Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896), was a United States Supreme Court case that, amongst other things, approved the use of a jury instruction intended to prevent a hung jury by encouraging jurors in the minority to reconsider. The Court affirmed Alexander Allen's murder conviction, having vacated his two prior convictions for the same crime. Allen is based upon the Supreme Court's supervisory power over the federal courts. Thus, it is not binding on state courts. Approximately half of US states prohibit Allen charges on state law grounds.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896), was a United States Supreme Court case that, amongst other things, approved the use of a jury instruction intended to prevent a hung jury by encouraging jurors in the minority to reconsider. The Court affirmed Alexander Allen's murder conviction, having vacated his two prior convictions for the same crime. Such an instruction became known as an Allen charge and is given when, after deliberation, a jury reports that it is deadlocked and unable to decide on a verdict. Because it is used to dislodge jurors from entrenched positions, the Allen charge is sometimes referred to as the "dynamite charge" or the "hammer charge." Allen is based upon the Supreme Court's supervisory power over the federal courts. Thus, it is not binding on state courts. Approximately half of US states prohibit Allen charges on state law grounds. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 1040979 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 13329 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1109668200 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:case
  • Allen v. United States, (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-12-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1896 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Allen v. United States (en)
dbp:holding
  • There is no error in a jury instruction encouraging dissenting jurors to reconsider (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Allen v. United States (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Brown (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 17 (xsd:integer)
dbp:prior
  • Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Arkansas (en)
dbp:submitdate
  • 0001-10-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:submityear
  • 1896 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 492 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 164 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896), was a United States Supreme Court case that, amongst other things, approved the use of a jury instruction intended to prevent a hung jury by encouraging jurors in the minority to reconsider. The Court affirmed Alexander Allen's murder conviction, having vacated his two prior convictions for the same crime. Allen is based upon the Supreme Court's supervisory power over the federal courts. Thus, it is not binding on state courts. Approximately half of US states prohibit Allen charges on state law grounds. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Allen v. United States (1896) (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Allen v. United States (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License