Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
This article aims to reconsider Level V of Tel Lachish, the main focus of the fourth archaeological expedition. Four issues are addressed here. (1) The pottery assemblage of Level V could be compared with those of other sites, such as Khirbet Qeiyafa, a stratifijied site with a short-lived Iron Age occupation. (2) After three main expeditions, Lachish Level V is stratigraphically well defijined but poorly known; no fortifijication or public building has been found. (3) According to analysis of the typology and surface treatment of its pottery assemblage, Level V cannot be dated to the 9th century BCE, but can possibly be dated to somewhere in the second half of the 10th century BCE. (4) Taking into account the archaeological results from Khirbet Qeiyafa and the ongoing excavations at Tel Lachish, the suggested division of Iron Age IIA into early and late (Herzog and Singer-Avitz 2004) must be reconsidered.
During recent salvage excavations at the junction of the Latrun-Ashqelon Highway 3 near Bet Ḥilqiya, northern Negev, Israel, the broken head/torso of a Yarmukian cowrie-eye female clay fijigurine was uncovered within a Pottery Neolithic (Jericho IX/Lodian) deposit. A brief presentation of the fragment, providing a fresh look at and a new interpretation of its back in particular, is followed by a synopsis of sites known to have yielded female clay fijigurines of this type to date.
The Shephelah was a geographical buffer zone between the central hills of Judea and the coastal plains of southern Israel during the Iron Age as well as in other periods. The region was relatively densely occupied during the Iron Age II. This paper will examine several settlements of the Shephelah during the Iron Age through the lens of pottery study and in particular pottery production and petrographic analysis. Over five hundred Iron Age II pottery vessels from the sites of Khirbet Qeiyafa, Tel Sochoh, Tell eṣ-Ṣafiji/Gath, Tel Burna and Tel ‘Eton were analyzed by thin section petrography. The comparative results show certain diachronic changes in the usage of raw materials in the different sites during the Iron Age.
In this study we reassess the character of the Judahite Kingdom during the Iron Age. As opposed to most past discussions of this monarchy, which define it as a highly centralized political structure, we suggest to identify various facets indicating that local elites played a major role in the societal and leadership structure of the Judahite Kingdom. We suggest that many of the supposed indices of centralized bureaucratic control that have been previously identified may in fact reflect the influence and control of local elites within the kingdom. We likewise believe that patronage-based relations, at different levels of society, were of central importance in the social and economic structure of the kingdom.
Burials are a well-known phenomenon during the Neolithic period of the southern Levant. However, we seem to lack suf-fijicient information regarding the burial customs of the Early Pottery Neolithic period (the Yarmukian culture), as not many burials from this time span have so far been discovered. In 2007, the fragmentary remains of several burials dated to the Early Pottery Neolithic period were discovered at Beisamoun during a salvage excavation. These burials are crucial to understanding the funerary practices of the period. The burials were placed in the upper part of a marked pit, in one of several stone pavements , and in pits fijilled with angular stones discovered in the southwestern part of the site. This paper focuses on the specifijic burial context and characteristics of the burials and discusses its signifijicance.
From Sha‘ar Hagolan to Shaaraim Essays in Honor of Prof. Yosef Garfinkel
The Yarmukian Site at Tel Mitzpe Zevulun North (Naḥal Zippori 3), Lower Galilee, Israel2016 •
The Yarmukian culture of the central Jordan Valley in northern Israel is well known owing to the extensive excavations carried out by Yossi Garfinkel at Sha‘ar Hagolan, which have provided many insights into the Neolithic way of life. In the last decade, several new Yarmukian settlements have been discovered and excavated by the Israel Antiquities Authority due to construction plans. One of these is the site of Naḥal Zippori in the Lower Galilee. The settlement was established within alluvial lands close to the Naḥal Zippori stream, and hence its name. Its architectural remains include a rectangular structure that faced a courtyard with a rounded silo, cooking pits and other installations. The pottery assemblage, including decorated vessels with herringbone patterns and line-painted designs, is characteristic of the Yarmukian and Jericho IX aspects of the Pottery Neolithic period; so too is the lithic assemblage with its distinctive denticulated sickle blades. The most remarkable finds that link this site with Sha‘ar Hagolan are fragments of around three dozen anthropomorphic clay figurines, both female and male, and a few zoomorphic clay figurines, all characteristic of the Yarmukian culture. The discovery of this settlement site at Naḥal Zippori extends the Yarmukian territory to the west of the country. Its rich material culture, including a well-built architectural complex and clay figurines, possibly indicates that it was a central settlement in the Lower Galilee region.
From Sha‘ar Hagolan to Shaaraim: Essays in Honor of Prof. Yosef Garfinkel
Golub, M. R., 2016. Revisiting Vaughn and Dobler’s Provenance Study of Hebrew Seals and Seal Impressions. Pp. 371-382 in S. Ganor, I. Kreimerman, K. Streit and M. Mumcuoglu (eds.). From Sha‘ar Hagolan to Shaaraim: Essays in Honor of Prof. Yosef Garfinkel. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.2016 •
In order to assess the probability of forgeries among unprovenanced Hebrew seal and seal impressions, Vaughn and Dobler (2006) conducted a comparative statistical analysis of features associated with provenanced and unprovenanced seals and bullae. As Vaughn and Dobler explain, their work rests on the assumption that if seals and bullae of known and unknown provenance are all authentic, similar features will be found in both groups. Because their study found signifijicant diffferences in some features between the provenanced and the unprovenanced groups, they concluded that the unprovenanced group may contain forged artifacts. In this paper, I reanalyze Vaughn and Dobler’s dataset in the light of my recent study on the geographical distribution of provenanced Hebrew seals and bullae. Viewed in this light, the unprovenanced bullae are probably authentic and the diffferences may arise from the diffferent geographical origin of the two groups.
Infant jar burials are characterized by the interment of infants or neonates in ceramic containers or between large potsherds, covering the body from both sides. Such interments are usually found in domestic contexts, both in open areas and under floors. A renewed analysis of infant jar burials from the southern Levant suggests that this phenomenon dates mainly from the Middle Chalcolithic period of the very late 6th and early 5th millennia BCE. Infant jar burials were also very popular in the contemporary Ubaid culture of Upper Mesopotamia and the Amuq E phase of the northern Levant. I argue that the appearance of this burial custom in the southern Levant is the result of a cultural influence of the Ubaid culture. It is likely that the protohistoric appearance of infant jar burials marks the beginning of a tradition of burial practices involving containers such as jars or ossuaries, thus permanently altering the burial culture of the southern Levant.
From Sha'ar Hagolan to Shaaraim: Essays in Honor of Prof. Yosef Garfinkel
Sealed with a Dance: An Iron Age IIA Seal from Tel Abel Beth Maacah2016 •
Ekron 9/1. The Iron Age I Early Philistine City,
The Thoth Baboon Statuette: The Inscription and Its Dating2016 •
Papers Presented at a Colloquium of the Swiss Society for Ancient Near Eastern Studies Held at the University of Bern, September 6, 2014, ed. by S. Schroer and S. Münger (Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 282). Fribourg (CH): Academic Press/Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
Khirbet Qeiyafa in the Shephelah2017 •
Tel Miqne-Ekron The Iron Age I- The Early Age Philistine City 9/11
An Overview of Iron Age I Pottery Types from Strata VII–IV -EKRON 9/1 Field IV Lower The Iron Age I Early Philistine City2016 •
Ekron 9/1. The Iron Age I Early Philistine City
Two Scarabs and Two Finger-Rings from Iron Age I Contexts2016 •
Khirbet Qeiyafa Vol. 1
Garfinkal & Ganor, 2009. Khirbet Qeiyafa Vol. 1. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Tell It in Gath: Studies in the History and Archaeology of Israel. Essays in Honor of A. M. Maier on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday
When Considering Infants and Jar Burials in the Middle Bronze Age Southern Levant2018 •
The Judean Shephelah after the Assyrian Destruction: A View from Tel Lachish
The Judean Shephelah after the Assyrian Destruction A View from Tel Lachish2017 •
The Iron Age Pottery of Jerusalem: A Typological and Technological Study
The Development of Pottery in Iron Age Jerusalem2019 •
In I. Shai et al., eds., Tell it in Gath: Studies in the History and Archaeology of Israel. Essays in Honor of A. M. Maeir on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday.
Notes on Early Bronze Age Commensality2018 •
Debating Khirbet Qeiyafa: A Fortified City in Judah from the Time of King David.
Y. Garfinkel, I. Kreimerman and P. Zilberg, 2016. Debating Khirbet Qeiyafa: A Fortified City in Judah from the Time of King David. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Tel Miqne-Ekron Publications 1985-1988, 1990, 1992-1996 Field IV Lower--The Elite Zone, Part 1, The Iron Age ! Early Philistine City
A Stratigraphic and Chronological Analysis of the Iron Age I Pottery from Strata VII–IV-EKRON 9/1 Field IV Lower The Iron Age I Early Philistine City Chapter 5B2016 •