Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3385956.3418959acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvrstConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of Synchronized Leg Motion in Walk-in-Place Utilizing Deep Neural Networks for Enhanced Body Ownership and Sense of Presence in VR

Published: 01 November 2020 Publication History

Abstract

We investigate the effects of different ways of visualizing the virtual gait of the avatar in the context of Walk-in-Place (WIP) based navigation in a virtual environment (VE). In Study 1, participants navigated through a VE using the WIP method while inhabiting an avatar. We varied the visualization of the avatar’s leg motion while performing the WIP gesture: (1) Fixed Body: the legs stood still; (2) Pre-recorded Animation: the legs moved in a fixed predetermined pace (plausible but not in accordance to that of the user in general); (3) Synchronized Motion the legs moved according (synchronized) to those of the user. Our results indicated that the sense of presence and body ownership improved significantly when the leg motion was rendered synchronized to that of the user (Synchronized Motion). In addition, we developed a deep neural network (DNN) that predicted the users’ leg postures only with the head position tracking, eliminating the need for any external sensors. We carried out Study 2, to assess the effects of different gait visualizations, under two new factors: (1) virtual gait seen directly by the user looking down, or already visible by one’s shadow (i.e., no need to look down); and (2) playing a pre-recorded animation, or pre-recorded animation whose playback speed was adjusted to match with pace of the users’ actual leg motions as predicted by the DNN. The results of Study 2 showed that the virtual gait temporally synchronized with that of the user greatly improved the sense of body ownership, whether it was witnessed directly or indirectly with the shadow. However, the effect of virtual gait on presence was less marked when indirectly observed. We discuss our findings and the implications for representing the avatar locomotion in immersive virtual environments.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (a12-lee-supplement.mp4)

References

[1]
Martín Abadi, Paul Barham, Jianmin Chen, Zhifeng Chen, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, Sanjay Ghemawat, Geoffrey Irving, Michael Isard, 2016. Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In 12th {USENIX} symposium on operating systems design and implementation ({OSDI} 16). 265–283.
[2]
Parastoo Abtahi, Mar Gonzalez-Franco, Eyal Ofek, and Anthony Steed. 2019. I’m a giant: Walking in large virtual environments at high speed gains. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[3]
Jakki O. Bailey, Jeremy N. Bailenson, and Daniel Casasanto. 2016. When does virtual embodiment change our minds?Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 25, 3(2016), 222–233.
[4]
Matthew Botvinick and Jonathan Cohen. 1998. Rubber hands ‘feel’touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 6669 (1998), 756.
[5]
Laroussi Bouguila, Florian Evequoz, Michele Courant, and Beat Hirsbrunner. 2004. Walking-pad: a step-in-place locomotion interface for virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Multimodal interfaces (ICMI). ACM, 77–81.
[6]
Luís Bruno, Maurício Sousa, Alfredo Ferreira, João Madeiras Pereira, and Joaquim Jorge. 2017. Hip-directed walking-in-place using a single depth camera. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 105 (2017), 1–11.
[7]
Zhe Cao, Gines Hidalgo, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei, and Yaser Sheikh. 2018. OpenPose: realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using Part Affinity Fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08008(2018).
[8]
Changyeol Choi, Joohee Jun, Jiwoong Heo, and Kwanguk Kim. 2019. Effects of virtual-avatar motion-synchrony levels on full-body interaction. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. 701–708.
[9]
Youjin Choi, Jeongmi Lee, and Sung-Hee Lee. 2020. Effects of Locomotion Style and Body Visibility of a Telepresence Avatar. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 1–9.
[10]
Guillaume Cortes, Ferran Argelaguet, Eric Marchand, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2018. Virtual shadows for real humans in a CAVE: influence on virtual embodiment and 3D interaction. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. 1–8.
[11]
Jeff Feasel, Mary C. Whitton, and Jeremy D. Wendt. 2008. LLCM-WIP: Low-latency, continuous-motion walking-in-place. In 2008 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, 97–104.
[12]
Yarin Gal and Zoubin Ghahramani. 2016. Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In international conference on machine learning. 1050–1059.
[13]
Sara Hanson, Richard A. Paris, Haley A. Adams, and Bobby Bodenheimer. 2019. Improving Walking in Place Methods with Individualization and Deep Networks. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 367–376.
[14]
Beverly K. Jaeger and Ronald R. Mourant. 2001. Comparison of simulator sickness using static and dynamic walking simulators. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 45. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1896–1900.
[15]
Robert S. Kennedy, Norman E. Lane, Kevin S. Berbaum, and Michael G. Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The international journal of aviation psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203–220.
[16]
Konstantina Kilteni, Antonella Maselli, Konrad P. Kording, and Mel Slater. 2015. Over my fake body: body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9 (2015), 141.
[17]
Elena Kokkinara and Mel Slater. 2014. Measuring the effects through time of the influence of visuomotor and visuotactile synchronous stimulation on a virtual body ownership illusion. Perception 43, 1 (2014), 43–58.
[18]
Juyoung Lee, Sang C. Ahn, and Jae-In Hwang. 2018. A walking-in-place method for virtual reality using position and orientation tracking. Sensors 18, 9 (2018), 2832.
[19]
Juyoung Lee, Myungho Lee, Gerard Jounghyun Kim, and Jae-In Hwang. 2020. Effects of Virtual Gait Visualization in Walk-in-Place on Body Ownership and Presence. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7.
[20]
Juyoung Lee, Andreas Pastor, Jae-In Hwang, and Gerard J. Kim. 2019. Predicting the Torso Direction from HMD Movements for Walk-in-Place Navigation through Deep Learning. In 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, 84.
[21]
Niels Christian Nilsson, Tabitha Peck, Gerd Bruder, Eri Hodgson, Stefania Serafin, Mary Whitton, Frank Steinicke, and Evan Suma Rosenberg. 2018. 15 years of research on redirected walking in immersive virtual environments. IEEE computer graphics and applications 38, 2 (2018), 44–56.
[22]
Niels C. Nilsson, Stefania Serafin, Morten H. Laursen, Kasper S. Pedersen, Erik Sikström, and Rolf Nordahl. 2013. Tapping-in-place: Increasing the naturalness of immersive walking-in-place locomotion through novel gestural input. In 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, 31–38.
[23]
Niels C. Nilsson, Stefania Serafin, and Rolf Nordahl. 2013. Unintended positional drift and its potential solutions. In 2013 IEEE Virtual Reality. IEEE, 121–122.
[24]
Niels C. Nilsson, Stefania Serafin, and Rolf Nordahl. 2016. Walking in place through virtual worlds. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII). Springer, 37–48.
[25]
Niels C. Nilsson, Stefania Serafin, Frank Steinicke, and Rolf Nordahl. 2018. Natural walking in virtual reality: A review. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 16, 2 (2018), 8.
[26]
Ye Pan and Anthony Steed. 2019. How foot tracking matters: The impact of an animated self-avatar on interaction, embodiment and presence in shared virtual environments. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6 (2019), 104.
[27]
Fabian Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. the Journal of machine Learning research 12 (2011), 2825–2830.
[28]
Waseem Rawat and Zenghui Wang. 2017. Deep convolutional neural networks for image classification: A comprehensive review. Neural computation 29, 9 (2017), 2352–2449.
[29]
Sharif Razzaque, David Swapp, Mel Slater, Mary C. Whitton, and Anthony Steed. 2002. Redirected walking in place. In EGVE, Vol. 2. 123–130.
[30]
Martin Schwaiger, Thomas Thuimmel, and Heinz Ulbrich. 2007. Cyberwalk: An advanced prototype of a belt array platform. In 2007 IEEE International Workshop on Haptic, Audio and Visual Environments and Games. IEEE, 50–55.
[31]
Sotaro Shimada, Kensuke Fukuda, and Kazuo Hiraki. 2009. Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PloS one 4, 7 (2009), e6185.
[32]
Mel Slater, Daniel Pérez-Marcos, Henrik Ehrsson, and Maria V. Sanchez-Vives. 2009. Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body. Frontiers in neuroscience 3 (2009), 29.
[33]
Mel Slater, Martin Usoh, and Yiorgos Chrysanthou. 1995. The influence of dynamic shadows on presence in immersive virtual environments. In Virtual environments’ 95. Springer, 8–21.
[34]
Mel Slater, Martin Usoh, and Anthony Steed. 1995. Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 2, 3(1995), 201–219.
[35]
James N. Templeman, Patricia S. Denbrook, and Linda E. Sibert. 1999. Virtual locomotion: Walking in place through virtual environments. Presence 8, 6 (1999), 598–617.
[36]
Jonathan J. Tompson, Arjun Jain, Yann LeCun, and Christoph Bregler. 2014. Joint training of a convolutional network and a graphical model for human pose estimation. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 1799–1807.
[37]
Alexander Toshev and Christian Szegedy. 2014. Deeppose: Human pose estimation via deep neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1653–1660.
[38]
Sam Tregillus and Eelke Folmer. 2016. Vr-step: Walking-in-place using inertial sensing for hands free navigation in mobile vr environments. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1250–1255.
[39]
Terry T. Um, Franz MJ Pfister, Daniel Pichler, Satoshi Endo, Muriel Lang, Sandra Hirche, Urban Fietzek, and Dana Kulić. 2017. Data augmentation of wearable sensor data for parkinson’s disease monitoring using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. 216–220.
[40]
Martin Usoh, Kevin Arthur, Mary C. Whitton, Rui Bastos, Anthony Steed, Mel Slater, and Frederick P. Brooks Jr. 1999. Walking> walking-in-place> flying, in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 359–364.
[41]
Jeremy D. Wendt, Mary C. Whitton, and Frederick P. Brooks. 2010. Gud wip: Gait-understanding-driven walking-in-place. In 2010 IEEE Virtual Reality. IEEE, 51–58.
[42]
Betsy Williams, Stephen Bailey, Gayathri Narasimham, Muqun Li, and Bobby Bodenheimer. 2011. Evaluation of walking in place on a wii balance board to explore a virtual environment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 8, 3 (2011), 1–14.
[43]
Preston Tunnell Wilson, Kevin Nguyen, Alyssa Harris, and Betsy Williams. 2014. Walking in place using the Microsoft Kinect to explore a large VE. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry. 27–33.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Mapping Real World Locomotion Speed to the Virtual World in Large Field of View Virtual EnvironmentsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3677386.3682077(1-12)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Evaluating Plausible Preference of Body-Centric Locomotion using Subjective Matching in Virtual Reality2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR58804.2024.00124(1054-1064)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Sense of embodiment with synchronized avatar during walking in mixed realityScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-72095-714:1Online publication date: 11-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
VRST '20: Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology
November 2020
429 pages
ISBN:9781450376198
DOI:10.1145/3385956
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. body ownership illusion
  2. deep neural network
  3. machine learning
  4. presence
  5. walk-in-place

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

VRST '20

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 66 of 254 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)73
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Mapping Real World Locomotion Speed to the Virtual World in Large Field of View Virtual EnvironmentsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3677386.3682077(1-12)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Evaluating Plausible Preference of Body-Centric Locomotion using Subjective Matching in Virtual Reality2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR58804.2024.00124(1054-1064)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Sense of embodiment with synchronized avatar during walking in mixed realityScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-72095-714:1Online publication date: 11-Sep-2024
  • (2023)A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Body Ownership Illusions in Virtual RealityACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/359076730:5(1-42)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2023
  • (2023)When XR and AI Meet - A Scoping Review on Extended Reality and Artificial IntelligenceProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581072(1-45)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Combining Motion Matching and Orientation Prediction to Animate Avatars for Consumer‐Grade VR DevicesComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1462841:8(107-118)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Effects of Walking Together in a Co-Located Virtual Reality Game2023 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)10.1109/VRW58643.2023.00063(257-262)Online publication date: Mar-2023
  • (2023)Real-Time Recognition of In-Place Body Actions and Head Gestures using Only a Head-Mounted Display2023 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR55154.2023.00026(105-114)Online publication date: Mar-2023
  • (2023)Effects of Different Levels of Self-Representation on Spatial Awareness, Self-Presence and Spatial Presence During Virtual Locomotion2023 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)10.1109/SMC53992.2023.10394288(4128-4133)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
  • (2021)Classifying In-Place Gestures with End-to-End Point Cloud Learning2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR52148.2021.00038(229-238)Online publication date: Oct-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media