Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Bond v. United States, 572 U.S. 844 (2014), follows up on the Supreme Court's 2011 case of the same name in which it had reversed the Third Circuit and concluded that both individuals and states can bring a Tenth Amendment challenge to federal law. The case was remanded to the Third Circuit, for a decision on the merits, which again ruled against Bond. On appeal, the Supreme Court reversed and remanded again, ruling that the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act of 1998 did not reach Bond's actions and she could not be charged under that federal law.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Bond v. United States, 572 U.S. 844 (2014), follows up on the Supreme Court's 2011 case of the same name in which it had reversed the Third Circuit and concluded that both individuals and states can bring a Tenth Amendment challenge to federal law. The case was remanded to the Third Circuit, for a decision on the merits, which again ruled against Bond. On appeal, the Supreme Court reversed and remanded again, ruling that the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act of 1998 did not reach Bond's actions and she could not be charged under that federal law. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 43834311 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 13217 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1119442541 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-11-03 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Bond v. United States, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Thomas (en)
  • Scalia (en)
  • Alito (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2014 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket
  • 12 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Carol Anne Bond, Petitioner v. United States (en)
dbp:holding
  • A fair reading of statutes must be certain of the intent of Congress before it finds that federal law overrides the usual constitutional balance of federal and state powers. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Scalia; Alito (en)
  • Thomas; Alito (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Bond v. United States (en)
dbp:majority
  • Roberts (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:uspage
  • 844 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 572 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Bond v. United States, 572 U.S. 844 (2014), follows up on the Supreme Court's 2011 case of the same name in which it had reversed the Third Circuit and concluded that both individuals and states can bring a Tenth Amendment challenge to federal law. The case was remanded to the Third Circuit, for a decision on the merits, which again ruled against Bond. On appeal, the Supreme Court reversed and remanded again, ruling that the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act of 1998 did not reach Bond's actions and she could not be charged under that federal law. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Bond v. United States (2014) (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Carol Anne Bond, Petitioner v. United States (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License