Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3629296.3629347acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicetcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Estimating Answer Strategies using Online Handwritten Data: A Study using Geometry Problems

Published: 15 January 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Emphasis has been placed on logical reasoning skills as a necessary ability and quality for the next generation. Developing logical reasoning skills is one of the objectives of the geometry curriculum in secondary education. Understanding an individual's strategy for finding a solution is necessary to assess his/her logical reasoning abilities. This study is the first to estimate answer strategies using online handwritten data automatically. Using geometry problems as our subject, we: 1) detect symbols written in a diagram; and 2) classify the answer strategies using XGBoost with the features combining uni-grams, bi-grams, and 1-skip-grams of symbols in their written order. Our experimental evaluation with 38 university students for a single geometry problem confirmed that answer strategies were successfully classified into three categories with an accuracy of 0.71, which shows the feasibility of the automatic detection of answer strategies.

References

[1]
Hager Gal and Liora Linchevski. 2010. To see or not to see: analyzing difficulties in geometry from the perspective of visual perception. Educ Stud Math, 74, Springer, 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9232-y
[2]
Song Eng Goh. 2018. Guided problem solving at primary level: students’ strategies for solving challenging geometry problems. Master Thesis of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
[3]
Michelle Cirillo and Jenifer Hummer. 2021. Competencies and behaviors observed when students solve geometry proof problems: an interview study with smartpen technology. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53, 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01221-w
[4]
Linda Margarita Medina Herrera, Marlene Aguilar Abalo, and Saúl Juárez Ordóñez. 2019. Learning calculus with augmented reality and virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (ICETC 2019). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 18-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369255.3369271
[5]
Yingying Jiang, Feng Tian, Hongan Wang, Xiaolong Zhang, Xugang Wang, and Guozhong Dai. 2010. Intelligent understanding of handwritten geometry theorem proving, In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI2010). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1145/1719970.1719988
[6]
Jiaqi Chen, Tong Li, Jinghui Qin, Pan Lu, Liang Lin, Chongyu Chen, and Xiaodan Liang. UniGeo: Unifying Geometry Logical Reasoning via Reformulating Mathematical Expression. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2212.02746, 1-11. https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2212.02746
[7]
Pan Lu, Ran Gong, Shibiao Jiang, Liang Qiu, Siyuan Huang, Xiaodan Liang, and Song-Chun Zhu. 2021. Inter-gps: Interpretable geometry problem solving with formal language and symbolic reasoning. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (ACL-IJCNLP). 6774-6786.
[8]
Ming-Liang Zhang, Fei Yin,Yi-Han Hao, and Cheng-Lin Liu., C. 2022. Plane geometry diagram parsing. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). 1636–1643. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2022/228
[9]
Michael L. Winer, and Michael T. Battista. 2022. Investigating students' proof reasoning: analyzing students' oral proof explanations and their written proofs in high school geometry. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0677, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11713
[10]
Daichi Yoshitake, Brendan Flanagan, and Hiroaki Ogata. 2020. Supporting Group Learning Using Pen Stroke Data Analytics. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computers in Education, Asia Pacific Society for Computers in Education, 634-639.
[11]
Masato Miura, Masahiro Kudo, Kazuaki Okada, Yuki Nakayama, and Hayato Yamana. 2022. Automatic Estimation of Established Problems using Online Handwriting Data: A Case Study for Geometric Problems (in Japanese). In Proceedings of 14th Data Engineering and Information Management Forum (DEIM2022), Database Society of Japan. 1-8.
[12]
Minjoon Seo, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Ali Farhadi, Oren Etzioni, and Cilint Malcolm. 2015. Solving geometry problems: Combining text and diagram interpretation. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 1466–1476. https://doi.org/ 10.18653/v1/D15-1171
[13]
Alexey Bochkovskiy, Chien-Yao Wang, and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao. 2020. Yolov4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2004.10934, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.10934
[14]
Leland McInnes, John Healy, and James Melville. 2020. UMAP: uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1802.03426, 1-63. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426
[15]
Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '16), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
[16]
Swati Verma, Rakesh Kumar Yadav, and Kuldeep Kholiya. 2022. Prediction of Academic Performance of Engineering Students by Using Data Mining Techniques. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(11), 1164-1171. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.11.1734
[17]
Jonardo R. Asor, Gene Marck B. Catedrilla, Chester Alexis C. Buama, Monique E.Malabayabas, and Cristina E. Malabayabas. 2023. Prediction of Senior High School Students’ Performance in a State University: An Educational Data Mining Approach. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(6), 925-931. https://doi.org/ 10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.6.1888

Index Terms

  1. Estimating Answer Strategies using Online Handwritten Data: A Study using Geometry Problems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICETC '23: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers
    September 2023
    532 pages
    ISBN:9798400709111
    DOI:10.1145/3629296
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 January 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Educational Data Mining
    2. Learning Analytics
    3. Online Handwritten Data
    4. Pen-based Computing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICETC 2023

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 28
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media