Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Bunraku to Butoh: The Japanese Puppet, the Modernist Marionette, and Physical Pain

MSA 19, Amsterdam 2017

Hannah Simpson Hannah.simpson@stx.ox.ac.uk Bunraku to Butoh: The Japanese Puppet, the Modernist Marionette, and Physical Pain European theatre-reformers frequently turned to a vaguely defined ‘Orient’, ‘East’, or ‘Asia’ when they felt the need to legitimise their call for a marionette-based theatre. “It is natural that I go to Asia for a stage-convention,” W. B. Yeats declares, “and perhaps for those movements of the body copied from the marionette shows of the 14th century.” Edward Gordon Craig pronounces that “Asia” was the “first kingdom” of the marionette, who “took up his abode on the far Eastern Coast.” To what tradition were these men so vaguely referring? One key source of ‘Eastern’ marionette performance is the Bunraku or ningyō jōruri, a Japanese puppet theatre popular since the seventeenth century. Although still practised today, Bunraku theatre has influenced some notable contemporary Japanese performance modes, including the post-World War II butoh theatre. Butoh practitioners distort their bodies in a disjointed, jerky manner that is often strikingly evocative of the marionette figure. The body itself seems not only fragmented into random, uncanny articulations, but is indeed presented as though dissociated from the will of the performer themselves: butoh’s founder Hijikata Tatsumi claimed that the “roots of butoh” lay feeling “that your arm is not really your arm”. Butoh aims to erase self-expression and self-consciousness: butoh “is not attained through any act of will”, Sondra Fraleigh observes, and is not self-expression; self-erasure would come closer”. The Bunraku influence of butoh is clear even without the explicit acknowledgement of contemporary performers: Juju Alishina, for example, incorporates direct Bunraku elements in her work, choreographing dancers who “seem to be handled by a puppeteer behind them.” Since butoh takes on so many of the elements of Bunraku theatre, why does it get rid of its crucial defining feature: the marionette itself? In this paper, I suggest that butoh theatre replaces the marionette figure in order to foreground the vulnerability of the human body. This highlights an element of the marionette that has been underemphasised in previous discussions on the topic: the absence not merely of will or consciousness, but of physical feeling, of vulnerability to pain. Arising directly from the aftermath of Hiroshima, butoh emphasises the weakened, pain-wracked condition of the postwar body. The human-marionette figure is here not a means of evading what Gordon Craig calls the “living figure in which the weakness and tremors of the flesh were perceptible”, but rather a way to foreground this very physical fallibility. This paper ends by exploring how the experience of physical pain can, according to butoh practitioners and supported by established pain scholarship, achieve the unself-conscious state of ‘grace’ that Kleist and Craig hope for the human or “Uber-marionette” performer.