Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3430895.3460162acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Toward Effective Courseware at Scale: Investigating Automatically Generated Questions as Formative Practice

Published: 08 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Courseware is a comprehensive learning environment that engages students in a learning by doing approach while also giving instructors data-driven insights on their class, providing a scalable solution for many instructional models. However, courseware-and the volume of formative questions required to make it effective-is time-consuming and expensive to create. By using artificial intelligence for automatic question generation, we can reduce the time and cost of developing formative questions in courseware. However, it is critical that automatically generated (AG) questions have a level of quality on par with human-authored (HA) questions in order to be confident in their usage at scale. Therefore, our research question is: are student interactions with AG questions equivalent to HA questions with respect to engagement, difficulty, and persistence metrics? This paper evaluates data for AG and HA questions that students used as formative practice in their university Communication course. Analysis of AG and HA questions shows that our first generation of AG questions perform equally well as HA questions in multiple important respects.

References

[1]
Koedinger, K., Kim, J., Jia, J., McLaughlin, E., & Bier, N. (2015). Learning is not a spectator sport: doing is better than watching for learning from a MOOC. In: Learning at Scale, pp. 111--120. Vancouver, Canada. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724681
[2]
Koedinger, K., McLaughlin, E., Jia, J., & Bier, N. (2016). Is the doer effect a causal relationship? How can we tell and why it's important. Learning Analytics and Knowledge. Edinburgh, United Kingdom. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883957
[3]
Koedinger, K. R., Scheines, R., & Schaldenbrand, P. (2018). Is the doer effect robust across multiple data sets? Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2018, 369--375.
[4]
Kurdi, G., Leo, J., Parsia, B., Sattler, U., & Al-Emari, S. (2020). A Systematic Review of Automatic Question Generation for Educational Purposes. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 121--204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00186-y
[5]
Lovett, M., Meyer, O., & Thille, C. (n.d.). The Open Learning Initiative: Measuring the Effectiveness of the OLI Statistics Course in Accelerating Student Learning.
[6]
Van Campenhout, R. & Kimball, M. (2021). At the intersection of technology and teaching: The critical role of educators in implementing technology solutions. IICE 2021: The 6th IAFOR International Conference on Education.
[7]
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197--221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Forums, Feedback, and Two Kinds of AI: A Selective History of Learning @ ScaleProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3664667(376-382)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
  • (2024)On the Effects of Automatically Generated Adjunct Questions for Search as LearningProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3627508.3638332(266-277)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2024
  • (2024)How to Improve the Explanatory Power of an Intelligent Textbook: a Case Study in Legal WritingInternational Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/s40593-024-00399-wOnline publication date: 6-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
L@S '21: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
June 2021
380 pages
ISBN:9781450382151
DOI:10.1145/3430895
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 June 2021

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. artificial intelligence
  2. automatic question generation
  3. courseware
  4. formative practice
  5. human-authored questions
  6. in vivo experimentation
  7. natural language processing
  8. question difficulty
  9. student engagement

Qualifiers

  • Work in progress

Conference

L@S '21
L@S '21: Eighth (2021) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
June 22 - 25, 2021
Virtual Event, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 117 of 440 submissions, 27%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 09 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Forums, Feedback, and Two Kinds of AI: A Selective History of Learning @ ScaleProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3664667(376-382)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
  • (2024)On the Effects of Automatically Generated Adjunct Questions for Search as LearningProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3627508.3638332(266-277)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2024
  • (2024)How to Improve the Explanatory Power of an Intelligent Textbook: a Case Study in Legal WritingInternational Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/s40593-024-00399-wOnline publication date: 6-May-2024
  • (2023)Type diversity maximization aware coursewares crowdcollection with limited budget in MOOCsInformation Sciences: an International Journal10.1016/j.ins.2023.119663649:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2022)Educational Automatic Question Generation Improves Reading Comprehension in Non-native Speakers: A Learner-Centric Case StudyFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence10.3389/frai.2022.9003045Online publication date: 10-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Discrimination of Automatically Generated Questions Used as Formative PracticeProceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3491140.3528323(325-329)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media