Friends, in case anyone is still interested in my atomic model, I put the simple reference of hydrogen, unlike the quantum mechanics.
In my model the positive charges are created and act in the orbits formed by the magnetic fields, and on them the electrons are attracted, located and maintained.
In chemical reactions, these orbits are the ones that give up or acquire (exchange) the electrons.
In addition to the higher potential magnetic fields, the gravitational fields that create their valence shells also intervene in the atomic structure, and like the orbits, these shells also tend to be sutured or completed with electrons.
Thus, in order to be "satisfied and content" atoms like to complete both their orbits and their valence shells, and that is why they seek this saturation by "borrowing" electrons from other atoms that are left over.

* As a criticism of quantum mechanics, I will say that it lacks logic, since it tries to tell us that within atoms all the electromagnetic charges, forces of attraction and repulsion, inertial balances of motions etc., do not act, when inside atoms it is where these charges are created and situated.

In the drawing below (carbon atom), we have already expanded the elements of this model, and the magnetic fields that create the positive orbits are shown; the two gravitational shells of carbon (2.6); the orbital cuts or magnetic lines where the orbits are produced (and that can be seen in the magnets by alignment and sum of these cuts or magnetic lines); as well as the north-south N_S magnetic polarity, produced by the rotation of the magnetic and gravitational fields.

And finally I put the general formula that interrelates the atomic measurements, such as atomic radii, atomic mass unit, atomic density, atomic radius unit (that of hydrogen), etc.

* Here the helium atom with correspondent electrons radius

And next the litium atom

Thank you friends