Perceptions and reasons for quitting and transitioning between smoking and smokeless tobacco products: Findings from four waves of the ITC Bangladesh survey

Tobacco Induced Diseases Research Paper Perceptions and reasons for quitting and transitioning between smoking and smokeless tobacco products: Findings from four waves of the ITC Bangladesh survey Daniel T. H. Chen1,2, Nigar Nargis3, Geoffrey T. Fong4,5,6, Syed Mahfuzul Huq7, Anne C. K. Quah4, Filippos T. Filippidis1 ABSTRACT Transitions between different tobacco products are frequent among tobacco users in Bangladesh; however, the reasons leading to such transitions and why they quit are not well researched. The aim of the study is to examine perceptions and reasons reported by tobacco users in Bangladesh to transition to other products or quit. METHODS Data from four waves (2009–2015) of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Bangladesh Survey were used. Repeated data on perceptions and reasons for exclusive cigarette (n=520), bidi (n=130), and SLT users (n=308) to either start using other products or quit were analyzed with sampling weights. The percentages of responses across waves were used to calculate the pooled proportion data using a meta-analysis approach. RESULTS Common reasonsig for respondents switching to other tobacco products were influence of friends/family (73.8–86.0%), and curiosity (44.4–71.3%). The perceived calming effect of smoking cigarettes and bidis (43.2–56.9%), and the impression that bidis were less harmful (52.3%) and taste better (71.2%) were major reasons for exclusive SLT users to switch products. Health concerns (16.5– 62.7%) and disapproval from friends/family (29.8–56.4%) were generally the main reasons for quitting. For smoked tobacco users, doctor’s advice (41.6%), package warning labels (32.3%), and price (32.4%) seemed to be the major driving factors to quit. CONCLUSIONS Results highlight that the reasons for switching between tobacco products and quitting include social factors (e.g. friends/family) and (mis) perceptions regarding the products. Tobacco control policy could emphasize cessation support, increased price and education campaigns as key policies to reduce overall tobacco use in Bangladesh. Data from four waves (2009–2015) of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Bangladesh Survey were used. Repeated data on perceptions and reasons for exclusive cigarette (n=520), bidi (n=130), and SLT users (n=308) to either start using other products or quit were analyzed with sampling weights. The percentages of responses across waves were used to calculate the pooled proportion data using a meta-analysis approach. INTRODUCTION Tob. Induc. Dis. 2023;21(February):25 https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/159137 AFFILIATION 1 Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom 2 Primary Care Epidemiology, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom 3 American Cancer Society, Atlanta, United States 4 Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada 5 School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada 6 Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada 7 Country Office of World Health Organization, Dhaka, Bangladesh CORRESPONDENCE TO Daniel T.H. Chen. Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Room 319, Reynolds Building, St. Dunstan’s Road, London W6 8RP, United Kingdom. E-mail: t.chen17@imperial. ac.uk ORCID ID: https://orcid. org/0000-0001-9849-4966 KEYWORDS smoking, smokeless tobacco, dual use, poly tobacco use, tobacco control Received: 1 November 2022 Revised: 9 January 2023 Accepted: 12 January 2023 INTRODUCTION Tobacco use, whether smoking or smokeless, is widely regarded as the leading cause of preventable morbidity and premature mortality worldwide, particularly Published by European Publishing. © 2023 Chen D.T.H. et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 1 Tobacco Induced Diseases Research Paper in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)1,2. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that in 2022 the South-East Asia Region accounted for more than 22% of global smokers aged ≥15 years and was home to 90% of the world’s smokeless tobacco (SLT) users3. In South-East Asia, tobacco is consumed in diverse forms, including smoked tobacco (ST), such as cigarettes, bidis (a cheaper hand-rolled substitute for cigarettes) and SLT, which covers a variety of tobacco containing products that are used orally or nasally without combustion3,4. Although the proportion of tobacco users has declined in most South-East Asian countries in recent decades1, the growing tobacco market and the variety of products used within this region have led to concurrent use of multiple tobacco products and transitions of use between products4-7. A large number of tobacco users in South-East Asian countries were persistent users and unwilling to quit despite awareness of smoking hazards 8. This is especially prominent in Bangladesh, one of the highest tobaccoconsuming countries in the region, where there were 37.8 million (35.3%) adults consuming tobacco products (mainly cigarettes, bidis, and SLT)9 in 2017. SLT is the most commonly used form of tobacco in Bangladesh, accounting for a substantial portion of overall tobacco use in the nation3. Available products include betel quid with tobacco, zarda, gul, sada pata, and khoinee, the majority of which are also available in neighboring India and Myanmar10. As with ST, SLT is found to be associated with adverse health effects such as the development of cancer, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and adverse pregnancy outcomes11,12. However, almost one in ten (9.3%) tobacco users in Bangladesh is a dual user of both ST and SLT, and one in eleven (8.8%) is a polyuser of two or more tobacco products6. Furthermore, regardless of the country’s high health and economic burden from tobacco use, quit ratios have remained low, even though the population of former smokers has increased in most South-East Asian countries in recent years13,14. Most studies, to date, have explored factors associated with different tobacco use patterns and quitting of smoked and smokeless tobacco7,13,15. Shared traits of these users in the South-East Asian context were that they were older, of lower education level, in poverty, and higher intentions to quit13,15. However, no studies have focused on users’ perceptions and reasons for changes in their tobacco use behavior. Within the context of Bangladesh, which represents a substantial proportion of the region’s tobacco market, it is essential to understand both person/product-level factors (i.e. product knowledge, appeal, and perceived harm, etc.) and contextual factors (i.e. policy restrictions, affordability and product availability, etc.) that influence the behavioral changes of these users for tobacco product substitution/initiation and nicotine seeking16. This will improve our understanding of the factors that help to reduce overall use and lead to quitting, and will inform policies on tobacco control to maximize their impact. Such information can also inform tobacco control policies in neighboring SouthEast Asian countries with similar tobacco use profiles. In light of this, this study aimed to explore factors of product transitions, reasons and perceptions about quitting, using cohort data from adult smokers in Bangladesh. METHODS Data and sample Data come from all four waves of The International Tobacco Control (ITC) Survey in Bangladesh. The ITC Bangladesh Survey uses a nationally representative probability sample of adult tobacco users and nonusers aged ≥15 years, recruited using a multistage cluster sampling design since the first wave in 2009. Participants were re-contacted in 2010, 2011–2012 and 2014–2015, to complete follow-up questionnaires. The retention rates were fairly high, between 87.1% and 94.0%. Details on survey interview procedures, questionnaires, sampling, weighting, and information on accessing the data are available on the ITC website (https://itcproject.org/countries/bangladesh/) and the technical reports17-20. To explore respondent-level changes in tobacco product use and reasons related to the transitions of use among Bangladeshi adults throughout the surveys, we used a balanced sample of respondents present in all four waves yielding a total of 958 respondents that were followed up since the first wave on perceptions and reasons for tobacco use transition to other smoked or smokeless products or to quitting. All tobacco userelated questions and data were retrieved from the tobacco users’ survey, except for data on SLT use in Waves 1 and 2, which were partially recorded Tob. Induc. Dis. 2023;21(February):25 https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/159137 2 Tobacco Induced Diseases Research Paper to the questions include the influence of friends/family; people on media (cigarettes and bidis); curiosity; to occupy time; the calming effects (cigarettes and bidis); sign of sophistication (cigarettes); the packaging (bidis and SLT); to reduce stress (SLT); to help quit tobacco (SLT); the taste (bidis and SLT); and considered to be less harmful (bidis and SLT). Respondents were asked to respond ‘yes’, ‘no’, and ‘don’t know’ to the series of questions in the relevant waves. Reasons for quitting in the following waves were assessed by a number of questions asking cigarette (Waves 2 to 3) and bidi (Waves 2 to 4) smokers, or SLT (Waves 3 to 4) users, whether any of the following reasons led them to think about quitting: concerns for health; concerns for others; fewer places to smoke; workplace restrictions (SLT); set an example for children; doctor’s advice; price; warning labels; friends/family disapprove; and society disapproves (SLT). The responses to these questions were ‘yes’, ‘no’, and ‘don’t know’. It is worth noting that some questions were asked only in certain waves. Therefore, data were analyzed only among the waves for which data were available. Supplementary file Table 1 shows a list of all the full questions asked above in relation to perceptions and reasons for transitions/quitting in the ITC Bangladesh Survey. and derived from the non-users’ surveys due to questionnaire design. Measures Sociodemographic characteristics Sociodemographic characteristics examined were sex, age group (15–17, 18–24, 25–39, 40–54, and ≥55 years), residence (urban, rural), marital status (married, single or living alone), and education level (illiterate, 1–8 years or ≥9 years), and the CASHPOR housing index as a proxy of socioeconomic status (SES) (low, intermediate, high). The CASHPOR index of housing conditions was originally constructed by the ITC researchers and used as the basis for stratification of the population by socioeconomic status21. Current tobacco use In the current study, respondents were considered as current tobacco users if they reported current use of cigarettes, bidis or smokeless (SLT) products on a daily, weekly, or less than weekly basis (e.g. monthly), in the surveys. For users of smoking products, the question was: ‘Do you currently smoke cigarettes/ bidis?’. Those who answered ‘yes’ (Wave 1) or ‘daily/ weekly/less than weekly’ (Waves 2, 3, and 4) were categorized as current users. For the identification of SLT users, the relevant question asked in Waves 1 and 2 was: ‘In the past 6 months, have you used any smokeless products?’ (yes/no); and a response to the statement ‘I generally use SLT at least weekly.’ (yes/no). Those who responded ‘yes’ to both, were classified as current SLT users. In Waves 3 and 4, the question was asked: ‘Do you currently use SLT?’, with response options ‘daily’, ‘weekly’, or ‘less than weekly’ indicating current use. However, those who responded ‘no’ to all of the above, were classified as non-users or quitters. Statistical analysis Descriptive data of the sample characteristics are shown as weighted percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The responses to questions around reasons for transitions between products and quitting were analyzed using repeated data from Waves 2 to 4, with Wave 1 as the base wave, of the ITC Bangladesh Survey. To obtain the pooled percentage of response across all waves, the Stata command metaprop was used to perform meta-analyses of the proportion data22. This command offers proper techniques for pooling percentage data using the random-effects model and permits computation of accurate binomial and score test-based confidence intervals when the estimated proportion of the sub-group is between 0 and 122. All analyses were weighted using the ITC sampling weights respective to the waves analyzed. Weighted estimates are presented to ensure that results are representative of the Bangladeshi population of tobacco users. Perceptions and reasons for quitting and transitions A set of questions around perceptions and reasons why exclusive cigarette, bidis, and SLT users in Wave 1 transitioned to other tobacco products (either exclusively or as dual/poly users of other products) in subsequent waves, were assessed. Current tobacco users were asked a series of questions about why they started smoking cigarettes (Waves 2 to 4), bidis (Waves 2 to 4), or using SLT (Waves 3 to 4). Potential answers Tob. Induc. Dis. 2023;21(February):25 https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/159137 3 Tobacco Induced Diseases Research Paper Table 1. Sample characteristics of exclusive tobacco users at Wave 1, who transitioned to other products or to quitting at Waves 2–4 of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) survey Bangladesh, 2009–2015 (N=958) Characteristics Exclusive cigarette smokers at Wave 1* (Males only) Transition to bidis (N=110) Transition to SLT (N=190) Transition to quitting (N=220) Exclusive bidi smokers at Wave 1* (Males only) Transition to cigarettes (N=61) Transition to SLT (N=47) Transition to quitting (N=22) Exclusive SLT users at Wave 1* Transition to cigarettes (N=23) Transition to quitting (N=263) Transition to bidis (N=22) Gender Male 74.6 (65.8–81.5) 31.5 (18.3–49.1) 27.6 (22.6–33.3) Female 25.4 (18.5–34.2) 68.5 (60.9–91.7) 73.4 (66.7–77.4) Age (years) 15–24 16.6 (10.7–24.7) 11.7 (7.8–17.1) 20.7 (15.9–26.6) 3.7 (1.5–12.4) 2.5 (1.0–5.6) 5.2 (3.6–14.3) 7.9 (3.9–17.0) 2.1 (0.5–9.3) 10.8 (7.5–15.1) 25–39 28.6 (20.9–37.7) 48.7 (41.7–55.8) 43.2 (36.9–49.8) 21.7 (13.1–33.7) 10.3 (3.2–15.5) 6.0 (3.3–15.6) 17.5 (14.0–36.8) 3.1 (3.5–8.9) 33.9 (28.4–39.8) 40–54 30.4 (22.5–39.5) 19.5 (14.4–25.7) 18.1 (13.5–23.7) 41.8 (30.2–54.3) 49.4 (43.5–55.4) 15.8 (5.2–26.6) 64.3 (56.8–74.9) 6.8 (3.1–13.6) 33.3 (27.9–39.2) ≥55 24.5 (17.4–33.4) 20.2 (15.0–26.5) 18.0 (13.4–23.6) 32.9 (22.4–45.4) 37.8 (33.5–44.6) 73.1 (61.9–87.4) 10.3 (5.3–17.8) 88.0 (71.1–90.2) 22.0 (17.1–27.4) Urban 18.3 (12.1–26.7) 19.2 (14.2–25.4) 27.4 (21.9–33.6) 7.4 (2.7–17.2) 9.1 (2.4–14.0) 9.3 (1.4–13.2) 21.2 (16.0–30.3) 4.7 (2.7–12.5) 24.5 (19.7–30.1) Rural 81.7 (73.3–87.9) 80.8 (74.6–85.8) 72.7 (66.4–78.1) 92.6 (82.8–97.3) 90.9 (86.0–97.6) 90.8 (90.8–98.6) 78.8 (59.7–84.0) 95.3 (88.3–99.3) 75.5 (69.9–80.3) Low 26.6 (19.2–35.6) 31.9 (25.6–38.8) 25.3 (20.0–31.4) 47.1 (35.1–59.4) 44.4 (29.1–50.8) 29.4 (24.4–40.5) 32.9 (23.2–50.8) 5.2 (3.5–18.9) 29.5 (24.3–35.3) Medium 35.5 (27.2–44.9) 38.7 (32.1–45.8) 34.1 (28.1–40.5) 37.2 (26.1–49.8) 41.3 (36.5–50.9) 35.8 (29.2–46.6) 1.2 (3.6–9.6) 74.6 (65.2–84.8) 32.6 (27.2–38.5) High 37.8 (29.3–47.2) 29.4 (23.4–36.3) 40.7 (34.4–47.3) 15.7 (8.5–27.1) 14.3 (5.7–20.2) 34.8 (28.4–45.7) 66.0 (48.2–76.0) 20.2 (12.7–30.9) 37.9 (32.3–43.9) Illiterate 22.1 (15.3–30.8) 20.2 (15.1–26.5) 18.8 (14.2–24.5) 57.7 (45.2–69.3) 49.0 (33.2–55.0) 43.0 (34.9–53.2) 26.0 (18.9–34.7) 68.6 (54.6–74.4) 41.7 (35.9–47.7) 1–8 60.7 (51.3–69.4) 61.0 (53.9–67.7) 45.7 (39.3–52.3) 33.6 (23.0–46.2) 49.6 (33.8–55.6) 51.0 (41.6–60.2) 50.5 (25.7–65.0) 21.1 (15.6–35.4) 49.3 (43.4–55.3) ≥9 17.2 (11.1–25.4) 18.8 (13.8–25.0) 35.5 (29.4–42.0) 8.7 (3.5–18.8) 1.4 (0.5–10.0) 6.0 (2.2–15.3) 23.6 (7.4–32.5) 10.3 (23.5–33.5) 9.0 (6.1–13.1) Married 82.3 (74.0–88.4) 81.8 (75.6–86.6) 78.56 (72.6–83.5) 95.5 (86.3–99.2) 97.4 (83.7–99.1) 94.81 (85.69–99.52) 73.60 (64.88–90.87) 72.52 (60.87–84.61) 81.37 (80.92–94.50) Single/live alone 17.7 (11.6–26.0) 18.2 (13.4–24.4) 21.5 (16.5–27.4) 4.5 (0.9–13.7) 2.6 (1.1–6.3) 5.19 (2.61–14.31) 26.40 (19.13–35.12) 27.48 (15.39–39.13) 18.63 (14.31–23.89) Residence Housing index Education level (years) Marital status *Weighted % with 95% CI. Blank: no data. N=520 for exclusive cigarette smokers. N=130 for exclusive bidi smokers. N=308 for exclusive SLT smokers. Male respondents only for exclusive cigarette and bidi smokers. SLT: smokeless tobacco. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2023;21(February):25 https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/159137 4 Tobacco Induced Diseases Research Paper In the current study, only male adults were included for analyses for exclusive cigarette and exclusive bidi smokers, considering the inadequate size of the female smoker sample (the prevalence of cigarette and bidi smoking among female adults was less than 2% in all waves of the survey). among those who were illiterate or received less education (1–8 years) for most exclusive users (≥76.4%). Additionally, most exclusive SLT users who transitioned to smoking cigarettes were male (74.6%), while those who transitioned to bidi use or to quitting, were mainly female (68.5% and 73.4%, respectively). RESULTS Sample characteristics of respondents who transitioned The analytical sample consisted of 958 exclusive users (520 male exclusive cigarette smokers, 130 male exclusive bidi smokers, and 308 male and female exclusive SLT users) recruited at Wave 1 and who had transitioned to using other tobacco products (either exclusively or as dual or poly users with other products) or quit at Waves 2 to 4. The breakdown of the numbers of respondents who transitioned in subsequent waves is presented in Supplementary file Table 2. As presented in Table 1, most exclusive users who transitioned to using other tobacco products were of younger age (≤54 years), living in rural areas, and married. However, an exceptionally large proportion (73.1%) of exclusive bidi smokers who quit were of older age (≥55 years). Within this cohort sample, 34.8–40.7% of respondents who quit were from better housing conditions (higher SES). Percentages of transitions to using other products were higher Perceptions and reasons for quitting and transition Figures 1 to 4 present the pooled proportions of perceptions and reasons for exclusive cigarette, bidis, and SLT users in Waves 2 to 4, to start using other products or to quit. Estimates with 95% CIs are presented in Supplementary file Table 3. As shown in Figure 1, the top three reasons for exclusive SLT users to start smoking cigarettes were the influence of friends/family (73.8%), curiosity (71.3%), and to calm stress (56.9%). The reasons for exclusive bidi smokers to start smoking cigarettes were generally the same, the proportions were 77.3%, 56.4%, and 44.7%, respectively, for the above reasons. In Figure 2, the most common two reasons for exclusive bidi and exclusive cigarette smokers to start using SLT were friends/family (86.0% and 80.0%, respectively) and curiosity (46.8% and 45.4%, respectively). A larger proportion of exclusive cigarette smokers started SLT because of the better taste (37.9%), and because they thought that it helps quit tobacco use (31.9%); 36.6% exclusive Figure 1. Perceptions and reasons for exclusive bidis and smokeless tobacco (SLT) users to start using cigarettes from Wave 2 (2009) to Wave 4 (2014) of the ITC-Bangladesh survey (pooled %) N=23 for exclusive SLT. N=61 for exclusive bidis. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2023;21(February):25 https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/159137 5 Tobacco Induced Diseases Research Paper Figure 2. Perceptions and reasons for exclusive cigarettes and bidis users to start using smokeless tobacco (SLT) from Wave 3 (2011) to Wave 4 (2014) of the ITC-Bangladesh survey (pooled %) Data available only for Wave 3 and Wave 4. N=25 for exclusive bidis. N=73 for exclusive cigarettes. Figure 3. Perceptions and reasons for exclusive smokeless tobacco (SLT) and cigarette users to start using bidis from Wave 2 (2009) to Wave 4 (2014) of the ITC-Bangladesh survey (pooled %) N=100 for exclusive cigarettes. N=22 for exclusive SLT. bidi smokers started SLT because they thought it is less harmful, and 30.8% smokers considered that it reduces stress. Only around 6% of exclusive cigarette/ bidi smokers started SLT because of the packaging warning characteristics, which is ranked in last place among all reasons. In Figure 3, the top four reasons for exclusive SLT users to start smoking bidis were friends/family (82.9%), curiosity (71.5%), the impression that bidis taste better (71.2%), and thinking that bidis are less harmful (52.3%). Regarding exclusive cigarette users, the major reasons to start smoking bidis were friends/ family (80.2%), curiosity (44.4%), calming of stress (43.2%), to occupy time (30.1%), and the impression that bidis taste better (26.7%). Figure 4 describes the top reasons for exclusive users to quit. For exclusive cigarette smokers, the majority quit because of their concerns for health (62.7%), disapproval from friends/family (56.4%), followed by doctor’s advice and concerns for others Tob. Induc. Dis. 2023;21(February):25 https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/159137 6 Tobacco Induced Diseases Research Paper Figure 4. Perceptions and reasons for exclusive cigarettes, bidis, and smokeless tobacco (SLT) to quit from Wave 2 (2009) to Wave 4 (2014) of the ITC-Bangladesh survey (pooled %) Wave 2 and Wave 3 data are only available for exclusive cigarette users. Wave 3 and Wave 4 data are only available for exclusive SLT users. N=263 for exclusive SLT. N=22 for exclusive bidis. N=140 for exclusive cigarettes. # Asked as society disapproves for exclusive SLT users. * Asked as work place restrictions for exclusive SLT users. § Pooled responses for concerns of poor health, future health, and information about health. (41.6% and 41.4%, respectively). The lowest ranked reason for exclusive cigarette smokers to quit was smoking bans (8.7%) in public places. As for exclusive bidi smokers, the leading reported reasons were price and health concerns (32.4% and 33.0%, respectively), followed by disapproval of friends/family, concern for others (25.2% and 24.6%, respectively), and doctor’s advice to quit (23.2%). Only around 5% of exclusive bidi smokers quit because of the warning labels and smoking bans. For exclusive SLT users, the majority quit because of their friends/family (29.8%), and concerns about health (16.5%). About 10% quit because of the price and to set an example for their children. Only 1.5% of exclusive SLT users quit because of the doctor’s advice, which was the least reported reason. Promotion & Sponsorship (TAPS) in entertainment media, and health education programs for awareness of the harmful effects, have an essential influence on the reported reasons for consumers to switch to, couse or discontinue using different tobacco products. Friends/family were the most common social factor for respondents switching to other tobacco products. This is in line with established evidence emphasizing that smoking behaviors are heavily impacted by peers and others close to the respondents’ social contacts, such as friends/family23. Such influence was found to be more relevant in developing countries and Asian 15 cultures, where smoking is a social activity to develop social networks and a tool for networking24. However, social factors also act as a double-edged sword; tobacco users are prone to switching products due to peer influence and are also more inclined to quit because of their disapproval23. Our study results show that health concerns and disapproval from friends/ family were also reported as important reasons for quitting. This may indicate that consumer education and anti-tobacco campaigns may be an effective policy to aid tobacco users to quit. A recent study identified education and raising public awareness around antitobacco advocacies in Bangladesh, would stand as DISCUSSION Transitions between tobacco products are frequent among tobacco users in Bangladesh. Social factors were major reasons for quitting and transitioning. Curiosity and misperceptions of tobacco products were also drivers for users to switch between products. Furthermore, tobacco control measures such as price/tax, ban on Tobacco Advertisement Tob. Induc. Dis. 2023;21(February):25 https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/159137 7 Tobacco Induced Diseases Research Paper The status of tobacco control policies appears to be an important factor in influencing smoking behaviors and tobacco use. There is clear evidence that smoking restrictions in workplaces and public places contribute to smoking cessation and reduce tobacco use prevalence1. Large pictorial warnings with strong messages are also proven to effectively persuade smokers to quit smoking and increase compliance with smoke-free laws31,32. However, amid all responses, smoking restrictions and packaging warning labels were generally not a frequently cited reason for smokers to quit (particularly exclusive bidi smokers). Bangladesh has implemented various policies and initiatives since the implementation of the Tobacco Control Act in 2005. A series of policy amendments have then been brought forward since the first ITC Bangladesh Survey in 2009, including amendments to the Act in 2013 (after Wave 3) and framing new guidelines in 2015 (before Wave 4), to supersede the original 2005 Act and bring the nation closer to compliance with the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). It was not until 2013 that the list of smoke-free public areas was largely expanded and the requirement imposed that all tobacco products have warning labels that cover at least 50% of the total display space on the packaging33. Therefore, implementations of smoke-free laws and regulations on warning labels may have been less effective at the time when the surveys were conducted and should be continuously reinforced to further reduce tobacco consumption. However, up until now, restrictions on tobacco use in the transport area and public places, covers mainly smoked tobacco but not SLT11,33. Generally, in many LMICs, smoke-free policies are often poorly implemented or enforced34. Social norms in most homes in LMICs still permit smoking indoors. Therefore, continuous reinforcements on expanding smoke-free policies to cover all public places and warning labels on alternative products, including bidis and SLT, should be enacted to curb the growing prevalence of use and to increase people’s awareness of the harms of tobacco in Bangladesh. Regarding price, it was considered a driving factor for bidi smokers to quit but was not a frequently cited reason for cigarette and SLT users. Despite the increase in taxes and prices of tobacco products at the a key opportunity against the culturally engrained acceptance of tobacco and SLT use 25. Therefore, educational campaigns should focus on the social aspect of smoking behaviors. Factors related with perceptions of harm, curiosity, and mistaken belief of the calming effect or stressreducing properties of tobacco products, were the major reasons for their transition between smoking and smokeless products. This might be driven by advertising strategies that promote the misleading impression that SLT or bidis are more appealing (taste better) than manufactured cigarettes 26 . Previous studies also pointed out that curiosity about tobacco products was highly associated with product initiation27. Receptivity to tobacco industry advertising and promotions may explain the high proportions of respondents susceptible to smoking due to curiosity28. This is an exceptionally a prominent reason why SLT users in Bangladesh start using smoked products. As noted in previous studies, this proportion increased with additional exposure to tobacco marketing throughout adolescence29. Educational campaigns and TAPS bans of bidis and smoking products, should be deemed critical policies and strengthened to discourage people from consuming tobacco products to reduce overall tobacco use prevalence in Bangladesh30. Furthermore, results indicate that doctor’s advice accounted for a significant share of why bidi and cigarette smokers quit. Doctors’ and health professionals’ advice may be an effective strategy to combat misinformation/misconception and may have an impact on smoking behaviors, since many smokers identify health concerns as a primary reason for quitting. However, this was not the case with SLT users. Our results show that only 1.5% of SLT users received doctors’ advice to quit. Despite the high disease burden associated with SLT use in Bangladesh, access to doctors’ advice and cessation services are not yet widely available for SLT users in routine healthcare in Bangladesh11,25. To combat the high prevalence of SLT use and the frequent transition between smoking and smokeless products, authorities should place a greater emphasis on integrating SLT cessation services on treating nicotine dependence25 and provide support for high-risk populations (e.g. rural female SLT users or older male SLT users transitioning to cigarette use). Tob. Induc. Dis. 2023;21(February):25 https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/159137 8 Tobacco Induced Diseases Research Paper time of the surveys from 2009 to 2015 in Bangladesh35, cigarettes became more affordable as a result of the rising economy and income growth4. Cheaper brands and products are becoming increasingly popular, which may explain why price was not reflected in the respondents’ reasons for quitting. Taxation and price increases have been shown to be powerful motivators for reducing tobacco use and encouraging quitting1. Particularly in LMICs, such as Bangladesh, where taxation on tobacco products, especially on SLT, remains low35, increasing taxes and prices of all types of tobacco products is essential to ensure that the affordability of tobacco products continues to decline. To our knowledge, this is the first cohort study exploring perceptions and reasons for transitions between smoked and smokeless tobacco products and quitting among adult smokers in Bangladesh. The current study examined a range of factors that were considered important by the respondents at the time of the study. However, the landscape of tobacco control policies in Bangladesh is changing. The perceptions and reasons do not necessarily reflect the actual effectiveness of various policies. Regardless, these findings can be informative of future tobacco control policies and could be incorporated into the revision of current regulations in the country to strengthen existing policies that appeal to the users’ concerns and motivations to quit. Furthermore, the factors influencing decisions about transitions and quitting may be shared among neighboring LMICs with similar tobacco use landscapes. self-reported and defined as 30-day abstinence; we cannot verify that respondents remained abstinent from smoking. CONCLUSIONS Influence of friends/family, curiosity, and misleading beliefs regarding tobacco products play important roles in the initiation and switching between products in Bangladesh. On the other hand, health concerns, friends/family disapproval, doctors’ advice, and package warning labels were seen to be effective reasons in encouraging cessation, especially for smoking products. Although Bangladesh has made notable progress in adopting various tobacco control policies during the past decades, the implementation of policies could be strengthened towards full compliance with FCTC. Understanding initiation to and transition between products could inform such policies, for example in terms of taxation levels across products, to reduce tobacco use in the country. REFERENCES 1. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2021: Addressing new and emerging products. World Health Organization; 2021. Accessed January 9, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/ item/9789240032095 2. World Health Organization. Tobacco: Key facts. May 24, 2022. Accessed January 9, 2023. https://www.who.int/ news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco 3. World Health Organization. Tobacco Control in SouthEast Asia Region. World Health Organization. 2022; Accessed 15th June, 2022. https://www.who.int/ southeastasia/health-topics/tobacco/tobacco-controlin-the-south-east-asia-region 4. Burki TK. Tobacco consumption in Bangladesh. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(4):478. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30144-5 5. Rahman MA, Kundu S, Ahinkorah BO, et al. Was there any change in tobacco smoking among adults in Bangladesh during 2009-2017? Insights from two nationally representative cross-sectional surveys. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12):e057896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057896 6. Chen DT, Girvalaki C, Mechili EA, Millett C, Filippidis FT. Global Patterns and Prevalence of Dual and PolyTobacco Use: A Systematic Review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021;23(11):1816-1820. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab084 7. Chen DT, Millett C, Filippidis FT. Prevalence and determinants of dual and poly-tobacco use among males in 19 low-and middle-income countries: Implications for a comprehensive tobacco control regulation. Prev Med. 2021;142:106377. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106377 8. Kishore J, Jena PK, Bandyopadhyay C, Swain M, Das Limitations This study has some limitations. All results were metaanalyzed and pooled from all following waves after the initial survey, to maximize the representability of available data. Nevertheless, some questions were only asked of specific subsets of users; consequently, numbers may not be directly comparable between each user group. Due to this, response rankings were used to identify the most likely reasons when comparing across distinct exclusive user groups. Additionally, our analysis was based on self-reported data, which may be subject to information or recall bias. Perceptions and reasons for quitting and tobacco use could also change over time, given the fact that Bangladesh has made great progress between 2009 and 2015, when the respondents were assessed. Lastly, quitting was Tob. Induc. Dis. 2023;21(February):25 https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/159137 9 Tobacco Induced Diseases Research Paper 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. S, Banerjee I. Hardcore smoking in three South-East asian countries: results from the global adult tobacco survey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(2):625-30. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.2.625 World Health Organization. Global Adult Tobacco Survey. Fact Sheet: Bangladesh 2017. Accessed January 9, 2023. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/ default-source/ncds/ncd-surveillance/data-reporting/ bangladesh/gats/fact-sheet-gats-bangladesh-2017. pdf?sfvrsn=175f043_2&download=true National Cancer Institute, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smokeless Tobacco and Public Health: A Global Perspective. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Cancer Institute; 2014. NIH Publication No. 14-7983. Accessed January 9, 2023. https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/sites/default/ files/2020-06/smokelesstobaccoandpublichealth.pdf Huque R, Zaman MM, Huq SM, Sinha DN. Smokeless tobacco and public health in Bangladesh. Indian J Public Health. 2017;61(Suppl 1):S18-S24. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_233_17 Singh PK. Smokeless tobacco use and public health in countries of South-East Asia region. Indian J Cancer. 2014;51 Suppl 1:S1-2. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.147415 Li L, Borland R, Yong HH, et al. Predictors of smoking cessation among adult smokers in Malaysia and Thailand: findings from the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12 Suppl(Suppl 1):S34-44. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq030 Amul GGH, Tan GPP, van der Eijk Y. A Systematic Review of Tobacco Industry Tactics in Southeast Asia: Lessons for Other Low- And MiddleIncome Regions. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;10(6):324-337. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.97 Sreeramareddy CT, Pradhan PM, Mir IA, Sin S. Smoking and smokeless tobacco use in nine South and Southeast Asian countries: prevalence estimates and social determinants from Demographic and Health Surveys. Popul Health Metr. 2014;12:22. doi: 10.1186/s12963-014-0022-0 Pacek LR, Wiley JL, McClernon FJ. A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Multiple Tobacco Product Use and the Impact of Regulatory Action. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;21(3):268-277. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty129 International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. ITC Bangladesh: Wave 4 (2014-2015) Technical Report. May, 2016. Updated December 14, 2020. Accessed January 9, 2023. https://itcproject.s3.amazonaws. com/uploads/documents/ITC-BD4-Technical_ReportrevisedDec2020.pdf International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. ITC Bangladesh: Wave 3 Technical Report. March, 2015. Updated December 14, 2020. Accessed January 9, 2023. https://itcproject.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/ documents/ITC_BD3-Technical_Report-revisedDec2020. pdf 19. International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. ITC Bangladesh: Wave 2 Technical Report. June 6, 2016. Updated December 14, 2020. Accessed January 9, 2023. https://itcproject.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/ documents/ITC-BD2-Technical_Report-revisedDec2020. pdf 20. International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. ITC Bangladesh: Wave 1 Technical Report. April 21, 2010. Updated December 14, 2020. Accessed January 9, 2023. https://itcproject.s3.amazonaws.com/ uploads/documents/ITC-BD1-Techinical_ReportrevisedDec2020.pdf 21. Simanowitz A, Nkuna UK, Kasim S. Overcoming the Obstacles of Identifying the Poorest Families: Using Participatory Wealth Ranking (PWR), The CASHPOR House Index (CHI), and Other Measurements to Identify and Encourage the Participation of the Poorest Families, Especially the Women of Those Families. Updated 2000. Accessed January 9, 2023. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ &doi=b0726037d4e9d065fe4c43fac2f17c4e0d3a6ef3 22. Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M. Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health. 2014;72(1):39. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-72-39 23. de Vries H, Engels R, Kremers S, Wetzels J, Mudde A. Parents’ and friends’ smoking status as predictors of smoking onset: findings from six European countries. Health Educ Res. 2003;18(5):627-36. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg032 24. Subramaniam M, Shahwan S, Fauziana R, et al. Perspectives on Smoking Initiation and Maintenance: A Qualitative Exploration among Singapore Youth. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(8):8956-70. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120808956 25. Huque R, Al Azdi Z, Sheikh A, et al. Policy priorities for strengthening smokeless tobacco control in Bangladesh: A mixed-methods analysis. Tob Induc Dis. 2021;19:78. doi: 10.18332/tid/140826 26. Soldz S, Dorsey E. Youth attitudes and beliefs toward alternative tobacco products: cigars, bidis, and kreteks. Health Educ Behav. 2005;32(4):549-66. doi: 10.1177/1090198105276219 27. Nodora J, Hartman SJ, Strong DR, et al. Curiosity predicts smoking experimentation independent of susceptibility in a US national sample. Addict Behav. 2014;39(12):16951700. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.06.002 28. Gilpin EA, Distefan JM, Pierce JP. Population receptivity to tobacco advertising/promotions and exposure to antitobacco media: effect of Master Settlement Agreement in California: 1992-2002. Health Promot Pract. 2004;5(3 Suppl):91S-98S. doi: 10.1177/1524839904264601 29. Pierce JP, Messer K, James LE, et al. Camel No. 9 cigarettemarketing campaign targeted young teenage girls. Pediatrics. 2010;125(4):619-626. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0607 30. Sultana P, Rahman MT, Roy DC. Marketing Policy that Accelerate Tobacco Use in Bangladesh: A Statistical Investigation. J Biom Biostat. 2017;8(386):2. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2023;21(February):25 https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/159137 10 Tobacco Induced Diseases Research Paper doi: 10.4172/2155-6180.1000386 31. Francis DB, Hall MG, Noar SM, Ribisl KM, Brewer NT. Systematic Review of Measures Used in Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warning Experiments. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;19(10):1127-1137. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx082 32. World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. World Health Organization; 2003. Accessed January 9, 2023. https://fctc.who.int/ who-fctc/overview#:~:text=WHO%20Framework%20 Convention%20on%20Tobacco%20Control%20 overview&text=The%20WHO%20Framework%20 Convention%20on,force%20on%2027%20February%20 2005 33. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS): Bangladesh 2017. Updated August 7, 2018. Accessed December 10, 2022. http://bbs. portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/bbs.portal.gov. bd/page/57def76a_aa3c_46e3_9f80_53732eb94a83/ Preliminary%20Report%20on%20GATS%20 Bangladesh%202017.pdf 34. Ferdous T, Siddiqi K, Semple S, et al. Smoking behaviours and indoor air quality: a comparative analysis of smoking-permitted versus smoke-free homes in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Tob Control. 2022;31(3):444-451. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055969 35. Nargis N, Hussain AG, Goodchild M, Quah AC, Fong GT. A decade of cigarette taxation in Bangladesh: lessons learnt for tobacco control. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(3):221-229. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.216135 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors have each completed and submitted an ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the current work. G.T. Fong and A.C.K. Quah report that since the initial planning of the work The ITC Bangladesh Surveys were supported by grants from the US National Cancer Institute (P01 CA138389), the International Development Research Centre (IDRC Grant 104831-003), and Canadian Institutes for Health Research (MOP-79551, MOP115016), and that they were supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (FDN-148477). Furthermore, G.T. Fong reports that in the past 36 months he received a Senior Investigator Award from Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (IA-004). FUNDING The ITC Bangladesh Surveys were supported by grants from the US National Cancer Institute (P01 CA138389), the International Development Research Centre (IDRC Grant 104831-003), and Canadian Institutes for Health Research (MOP-79551, MOP-115016). GTF and ACKQ were supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (FDN-148477). Additional support to GTF was provided by a Senior Investigator Grant from the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated. The funding agencies did not have any role in study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing the report; nor the decision to submit the report for publication. No WHO funds are involved in developing this manuscript. ETHICAL APPROVAL AND INFORMED CONSENT The survey protocols and all materials, including the survey questionnaires, were cleared for ethics by the Office of Research Ethics, University of Waterloo, Canada (REB#15019 and REB#19862/30312); Bangladesh Medical Research Council, Bangladesh (IRB BMRC/ ERC/2013-2016/1729 and IRB BMRC/ERC/2007-2010/1372). DATA AVAILABILITY In each country participating in the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Project, the data are jointly owned by the lead researcher(s) in that country and the ITC Project at the University of Waterloo. Data from the ITC Project are available to approved researchers, 2 years after the date of issuance of cleaned data sets by the ITC Data Management Centre. Researchers interested in using ITC data are required to apply for approval by submitting an International Tobacco Control Data Repository (ITCDR) request application and subsequently to sign an ITCDR Data Usage Agreement. The criteria for data usage approval and the contents of the Data Usage Agreement are described online (http://www.itcproject.org). The authors of this article obtained the data following this application process. They did not have any special access privileges. Others would be able to access the data in the same manner. AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS DTHC and FTF conceived of the study idea and study methodology. DTHC designed and conducted the analyses. DTHC wrote the first draft, and FTF contributed to the development of the final version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to reviewing and editing of the manuscript, provided comments and accepted the final version. All the authors were involved in the interpretation of data and revision of the manuscript for critical intellectual input. PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2023;21(February):25 https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/159137 11