Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Personalized optimization for android smartphones

Published: 27 January 2014 Publication History

Abstract

As a highly personalized computing device, smartphones present a unique new opportunity for system optimization. For example, it is widely observed that a smartphone user exhibits very regular application usage patterns (although different users are quite different in their usage patterns). User-specific high-level app usage information, when properly managed, can provide valuable hints for optimizing various system design requirements. In this article, we describe the design and implementation of a personalized optimization framework for the Android platform that takes advantage of user's application usage patterns in optimizing the performance of the Android platform. Our optimization framework consists of two main components, the application usage modeling module and the usage model-based optimization module. We have developed two novel application usage models that correctly capture typical smartphone user's application usage patterns. Based on the application usage models, we have implemented an app-launching experience optimization technique which tries to minimize user-perceived delays, extra energy consumption, and state loss when a user launches apps. Our experimental results on the Nexus S Android reference phones show that our proposed optimization technique can avoid unnecessary application restarts by up to 78.4% over the default LRU-based policy of the Android platform.

References

[1]
J. A. Baiocchi and B. R. Childers. 2011. Demand code paging for NAND flash in MMU-less embedded systems. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition.
[2]
Digitizor. 2011. Android stats: 200k market apps, 400k new activations daily, malware up by 400%. http://digitizor.com/2011/05/11/android-stats/.
[3]
T. M. T. Do, Jan Blom, and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2011. Smartphone usage in the wild: A large-scale analysis of applications and context. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interaction.
[4]
B. Esfahbod. 2006. Preload - an adaptive prefetching daemon. Master's thesis. University of Toronto.
[5]
Hossein Falaki, Ratul Mahajan, Srikanth Kandula, Dimitrios Lymberopoulos, Ramesh Govindan, and Deborah Estrin. 2010. Diversity in smartphone usage. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services.
[6]
Google. 2010. Nexus s. http://www.google.com/phone/detail/nexus-s.
[7]
Y. Joo, J. Ryu, S. Park, and K. G. Shin. 2011. Fast: Quick application launch on solid-state drives. In Proceedings of the USENIX Conference on File and Stroage Technologies.
[8]
N. Kiukkonen, J. Blom, O. Dousse, Daniel Gatica-Perez, and Juha Laurila. 2010. Towards rich mobile phone datasets: Lausanne data collection campaign. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Pervasive Services.
[9]
V. I. Levenshtein. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 10, 8, 707--710.
[10]
Jehun Lim, Hakbong Kim, Wook Song, and Jihong Kim. 2011. Ltmeter: An app launching time analyzer for personal smart devices. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Technologies & Applications.
[11]
Microsoft. 2007. Inside the Windows Vista Kernel. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetmag/issues/2007/03/VistaKernel/.
[12]
J. Ryu, Y. Joo, S. Park, H. Shin, and K. G. Shin. 2011. Exploiting SSD parallelism to accelerate application launch on SSDs. Electron. Lett. 47, 5, 313--315.
[13]
A. Shye, B. Scholbrock, G. Memik, and P. A. Dinda. 2010. Characterizing and modeling user activity on smartphones: Summary. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems.
[14]
P. H. A. Sneath. 1957. The application of computers to taxonomy. J. Gen. Microbiol. 17, 1, 201--226.
[15]
N. Tolia, D. G. Andersen, and M. Satyanarayanan. 2006. Quantifying interactive user experience on thin clients. Computer 39, 3, 46--52.
[16]
Wireless Intelligence. 2011. Smartphone users spending more “face time” on apps than voice calls or Web browsing. https://www.wirelessintelligence.com/analysis/2011/03/smartphone-users-spending-more-face-time-on-apps-than-voice-calls-or-web-browsing/.
[17]
Lide Zhang, Birjodh Tiwana, Zhiyun Qian, Zhaoguang Wang, Robert P. Dick, Zhuoqing Morley Mao, and Lei Yang. 2010. Accurate online power estimation and automatic battery behavior based power model generation for smartphones. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)SWAM: Revisiting Swap and OOMK for Improving Application Responsiveness on Mobile DevicesProceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking10.1145/3570361.3592518(1-15)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
  • (2022)A Survey of Performance Optimization for Mobile ApplicationsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2021.307119348:8(2879-2904)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022
  • (2021)Android runtime service optimization for execution inside LXC2021 44th International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO)10.23919/MIPRO52101.2021.9597181(995-997)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems  Volume 13, Issue 2s
Special Section ESFH'12, ESTIMedia'11 and Regular Papers
January 2014
409 pages
ISSN:1539-9087
EISSN:1558-3465
DOI:10.1145/2544375
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Journal Family

Publication History

Published: 27 January 2014
Accepted: 01 November 2012
Revised: 01 September 2012
Received: 01 January 2012
Published in TECS Volume 13, Issue 2s

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Android
  2. application usage pattern
  3. mobile systems
  4. user experience

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)SWAM: Revisiting Swap and OOMK for Improving Application Responsiveness on Mobile DevicesProceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking10.1145/3570361.3592518(1-15)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
  • (2022)A Survey of Performance Optimization for Mobile ApplicationsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2021.307119348:8(2879-2904)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022
  • (2021)Android runtime service optimization for execution inside LXC2021 44th International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO)10.23919/MIPRO52101.2021.9597181(995-997)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2021
  • (2020)Does Smartphone Use Drive our Emotions or vice versa? A Causal AnalysisProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376163(1-15)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
  • (2020)An Optimization of Memory Usage Based on the Android Low Memory Management MechanismsMobile Computing, Applications, and Services10.1007/978-3-030-64214-3_2(16-36)Online publication date: 19-Dec-2020
  • (2020)A Framework for Speculative Job Scheduling on Mobile Cloud ResourcesBig Data Analytics for Cyber-Physical Systems10.1007/978-3-030-43494-6_4(103-128)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2020
  • (2019)Self-learnable Cluster-based Prefetching Method for DRAM-Flash Hybrid Main Memory ArchitectureACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems10.1145/328493215:1(1-21)Online publication date: 9-Jan-2019
  • (2018)Design of DRAM-NAND flash hybrid main memory and Q-learning-based prefetching methodThe Journal of Supercomputing10.5555/3288339.328836274:10(5293-5313)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018
  • (2018)Exploring non-volatile main memory architectures for handheld devices2018 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)10.23919/DATE.2018.8342258(1528-1531)Online publication date: Mar-2018
  • (2018)Adaptive correlated prefetch with large-scale hybrid memory system for stream processingThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-018-2466-774:9(4746-4770)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media