Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Several interacting genes influence the malignant hyperthermia phenotype

2003, Human genetics

Malignant hyperthermia (MH), a potentially lethal disorder of skeletal muscle calcium homeostasis, manifests only on exposure to certain anaesthetic drugs. The mode of inheritance appears to be autosomal dominant with both locus and allelic heterogeneity having been reported. Association analysis of eight MH candidate loci in UK families has indicated that several genes influence susceptibility in individual families, rather than MH simply being a major gene defect. In support of this hypothesis, we present data on a replica analysis of an independent sample of European MH families.

Hum Genet (2003) 112 : 217–218 DOI 10.1007/s00439-002-0864-6 S H O RT R E P O RT Rachel Robinson · Philip Hopkins · Antonella Carsana · Hermann Gilly · Jane Halsall · Luc Heytens · Gunilla Islander · Karin Jurkat-Rott · Clemens Müller · Marie-Anne Shaw Several interacting genes influence the malignant hyperthermia phenotype Received: 29 August 2002 / Accepted: 3 October 2002 / Published online: 15 November 2002 © Springer-Verlag 2002 Abstract Malignant hyperthermia (MH), a potentially lethal disorder of skeletal muscle calcium homeostasis, manifests only on exposure to certain anaesthetic drugs. The mode of inheritance appears to be autosomal dominant with both locus and allelic heterogeneity having been reported. Association analysis of eight MH candidate loci in UK families has indicated that several genes influence susceptibility in individual families, rather than MH simply being a major gene defect. In support of this hypothesis, we present data on a replica analysis of an independent sample of European MH families. R. Robinson (✉) · P. Hopkins · J. Halsall MH Investigation Unit, Academic Unit of Anaesthesia, St James University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK e-mail: medrlr@stjames.leeds.ac.uk, Tel.: +44-113-2065271 or +44-113-2065274, Fax: +44-113-2064140 M-A. Shaw School of Biology, University of Leeds, Miall Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK A. Carsana Dipartimento di Biochemica, Biotecnologie Mediche e CEINGE-Biotecnologie avanzate s.c.a.r.l., Via Sergio Pansini, 5-80131 Napoli, Italy H. Gilly Department of Anaesthesia, University of Vienna, Waehringerguertel 18-20 AKH-EO9I, 1080 Vienna, Austria L. Heytens Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium G. Islander MH Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital, 221 85 Lund, Sweden K. Jurkat-Rott Department of Applied Physiology, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany C. Müller Department of Human Genetics, University of Würzburg, Biozentrum, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany Malignant hyperthermia (MH) has an estimated prevalence of 1 in 10,000 and is only triggered in susceptible individuals following exposure to certain anaesthetic drugs. The ryanodine receptor gene (RYR1) on chromosome 19q13.1 encodes a skeletal muscle calcium release channel and accounts for susceptibility in at least 50% of MH families. Other implicated loci include CACNA1S (1q32) and CACNA2D1 (7q11.23-q21.1) and loci on 3q13.1 (MHS4) and 5p (MHS6). CACNA1S and CACNA2D1 encode subunits of the dihydropyridine receptor, a voltagegated calcium channel, functionally coupled to the ryanodine receptor. The in vitro contracture test (IVCT) was the first reliable method to assess MH phenotype and involves measuring the contracture response of a muscle specimen to certain agents (European Malignant Hyperthermia Group 1984). Although the pattern of inheritance according to IVCT phenotype appears to be autosomal dominant, some families have been identified where the IVCT phenotype and the susceptibility genotype are discordant (Adeokun et al. 1997; Fagerlund et al. 1997). One explanation is that several independent genes may influence MH susceptibility in an individual family. Using the extended transmission disequilibrium test (ETDT; Sham and Curtis 1995), we investigated the role of candidate loci on six chromosomes in a sample of 77 UK nuclear families. Our analysis indicated that that MH loci on chromosomes 3q, 5p and 7q were involved in families that had previously demonstrated linkage to RYR1 (19FAM, n=61). In families that showed no evidence for chromosome 19 involvement (OTHER, n=16), an effect from chromosome 1q was detected (Robinson et al. 2000). This was the first demonstration that multiple genes may influence susceptibility to MH in individual families. Our objective has been to test these findings in an independent data set. We investigated a sample of 131 independent nuclear MH families from seven European MH centres. ETDT analysis was performed for the candidate regions previously studied. All families were analysed together (Table 1). In addition, families were stratified into distinct groups according to the posterior probability of linkage to RYR1 218 Table 1 Results of ETDT analysis for the entire sample set for chromosome 1, 3, 5, 7 and 19 markers (TDT transmission disequilibrium test). Numbers in bold represent results from the current analysis, the other numbers are results obtained from a previous analysis of 77 UK nuclear families (Robinson et al. 2000). Family material was selected and marker genotyping conducted as described in Robinson et al. (2000) Marker Candidate locus Number of transmissions from heterozygous parents D19S191 ↑ 2.7 cM ↓ D19S422 RYR1 CACNL1AS CACNL1AS D3S1281 MHS4 D5S674 ↑ 12 cM ↓ D5S418 MHS6 D7S634 ↑ 2–5 cM ↓ D7S849 CACNA2D1 as previously described (Robinson et al. 2000). Families with a posterior probability of linkage to RYR1≥0.5 were partitioned into the “19FAM” pedigree set (n=100). Remaining families were grouped into the “OTHER” pedigree set (n=31). Gene symbols used in this article follow the recommendations of the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (Povey et al. 2001). ETDT analysis of the entire data set confirmed the role of the RYR1 region in MH susceptibility with P=0.0002 for D19S191, which lies proximal to RYR1 (Table 1). For remaining candidate loci, the effects of chromosomes 1 and 7 were confirmed in the entire data set as previously observed. In contrast to the earlier study, a chromosome 3 effect was not detected and chromosome 5 gave significant results in the entire data set. On analysis of the partitioned data set, a chromosome 1 effect was detected in the “19FAM” grouping (genotype-wise TDT P=0.009). Genotype-wise TDT results were also significant for D5S674 (P=0.013) and D7S634 (P=0.043) in “19FAM”. In the “OTHER” grouping, only D7S849 was significant (genotype-wise TDT P=0.006; data not shown). These results support the hypothesis that several genes influence susceptibility to MH and suggest that the phenotype is influenced by a major locus (RYR1) and the effect of modifier genes, perhaps by way of a threshold type model (Scriver and Waters 1999; Dipple and McCabe 2000). Following family stratification, results confirm a role for loci on chromosomes 5 and 7 in RYR1-linked families, with the influence of chromosomes 1 and 3 being less clear. In families with no evidence of RYR1 linkage, a chromosome 7 effect was also detected compared with the chromosome 1 effect seen previously (Robinson et al. 2000). As the proportion of families within each grouping P value for χ2 test for: Genotypewise TDT Allelewise TDT 97 71 0.25 0.0002 0.07 0.033 131 157 119 133 118 65 124 170 0.02 0.094 0.001 0.008 0.003 0.121 0.34 0.018 0.002 0.224 0.0006 0.048 0.01 0.065 0.34 0.010 152 153 120 109 0.07 0.625 0.01 0.159 0.26 0.972 0.0001 0.085 71 105 0.02 0.006 0.26 0.009 is similar to that in the first study, an explanation for these diverse findings and the observed variation in significance levels for the two sample sets is the genetic background of the sample, or the possible consequences of the method used for family stratification. Acknowledgement The authors thank the British Malignant Hyperthermia Association for helping to fund this work. References Adeokun AM, West SP, Ellis FR, Halsall PJ, Hopkins PM, Foroughmand AM, Iles DE, Robinson RL, Stewart AD, Curran JL (1997) The G1021A substitution in the RYR1 gene does not cosegregate with malignant hyperthermia in a British pedigree. Am J Hum Genet 60:833–841 Dipple KM, McCabe ERB (2000) Phenotypes of patients with “simple” Mendelian disorders are complex traits: thresholds, modifiers, systems dynamics. Am J Hum Genet 66:1729–1735 European Malignant Hyperthermia Group (1984) A protocol for the investigation of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Br J Anaesth 56:1267–1269 Fagerlund TH, Islander G, Ranklev Twetman E, Berg K (1997) Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility, an autosomal dominant disorder? Clin Genet 51:365–369 Povey S, Lovering R, Bruford E, Wright M, Lush M, Wain H (2001) The HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC). Hum Genet 109:678–680 Robinson RL, Curran JL, Ellis FR, Halsall PJ, Hall WJ, Hopkins PM, Iles DE, West SP, Shaw M-A (2000) Multiple interacting gene products may influence susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia. Ann Hum Genet 64:307–320 Scriver CR, Waters PJ (1999) Monogenic traits are not so simple. Trends Genet 15:267–272 Sham PC, Curtis D (1995) An extended transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) for multi-allele marker loci. Ann Hum Genet 59:323–336