Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu
‘Taking ancient Egyptian mortuary religion seriously’: How could we, and why would we? Rune Nyord, Freie Universität Berlin Anthropology and Egyptology Symposium Cambridge, 24–25/7/2017 The limits of Egyptology A.H. Gardiner (1879–1963), The Queen’s College, Oxford ‘There can be no doubt that, while to ourselves the contents of our Sobk hymns must appear to be unmitigated rubbish, the Egyptians will have found in them mystical charms which stirred their pious emotions. It must at least be realized that with their traditional understanding of mythological allusion much that strikes ourselves as meaningless will to the subjects of Ammenemes have sounded profound and have awakened colourful images. This, however, is the concern of the psychologist and of the student of comparative religions rather than of the Egyptologist as such. The latter is in the first instance merely a purveyor of the scanty material that has survived, and he has plenty of grounds of his own, lexical, grammatical and interpretative, to sustain his interest in what might otherwise seem intolerably arid.’ Gardiner, RdE 11 (1957), 55f. How crazy were the ancient Egyptians? Goscinny and Uderzo, Astérix et Cléopâtre, 1965 Plan of MMA excavations at Lisht 1914 (Arnold 1988: Pl. 80) with early–mid 13th Dynasty shabti deposits. Plan of the tomb of Tetiky, Dra Abu el-Naga (TT 15). Whelan 2007: 11. Shabti of User(?), British Museum EA 49130. The Quest for Immortality? The Field of Hetep (chapter 110) from the Book of the Dead of Ani (c. 1275 BCE, British Museum, EA 10470/3) The universality of afterlife beliefs in Victorian thought ‘It appears almost impossible for man not to conceive of himself as composed of two elements, a corporeal and a spiritual principle, to which a different destiny is assigned, when their temporary union is dissolved by death. The larger and grosser part is visibly restored to the earth; but it is only by the analogical reasonings of philosophy that men have ever been brought to believe that the soul is involved in the same destruction. The instinct of nature prompts to a belief in its continued existence, which is the more easily cherished, because it has no sensible properties distinct from matter.’ (Kenrick 1852: I, 396) ‘The quest for immortality’ as research hypothesis • Any archaeological object can be argued to have been of use in the afterlife • Any textual description or allusion can be argued to refer to the afterlife In other words, no empirical evidence can falsify the ‘quest for immortality’ hypothesis. A new approach to Egyptian mortuary religion • • • • • Social context Conceptual framework Mortuary texts Material culture Bodies Social context The tomb owner at the offering table, tomb of Mehu (6th Dynasty, Saqqara) Conceptual framework Mortuary texts Head board from the inner coffin of general Sepi, Bersheh, 12th Dynasty. Material culture Full-size (c. 19 cm) ‘dummy’ vase of wood (Sheikh Abd el-Qurna ,18th Dynasty). Metropolitan Museum of Art, 12.182.24 Weavers, tomb of Djehutynakht (Bersheh 10A, early 11th–late 12th Dynasty). Boston Museum of Fine Arts 21.891 Bodies Burial of the king’s daughter Khenmet, Dahshur, 12th Dynasty (de Morgan 1903: 46) Perspectives Estate figure from tomb of Meketre, Assasif (TT 280, 12th Dynasty). Metropolitan Museum of Art, 20.3.7. With thanks to • • • • Christ’s College, Cambridge The Carlsberg Foundation The Isaac Newton Trust Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft