The International Journal of the History of Sport
Vol. 28, Nos. 8–9, May–June 2011, 1283–1300
Hasta la Victoria (Deportista) Siempre: Revolution, Art, and the
Representation of Sport in Cuban Visual Culture
Dylan A.T. Miner*
Michigan State University
Since 1959, Cuban artists have produced an extensive and distinguished body of
poster art, while the international success of Cuban athletes has likewise been
lauded. Although poster production is primarily focused on themes related to
domestic sovereignty and anti-imperial struggles, sport and health-related
subjects also figure prominently in the larger Cuban visual tradition. By
incorporating methodologies drawn from art history and visual studies,
particularly using approaches illustrated in the writings of Roland Barthes,
Susan Sontag, Aldolfo Sánchez Vásquez and Guy Debord, this article highlights
the manner that understanding the ‘visual turn in sport’ initiates historical ways
of knowing that are different from other ways of understanding sport history. By
analysing photographs of Fidel Castro and other barbudos (bearded revolutionaries) engaged in sport, as well as sport-themed posters, the author begins to
uncover how art history and visual studies may aid in creatively understanding
sport history and its role in larger political spheres.
Keywords: Cuba; Fidel Castro; photography; posters; art; baseball
Como ya era tiempo de justicia, cultura y deporte dejaron de ser exclusivos, privilegios
de unos pocos, y ascendieron a las masas.
[‘Now in a period of justice, culture and sport stopped being exclusive, privileged by few,
and spread to the masses’].1
Since the 1959 institutionalisation of the revolution, Cuba has produced an extensive
and distinguished body of poster art, while the international success of Cuban sports
has likewise been lauded.2 The crux of poster production focuses heavily on themes
related to domestic sovereignty and internationalist struggles against imperialism.
Sport and health-related material, as shown by Lincoln Cushing, also figure
prominently in the larger corpus of the Cuban poster tradition.3 By incorporating
approaches drawn primarily from art history and visual studies, as well as Cuban
and sport history, this essay highlights the manner in which photographic and
artistic representations of sport initiate multifaceted histories that can best be
interpreted using approaches drawn from theorists including Roland Barthes, Susan
Sontag and Adolfo Sánchez Vásquez, among others. Moreover, by analysing
*Email: dminer@msu.edu
ISSN 0952-3367 print/ISSN 1743-9035 online
Ó 2011 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/09523367.2011.567778
http://www.informaworld.com
1284
D.A.T. Miner
photographs of Fidel Castro and other barbudos (the bearded revolutionaries)
actively engaged in sport, as well as sporting posters, we begin to thoroughly uncover
the manner in which art historical and visual studies approaches may aid in the
understanding of sport history and its role in the larger political sphere.
By interrogating sports posters and photographs, following recent scholarly
trends initiated in works such as Contesting Identities: Sports in American Film by
Aaron Baker and Sport in the USSR: Physical Culture – Visual Culture by Mike
O’Mahony, this essay analyses the visual representation of Cuban sports to fully
flesh out the tripartite relationship between sport, art and politics. Unlike popular
mythologies of sport as formulaic propaganda, Cuban sport (and particularly visual
representations of sport) serves as a complex site where the intricacies of the
revolution were (and continue to be) played out.4 In many ways, Cuban sport
becomes a dialectic site where competing ideas are engaged. Although specifically
writing about Soviet sporting cultures, O’Mahony writes that ‘Far from simply
reflecting contemporary activities, representations of sport frequently addressed
important and complex issues regarding not only the practice of sport itself, but also
its wider significance for Soviet society’.5
In a similar manner, this investigation of Cuban visual culture becomes
increasingly important for sport historians as it facilitates an explanation of the
multifarious relationship between seemingly disparate historic, visual and discursive
fields. By seeing sports photographs and posters as historically situated within the
socialist-capitalist dialectic, we begin to dismantle the notion that visual representations of sport might be seen as purely primary documents to be used as archival
‘evidence’. Instead, these images function as highly contested sites serving a variety
of ideological and social functions. By (literally) seeing how these two bodies of
images (photographs and posters) operate in relation to Cuban art and politics, we
begin to understand how and why the history of sports ephemera is relevant to the
documentation and historicisation of sport, while simultaneously linked to counterhegemonic political and revolutionary aesthetic programmes.
With the seizure of power on 1 January 1959, socialist Cuba entered into the
internationalist and anti-colonial project of creating Third World solidarity. More so
than any other Third World state, Cuba was heavily committed to internationalist
solidarity. As historian Vijay Prishad notes in The Darker Nations, ‘The Third World
was not a place. It was a project. During the seemingly interminable battles against
colonialism, the peoples of Africa, Asia, and Latin America dreamed of a new world.
They longed for dignity above all else, but also the basic necessities of life (land, peace,
and freedom).’ 6 The Third World project, as Prishad clearly articulates, was the
collective and continental reply of the colonised against systematic and continued
colonial oppression. In fact, Che Guevara noted the ‘continental character of the
[Cuban] struggle’.7 As such, in January 1966, Cuba established OSPAAAL (Organisation in Solidarity with the Peoples of Africa, Asia and Latin America) as an institution to
express camaraderie with anti-colonial and anti-capitalist movements around the world.
Founded following the Tricontinental Conference in Havanna, OSPAAAL’s
agenda included funding and producing thousands of posters, distributed both in
Cuba and abroad. These posters, along with those produced by other federal
agencies evoked pop art aesthetics to visually challenge Cuban society through new
signifying systems. The language of the Cuban poster, as historians and critics have
noted, was unique in its incorporation of global ‘bourgeois’ aesthetics, a form that
other socialist regimes denied. Susan Sontag notes that
The International Journal of the History of Sport
1285
Cuba has not solved the problem of creating a new, revolutionary art for a new,
revolutionary society–assuming that indeed a revolutionary society needs its own kind
of art. . .[Instead] All that the revolution should do with bourgeois culture is democratize
it, making it available to everyone and not just a socially privileged minority.8
Accordingly, both sport and art were to be democratised in socialist Cuba.
In February 1961, INDER (National Institute of Physical Education and
Recreation) was established. With Decree 936, a moratorium was placed on
‘capitalist sport’ in favour of promoting amateur athletics through increased citizen
participation. Since Havana had a strong baseball infrastructure established in the
mid-nineteenth century, the revolution shifted focus from professional sport to one
advocating healthy lifestyles and a lifelong commitment to participation.9 This
restructuring was seen as a threat to North American minor league baseball’s
International League which, in 1960, relocated the Havana Sugar Kings to Jersey
City, NJ. Instead of the staunch competition of professional sport, as Paula
Pettavino and Philip Brenner document, the universal physical education practised
in Cuba served to eliminate gender, class and racial divisions, while supporting
(inter)national development.10 As such, the socialist regime evoked the slogan el
deportes es salud (sports is health) linking sport to both the health of the Cuban
people, as well as the nation as a whole.
Los Barbudos: Mythologising the Revolution through Baseball Photographs
From the first Cuban League game played on the island in December 1878, baseball
has been integral to the creation of an anti-colonial and revolutionary culture that
resists outside domination and imperial control by linking sport to a revolutionary
and sovereigntist movement. Peter C. Bjarkman notes that
If Fidel Castro has often used baseball in recent decades as a propaganda tool to
advance the cause of national identity and promote his perceived advantages of a
socialist society, it must be remembered that the sport’s 19th-century roots were also
bound up with a nationalistic cause of rebellion against the then-hated Spaniards.11
While Castro, as a metonynm for socialist Cuba, has been criticised for his use of
sport as an ‘ideological’ tool, a century prior to the evocation of baseball as
‘propaganda’, sport already served as an anti-colonial and anti-imperialist tool
against imperial Spain.
With the revolution’s seizure of state power in 1959, the importance of sport to
the revolution was quickly picked up in the international media. This historical
legacy was tactically employed by the revolutionary regime. In fact, as documented
in a 1958 Agence France-Presse (AFP) photograph of Che Guevara, posed in his
batting stance while wearing military fatigues, baseball was so important that rebels
took time out of their struggles in the Sierra Maestra to play the game. The
importance of baseball to a revolutionary social agenda did not diminish with the
success of the revolution, but actually increased and became a hallmark of Cuban
socialist heterodoxy.
Just months after Castro and the barbudos marched successfully into Havana, the
revolutionary government organised an exhibition game between Los Barbudos, as
their uniforms were aptly embroidered, and a rival team consisting of the
‘revolutionary military police’. Scheduled immediately prior to the International
League match between the Havana Sugar Kings and the Rochester Red Wings on 24
1286
D.A.T. Miner
July 1959, Castro pitched two innings for the Barbudos, while Camilo Cienfuegos
was scheduled to start for the military police squad.12 Images from this game
circulated the globe through international journalist networks, such as AFP and Life
magazine. The photographs function as complex visual artifacts that demand
intimate analysis. By offering possible ‘readings’ of these images, we may prefigure
ways that sport history may more thoroughly engage visuality in its pre-existing
array of methodologies.
These photographs, particularly images such as Perfecto Romero’s representation
of Castro and Cienfuegos smiling and walking in their Barbudos uniforms, presented
a particular playful and masculine image of the revolution. These photographs in
their timely articulation enabled the establishment of a mythology that presents
Castro as an ex-baseball player once scouted by the Washington Senators. While this
folkloric myth is dispelled in Roberto Gonález Echeverrı́a’s The Pride of Havana: A
History of Cuban Baseball, as well as Peter C. Bjarkman’s A History of Cuban
Baseball, 1864-2006, it nonetheless works its mythology on countless histories of
Cuba, including Cuban sport history.13 While I do not intend to dispel this Barthesian
mythology, it is interesting nonetheless to see the manner in which a series of
photographs, taken in Havana’s Cerro Stadium, serves both to legitimise the
revolution, as well as mythologise Castro, the Barbudos and baseball in general.
These journalistic images of revolutionary baseball helped bolster a certain
sporting and masculine mythology of Castro and the socialist state. One example, a
posed photograph of Castro pitching (or at least pretending to pitch), serves to
highlight the compound visual readings which photographs necessitate. In this
particular image, Castro is represented wearing his Barbudos uniform, a watch and
identifying spectacles, as he rears back to throw the ball. However, Castro’s
unorthodox ‘pitching’ style is highlighted in the image, which depicts Castro with his
glove turned outward to reveal his grip on the baseball both to the viewer of the
photograph, as well as to any potential batter. While Bjarkman calls this style
‘unprofessional’, I wonder whether, instead of simply being representational of
Castro’s actual pitching style, this highly posed photograph may actually reveal the
heterodoxy of both Castro’s sporting practice and his larger political persona.
Although both perspectives are informed readings, only the latter commences to
interrogate the possible visual (and political) language of the image, even if perhaps
improperly.
While informed, and creative, readings of photographs cannot be substantiated
in the same way that archival ‘evidence’ may be verified, various ‘ways of seeing’, to
paraphrase art historian John Berger, nevertheless aid in establishing nuanced
histories.14 In Image-Music-Text, Roland Barthes argues that ‘whatever the origin
and the destination of the message, the photograph is not simply a product or a
channel but also an object endowed with a structural autonomy’.15 Barthes’s timely
semiotic analysis ideally begins to establish a framework for how photographs could
be interpreted at the time of their initial and now historical circulation. Although this
type of theoretical explication has not been thoroughly incorporated into sport
history, texts such as Murray G. Phillips and Alun Munslow’s Deconstructing Sport:
A Postmodern Analysis begin to develop the theoretical and critical language needed
to discuss the multiple ways sport history may be written.16
The date of the Cuban revolution and its relationship to an expanding global
saturation of photographic images corresponded directly to writings on the
photographic image as a mediated and therefore ideological form. Influenced by
The International Journal of the History of Sport
1287
earlier Marxist writings such as Walter Benjamin’s Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner
technischen Reproduzierbarkeit, Roland Barthes published Mythologies in 1957, only
two years before the images of the Barbudos playing baseball circulated.17 His ideas
were later expanded in Image-Music-Text in which he directly engaged with the way
photographs could (and should) be read. For Barthes,
Certainly the image is not the reality but at least it is its perfect analogon and it is exactly
this analogical perfection which, to common sense, defines the photograph. . . . The
photograph professing to be a mechanical analogue of reality, its first-order message in
some sort completely fills its substance and leaves no place for the development of a
second-order meaning.18
In this way, Barthes acknowledges the seemingly overt analogue relationship
between a photograph and its respective ‘reality’. This first-order meaning serves to
mystify any capacity for second-order interpretation of the image. Of course, Barthes
develops this line of critical thinking merely to demonstrate the ‘dialectical’
relationship between denotation and connotation that the photograph specifically
evokes. The contemporaneous nature of Barthes’s writing and the journalistic
photographs of revolutionary Cuban leaders playing baseball serve well in
establishing a historically-situated reading of these images.
In addition to Barthes, other intellectuals offer insights into how we may
appropriately ‘read’ photographs, not as evidence but as highly contested artefacts
embedded in historically-situated visual systems. Sontag, who has written both on
photographic theory (On Photography) as well as on Cuban posters (‘Posters:
Advertisement, Art, Political Artifact, Commodity’), expands Barthes’s intellectual
initiative and further elucidates how photographs can be historically deciphered.
Sontag writes that ‘Photography has powers that no other image-system has ever
enjoyed because, unlike the earlier ones, it is not dependent on an image maker’.19
While critical of perceived authorial and pictorial autonomy, Sontag acknowledges,
as did Barthes before her, that photographs establish a two-tiered system of meaning
(known to semiologists as denotation and connotation). While visual studies
approaches evoke this methodology, many historians, particularly sport historians,
have inadequately addressed the analogue relationship between the photograph and
its representation, not fully enquiring about an image’s connotation or second-level
meaning.
The reciprocity, one where the photograph appears to operate within a first-order
truth, must be called into question when interpreting sport history. Writing in 1931,
Bertolt Brecht noted that
The tremendous development of photojournalism has contributed practically nothing to
the revelation of the truth about the conditions of the world. On the contrary,
photography, in the hands of the bourgeoisie, has become a terrible weapon against the
truth. The vast amount of pictured material that is being disgorged daily by the press
and that seems to have the character of truth serves in reality only to obscure the facts.
The camera is just as capable of lying as the typewriter.20
In turn, as this special issue of International Journal of the History of Sport
demonstrates, sport historians must acknowledge the peculiar situatedness of
photography, as well as the constructed nature of media objectivity.
How, then, do we read and historicise the visual manner in which sport is
presented both to an international and domestic audience, through photojournalistic
images of revolutionary Cuban leaders engaged in sport? The Getty Archives reveal
1288
D.A.T. Miner
that this photographic genre of revolutionary leaders playing sport was primarily
produced in the first two years after the revolution, with additional photographs
being published through the mid-1960s. As images, these photographs contain both
denotative and connotative information, and historians have generally focused upon
uncovering the former. Deciphering the latter, the second-level or connotative
meaning, is the intervention that this special issue offers. In terms of the Cuban
revolution, photographs of revolutionary leaders engaging in sport served multiple
purposes: social, cultural, pedagogical and political. On the one hand, these
significant images helped humanise and legitimise the heterodox Marxist practices of
the new government. On the other, they established a new notion of citizen
participation in sport, inverting how both citizenship and professional sport
generally operate under capitalist auspices. In the United States, for instance,
capitalist leaders are commonly photographed throwing the first pitch at a baseball
game or as spectators in the grandstand. Conversely, the photographs of the
Barbudos serve to highlight the reciprocity between citizen participation, government leadership and socialist reorganisation. This, of course, contrasts with the
practice of United States baseball. In this way, the photographs served to
mythologise the revolution and its hopeful creation of a new humanity through
sport. Without the unique status of the visual image, revolutionary mythologies
would have remained incomplete.
However, once the revolution was fully institutionalised following the Batalla de
Girón (Bay of Pigs) in 1961, photographs of Cuban leaders playing sport appear less
and less frequently, although the spectre of these photographs nonetheless remained.
By the 1970s, Cuban media campaigns had been turned inward, less interested in
media ‘spectacle’, commencing the rise of the poster as a uniquely Cuban visual
form. Through the alignment of amateur sport and non-commodifiable art, the
Cuban state continued to reorganise civil society in anti-capitalist ways that
challenged both United States and Soviet hegemonies.
Nuestro Enemigo es Imperialismo: The Heterodoxy of Cuban Posters
Beginning in the 1960s, posters were at the forefront of re-imagining Cuban
visuality. Much in the way that sport and its visual representation served an
ideological role in creating a new and socially equitable Cuban society, art was also
reconceptualised in a way that disavowed both market economics and socialist
realism. The experimentation of post-1959 Cuban art, contrasting the orthodoxy of
Soviet visuality, allowed for the production of a multiplicity of visual styles to
emerge.
Cuban artists, especially those producing serigraphs or silk-screens, did not sell
their works nor use them as advertising. Instead, Cuban posters announced the
screening of domestic and foreign films, advocated solidarity with the Third World,
promoted national pedagogies and discussed community health – each serving a
unique function outside capitalist markets. More so than other countries, Cuban
artists constructed a caring and intimate internationalism which was at the core of
Cuba’s socialist project. Sontag writes that ‘The promotion of internationalist
consciousness plays almost as large a role in Cuba as the promotion of nationalist
consciousness in most other left-revolutionary societies. . . . Contrary to what older
artists in Cuba often allege, it is internationalism – not nationalism – in art which
best serves the revolution’s cause.’21
The International Journal of the History of Sport
1289
As Ernesto Cardenal acknowledged, Cuba found its artistic voice, not in the
limited vocabulary of the Soviet bloc but in a cosmopolitan and indigenous visual
language. Cardenal further recognised that Castro discouraged the monopolising of
art by a singular style or visual mode, but understood the complexities of using
multiple aesthetic styles.22 This was acutely manifest in Castro’s articulation that
‘Our enemies are capitalism and imperialism, not abstract painters’.23
Under the auspices of numerous government agencies, including OSPAAAL,
INDER, ICAIC (Cuban Film Institute), COR (Commission of Revolutionary
Orientation), OCLAE (Latin American and Caribbean Students’ Association), and
Editora Polı́tica, posters served important ideological and visual functions. By the
mid-1960s, intensifying international recognition was granted to the burgeoning
poster culture of Cuba. In 1964, Antonio Fernández Reboiro’s poster for the
Japanese film Hara Kiri was recognised abroad for its avant-garde design.24 Two
years later, the Primera Muestra de la Cultura Cubana (First Show of Cuban
Culture) was hung at the Pabellón Cuba in Havana. In 1968, the Pabellón served as
host for a major exhibition, Exposición del Tercer Mundo, documenting the artistic
and design practices of the Third World project.25 By institutionalising an
internationalist creative culture, Cuban society radically changed the face of
‘socialist realism’ and the history of modern art.
In this way, a cadre of artists made up the core of those producing posters for the
various institutions, some as staff designers and others as freelance illustrators.
Artists such as Eduardo Muñoz Bachs (1937–2001), Estela Dı́az (dates unknown),
Raúl Martı́nez (1927–95), René Mederos (1933–96), Antonio Pérez (Ñiko, b. 1941),
René Portocarrero (1912–85), Alfredo Rostgaard (1943–2004) and Elena Serrano
(dates unknown), to name only a few, rose to cultural (if not economic)
prominence.26 Cuba’s aesthetic programme and ‘national’ art was one that drew
heavily from contemporary visual expressions. As Raúl Martı́nez told Shifra
Goldman, ‘abstract art was the only weapon with which we could frighten
people . . . our painting served as a means to raise consciousness’.27 Much in the
manner that the government instituted ‘literary brigades’ using Freirian conscientización, posters raised consciousness and literacy levels through visual
communication.
Within the arts, the continental and global solidarity that developed through
these posters, connected to an unconventional visual language, was one of the most
crucial and important aspects of Cuban artistic production. As has been pointed out:
By allowing art to evolve at its own pace within a new society, Cuban leadership hoped
to have the contradictions go away on their own. The contradictions did not go away,
but the restraint of the government on aesthetic issues allowed for a healthy and nonintimidating presence of these issues for all the artists.28
Art critic Adelaida de Juan likewise notes that ‘Cultural institutions were the first to
search for a new visual and conceptual image’.29 Since the revolution sought a
rupture with the past, including an athletic shift towards amateur sport, the creation
of new ways of seeing, and associated modes of visual representation, was crucial.
Unlike Cuba’s economic system, which became intimately linked to Soviet-style
modalities, artistic and cultural practices emerged unmoored to any specific visual
style. In fact, Nicaraguan priest and Sandinista minister of culture Ernesto Cardenal
recognised that ‘In Cuba, as contrasted with Russia, there is no attempt made to
create an art that can be understood by the people, the attempt is to educate the
1290
D.A.T. Miner
people to the point where they can understand art. I was told that this has been the
official policy of the revolution.’30 Instead of creating easily accessible artworks,
visually reducing them to naturalist illustrations, the new visual practice was instead
intended to improve visual literacy.
This heterodox usage of the visual arts found advocates within the barbudos.
Guevara held the conviction that ‘socialist realist art was the corpse of the 19th
century bourgeois painting’.31 For both Castro and Guevara, their multifaceted
artistic beliefs ran counter to those posited by Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev.
Art historian David Kunzle writes that
Soviet art officialdom and Premier Khrushchev were engaged in more-or-less public
disputes with dissidents pursuing abstract or ‘‘nihilist’’ art. Khrushchev’s now famous
outbursts against abstract art cannot have failed to penetrate Cuba in some form at the
time Cuba was drawing economically closer to the Soviet Union.32
Yet even with the growing economic necessity during the 1960s to be drawn into
Soviet-style economic relations, Cuba refused to be contained by the stringent and
authoritative style of socialist realism. Instead, the visual heterodoxy encouraged by
Castro and Cuban cultural institutions was acutely apparent within the multi-layered
visual language of Cuban serigraphs.
Early posters, however, were disparaged by Cuban critics for being ‘a grotesque
and schematic simplification of the worker and his struggle against imperialism’.33
Impressively, the crass celebratory nature of these early posters matured into a
complex and nuanced signifying visual language, finding its ‘true socialist realism in
Pop Art’, as Cardenal revealed.34
Beginning in the 1960s and extending into the 1980s, state-funded institutions
produced thousands of serigraphs as a way to publicise particular issues and
events.35 The function of these posters contrasted greatly with their capitalist
counterparts. As ‘an early manifestation of commodity production within industrial
capitalism’, as David Craven writes, capitalist-oriented posters have historically
operated with the intention of selling products.36 Instead, post-1959 Cuban posters
have little or nothing to actually sell and therefore perform more ambitious
pedagogical and ideological functions, as opposed to their inherent commercial
nature under capitalism. Craven further writes that ‘the Cuban poster is not based
on the ideological pretense that its images are ‘‘non ideological’’. Instead, it overtly
contests the ideology of mere personal gain by not presenting ideas and images as if
they were outside a system of values, mediated by ideology at various levels.’ 37 The
formal and functional differences within these dialectic political economies
(capitalism-socialism), and the cultural practices within them, are crucial to properly
understand and contextualise these noteworthy visual artefacts, both from the
vantage point of their production, as well as their reception.
A poster not intent on selling commodities to its audience has a unique
relationship to sport, particularly the amateur sport that has predominated in
revolutionary Cuba. As archivist Lincoln Cushing maintains in his superbly
illustrated book Revolución!: Cuban Poster Art, ‘posters advertise sporting events,
rather than individual teams, and encourage whole communities to participate in
sports for the simple reason that it is good for them’.38 Just as Castro believed that
all Cubans should be athletes, these posters supported quotidian engagement with
athletics. Castro himself stated that one ‘could not conceive of a young revolutionary
who would not also be a sportsman’.39
The International Journal of the History of Sport
1291
This representative Cuban practice is exemplified in Eduardo Murin Portillé’s
1972 serigraph ‘Practicar deportes es cultivar la salud’ (‘To Practise Sports is to Grow
Healthy’ – Figure 1). In this print, sport is not reduced to mindless competition, but
rather focuses on the localised complexities of practising sport as a way of
developing a healthy society. In posters such as this, Cuban artists illuminate the
economic and socio-political realities of the island, instead of purely mystifying class
relations, as commonly occurs under capitalist representations of sport. Just as
capitalist modes of production attempt to diminish the ideological function of the
visual arts, so too did anti-Communist rhetoric attempt to highlight the nonideological function of sports, a fallacy that many sport historians recognise. In this
manner, both sport and art are frequently presented as ideologically neutral. In a
1963 pamphlet Sports without Freedom is No Sport at All, the Unión Deportiva de
Cuba Libre, an anti-Communist group of Cuban exiles, asserts that
Communist Cuba’s sports delegations do not attend these [international sporting] events
with a sporting spirit. They are political instruments that take advantage of such
opportunities to infiltrate into the Youth of this Hemisphere, and of the rest of the Free
World, the Communist philosophy which oppresses all human rights. They try to
change the pure and clean activity of sport into a farce to serve the political instruments
of the Soviet Union.40
This publication serves to clarify the anti-Communist rhetoric surrounding both
sport and art after the Revolution and is particularly salient in reconstructing how
sport was seen by Cuban exiles in the US.
Practicar Deportes es Cultivar la Salud: Cuban Posters and Amateur Sport
It appears, at least from extant archival documentation, that the bulk of sportsrelated posters were printed in the early 1970s. Practicar deportes es cultivar la salud,
published by the Editora Polı́tica for DOR and briefly discussed earlier, is an
interesting point of departure. This bi-chromatic, offset lithograph poster – based on
an original serigraph – addresses amateur sport on the island and sport’s greater
importance to the development of a healthy society. While the United States and
United Kingdom tend to validate youth sports, there nonetheless remains a focus in
the West on using sport not as a form of healthy (and socialist) cooperation, but as a
means toward professionalisation. In Practicar deportes es cultivar la salud, the
composition freely plays with both positive and negative space by using flat tonal
ranges, as was common among the larger body of Cuban posters. It is activated by
three figures (a batter, catcher and umpire), individually represented by areas of
white space highlighted against a warm yellow ground. Each figure is firmly
positioned in the middle-ground of the print. A large organic and amorphous field of
orange juts through the yellow landscape to the right of the figures, and pulls the
composition together. The figure, placed within the extreme foreground, decisively
locates the poster’s audience as an actual spectator of the represented ballgame.
While socialist realism attempted to mimic the analogue relationship of
photography, the abstract nature of Cuban posters facilitates complex readings. In
the same way that photographs of the Barbudos baseball team have multiple
significations, so too do these posters. Initially, these posters were intended to shape
public opinion and practice at the grass roots level. Inversely, through their sensuous
compositions and skilled handling of the media, artists redirect poster audiences to
1292
D.A.T. Miner
Figure 1. Eduardo Murı́n Potrille, Practicar Deportes es Cultivar la Salud (‘To Practise
Sports is to Grow Healthy’), 1973. Offset lithograph.
Source: Image provided by Lincoln Cushing/Docs Populi, scanned from slides provided by
Editora Politica, Havana, Cuba. All rights reserved by original artist.
The International Journal of the History of Sport
1293
an array of possible significations. These multivalent readings, just as they did during
the poster’s initial circulation in 1972, work to historicise the image and make sense
of its visual historicity.
While ‘Practicar deportes es cultivar la salud’ is an image with primarily
pedagogical purposes, José Lamas’ serigraph ‘XI Serie nacional de beisbol aficionado’
(‘11th National Amateur Baseball Series’) performs the distinct function of
promoting a January 1972 athletic event. Instead of focusing on the specificity of
the teams or players participating in this national series, Lamas evokes an elongated
umpire to dissect the composition into four unequal sections. Using a sans serif font,
without capitalisation, the text becomes negative space in the flat, opaque, olivegreen background, seemingly signifying the grass playing field.
Using the umpire to represent a baseball tournament is an interesting decision on
the artist’s behalf. With his arms spread wide, signalling ‘safe’, the umpire establishes
a safe space where the ball player is literally safe on base. Metaphorically, the image
perhaps intimates how the revolution and its supporters could be safe from the
omnipresent threats of United States imperialism or outside danger. Furthermore,
the ambiguity of the umpire’s identity, also seen in many of the other sporting
posters, operates in strict contrast to the analogue relationship seen in the
photographs of revolutionary leaders, whose likenesses cannot be denied.
Since photographs have a structural relationship with the ‘reality’ they represent,
the image of the Barbudos (or of anyone else for that matter) will ultimately establish
a direct connection back to the individual they depict. A photograph of Castro
pitching will almost certainly signify Castro. Conversely, the anonymity of these
posters’ figures, with their absence of facial features, allows both the artist and the
audience interpretive latitude when ‘reading’ them. This, of course, allows for more
open-ended analyses among their original audiences, not to mention for historians.
For instance, while seeing oneself represented in a photograph as Castro may be
improbable, identifying oneself as the anonymous umpire is a legitimate response to
these posters. In this regard, posters, unlike photographs, allow for more historical
mobility and critical analysis.
Since baseball is central to Cuban national identity, a point that will be clarified in
the conclusion, it is not surprising that some of the most visually appealing sport
ephemera are directed towards baseball. Unlike either the work of Portillé or Lamas,
Jesús Forjáns’s 1970 offset lithograph ‘XI Juegos Centroamericanos y del Caribe’
(‘11th Central American and Caribbean Games’) was created for an international
audience to announce an event that occurred outside the island. The February 1970
Central American and Caribbean Games were held in Panama, with Cuba
successfully competing against neighbouring nations. According to a 1972 issue of
Ediciones Deportivas, a Havana-based sports publication, the 1970 games proved that
the success ‘demonstrated by the Cuban athletes, their strength, went far beyond all
calculations previously made by those who would later be rivals in competitions’.41
Although the non-professionalisation of Cuban sports is one of the greatest
characteristics of the island’s athletics, sport has nonetheless frequently been used by
state bureaucrats to represent the achievements of the government. The potential of
getting lost in the successes of high-performing Cuban athletes led Castro to warn
that ‘It is important that we not be mistaken, that in the search for champions we do
not neglect the practice of sports. Everyone should practise sports, not only those in
primary schools but also adults and the elderly’.42 From the initial photographs of
1959 through the posters of the 1970s, as well as in images of Castro ‘coaching’ the
1294
D.A.T. Miner
national team in their 1999 exhibition match against the Baltimore Orioles, there has
been a tension between how sport is practised competitively and how it is represented
pictorially.
While Barthes and Sontag acknowledge that photographs are directly tied to the
events they represent, posters do not have this same analogue affiliation and more
readily reflect second-level signification. In this way, serigraphs and lithographs
allowed their creators (and audiences) to develop nuanced readings partially
autonomous from the referents that the posters depict. In his work on Marxist
aesthetics, Mexico-based Adolfo Sánchez Vásquez maintained that capitalism
establishes a false binary between fine art and popular art.43 For Sánchez Vásquez,
artists can avoid this dilemma
by struggling to make art that is neither elite and for the initiated, nor mass art which
obeys the economic and ideological demands of capitalism and is interested only in mass
consumption. An art suitable for a public capable of a human or aesthetic appropriation
of its products must address itself neither to a privileged nor an alienated public, but to
the people, because it would be the living language of man.44
The dialectic nature of Cuban visual art is likewise addressed both in Cuban sport
and its representation. This sporting tension between athletic competition and sport
as cooperation is visually portrayed in a selection of posters from the early 1970s.
Much like the regime’s early heterodox socialist policies in general, this cooperativecompetitive tension is left unresolved, ultimately allowing the Cuban citizenry to
construct meaning.
We see this dialectic tension in Estela Dı́az’s ‘Juegos Juveniles de la Amistad’
(‘Youth Friendship Games’, 1971 – Figure 2) and ‘Giraldo Córdova Cardı´n Torneo
Boxeo’ (‘Giraldo Córdova Cardı́n Boxing Tournament’, 1972) both which use faceto-face confrontation as the focal point. Focusing on confrontation and human
conflict, these posters aestheticise the practical tension between participation and
competition. By calling the former event Youth Friendship Games, as many amateur
sports contests were, this contest is recontextualised as a site of ‘friendly
competition’. Much in the way that Sánchez Vásquez dismantles the capitalist
division between fine art and popular art; the competition-cooperation dilemma was
also contested under the Cuban system.
Visually, the point of conflict in each image is confronted. In ‘Boxing
Tournament’, Dı́az portrays the attacking boxer as throwing a missing punch at
the head of the defensive figure. Equally, ‘Friendship Games’ evokes wrestling to
symbolise camaraderie, a seemingly contradictory manoeuvre that contests normative notions of combat sports. The playful use of language is likewise enticing, as lucha
libre (literally, ‘free struggle’) is the Spanish translation for wrestling. The linguistic
and pictorial double signification of wrestling recalls continued ‘struggles’ against
United States hegemony by using two grappling figures as the poster’s focal point.
Moreover, the serigraph’s non-naturalistic flesh-tones are a common aesthetic device
in Cuban posters. By representing the athletes as outside Black-White racialised
structures, Dı́az plays with notions of race in the Cuban struggle to create a new
humanity, even if race could never be fully escaped in Cuban daily life. Since racial
hierarchies continued to persist in socialist Cuba, the artist toys with these identities
by prefiguring a non-racialised Cuban society.
While these images are examples of the way that artists have represented sporting
competitions, there are also multiple film posters for sports festivals and films that
The International Journal of the History of Sport
1295
Figure 2. Estela Dı́az, Juegos Juveniles de la Amistad (‘Youth Friendship Games’), 1971.
Serigraph.
Source: Image provided by Lincoln Cushing/Docs Populi, scanned from slides provided by
Editora Politica, Havana, Cuba. All rights reserved by original artist.
1296
D.A.T. Miner
deal with sport as their themes. These include: Bachs’s ‘El Deporte Nacional’ (1973),
publicising an animated film, and ‘Maravilla con Trenzas Largas’ (‘Long-haired
Wonder’ [Chudo S Kosichkami], 1977), announcing the Cuban release of a Soviet
film on gymnastics; as well as Antonio Reboiro’s ‘El Deporte en el Cine’ (1975) for a
sport film festival. These posters each transcend the insular nature of capitalist sport
by highlighting sport’s universal capacity to penetrate all facets of Cuban society. As
sport and art were democratised after 1959, the high-low binary between various
cultural sectors was abandoned, just as Sánchez Vásquez proposed in his Marxist
critique of aesthetics.
More recently, sport was prominently featured alongside culture in a series of
eight didactic posters created in 1989 by René Mederos. The posters illustrate
important emancipatory moments in Cuban history, beginning with José Martı́ and
ending with literacy and medical improvements on the island. In the sixth poster,
Mederos illustrates that ‘Now in a period of justice, culture and sport stopped being
exclusive, privileged by few, and spread to the masses’. By placing sport in the same
non-elite category as post-revolutionary culture, Mederos displays the democratised
character that both have performed in Cuba. In this series, sport and culture fit
snugly into the way that the revolution has been situated. By moving away from
sport as a privilege, this series places sport and culture as human rights that must be
accessible to all Cubans, not only elites. Produced in 1989, however, the reductive
composition and naturalistic visual language of the poster is demonstrative of the
fate of Cuba’s once transgressive visual culture. While the previously produced
posters successfully played with their materiality, this poster appears visually
reductive in its use of text and image.
The publication of this poster in 1989 coincides directly with the fall of the Berlin
Wall and the eventual collapse of the Soviet Union, whose funds helped support
Cuba’s complex artistic and sporting infrastructure. With the breakdown of the
state-socialist project in the late 1980s and 1990s, the heterodoxy of Cuban visual art
entered into a phase of restructuring. This ‘Special Period’, as the post-Soviet era was
known in Cuba, greatly affected the vibrancy of both sport and art in profound
ways, as the island struggled to maintain a just and sustainable economic future.
Ariana Hernández-Requant states that ‘As Cuba moved to salvage its economy from
the deep crisis caused by the loss of its socialist trading partners, much of the state
infrastructure of cultural production and distribution was turned into a network of
for-profit semiautonomous enterprises’.45 The transition towards capitalist and semicapitalist endeavours has intensely affected the representation of sport, both in terms
of aesthetic devices, as well as the artistic modalities themselves. With the
reintroduction of capitalist models, artistic tendencies have shifted towards capitalist
models of market-based objects and spectacle.
Conclusion
In La Socie´te´ du Spectacle, French Situationist Guy Debord theorised the work of
Marx as understood within the closed constraints of mid twentieth-century
commodity fetishism and its affiliation with expanding mass media.46 When writing
in 1970, Sontag found that spectacle was not of interest to contemporary artists in
Cuba. Instead, she determined that ‘Spectacle, the favorite public art form of most
revolutionary societies, whether to the right or the left, is implicitly understood by
The International Journal of the History of Sport
1297
Cubans as repressive’.47 While once viewed as ‘repressive,’ with the re-emergence of
capitalism in Cuba, spectacle returned as a viable artistic modality.
By the late-1980s, the aesthetic vitality of Cuban art, particularly posters, began
to diminish and the vibrancy of Cuban artistic practices became somewhat torpid,
much like the island’s athletic and economic infrastructure. The indeterminancy of
the 1960s and 1970s transformed into a ‘trajectory of rumors’, as Havana-based
critic Eugenio Valdés Figueroa refers to recent Cuban art.48 As a case in point, the
structural limitations of both art and sport came to a head with an exhibition at the
Castillo de la Real Fuerza, also in 1989. After five days, the exhibition was censored
and closed, characterising this troubling transition from an open artistic playing field
to an ever-contracting political and economic atmosphere. In an ironic response to
the show’s forced closure, artists, students and intellectuals gathered for a game of
baseball in Echeverrı́a Stadium, further linking art and sport in a discursive network
of interconnected practices.
Since government certification was required to curate an art exhibition, but not
to organise a game of baseball, artists openly evoked sport as a codified critique
against impending state control of the arts. Calling the irreverent performance piece
‘Cuban Art is Dedicated to Baseball’, the event was similarly forced to close
prematurely, shepherding in a period of crisis in Cuban art-making. Artists began
returning to more ‘traditional’ fine arts and object-based practices, a move linked to
both the continued pressure exerted on the state by the United States trade embargo,
as well as a response to the opening-up of the Cuban art market to international
collecting. The heterodox tradition of Cuban posters was transformed into a shell of
its former self, with many artists surviving by selling their work to foreign collectors.
Part ideological, part economic, part necessity, artists in the late-1980s and 1990s
began making works to sell in the capitalist market, moving away from the anticapitalist posters of the 1960s and 1970s.
It seems fitting that, in a move against artistic censorship by the state, artists
would turn towards sport as the mode of institutional critique. In an era of growing
corporate sponsorship of sports, ‘Cuban Art is Dedicated to Baseball’ elucidates the
growing disparity that now exists between amateur sport in the Third World and
professional sport under globalised capital. Although these artists employed sport as
art, acting in many ways as a proxy for art itself, its evocation further indicates the
importance of sport to communicate the complexities of Cuban society likewise
embedded in art. By concentrating on the complex networks of art, sport and politics
in Cuba, I believe we begin to see an interesting example of the possibilities and
failures of their integration within the centralised state. With the rise of serigraph
posters, a popular and indigenous artistic form arose in Cuba. With the censure of
‘Cuban Art is Dedicated to Baseball’, the omnipresent relationship between sport
and art in Cuba, one where sport serves as metonym for larger social and political
issues in a tightened political sphere, was concretised.
Since at least the 1959 photographs of the Barbudos, sport and its representation
has offered contested visions of Cuban history and ways that we may creatively
interpret it. By historically analysing these photographs alongside sports-themed
posters, the intricacies of art, sport and politics are expanded. Further, by
highlighting this reciprocity with the political realm, ‘Cuban Art is Dedicated to
Baseball’ contrasts with the counter-revolutionary propaganda published by the
Unión Deportiva de Cuba Libre in 1963 and offers even more possibilities for future
research. While not offering any definitive directions on using visual studies to better
1298
D.A.T. Miner
interpret sport, these three brief vignettes serve as theoretical models as to how visual
culture may be better incorporated into a hermeneutically rich sport history that is
both interpretive and theoretical, while simultaneously operating across disciplinary
fields.
Note on Contributor
Dylan A.T. Miner teaches at Michigan State University. An artist and historian, his writing
has appeared in Third Text; CR: The New Centennial Review; and Aztlán: A Journal of
Chicano Studies.
Notes
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
René Mederos, Editora Polı´tica Poster (1989).
During the 1960s and 1970s, ‘la edad de oro’ as art critic Gerardo Mosquera calls the
period, the production of posters reached visual and numeric heights. To date, with the
help of archivist and historian Lincoln Cushing, I have located more than 20 posters
directly endorsing sporting events or engaging health-related themes. It is important to
note that Lincoln Cushing, who has worked directly with Cuban cultural institutions to
document poster history, has found that many of the agencies have no institutional
means of archiving the posters. As more research is conducted, more posters will come to
light.
Cushing, Revolución!
O’Mahony, Sport in the USSR.
Ibid., 9.
Prishad, The Darker Nations, xv.
Guevara, Che Speaks, 85.
Sontag, ‘Posters’, xvii.
Bjarkman, A History of Cuban Baseball.
Pettavino and Brenner, ‘The Dual Role of Sports’, 380.
Bjarkman, A History of Cuban Baseball, 5.
See Bunck, Fidel Castro and the Quest for a Revolutionary Culture.
González Echeverrı́a, The Pride of Havana; and Bjarkman, A History of Cuban Baseball.
Berger, Ways of Seeing.
Barthes, Image-Music-Text, 15.
Phillips and Munslow, Deconstructing Sport.
Benjamin, The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility.
Barthes, Image-Music-Text, 17.
Sontag, ‘The Image-World’, 352.
Statement made by Bertolt Brecht in a 1931 issue of A-I-Z magazine, cited in Kahn, John
Heartfield: Art and Mass Media, 64.
Sontag, ‘Posters,’ xiix.
Cardenal, In Cuba, 189.
Time Magazine, 29 March 1963.
de Juan, ‘Three Essays on Design’, 46.
Menéndez, ‘Cuba: Diseño Gráfico’.
Unfortunately, even though the revolution made an effort to challenge the prescribed
gender relations in Cuban society, it must be noted that of all catalogued posters, only
between 7% and 15% were produced by women. Even with this absence, many
international artists, including both men and women, travelled to Cuba to labour
alongside their Cuban allies.
Goldman, Dimensions of the Americas, 46–7.
Camnitzer, New Art of Cuba, 100.
de Juan, ‘Three Essays on Design’, 45.
Cardenal, In Cuba, 189.
Kunzle, ‘Public Graphics in Cuba’, 90.
Ibid.
Revolución, 6 and 13 May 1963, cited in Kunzle, ‘Public Graphics in Cuba’, 91.
The International Journal of the History of Sport
1299
34. Cardenal, In Cuba, 189.
35. Archivist Lincoln Cushing estimates that there were somewhere between 6,000 to 8,000,
many of which no longer exist or have any documentation of their creation.
36. Craven, ‘The Visual Arts since the Cuban Revolution’, 81–2.
37. Ibid.
38. Cushing, Revolución!, 49
39. Fidel Castro cited in Bunck, Fidel Castro, 202.
40. Unión Deportista de Cuba Libre, Sports without Freedom is No Sport at All.
41. Ulloa, ‘XI Juegos Centroamericanos y del Caribe’. Ulloa cites the 1972 issue of Ediciones
Deportivas (my translation).
42. Fidel Castro speech at Mártires de Barbados. Cited in Pettavino and Pye, Sport in Cuba,
97–8.
43. In his writing, Sánchez Vásquez calls these ‘minority art’ and ‘mass art.
44. Sánchez Vásquez, Art and Society, 265.
45. Hernández-Regaunt, ‘Copyrighting Che’, 2.
46. Debord, Society of the Spectacle.
47. Sontag, ‘Posters’, xix.
48. Valdés Figueroa, ‘Trajectories of a Rumor’.
References
Baker, Aaron. Contesting Identities: Sports in American Film. Champaign, IL: University of
Illinois Press, 2006.
Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1972 [orig. pub. 1957].
Barthes, Roland. Image-Music-Text. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977.
Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. New York: Penguin, 1990.
Bjarkman, Peter C. A History of Cuban Baseball, 1864–2006. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and
Co., 2007.
Bunck, Julie Marie. Fidel Castro and the Quest for a Revolutionary Culture in Cuba. University
Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.
Camnitzer, Luis. New Art of Cuba. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1994.
Cardenal, Ernesto. In Cuba, trans. Donald D. Walsh. New York: New Directions, 1974.
Craven, David. ‘The Visual Arts since the Cuban Revolution’. Third Text: Third World
Perspectives on Contemporary Art and Culture 20 (Autumn 1992): 77–102.
Craven, David. Art and Revolution in Latin America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press,
2006.
Cushing, Lincoln. Revolución!: Cuban Poster Art. San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 2003.
de Juan, Adelaida. ‘Three Essays on Design’. Design Issues 16, no. 2 (Summer 2000): 45–61.
Debord, Guy. Society of the Spectacle. London: Rebel Press, 2004.
Fernández, Silvia and Gui Bonsiepe, eds. Historia del diseño en el Caribe y Ame´rica Latina:
Industrialización y comunicación para la autonomı´a. Sao Paolo: Editora Blücher, 2008.
Goldman, Shifra. Dimensions of the Americas: Art and Social Change in Latin American and
the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
González Echeverrı́a, Roberto. The Pride of Havana: A History of Cuban Baseball. New York:
Oxford University Press, 1999.
Guevara, Ernesto. Che Speaks, trans. George Lavan. New York: Grove, 1968.
Hernández-Regaunt, Ariana. ‘Copyrighting Che: Art and Authorship Under Cuban Late
Socialism’. Public Culture 16, no. 1: 1–29.
Kahn, Douglas. John Heartfield: Art and Mass Media. New York: Tanam, 1985.
Kunzle, David. ‘Public Graphics in Cuba: A Very Cuban Form of Internationalist Art’. Latin
American Perspectives 2, no. 4 (1975): 89–110.
Menéndez, José ‘Pepe’. ‘Cuba: Diseño Gráfico’, in Historia del diseño en el Caribe y Ame´rica
Latina: Industrialización y comunicación para la autonomı´a. eds Silvia Fernández and Gui
Bonsiepe. Sao Paolo: Editora Blücher, 2008, 124–37.
O’Mahony, Mike. Sport in the USSR: Physical Culture, Visual Culture. London: Reaktion
Books, 2006.
Prishad, Vijay. The Darker Nations: A People’s History of the Third World. New York: The
New Press, 2007.
1300
D.A.T. Miner
Pettavino, Paula and Philip Brenner. ‘The Dual Role of Sports’, in A Contemporary Cuba
Reader: Reinventing the Revolution, eds Philip Brenner, Marguerite Rose Jiménez, John M.
Kirk and William M. LeoGrande. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2008, 379–85.
Pettavino, Paul J. and Geralyn Pye. Sport in Cuba: The Diamond in the Rough. Pittsburgh, PA:
University of Pittsburgh Press, 1994.
Benjamin, Walter. The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, and Other
Writings on Media. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2008.
Phillips, Murray G. and Alun Munslow. Deconstructing Sport History: A Postmodern
Analysis. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2006.
Sánchez Vásquez, Adolfo. Art and Society: Essays in Marxist Aesthetics. New York: Monthly
Review Press, 1973 [orig. pub. 1965].
Sontag, Susan. On Photography. New York: Picador, 2001.
Sontag, Susan. ‘Posters: Advertisement, Art, Political Artifact, Commodity’, in The Art of
Revolution: 96 Posters from Castro’s Cuba, 1959–1970, ed. Donald Stermer. New York:
McGraw Hill, 1970; xvii.
Sontag, Susan. A Susan Sontag Reader. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1982.
Ulloa, Jesús. ‘XI Juegos Centroamericanos y del Caribe, Panamá 1970: Treinta y un años
después’. EF Deportes Revista Digital (Buenos Aires) 7, no. 41 (Oct. 2001), available at
http://www.efdeportes.com.
Unión Deportista de Cuba Libre. Sports without Freedom is No Sport at All: Communist
Sports is a Political Instrument. Miami, FL: Unión Deportiva de Cuba Libre, 1963.
Valdés Figueroa, Eugenio. ‘Trajectories of a Rumor: Cuban Art in the Postwar Period’, in
Cuban Art: The New Generation, ed. Holly Block.. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 2001,
17–23.