| dbo:abstract
|
- Gronow v Gronow, was a decision of the High Court of Australia. It is an important case in Australian Family Law for two main propositions. The first is that there is no presumption at law that children are better off in their mother's custody. The second is that custody is a discretionary decision, and as such, is only to be overturned by an appellate court if there existed an error of law. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 17690 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:judges
| |
| dbp:name
| |
| dbp:opinions
|
- 4 (xsd:integer)
- 5 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbp:priorActions
|
- Full Court of the Family Court, Watson, Fogarty & Joske JJ, unreported January 1979 (en)
- Family Court, Evatt CJ, unreported June 1978 (en)
|
| dbp:subsequentActions
|
- Family Court, Evatt CJ, unreported (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| gold:hypernym
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Gronow v Gronow, was a decision of the High Court of Australia. It is an important case in Australian Family Law for two main propositions. The first is that there is no presumption at law that children are better off in their mother's custody. The second is that custody is a discretionary decision, and as such, is only to be overturned by an appellate court if there existed an error of law. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |