp,
Indian hemp,
marijuana
Bhang
Bhango
O, M
Se, L
Roasted seeds used
to make pickle or
eaten raw; green
leaves occasionally
used to make snacks
(pakauda); green leaves
made into a paste and
applied to the forehead
to treat high fever
D402
23 Chenopodiaceae
Chenopodium
album L.
Lamb’s
quarter
Bethe
sag
Betu/
charchare
V
L
Leaves and young
shoots eaten as a
green vegetable
D229
24 Combretaceae
Terminalia
bellirica
(Gaertn.)
Roxb.
Belleric
myrobalan
Barro
Barado
F, M
Se, F
Ripe fruit eaten;
seeds used to treat
coughs and colds
D100
25 Combretaceae
Terminalia
chebula
Retz.
Chebulie
myrobalan,
yellow
myrobalan
Harro
Harado
F, M
Se, F
Fruit eaten; fruit
and seeds used to
treat coughs and colds
D154
26 Commelinaceae
Commelina
benghalensis L.
Day
flower
Kane
Sag
Kanya sag
V
L, Sh
Young leaves and
shoots eaten as a
green vegetable
D131
27 Convolvulaceae
Cuscuta
reflexa
Roxb.
Dodder
Aakas
beli
Megh
M
W
Whole plant used
to prepare medicine
to treat livestock
with cough and
throat allergy
D300
28 Cucurbitaceae
Coccinia
grandis (L.)
Voigt
Ivy gourd,
Kavai fruit
Golkakri
Golyakakadi
V
F
Fruits eaten as
a vegetable
D280
29 Cucurbitaceae
Momordica
dioica
Roxb. ex
Willd.
Bankarela
Bankarela
V
F
Immature fruit
eaten as a green
vegetable
D205
30 Dioscoreaceae
Dioscorea
bulbifera L.
Palmate
leaved yam
Githi
Githo
V
T
Tubers boiled and
eaten as a vegetable
D429
31 Dioscoreaceae
Dioscorea
deltoidea
Wall. ex
Griseb.
Cushcush yam
Bhyakur
Bhyakur
V,
B, T
Bulbil and tubers
boiled and eaten
as a vegetable
D432
Ban tarul
Ban taud
V, R
B, T
32 Dioscoreaceae
D438
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Page 8 of 18
Table 1 Wild and non-cultivated edible plants identified in Khar VDC, Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal (Continued)
Family
Nepali
name
Local
name
Usea
Botanical
name
English
name
Dioscorea
hamiltonii
Hook.f.
Air potato,
potato yam
33 Dryopteridaceae
Dryopteris
cochleata
(D. Don)
C. Chr.
Edible
fern
shoot
Niuro
Liundo
V, O
L, Sh
Young coiled fronds
and shoots cooked
and eaten as a vegetable;
sold in urban markets
(high demand)
D113
34 Elaeagnaceae
Elaeagnus
parvifolia Wall.
ex Royle
Oleaster
Kankoli
Guyaalo
F
F
Fruit eaten
D266
35 Ericaceae
Rhododendron
arboreum Sm.
Rhododendron
Laligurans
Gurauns
M, O
Fl
Flowers eaten; nectar
used to treat diarrhoea
and dysentery
D218
36 Euphorbiaceae
Phyllanthus
emblica L.
Indian
gooseberry
Amala
Aaula
F, M
F
Fruit eaten raw and dried;
fruit used in preparation of
some Ayurvedic medicines
for treating indigestion
D307
37 Fabaceae
Albizia
procera
(Roxb.)
Benth.
White
siris
Siris
Siris (not edible)
O
L
Leaves used to cover
bananas to ripen them
D85
38 Fabaceae
Bauhinia
variegata L.
Mountain
ebony,
White bauli
Koiralo
Koiral
V, M
Bu, Fl
Buds and flowers used
as a vegetable and in
pickle; flowers used to
make soup to treat
bacillary dysentery
D236
39 Fagaceae
Castanopsis
tribuloides (Sm.)
A.DC.
Chestnut
Katus
Katauj
F, R
F
Fruit eaten and offered
to gods during rituals
D145
40 Fagaceae
Quercus
lanata Sm.
Woollyleaved oak
Baanjha
Baanjha
F
F
Fruit (lekaal) eaten
D480
41 Gentianaceae
Swertia
chirayita
(Roxb. ex
Fleming)
Karsten
Chiretta
Chiraita
Chiraito
M
W
Whole plant used to
treat fever, diabetes,
and skin diseases
D299
42 Hippocastanaceae Aesculus
indica
(Wall. ex
Cambess.)
Hook.
Indian
horse
chestnut
Pangar
Pangar
M, O
F
Roasted fruit eaten to kill
stomach worms; fruit
used for washing clothes
D214
43 Juglandaceae
Juglans
regia L.
Walnut
Okhar
Okhad
F, R
F
Fruit eaten and offered
to gods during festivals
D233
44 Lamiaceae
Mentha
arvensis L.
Mint
Pudina
Padamchal
S, M
L
Leaves used in pickle;
juice from leaves used
for cooling in summer
D110
45 Lamiaceae
Mentha
spicata L.
Mint
Pudina
Padamchal
S, M
L
Leaves used as spice in
D248
pickle; leaves used as
medicine to reduce ‘body heat’
46 Lamiaceae
Perilla
frutescens
(L.) Britton
Perilla
Silame
Bhangiro
S
Se
Seeds roasted and ground
to use in pickle
D387
47 Lardizabalaceae
Holboellia
latifolia Wall.
Ghopala
F
F
Ripe fruit eaten
D493
48 Lauraceae
Cinnamomum
glanduliferum
(Wall.) Meisn.
Nepal
camphor
tree
Sunghandhaakokila Sunghandhaakokila
M, R
Ba, F
Bark and fruit
used to treat
coughs and colds,
toothache, and
swelling of muscles;
leaves and fruit offered
to gods during rituals
D96
49 Lauraceae
Cinnamomum
tamala
(Buch.-Ham.)
T.Nees &
Eberm.
Bay
leaf
Tejpaat
S
L
Dried leaves used as
spice for curries to
add flavour and smell
D82
Parts
usedb
Remarks
Specimen
number
Tubers and bulbils
cooked and eaten.
Boiled tubers are used
during religious event
first day of Nepali
Month Magh (January)
Tejpaat/dalchini
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Page 9 of 18
Table 1 Wild and non-cultivated edible plants identified in Khar VDC, Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal (Continued)
Family
Botanical
name
50 Loranthaceae
Loranthus
odoratus
Wall.
51 Moraceae
Ficus
auriculata
English
name
Eye’s apron,
Moretan-bay
fig
Nepali
name
Local
name
Usea
Parts
usedb
Remarks
Specimen
number
Ajeru
Anjedu
F
F
Fruit very tasty
D178
Timilo
Timlo
F
F
Fruit eaten
D352
Lour.
52 Moraceae
Ficus
hispida L.f.
Khasreto
Khasattya
F
F
Fruit eaten
D132
53 Moraceae
Ficus
lacor
Buch.-Ham
Kabhro
Kapado
V
Bu, Fl
Buds and flowers
boiled and eaten
as a vegetable
and pickle
D100
54 Moraceae
Ficus
neriifolia
Sm.
Dudhilo
Dudilo
V, F
Sh, F
Young shoots eaten
as a vegetable;
fruit eaten
D328
55 Moraceae
Ficus
semicordata
Buch.-Ham.
ex Sm.
Khaniyo
Khannyo/
khinne
F
F
Fruit eaten
D211
56 Moraceae
Ficus subincisa
Buch.-Ham.
ex Sm.
Berlo
Belto/
beldo
F
F
Ripe fruit eaten
D48
57 Moraceae
Morus
serrata
Roxb.
Mulberry
Kimbu
Kimu
F, O
F, L
Fruit eaten,
very popular
among children;
leaves used as
fodder, preferred
by goats
D333
58 Musaceae
Musa
balbisiana
Colla
Banana
Bankera
Bankela
F, R
F
Ripe fruit eaten
and offered to
gods during rituals
D127
59 Myricaceae
Myrica
esculenta
Buch.-Ham.
ex D. Don
Box
byrtle
Kafal
Kafal
F
F
Fruit tasty
and popular
D318
60 Myrtaceae
Syzygium
cumini
(L.) Skeels
Black plum,
Java plum,
Indian black
berry
Jamun
Jamno
F
F
Fruit eaten
D246
61 Myrtaceae
Syzygium
spp.
Phalda
F
F
Fruit eaten
D329
Nepal
fodder
fig
62 Nephrolepidaceae Nephrolepis
cordifolia
(L.) C. Presl
Sword
fern
Pani
amala
Rasmada
M
T
Tubers eaten to
treat worms
D72
63 Oxalidaceae
Oxalis
corniculata L.
Indian
sorrel,
creeping
sorrel
Chari
amilo
Chalmado
S
L
Leaves used in
preparing pickle
D99
64 Paeoniaceae
Paeonia
emodi
Royle
Hetto
V
L, Sh
Young shoots and
leaves eaten as a
green vegetable,
fresh or sundried,
rehydrated, and
cooked (in winter)
D32
65 Phytolaccaceae
Phytolacca
acinosa
Roxb.
Jarko
Jarak/jarka
V, M
L, R
Young leaves and
shoots eaten as a
green vegetable;
root used to treat
sickness after eating
buckwheat leaves
D4001
66 Pinaceae
Pinus
roxburghii
Sarg.
Chir pine,
Himalayan
long-leaved
pine
Salla
Sallo khote
M
La
Resin used to clear
blood clots
D70
67 Poaceae
Dendrocalamus
hamiltonii
Neer & Arn.
ex Munro
Tufted
bamboo
Bans
Bans
V
Sh
Young shoots (tama)
eaten as a vegetable
D174
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Page 10 of 18
Table 1 Wild and non-cultivated edible plants identified in Khar VDC, Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal (Continued)
Botanical
name
English
name
Nepali
name
Local
name
Usea
Parts
usedb
Remarks
Specimen
number
68 Poaceae
Drepanostachyum
falcatum (Munro)
Keng f.
Himalayan
Bamboo
Nigaalo
Nigaalo
V, O
S, Sh
Stem used to
make mats;
young shoots
eaten as a
vegetable
D290
69 Polygonaceae
Fagopyrum
esculentum Moench
Buckwheat
Phapar
Phanpar
V
L, Sh
Young shoots and
leaves eaten as a
vegetable
D443
70 Polygonaceae
Fagopyrum
tataricum (L.)
Gaertn.
Buckwheat
Phapar
Phanpar
V
L
Young shoots
and leaves
eaten as a
vegetable
D205
71 Polygonaceae
Polygonum
spp.
Halaudo
S
L
Young leaves
used to
make pickle
D8
72 Polygonaceae
Polygonum
verticillatum Birolli
ex Colla
Nigali sag
Khinaudo
V
L
Young leaves eaten
as a vegetable
D112
73 Ranunculaceae
Aconitum
heterophyllum
Wall. ex Royle
Atis
Atis
M
W, R
Whole plant and roots
used to treat high fever
and abdominal pain
D260
74 Rosaceae
Fragaria
nubicola
(Lindl.ex.
Hook.f)
Lacaita
Gande
kafal
F, R,
M
F, W
Fruit eaten; whole plant
used in death rituals;
whole plant used to
treat stomach disorders
D68
75 Rosaceae
Pyracantha
crenulata (Roxb.
ex D. Don)
M. Roem.
Ghangyaru/
kaatha gedi
Ghangyar
F
F
Ripe fruit eaten in
large quantities
D108
76 Rosaceae
Pyrus pashia
Buch.-Ham.
ex D. Don.
Mayal
Mel
F
F
Fruit eaten
D239
77 Rosaceae
Rubus
ellipticus
Sm.
Golden
evergreen
raspberry
Ainselu
Anselu
F
F
Fruit very
popular
D348
78 Rosaceae
Rubus
foliolosus
D. Don
Rasberry
Ainselu
Kalo
anselu
F, R
F, L, W
Fruit eaten;
leaves or whole
plant used in
death ceremonies
D501
79 Rosaceae
Rubus
niveus Thunb.
Ainselu
Katrya
anselu
F
F
Fruit eaten
D98
80 Rubiaceae
Rubia manjith
Roxb. ex
Fleming
Indian madder
Majitho
Majitho
M
S, L
Stem and
leaves used
to treat cuts
and wounds
D103
81 Rutaceae
Aegle
marmelos
(L.) Correa
Bael fruit
Bel
Bel
F, R
F, L
Fruit pulp eaten;
leaves used
for religious
purposes,
especially offering
to gods during
rituals
D187
82 Rutaceae
Zanthoxylum
armatum DC.
Nepal
pepper,
prickly ash
Timur
Timur
S, M
F
Fruit dried and
used as a
spice in pickles
and curries;
dried fruit used
in various allopathic
medicines like
indigestion and
nausea
D234
83 Sapindaceae
Sapindus
mukorossi
Gaertn.
Soap
nut
Reetha
Reetha
(not edible)
O
F
Fruit pulp
used to
wash hair
D431
84 Sapotaceae
Diploknema
butyracea
(Roxb.)
H.J.Lam
Nepal
Chiuri
butter fruit Phulwara
Chyuro
O, F
Fl, F,
Se
Nectar from
flowers and
ripened fruit
(bhina) eaten;
seeds used to
make a butter
D268
Family
Aconite
Fire horn
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Page 11 of 18
Table 1 Wild and non-cultivated edible plants identified in Khar VDC, Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal (Continued)
Family
Botanical
name
English
name
Nepali
name
Local
name
Usea
Parts
usedb
Remarks
Specimen
number
for cooking
vegetables
and others
85 Saurauiaceae
Saurauia
napaulensis DC.
Gogan
Gogan
F
F
Fruit
eaten
D15
86 Saxifragaceae
Bergenia ciliata
(Haw.)
Sternb.
Rock foil
Pakhanbed
Pakhanbed/simpari
phool
M
R
Rhizome used to
make medicine to
treat kidney stones
D134
87 Schisandraceae
Schisandra
grandiflora
(Wall.) Hook.f. &
Thomson
Magnolia
Vine
Haliyude
F
F
Ripe
fruit eaten
D245
88 Smilacaceae
Smilax aspera L.
Green briers
Kukurdaino
Kukuldaino
F, V
Sh, F
Fruit eaten;
young
shoots eaten
as a vegetable
D218
89 Smilacaceae
Smilax ovalifolia Roxb. ex D. Green briers
Don
Kukurdaino
Kukuldaino
F, V
Sh, F
Fruit eaten;
young shoots
eaten as a vegetable
D68
90 Solanaceae
Solanum
nigrum L.
Kalokamai
Ninauni
F
F
Fruit eaten
D149
91 Trilliaceae
Paris
polyphylla
Sm.
Satuwa
Satuwa
V, M
L, R
Tender leaves
eaten as a
vegetable; root
made into paste
and applied to
snake bite to
control the poison
D179
92 Urticaceae
Boehmeria
rugulosa
Wedd.
Getha
Githi
O
Ba
Bark paste/powder
mixed with rice
flour to prepare
sel roti(a form of
rice doughnut);
bark paste used
as soda and
to wash clothes
D22
93 Urticaceae
Debregeasia s
alicifolia (D. Don)
Rendle
Tusaare
Tusaaro
F
F
Fruit eaten
D55
94 Urticaceae
Girardinia
diversifolia
(Link) Friis
Allo Sisnu
Allo
V, O
L, Sh,
S,
Young leaves
and shoots
eaten; fibre
extracted f
rom stems
used to make
clothes
and bags
D17
95 Urticaceae
Gonostegia
hirta
(Blume ex Hassk.)
Miq.
Attinno
O
R
Ground root
used to prepare
chapatti; ground
root used for
washing hair
D458
96 Urticaceae
Urtica
dioica L.
Stinging
nettle
Sisnu
Sisnu
V
L, Sh
Young leaves
and shoots
used as a
vegetable
D16
97 Verbenaceae
Callicarpa
arborea Roxb.
Beauty berry
Guyalo
Gwailo
F
F
Tasty fruit
D67
98 Violaceae
Viola L.
Juke jhaar
M
L, R
Leaves and roots used
to treat worms in children
D481
99 Vitaceae
Tetrastigma spp.
Pudaayen
F
F
Fruit eaten
D344
Himalayan
Nettle
a
Use: F fruit, V vegetable, M medicine, O other, R religious, S spice
b
Part of plant used: W whole plant, B bulb, Ba bark, Bu buds, F fruit, Fl flowers, La latex, L leaf, O other, R root/rhizome, S stem, Se seeds, Sh shoots, T tuber/corm
in activities and decision-making on collection, processing,
food preparation, storage and marketing of WNEPs were
shared between men and women (Table 3). Irrespective of
gender, about half of the respondents (49%) stated that
decisions and activities related to collection and harvesting
were shared by men and women, with the remainder divided almost equally between women or men. Responsibility for processing was generally thought to be shared
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Page 12 of 18
Table 2 Categories of ailments and informant consensus factor
(ICF)
Fig. 3 Frequency of different life forms of WNEPs
Use categories
No. of
taxa
No. of use
reports
Consensus
factor
Stomach disorder (diarrhoea/
dysentry)
8
178
0.96
Cuts and wounds
4
160
0.98
Fever and headache
6
125
0.96
Skin diseases/skin irritation
2
4
0.67
Worms in stomach
2
120
0.99
Nausea and vomiting
2
73
0.98
Snake and scorpion bites
2
8
0.85
Cough and cold
4
186
0.98
equally (around 80%) as was responsibility for conservation
and management. However, women had much greater responsibility for preparation and storage.
domestication (38%) of key species in their home gardens and agricultural fields.
Local perceptions
Discussion
Respondents were asked about the existing and potential
issues of concern related to WNEPs. The primary issues
identified were premature and unsustainable harvesting
(147), inadequate labour resources within the family
(134) and time taken for collection (120) (Fig. 9). Other
issues included neglect of local food, availability of
ready-made food and problems identifying whether species are edible, especially among young collectors. We
discussed these issues further in the FGDs. Of the ten
FGDs (82 participants), eight groups also thought that
the major issues for utilisation and management were
lack of human resources due to migration for seasonal
work, unsustainable harvesting and changing human
lifestyles and taste. We also asked about current management practices. In all ten groups, participants mentioned in situ conservation of important species by
almost all people in the village, with domestication of
important species as the second most important strategy. This perception was supported by the data from the
household survey. The great majority of respondents
(86%) reported practising in situ conservation and
Diversity of WNEPs and their use
Fig. 4 Uses of WNEPs (single use, black-shaded; multiple
use, grey-shaded)
It is estimated that at least a billion people use WNEPs
in their diet [30]. Millions of people in the Himalayan
region depend on WNEPs for their daily food and vegetable requirements as well as for fresh fruit and medicines [30–33]. Our study documented 99 WNEP species
currently used in various forms by the local people in
the Kailash Sacred Landscape area in far west Nepal. A
number of studies by other authors have documented a
diverse range of WNEP species and uses in different
parts of the Himalayan region, but most have not
assessed status and availability, household consumption
patterns or local management practices. The study in Tibetan community of China documented the use of 54
species for household consumption [34]. Similar study
conducted in Tibetan communities of Nepal, China and
India also documented 75 wild food plants of diverse
uses at household level [35]. Singh et al. [36] documented 111 WNEPs used in Bandipora district in Kashmir, while other authors identified 112 WNEPs in
Fig. 5 Dependence on WNEPs on daily vegetable
requirements (N − 195)
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Page 13 of 18
Fig. 6 Perceptions of and reasons for using WNEPs (N = 195)
Dhading and Kaski districts in Nepal [16] and 62 in
Bhutan [37]. Khan et al. [38] conducted assessment of
wild edible plants of Sewa catchment area in Northwest
Himalaya of India and listed 97 plant species used by
local inhabitants for various uses. More than 380 nontimber forest products (NTFPs) were identified in Meghalaya in North East India [39] and 739 in the Kangchenjunga Landscape (India, Nepal and Bhutan) [40] of
which many were WNEPs, although these were not separately listed.
WNEPs contributed substantially to the food requirements of the households in the study area. People preferred to collect species with multiple use value, but
they also collected large quantities of species used purely
as a vegetable. P. emodi, U. dioica, F. esculentum and D.
cochleata were particularly popular and constituted an
important source of vegetables in household food. A
large quantity of P. emodi and F. esculentum is harvested, but the use value of D. cochleata was found
higher, which might be attributable to their widespread
distribution and abundance of the later species across
the study area making them the first choice for collection and consumption. The average annual extraction of
species used as vegetables was very high; this has also
been observed by others. For example, in Dhusa VDC in
Dhading district, Nepal, individual households were
Fig. 8 Use value of frequently used vegetable species
observed to collect an average 200 kg of D. bulbifera per
annum [13], while Chepang households in Gorkha district of Nepal consumed an average 364 kg of D. bulbifera and 96 kg of U. dioica per annum [41]. A diverse
range of Dioscorea spp. is widely used and consumed by
the local community in Himanchal and Similipal Biosphere Reserve in India [31, 42]. Together, these figures
suggest that people are harvesting at least some WNEPs
in large quantities, which has also been observed in
studies conducted in other parts of the world [1, 2, 11,
15, 31, 32, 43–51]. Most people at the study site
depended on WNEPs to fill their vegetable requirements
for between 1 and 3 months or more a year. A study carried out among the Chepang people in Nepal reported
that 58% of households depended on WNEPs for
Table 3 Division of responsibility for WNEP activities and
decisions among men and women
Role and responsibility
N = 195
Women
Men
Both
Harvesting/collection
55 (28)
45 (23)
95 (49)
Processing
25 (13)
20 (10)
150 (77)
Preparation
165 (85)
10 (5)
20 (10)
Storage
135 (69)
10 (5)
50 (26)
Marketing/exchange
75 (38)
37 (19)
83 (43)
Conservation and management
20 (10)
35 (18)
140 (72)
Harvesting/collection
45 (23)
55 (28)
95 (49)
Processing
25 (13)
12 (6)
158 (81)
Activities
Decision-making
Fig. 7 Average extraction per annum of major WNEPs (in kg)
Preparation
185 (95)
5 (3)
5 (3)
Storage
160 (82)
10 (5)
25 (13)
Marketing/exchange
45 (23)
85 (44)
65 (33)
Conservation and management
48 (25)
30 (15)
117 (60)
Note: figures in brackets are percentage of respondents
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Fig. 9 Primary issues related to utilisation and management of
WNEPs (N = 195)
vegetables for up to 5 months a year [2], and in one village in India, people ate WNEPs as vegetables for at
least 50–80 days per year [47]. A study in Burkina Faso
showed 20% of all food items to come from wild/noncultivated sources [43], while non-cultivated greens are
one of the major sources of vegetables in rural areas of
Vietnam, eaten by almost all households [43]. Wild leafy
vegetables are an important part of diet of people of
Shiri in Daghestan, and 70% of them are used as snacks.
They are important in maintaining social life as the dried
vegetables are sent as gifts to distant relatives and people
visiting them at their place [52]. So, the wild vegetables
are also culturally associated with the indigenous
communities.
The studies highlight the importance of WNEPs in
local diets but also indicate that the current trends in
harvesting of some species may not be sustainable and
could affect species availability in the future [1, 2, 4, 53].
WNEPs are considered to be an important source of
vitamins and minerals [32, 54–56] and to contribute to
energy and micronutrients for farm families throughout
the year [43, 57]. The study conducted in Naxi community of China depicted that wild edible plants play a very
important role in safeguarding food and nutritional security [58]. This is also supported by other two studies
conducted in India [59, 60]. However, the precise nutritional composition of most of these foods is not known
[61], although one study showed, for example, that the
root crop from Dioscorea spp. contains five times more
protein and fibre than potato and sweet potato [62].
Similarly, little is known about the actual contribution of
WNEPs to people’s daily food requirements, and this remains poorly studied. In addition to contributing to food
and nutritional security, a wide range of WNEPs contribute to health and well-being as medicinal plants [4,
10, 40, 44, 49, 63–67]. For example, most diseases in far
west Nepal are treated by individuals and local healers
using traditionally handed-down ethno-medicinal
Page 14 of 18
knowledge of plants, which have been protected and
have flourished where ethnic traditions and beliefs are
still strong [44, 68, 69]. The informant consensus factors
for the medicinal plant use suggest that a number of
plant species have been used for treating various ailments such as stomach disorder, colds and cough,
wounds and cut, skin diseases, fever/headache, nausea
and vomiting, worms in the stomach and snake and
scorpion bites. Rural people, particularly in remote villages, have been using these plant species for generations
to treat different diseases based on their indigenous
knowledge. Similar treatments of various diseases were
also documented in the other studies from the region
[70–72]. Especially, local healers know how to prepare
drugs from raw herbs through personal experience and
ancestral prescription. Such drugs are regularly used and
have proven to be effective, inexpensive and beneficial
and with few side effects compared to allopathic drugs
[2, 4, 10, 73]. The use of herbs by traditional health practitioners is based on trust gained over generations and
religious connections to such practices [4]. However, the
use of plants as medicines is declining [69, 74], partly
because there are fewer traditional healers due to lack of
knowledge transfer. The younger generation has little
interest in studying traditional forms of medicine.
Although WNEPs make a significant contribution to
the livelihoods of local people in the more remote
mountain regions, these species are less used in the
daily diets of households in other areas [2, 11, 13,
15]. WNEPs have the potential to play an important
role in maintaining and improving food security in
the many rural areas where food security remains a
cause for concern and in supplementing nutritionally
poor diets that are otherwise low in vitamins and
minerals. However, changing food habits, taste, and
lifestyles and availability of ready-made foods in the
market are contributing to an increasing neglect of
traditional foods in rural diets. Collection and use of
WNEPs is considered risky and time-consuming, and
young people are becoming less familiar with WNEP
species and forest environments and less able to identify suitable species for harvesting. Little is known
about the sustainability of harvesting practices [1, 2,
6, 9, 13, 16, 40], and reduced availability is also cited
by various studies as one of the underlying causes of
the declining use of WNEPs [1–3, 10–16]. The use of
WNEPs is likely to decrease further, threatening the
retention of knowledge about this important component of livelihoods, culture and tradition [11, 13]. At
the same time, sustainable use and management of
these resources remain a prime concern for the millions of mountain people whose lives still depend on
them [49], as well as being essential to ensure the
basis for further exploitation of their potential.
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Conservation and management of WNEPs
The true status of WNEPs, their contribution to livelihoods and the interrelationship with other species in the
region has yet to be studied systematically [33, 36, 44].
Recent and past studies remain inadequate as they have
focussed more on compiling lists of species and less on
analysing their contribution to nutrition and food security [40, 42]. Despite their important contribution to nutrition, WNEPs have also received little attention in
government food and nutrition programmes in the region [2, 33, 44].
A number of studies have noted the decreasing availability of WNEPs [2, 15]. The loss of WNEPs has many
causes, including habitat degradation, rapid urbanisation
and over exploitation, as well as changes in food habits
[75, 76]. Changes in agricultural practices towards increased monocropping, use of herbicides and pesticides
and increased mechanisation and changes in forestry
practices towards more managed regimes and plantation
may all play a role. At the same time, some WNEP species are becoming more heavily exploited as urbanised
populations become motivated to eat local products and
farmers collect plants for sale in urban markets rather
than personal consumption [15, 33, 44, 47, 74, 77–80].
Species with high use value are subjected to higher extraction, which may be unsustainable. Control of overexploitation and illegal harvesting will be essential to
ensure sustainable management. A coordinated effort is
needed from all sectors to develop and implement in
situ conservation, domestication and other conservation
and management strategies for long-term management
of WNEP species [1–5, 13, 19, 31, 33]. Furthermore,
WNEPs can be promoted through the large-scale cultivation by integrating them into agricultural systems and
making markets profitable for the benefit of the people
[59, 60] With the participation of local people and a
wide range of other stakeholders, it will be possible to
craft more holistic and culturally appropriate strategies
for utilisation and management of WNEPs in the Western Himalayas [67].
Maintenance and use of WNEPs in the Kailash region,
as in Nepal overall, is not just important for botanical
studies or as an ecological exercise. The conservation
and wise utilisation of the indigenous knowledge of useful plants can help in the improvement of living standard of poor people of Nepal. It equally holds true for
several developing countries where similar ecological
and socio-cultural landscapes exist [81]. These plants
play a significant role in meeting the daily food requirements of thousands of people living in rural villages like
Khar, and play an important part in their survival strategies [1, 2, 31, 37, 45, 82]. WNEPs are not only important in times of famine or stress [74], they are an
essential part of a mineral rich normal diet for millions
Page 15 of 18
of people [83–85]. WNEPs are important resources, and
further study is essential to provide updated inventories
and information about their availability and use. Local
people must be involved in conservation and management, as they are both the guardians and users of the resources and have the greatest knowledge about them. It
is also important to organise local-level WNEP fairs and
local food festivals to raise awareness about the importance of WNEP species, revive interest among the younger generation, and motivate communities towards
proactive management of these resources. Domestication
of WNEPs where possible will be needed to ensure continued availability; thus, it would be beneficial to encourage cultivation and/or domestication of plants used for
food, fodder, medicine and other purposes. Technical
and material support will be very much needed in the
initial stages. Domestication in home gardens would be
a good starting point, as they offer increased availability
of water, a mostly organic-based production system, easier protection against predators and close monitoring by
the household members.
Conclusions
A total of 99 WNEPs species with high diversity and
multiple use values were documented in the KSL Nepal.
These plants play a significant role in household-level
food and nutrition as well as health security. The local
livelihood system depends heavily on traditions and
values that are rooted in nature. WNEP species, now
often used most heavily in times of food shortage, have
the potential to become important alternatives to the
usual food crops cultivated by farmers. Farmers gave priority to those species that provide them with a multitude
of benefits such as food and nutritional security as well
as household-level healthcare but also harvested large
amounts of species popular as vegetables. Species like P.
emodi, D bulbifera L., D. deltoidea, U dioica, and F.
esculentum are an important part of local peoples’ livelihoods. However, there is a growing pressure on such
species, which suggests that there is an urgent need for
conservation and management, which requires proper
research and policy advocacy. These wild and noncultivated resources are crucial to local peoples’ traditions and contribute strongly to subsistence. It is important to consider how such species can contribute to
future food security. This requires an understanding of
how to manage the cultural changes affecting the use of
WNEPs and how to ensure sustainable availability. Integrated research and development programmes are urgently needed to address the issue.
Abbreviations
FGDs: Focus group discussions; KSL: Kailash Sacred Landscape; VDC: Village
Development Committee; WNEP: Wild and non-cultivated edible plant
species
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank all the respondents and community members at
the study sites who patiently shared their time, insights and views about
WNEPs. The study was carried out under the Kailash Sacred Landscape
Conservation and Development Initiative (KSLCDI) of the International Centre
for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD). The authors would like to
thank Mr. Bhumiraj Upadhyay, warden of Api-Nampa Conservation Area, and
his team for their cooperation and logistic support while conducting the survey. We also acknowledge the guidance and support of the Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Government of Nepal, for implementing KSLCDI.
The authors would like to thank ICIMOD and RECAST of Tribhuvan University
for providing technical and managerial support to facilitate the research. We
wish to thank Ms. Sabarnee Tuladhar from ICIMOD for her help in designing
the questionnaire and Ms. Beatrice Murray from the UK for the language
editing of the manuscript. We would like to thank the Department for International Development (DFID)-UK Aid, German Federal Ministry of Economic
Cooperation and Development and German International Cooperation (GIZ)
for providing financial support for the KSLCDI. Last but not least, this study
was partially supported by core funds from ICIMOD contributed by the Governments of Afghanistan, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India,
Myanmar, Nepal, Norway, Pakistan, Switzerland and the UK.
Funding
The funding support for this study came from the Department for
International Development (DFID)-UK Aid, German Federal Ministry of
Economic Cooperation and Development, and German International
Cooperation (GIZ) under the Kailash Sacred Landscape Conservation and
Development Initiative (KSLCDI) programme coordinated by International
Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD). Partial funding came
from ICIMOD’s core fund contributed by different member countries.
Availability of data and materials
Availability of the structured and organised version of the data is available
from the first author upon request. The voucher specimens are kept at
Central Department of Botany at Tribhuvan University, Nepal, and will be
available upon request.
Disclaimer
The views and interpretations in this publication are those of the authors
and not necessarily attributable to their organisations.
Authors’ contributions
KA, SP, RCP, NC, RC and WN designed the study. KA and SP carried out the
literature review and did the field study and data collection. KA, SP, RCP, NC,
PC and WN analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors
approved the final version of the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
A prior informed consent was taken from the farmers and local communities
in the study sites. The study was conducted in Api-Nampa Conservation Area
of Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation of Government of
Nepal, and prior approval and consent was taken from the government for
this study.
Consent for publication
The manuscript does not include the individuals’ photographs and images,
videos, reprints and personal information; hence, no need of submitting the
consent for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
Author details
1
Research Centre for Applied Science and Technology, Tribhuvan University,
Kritipur, Kathmandu, Nepal. 2Ecological Services Centre, Bharatpur, Chitwan,
Nepal. 3International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD),
Page 16 of 18
GPO Box 3226, Kathmandu, Nepal. 4Agriculture and Forestry University,
Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.
Received: 27 September 2017 Accepted: 13 January 2018
References
1. Dorji Y. Women’s roles in wild yam, conservation, management and
use in Bhutan. In: Khadka M, Verma R, editors. Gender and
biodiversity management in the Greater Himalayas, ICIMOD; 2012. p.
25–7.
2. Aryal KP, Berg A, Ogle BM. Uncultivated plants and livelihood support:
a case study from the Chepang people of Nepal. Ethnobot Res Appl.
2009;7:409–22.
3. Hawksworth DL. Human exploitation of biodiversity and conservation: a
question of balance? In: Hawksworth DL, Bull AT, editors. Human
exploitation and biodiversity and conservation, vol. 15. Dordrecht: Springer;
2006. p. 2341–2.
4. Rijal A. Surviving knowledge: ethnobotany of Chepang community from
mid hills of Nepal. Ethbot Res Appl. 2011;9:181–215.
5. Modi M, Modi AT, Hendriks S. Potential role for wild vegetables in
household food security: a preliminary case study in Kwazulu-Natal, South
Africa. Afr J Food Agric Nutr. 2006;6(1):1–13.
6. Somnasang P, Rathakette P, Rathanapanya S. The role of natural foods in
Northeast Thailand. In: Lovelace GW, Subhadira S, Simaraks S, editors. Rapid
rural appraisal in Northeast Thailand. Case studies. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen
University; 1988. p. 78–103.
7. FAO: Use and potential of wild plants in farm households. 1999. http://
www.fao.org/3/a-w8801e.HTM. Accessed 21 Feb 2017.
8. Hladik A, Dounias E. Wild yams of the American rain forest as potential food
resources. In: Hladik CM, Hladik A, Linares OE, Pagezy H, Semple A, Hadley
M, editors. Tropical forests, people and food. Biocultural interactions and
applications to development. New York and Paris: UNESCO and the
Parthenon Publishing Group; 1993. p. 163–76.
9. Kar A, Bora D, Borthakur SK, Goswami NK, Saharia D. Wild edible plant
resources used by the Mizos of Mizoram, India. Kath Uni J Sci Eng Tech.
2013;9(1):106–26.
10. Adnan M, Begum S, Khan AL, Tareen AM, Lee IJ. Medicinal plants and their
uses in selected temperate zones of Pakistani Hindu-Kush Himalaya. J Med
Plant Res. 2012;6(24):4113–27.
11. Akhtar F. Uncultivated food in the context of poor people’s livelihood: a
Nayakrishi experience. In: Johnston MM, editor. Proceedings of the regional
workshop on uncultivated foods and biodiversity, September 24 to 26,
Kathmandu, Nepal; 2001.
12. Yesudas BS. Conservation of uncultivated foods by local communities. LEISA
India, 6(1). Valuing Crop Biodiversity. 2004. http://vikaspedia.in/agriculture/
best-practices/sustainable-agriculture/biodiversity/conservation-ofuncultivated-foods-by-local-communities. Accessed 15 Nov 2015.
13. Aryal KP. Wild and uncultivated plants. Options for livelihood support of the
people in the middle hills of Nepal. Master’s Thesis No. 31. Uppsala 2007,
ISSN: 1653-834X, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala,
Sweden. 2007. https://www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/org/centrb/cbm/
dokument/publikationer-cbm/masteruppsatser/kamal-prasad-aryal-thesis.pdf.
Accessed on 28 June 2016.
14. Pieroni A, Nebel S, Sanroro RF, Heinrich M. Food for two seasons: culinary
uses of non-cultivated local vegetables and mushrooms in a south Italian
village. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2005;56(4):245–72.
15. Piya L, Maharjan KL, Joshi NP. Forest and food security of indigenous
people: a case of Chepangs in Nepal. J Int Dev Coop. 2011;17(1):113–35.
16. Regmi BR, Aryal KP, Tamang BB, Shrestha PK: Homegardens: an opportunity
to minimize pressure on slash and burn system and options for improving
dietary diversity of Chepang households. In: Gautam R, Sthapit BR, Shrestha
PK, editors. Enhancing the contribution of home gardens to on-farm
management of plant genetic resources and to improve the livelihoods of
Nepalese farmers: lessons learned and policy implications. Proceedings of
home garden workshop, 6–7 August 2004, Pokhara, Nepal. LI-BIRD,
Bioversity International and SDC. 2006. p. 35-47.
17. Kumar A, Pandey VC, Tewari DD, Singh AG. Traditional uses of medicinal
plants for dermatological healthcare management practices by the Tharu
tribal community of Utter Pradesh. India Gen Res Crop Eval. 2013;60:203–24.
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
18. Aryal KP, Kerkhoff EE, Maskey N, Sherchan R. Shifting cultivation in sacred
Himalayan landscape. A case study from Kangchenjunga Conservation Area. 1st
ed. Kathmandu: WWF Nepal; 2010.
19. Shrestha SR. The state of uncultivated foods in Nepal biodiversity and
uncultivated food plants. In: Johnston MM, editor. The proceedings of the
regional workshop on uncultivated foods and biodiversity, September 24 to 26,
Kathmandu, Nepal. USC Canada-Nepal; 2001.
20. Zomer R, Oli KP, editors. Kailash sacred landscape conservation
initiative—feasibility assessment report. Kathmandu: ICIMOD; 2011.
21. ICIMOD. Feasibility study report and participatory natural resources management
plan: Khar Village development committee in Api-Nampa Conservation Area,
Darchula Nepal [Unpublished report]. Kathmandu: International Center for
Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD); 2013.
22. CBS. Nepal living standard survey 2010/11, volume one. Kathmandu: Central
Bureau of Statistics, Government of Nepal; 2011.
23. Watson MF, Mkiyama S, Ikeda H, Pendry C, Rajbhandari KR, Shrestha KK,
editors. Flora of Nepal, vol. 3. Edinburgh: The Royal Botanic Garden; 2011.
24. Press JR, Shrestha KK, Sutton DA. Annotated checklist of the flowering
plants of Nepal. London: The Natural History Museum; 2000.
25. Stainton JDA. Flowers of the Himalaya. A supplement. New Delhi: Oxford
University Press; 1988.
26. The Plant List. Version 1.1. 2013. http://www.theplantlist.org/. Accessed 4
Nov 2017.
27. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG IV). An update of the angiosperm
phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering
plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc. 2016;181:1–20.
28. Trotter RT, Logan MH. Informant consensus. A new approach for identifying
potentially effective medicinal plants. In: Etkin NL, editor. Plants in
indigenous medicine and diet Rdgrave. New York: Bedford Hills; 1986.
29. Phillips O, Gentry AH, Reynel C, Wilkin P, Galvez-Durand BC. Quantitative
ethnobotany and Amazonian conservation. Conserv Biol. 1994;8:225–48.
30. Burlingame B. Wild nutrition. J Food Compos Anal. 2000;13(2):99–100.
31. Sundriyal M, Sundryal RC. Underutilized edible plants of the Sikkim
Himalaya: need for domestication. Curr Sci. 2003;85(6):731–6.
32. Sundriyal M, Sundryal RC. Wild edible plants of the Sikkim Himalaya:
nutritive values of selected species. Econ Bot. 2001;55(3):377–90.
33. Aryal K, Kotru R, Phuntsho K. Unlocking uncultivated food for mountain
livelihood: case from Hindu Kush, Himalayas. J Agric Environ. 2013;14:160–70.
34. Kang J, Kang Y, Ji X, Guo Q, Jacques G, Pietras M, Łuczaj L, Li D, Łuczaj L.
Wild food plants and fungi used in the mycophilous Tibetan community of
Zhagana (Tewo County, Gansu, China). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016;12:21.
35. Boesi A. Traditional knowledge of wild food plants in a few Tibetan
communities. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10:75.
36. Singh B, Sultan P, Hassan QP, Gairola S, Bedi YS. Ethnobotany, traditional
knowledge and diversity of wild edible plants and fungi: a case study in the
Bandipora District of Kashmir Himalaya, India. J Herbs Spices Med Plants.
2016; https://doi.org/10.1080/10496475.2016.1193833.
37. Thapa L. The research project on edible wild plants of Bhutan and their
associated traditional knowledge. J Fac Agr Shinshu Univ. 2009;45(1):43–8.
38. Khan M, Kumar S, Hamal IA, Koul S. Wild edible plants of Sewa catchment
area in Northwest Himalaya. J Plant Devel Sci. 2009;1(1&2):1–7.
39. Tiwari BK: Traditional management of NTFP/MAPs in north East India: a case
study of bayleaf and broom grass. Paper presented at a consultation meeting on
improving livelihoods of mountain communities through sustainable utilization
of non-timber forest products at ICIMOD, 18–20 December 2003, Kathmandu,
Nepal. 2003.
40. Uprety Y, Poudel RC, Gurung J, Chettri N, Chaudhary RP. Traditional use and
management of NTFPs in Kangchenjunga landscape; implications for
conservation and livelihoods. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016;12:19.
41. Kafle G, Limbu P, Pradhan B, Jing F. Piloting ecohealth approach for
addressing land use transition, climate change and human health issues.
NGO Group Bulletin on Climate Change. Pokhara: Local Initiatives for
Biodiversity, Research and Development (LI- BIRD); 2009. http://www.
forestrynepal.org/images/publications/Kafle_ecohealth-climate-change.pdf.
Accessed 20 Feb 2016
42. Kumar S, Das G, Shin H-S, Patra JK. Dioscorea spp. (a wild edible tuber): a
study on its ethnopharmacological potential and traditional use by the local
people of Similipal Biosphere Reserve, India. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:52.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00052.
43. Ogle BM. Wild vegetables and micronutrient nutrition: studies on the
significance of wild vegetables in women’s diet in Vietnam. Comprehensive
Page 17 of 18
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the faculty of Medicine 1056.
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 2001. p. 5-59. ISBN 91-554-5068-7.
Uprety Y, Poudel RC, Shrestha KK, Rajbhandary S, Tiwari NN, Shrestha
UB, Asselin H. Diversity of use and local knowledge of wild edible
plant resources in Nepal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012;8(1):16.
Talukdar T. Women’s as key managers of biodiversity in shifting cultivation
in Bangladesh. In: Khadka M, Verma M, editors. Gender and biodiversity
management in the Greater Himalayas, Kathmandu, International Centre for
Integrated Mountain Development; 2012. p. 21–4.
Tiwari JK, Ballabha R, Tiwari P. Some promising wild edible plants of
Srinagar and its adjacent area in Alaknada valley of Garhwal Himalaya, India.
J Am Sci. 2010;6(4):167–74.
Reddy KN, Pattanaik C, Reddy CS, Raju VS. Traditional knowledge on wild
food plants in Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2007;6(1):223–9.
Ngome-Tata P, Shackleton C, Degrande A, Tieguhong JC. Addressing
constraints in promoting wild edible plants’ utilization in household
nutrition: case of the Congo Basin forest area. Agric Food Secur. 2017;
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-017-0097-5.
Chettri N, Sharma E, Lama SD. Non-timber forest produces utilisation, distribution
and status in trekking corridor of Sikkim. India J Ecol Appl. 2008;8(1):93–108.
Misra S, Maikhuri RK, Kala CP, Rao KS, Saxena KG. Wild leafy vegetables: a
study of their subsistence dietic support to the inhabitants of Nanda Devi
Biosphere Reserve, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2008;4:15.
Kaliszewska I, Kolodziejska-Degorska I. The social context of wild leafy
vegetables uses in Shiri, Daghestan. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015;11:63.
Kaliszewska D, Degórska K. The social context of wild leafy vegetables uses
in Shiri, Daghestan. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015;11:63.
Shrestha PM, Dhillion SS. Diversity and traditional knowledge concerning
wild food species in a locally managed forest in Nepal. J Agroforest Syst.
2006;66(1):55–63.
Acharya KP, Acharya R. Eating from the wild: indigenous knowledge on wild
edible plants in Parroha VDC of Rupandehi district, Central Nepal. Internat J
Soc Forest. 2010;3(1):28–48.
Gari JA. Agrobiodiversity, food security and HIV/AIDS mitigation in SubSaharan Africa. 2002. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/esw/esw_
new/documents/Links/publications_other/8_Agrobiodiversity_Gar%C3%AD.
pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2016.
Harris FMA, Mohammed S. Relying in nature: wild foods in Northern Nigeria.
Ambio J Human Env. 2003;32(1):24–9.
Hunde D, Njoka J, Asfaw Z, Nyangito M. Seasonal availability and
consumption of wild edible plants in semiarid Ethiopia: implications to food
security and climate change adaptation. J Hortic For. 2011;3:138–49.
Zhang L, Chai Z, Zhang Y, Geng Y, Wang Y. Ethnobotanical study of
traditional edible plants used by the Naxi people during droughts. J
Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016;2:39.
Panmei R, Gajurel PR, Singh B. Ethnobotany and nutritional values of some
selected wild edible plants used by Rongmei tribe of Manipur Northeast
India. Internat J Appl Biol Pharmaceut Technol. 2016;7(4):1–9.
Konsam S, Thongam B, Handique AK. Assessment of wild leafy vegetables
traditionally consumed by the ethnic communities of Manipur, northeast
India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016;12:9.
Grivetti LE, Ogle BM. Value of traditional foods in meeting macro and
micronutrient needs: the wild plant connection. Nutr Res Rev. 2000;13(1):
31–46.
Bhandari MR, Kasai T, Kawabata J. Nutritional evaluation of wild yam
(Dioscorea spp.) tubers of Nepal. Food Chem. 2003;82(4):619–23.
Shrestha N, Prasai D, Shrestha KK, Shrestha S, Zhang XC. Ethnomedicinal
practices in the highlands of central Nepal: a case study of Syaphru and
Langtang village in Rasuwa district. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;155(2):1204–13.
Shinwari ZK. Medicinal plants research in Pakistan. J Med Plants Res. 2010;4:
161–76.
Manandhar NP, Manandhar S. Plants and people of Nepal. Portland: Timber
press; 2002.
Kunwar RM, Bussmann RW. Medicinal plants and quantitative
ethnomedicine: a case study from Baitadi and Darchula Districts, Far-West
Nepal. J Nat Hist Mus. 2009;24:73–82.
O’Neill AR, Badola HK, Dhyani PP, Rana SK. Integrating ethnobiological
knowledge into biodiversity conservation in the Eastern Himalayas. J
Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017;13:21.
Kunwar RM, Shrestha KP, Bussman RW. Traditional herbal medicine in Farwest Nepal: a pharmacological appraisal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2010;6:35.
Aryal et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:10
Page 18 of 18
69. Kunwar RM, Nepal BK, Kshhetri HB, Rai SK, Bussmann RW. Ethnomedicine in
Himalaya: a case study from Dolpa, Humla, Jumla and Mustang districts of
Nepal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006;2:27.
70. Kunwar R, Burlakoti C, Chowdhary CL, Bussman RW. Medicinal plants in
farwest Nepal: indigenous uses and pharmacological validity. Med Aromat
Plant Sci Biotechnol. 2010;28:42.
71. Negi VS, Pathak R, Chandra Sekar K, Rawal RS, Bhatt ID, Nandi SK, Dhyani PP.
Traditional knowledge and biodiversity conservation: a case study from
Byans Valley in Kailash Sacred Landscape, India. J Environ Plan Manag. 2017;
https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1371006.
72. Uddin MZ, Hassan MA. Determination of informant consensus factor of
ethnomedicinal plants used in Kalenga Forest, Bangladesh. J Plant Taxon.
2014;21(1):83–91.
73. Pandey NC, Bhatt D, Arya D, Chopra N, Upreti BM, Joshi GC, Tewari LM.
Diversity of ethno-medicinal plant: a case study of Bageshwar district
Uttarakhand. J Med Plants Stud. 2017;5(2):11–24.
74. Ong HG, Kim YD. The role of wild edible plants in household food security
among transitioning hunter-gatherers: evidence from the Philippines. Food
Sec. 2017;9(1):11–24.
75. Ashagre M, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E. Ethnobotanical study of wild edible plants
in Burji District, Segan Area Zone of Southern Nations, Nationalities and
Peoples Region (SNNPR), Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016;12(1):32–56.
76. Ahmad K, Pieroni A. Folk knowledge of wild food plants among the tribal
communities of Thakht-e-Sulaiman Hills, North-West Pakistan. J Ethnobiol
Ethnomed. 2016;12:7.
77. Aryal KP, Kerkhoff EE. The right to practice shifting cultivation as a
traditional occupation in Nepal: a case study to apply ILO conventions nos.
111 (employment and occupation) and 169 (indigenous and tribal peoples).
Geneva: ILO; 2008.
78. Jena MK. Economical and biological potential of Non-Timber Forest
Products (NTFP) in the Similipal Hills of Orissa. In: Seeland, Schmithusen,
editors. Indigenous knowledge, forest management and forest policy in
South Asia. Man and forest series 5; 2003. p. 81–103.
79. Kunwar RM, Bussmann RW. Medicinal, aromatic and dye plants of Baitadi
and Darchula districts, Nepal Himalaya: status, uses and management. In:
Hartmann M, Weipert J, editors. Biodiversitat und Naturausstattung im
Himalaya III. Erfurt: Naturekunde Museum; 2009. p. 43–9.
80. Hickey GM, Pouliot M, Smith-Hall C, Wunder S, Nielsen MR. Quantifying the
economic contribution of wild food harvests to rural livelihoods: a globalcomparative analysis. Food Policy. 2016;62:122–32.
81. Kunwar R, Bussman RW. Ethnobotany in the Nepal Himalaya. J Ethnobiol
Ethnomed. 2008;4:24.
82. Addis G, Asfaw Z, Woldu Z. The role of wild and semi-wild edible plants in
household food sovereignty in Hamer and Konso communities, South
Ethiopia. Ethnobot Res Applic. 2013;11:251–71.
83. Smith GC, Clegg MS, Keen CL, Grivett LE. Mineral values of selected plant
foods common to Southern Burkina Faso and Niamey, Niger, West Africa.
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 1995;47:41–53.
84. Pieroni A, Soukand R. The disappearing wild food and medicinal plant
knowledge in a few mountain villages of North-Eastern Albania. J Appl Bot
Food Qual. 2017;90:58–67.
85. Bharali P, Sharma M, Sharma CL, Singh B. Ethnobotanical survey of spices
and condiments used by some tribes of Arunachal Pradesh. J Med Plants
Stud. 2017;5(1):101–9.
Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
and we will help you at every step:
• We accept pre-submission inquiries
• Our selector tool helps you to find the most relevant journal
• We provide round the clock customer support
• Convenient online submission
• Thorough peer review
• Inclusion in PubMed and all major indexing services
• Maximum visibility for your research
Submit your manuscript at
www.biomedcentral.com/submit