dbo:abstract
|
- Utah v. Strieff, 579 U.S. 232, 136 S. Ct. 2056 (2016), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States limited the scope of the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 9625 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-02-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
|
- Sotomayor (en)
- Kagan (en)
|
dbp:docket
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Utah, Petitioner v. Edward Joseph Strieff, Jr. (en)
|
dbp:holding
|
- The evidence seized incident to arrest is admissible. The officer's discovery of a valid, pre-existing, and untainted arrest warrant attenuated the connection between the unconstitutional investigatory stop and the evidence seized incident to a lawful arrest. (en)
|
dbp:joindissent
| |
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:opinionannouncement
| |
dbp:oralargument
| |
dbp:otherSource
| |
dbp:otherUrl
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
|
- On writ of certiorari to the Utah Supreme Court (en)
|
dbp:procedural
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Utah v. Strieff, 579 U.S. 232, 136 S. Ct. 2056 (2016), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States limited the scope of the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule. (en)
|
rdfs:label
| |
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Utah, Petitioner v. Edward Joseph Strieff, Jr. (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |