Two-loop leading-colour QCD helicity amplitudes for Higgs boson production in association with a bottom-quark pair at the LHC

1. J.R. Andersen et al., Les Houches 2015: physics at TeV colliders standard model working group report, arXiv:1605.04692 [INSPIRE].

2. J. Bendavid et al., Les Houches 2017: Physics at TeV Colliders Standard Model Working Group Report, arXiv:1803.07977.

3. S. Amoroso et al., Les Houches 2019: physics at TeV colliders: standard model working group report, arXiv:2003.01700 [INSPIRE].

4. H.A. Chawdhry, M.L. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet, NNLO QCD corrections to three-photon production at the LHC, JHEP 02 (2020) 057 [arXiv:1911.00479] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

5. S. Kallweit, V. Sotnikov and M. Wiesemann, Triphoton production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD, Phys. Lett. B 812 (2021) 136013 [arXiv:2010.04681] [INSPIRE].

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. H.A. Chawdhry, M. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet, NNLO QCD corrections to diphoton production with an additional jet at the LHC, arXiv:2105.06940 [INSPIRE].

7. M. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet, Next-to-next-to-leading order study of three-jet production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 152001 [arXiv:2106.05331] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

8. C.G. Papadopoulos, D. Tommasini and C. Wever, The pentabox master integrals with the simplified differential equations approach, JHEP 04 (2016) 078 [arXiv:1511.09404] [INSPIRE].

   ADS  Google Scholar 

9. T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn and N.A. Lo Presti, Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes, JHEP 10 (2018) 103 [arXiv:1807.09812] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

10. S. Abreu, B. Page and M. Zeng, Differential equations from unitarity cuts: nonplanar hexa-box integrals, JHEP 01 (2019) 006 [arXiv:1807.11522] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

11. D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn, N.A. Lo Presti, V. Mitev and P. Wasser, Analytic result for the nonplanar hexa-box integrals, JHEP 03 (2019) 042 [arXiv:1809.06240] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

12. D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia, All master integrals for three-jet production at next-to-next-to-leading order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 041603 [arXiv:1812.11160] [INSPIRE].

13. D. Chicherin and V. Sotnikov, Pentagon functions for scattering of five massless particles, JHEP 12 (2020) 167 [arXiv:2009.07803] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

14. T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn and N.A. Lo Presti, Analytic form of the two-loop planar five-gluon all-plus-helicity amplitude in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 062001 [Erratum ibid. 116 (2016) 189903] [arXiv:1511.05409] [INSPIRE].

15. S. Badger, C. Brønnum-Hansen, H.B. Hartanto and T. Peraro, Analytic helicity amplitudes for two-loop five-gluon scattering: the single-minus case, JHEP 01 (2019) 186 [arXiv:1811.11699] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

16. S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita and B. Page, Analytic form of planar two-loop five-gluon scattering amplitudes in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 082002 [arXiv:1812.04586] [INSPIRE].

17. S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and V. Sotnikov, Analytic form of the planar two-loop five-parton scattering amplitudes in QCD, JHEP 05 (2019) 084 [arXiv:1904.00945] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

18. S. Badger et al., Analytic form of the full two-loop five-gluon all-plus helicity amplitude, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 071601 [arXiv:1905.03733] [INSPIRE].

19. S. Abreu, B. Page, E. Pascual and V. Sotnikov, Leading-color two-loop qcd corrections for three-photon production at hadron colliders, JHEP 01 (2021) 078 [arXiv:2010.15834] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

20. H.A. Chawdhry, M. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet, Two-loop leading-color helicity amplitudes for three-photon production at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2021) 150 [arXiv:2012.13553] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

21. B. Agarwal, F. Buccioni, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi, Two-loop leading colour QCD corrections to q\( \overline{q} \) → γγg and qg → γγq, JHEP 04 (2021) 201 [arXiv:2102.01820] [INSPIRE].

22. S. Abreu, F.F. Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and V. Sotnikov, Leading-color two-loop QCD corrections for three-jet production at hadron colliders, JHEP 07 (2021) 095 [arXiv:2102.13609] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

23. H.A. Chawdhry, M. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet, Two-loop leading-colour QCD helicity amplitudes for two-photon plus jet production at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2021) 164 [arXiv:2103.04319] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

24. B. Agarwal, F. Buccioni, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi, Two-loop helicity amplitudes for diphoton plus jet production in full color, arXiv:2105.04585 [INSPIRE].

25. S. Badger et al., Virtual QCD corrections to gluon-initiated diphoton plus jet production at hadron colliders, arXiv:2106.08664 [INSPIRE].

26. S. Badger, C. Brønnum-Hansen, H.B. Hartanto and T. Peraro, First look at two-loop five-gluon scattering in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 092001 [arXiv:1712.02229] [INSPIRE].

27. S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and M. Zeng, Planar two-loop five-gluon amplitudes from numerical unitarity, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 116014 [arXiv:1712.03946] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

28. S. Badger et al., Applications of integrand reduction to two-loop five-point scattering amplitudes in QCD, PoS(LL2018)006 [arXiv:1807.09709] [INSPIRE].

29. S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and V. Sotnikov, Planar two-loop five-parton amplitudes from numerical unitarity, JHEP 11 (2018) 116 [arXiv:1809.09067] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

30. A.V. Kotikov, Differential equations method: new technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation, Phys. Lett. B 254 (1991) 158 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

31. Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower, Dimensionally regulated pentagon integrals, Nucl. Phys. B 412 (1994) 751 [hep-ph/9306240] [INSPIRE].

32. E. Remiddi, Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes, Nuovo Cim. A 110 (1997) 1435 [hep-th/9711188] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

33. T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, Differential equations for two loop four point functions, Nucl. Phys. B 580 (2000) 485 [hep-ph/9912329] [INSPIRE].

34. J.M. Henn, Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 251601 [arXiv:1304.1806] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

35. J. Gluza, K. Kajda and D.A. Kosower, Towards a basis for planar two-loop integrals, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 045012 [arXiv:1009.0472] [INSPIRE].

36. R.M. Schabinger, A new algorithm for the generation of unitarity-compatible integration by parts relations, JHEP 01 (2012) 077 [arXiv:1111.4220] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

37. H. Ita, Two-loop integrand decomposition into master integrals and surface terms, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 116015 [arXiv:1510.05626] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

38. K.J. Larsen and Y. Zhang, Integration-by-parts reductions from unitarity cuts and algebraic geometry, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 041701 [arXiv:1511.01071] [INSPIRE].

39. J. Böhm, A. Georgoudis, K.J. Larsen, M. Schulze and Y. Zhang, Complete sets of logarithmic vector fields for integration-by-parts identities of Feynman integrals, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 025023 [arXiv:1712.09737] [INSPIRE].

40. A. von Manteuffel and R.M. Schabinger, A novel approach to integration by parts reduction, Phys. Lett. B 744 (2015) 101 [arXiv:1406.4513] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

41. T. Peraro, Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction, JHEP 12 (2016) 030 [arXiv:1608.01902] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

42. J. Klappert and F. Lange, Reconstructing rational functions with FireFly, Comput. Phys. Commun. 247 (2020) 106951 [arXiv:1904.00009].

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. T. Peraro, FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs, JHEP 07 (2019) 031 [arXiv:1905.08019] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

44. J. Klappert, S. Y. Klein and F. Lange, Interpolation of dense and sparse rational functions and other improvements in FireFly, Comput. Phys. Commun. 264 (2021) 107968 [arXiv:2004.01463].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

45. J. Klappert, F. Lange, P. Maierhöfer and J. Usovitsch, Integral reduction with Kira 2.0 and finite field methods, Comput. Phys. Commun. 266 (2021) 108024 [arXiv:2008.06494].

46. H.B. Hartanto, S. Badger, C. Brønnum-Hansen and T. Peraro, A numerical evaluation of planar two-loop helicity amplitudes for a W-boson plus four partons, JHEP 09 (2019) 119 [arXiv:1906.11862] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

47. S. Abreu, H. Ita, F. Moriello, B. Page, W. Tschernow and M. Zeng, Two-loop integrals for planar five-point one-mass processes, JHEP 11 (2020) 117 [arXiv:2005.04195] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

48. D.D. Canko, C.G. Papadopoulos and N. Syrrakos, Analytic representation of all planar two-loop five-point Master Integrals with one off-shell leg, JHEP 01 (2021) 199 [arXiv:2009.13917] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

49. N. Syrrakos, Pentagon integrals to arbitrary order in the dimensional regulator, JHEP 06 (2021) 037 [arXiv:2012.10635] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

50. S. Badger, H.B. Hartanto and S. Zoia, Two-loop QCD corrections to Wb\( \overline{b} \) production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 012001 [arXiv:2102.02516] [INSPIRE].

51. C.G. Papadopoulos and C. Wever, Internal Reduction method for computing Feynman integrals, JHEP 02 (2020) 112 [arXiv:1910.06275] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

52. S. Abreu, H. Ita, B. Page and W. Tschernow, Two-loop hexa-box integrals for non-planar five-point one-mass processes, arXiv:2107.14180 [INSPIRE].

53. C. Balázs, J.L. Diaz-Cruz, H.J. He, T.M.P. Tait and C.P. Yuan, Probing Higgs bosons with large bottom Yukawa coupling at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 055016 [hep-ph/9807349] [INSPIRE].

54. S. Dawson, C.B. Jackson, L. Reina and D. Wackeroth, Higgs production in association with bottom quarks at hadron colliders, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21 (2006) 89 [hep-ph/0508293] [INSPIRE].

55. D. Pagani, H.-S. Shao and M. Zaro, RIP Hb\( \overline{b} \): how other Higgs production modes conspire to kill a rare signal at the LHC, JHEP 11 (2020) 036 [arXiv:2005.10277] [INSPIRE].

56. C. Grojean, A. Paul and Z. Qian, Resurrecting b\( \overline{b} \)h with kinematic shapes, JHEP 04 (2021) 139 [arXiv:2011.13945] [INSPIRE].

57. P. Konar, B. Mukhopadhyaya, R. Rahaman and R.K. Singh, Probing non-standard b\( \overline{b} \)h interaction at the LHC at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 818 (2021) 136358 [arXiv:2101.10683].

58. F. Maltoni, G. Ridolfi and M. Ubiali, b-initiated processes at the LHC: a reappraisal, JHEP 07 (2012) 022 [Erratum ibid. 04 (2013) 095] [arXiv:1203.6393] [INSPIRE].

59. D. Dicus, T. Stelzer, Z. Sullivan and S. Willenbrock, Higgs boson production in association with bottom quarks at next-to-leading order, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 094016 [hep-ph/9811492] [INSPIRE].

60. C. Balázs, H.-J. He and C.P. Yuan, QCD corrections to scalar production via heavy quark fusion at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 114001 [hep-ph/9812263] [INSPIRE].

61. F. Maltoni, Z. Sullivan and S. Willenbrock, Higgs-boson production via bottom-quark fusion, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 093005 [hep-ph/0301033] [INSPIRE].

62. R.V. Harlander, K.J. Ozeren and M. Wiesemann, Higgs plus jet production in bottom quark annihilation at next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 693 (2010) 269 [arXiv:1007.5411] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

63. S. Bühler, F. Herzog, A. Lazopoulos and R. Müller, The fully differential hadronic production of a Higgs boson via bottom quark fusion at NNLO, JHEP 07 (2012) 115 [arXiv:1204.4415] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

64. R.V. Harlander, S. Liebler and H. Mantler, SusHi: a program for the calculation of Higgs production in gluon fusion and bottom-quark annihilation in the Standard Model and the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1605 [arXiv:1212.3249] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

65. A.H. Ajjath et al., NNLO QCD⊕QED corrections to Higgs production in bottom quark annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 114016 [arXiv:1906.09028] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

66. C. Duhr, F. Dulat and B. Mistlberger, Higgs boson production in bottom-quark fusion to third order in the strong coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 051804 [arXiv:1904.09990] [INSPIRE].

67. R. Mondini and C. Williams, Bottom-induced contributions to Higgs plus jet at next-to-next-to-leading order, JHEP 05 (2021) 045 [arXiv:2102.05487] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

68. J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, F. Maltoni and S. Willenbrock, Higgs-boson production in association with a single bottom quark, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 095002 [hep-ph/0204093] [INSPIRE].

69. S. Dawson and P. Jaiswal, Weak corrections to associated Higgs-bottom quark production, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 073008 [arXiv:1002.2672] [INSPIRE].

70. S. Dawson, C.B. Jackson and P. Jaiswal, SUSY QCD corrections to Higgs-b production: is the ∆_b approximation accurate?, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 115007 [arXiv:1104.1631] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

71. S. Dittmaier, M. Krämer and M. Spira, Higgs radiation off bottom quarks at the Tevatron and the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 074010 [hep-ph/0309204] [INSPIRE].

72. S. Dawson, C.B. Jackson, L. Reina and D. Wackeroth, Exclusive Higgs boson production with bottom quarks at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 074027 [hep-ph/0311067] [INSPIRE].

73. S. Dawson, C.B. Jackson, L. Reina and D. Wackeroth, Higgs boson production with one bottom quark jet at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 031802 [hep-ph/0408077] [INSPIRE].

74. M. Wiesemann, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni and P. Torrielli, Higgs production in association with bottom quarks, JHEP 02 (2015) 132 [arXiv:1409.5301] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

75. B. Jager, L. Reina and D. Wackeroth, Higgs boson production in association with b jets in the POWHEG BOX, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 014030 [arXiv:1509.05843] [INSPIRE].

76. N. Deutschmann, F. Maltoni, M. Wiesemann and M. Zaro, Top-Yukawa contributions to bbH production at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2019) 054 [arXiv:1808.01660] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

77. N. Liu, L. Wu, P. Wu and J.M. Yang, Complete one-loop effects of SUSY QCD in b\( \overline{b} \)h production at the LHC under current experimental constraints, JHEP 01 (2013) 161 [arXiv:1208.3413] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

78. S. Dittmaier, P. Häfliger, M. Krämer, M. Spira and M. Walser, Neutral MSSM Higgs-boson production with heavy quarks: NLO supersymmetric QCD corrections, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 035010 [arXiv:1406.5307] [INSPIRE].

79. R. Harlander, M. Krämer and M. Schumacher, Bottom-quark associated Higgs-boson production: reconciling the four- and five-flavour scheme approach, arXiv:1112.3478 [INSPIRE].

80. M. Bonvini, A.S. Papanastasiou and F.J. Tackmann, Resummation and matching of b-quark mass effects in b\( \overline{b} \)H production, JHEP 11 (2015) 196 [arXiv:1508.03288] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

81. S. Forte, D. Napoletano and M. Ubiali, Higgs production in bottom-quark fusion in a matched scheme, Phys. Lett. B 751 (2015) 331 [arXiv:1508.01529] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

82. S. Forte, D. Napoletano and M. Ubiali, Higgs production in bottom-quark fusion: matching beyond leading order, Phys. Lett. B 763 (2016) 190 [arXiv:1607.00389] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

83. C. Duhr, F. Dulat, V. Hirschi and B. Mistlberger, Higgs production in bottom quark fusion: matching the 4- and 5-flavour schemes to third order in the strong coupling, JHEP 08 (2020) 017 [arXiv:2004.04752] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

84. F. Krauss and D. Napoletano, Towards a fully massive five-flavor scheme, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 096002 [arXiv:1712.06832] [INSPIRE].

85. D. Figueroa, S. Honeywell, S. Quackenbush, L. Reina, C. Reuschle and D. Wackeroth, Electroweak and QCD corrections to Z-boson production with one b jet in a massive five-flavor scheme, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 093002 [arXiv:1805.01353] [INSPIRE].

86. A. Banfi, G.P. Salam and G. Zanderighi, Infrared safe definition of jet flavor, Eur. Phys. J. C 47 (2006) 113 [hep-ph/0601139] [INSPIRE].

87. F. Moriello, Generalised power series expansions for the elliptic planar families of Higgs + jet production at two loops, JHEP 01 (2020) 150 [arXiv:1907.13234] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

88. M. Hidding, DiffExp, a Mathematica package for computing Feynman integrals in terms of one-dimensional series expansions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 269 (2021) 108125 [arXiv:2006.05510] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

89. S. Catani, The singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order, Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998) 161 [hep-ph/9802439] [INSPIRE].

90. T. Becher and M. Neubert, On the structure of infrared singularities of gauge-theory amplitudes, JHEP 06 (2009) 081 [Erratum ibid. 11 (2013) 024] [arXiv:0903.1126] [INSPIRE].

91. T. Becher and M. Neubert, Infrared singularities of scattering amplitudes in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 162001 [Erratum ibid. 111 (2013) 199905] [arXiv:0901.0722] [INSPIRE].

92. E. Gardi and L. Magnea, Factorization constraints for soft anomalous dimensions in QCD scattering amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2009) 079 [arXiv:0901.1091] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

93. R. Britto, F. Cachazo and B. Feng, New recursion relations for tree amplitudes of gluons, Nucl. Phys. B 715 (2005) 499 [hep-th/0412308] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

94. R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng and E. Witten, Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 181602 [hep-th/0501052] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

95. S. Badger, E. Chaubey, H.B. Hartanto and R. Marzucca, Two-loop leading colour QCD helicity amplitudes for top quark pair production in the gluon fusion channel, JHEP 06 (2021) 163 [arXiv:2102.13450] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

96. P. Nogueira, Automatic Feynman graph generation, J. Comput. Phys. 105 (1993) 279.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

97. J. Kuipers, T. Ueda, J.A.M. Vermaseren and J. Vollinga, FORM version 4.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1453 [arXiv:1203.6543] [INSPIRE].

98. B. Ruijl, T. Ueda and J. Vermaseren, FORM version 4.2, arXiv:1707.06453 [INSPIRE].

99. G. Cullen, M. Koch-Janusz and T. Reiter, Spinney: a form library for helicity spinors, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 2368 [arXiv:1008.0803] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

100. A. Hodges, Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes, JHEP 05 (2013) 135 [arXiv:0905.1473] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

101. S. Badger, Automating QCD amplitudes with on-shell methods, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 762 (2016) 012057 [arXiv:1605.02172] [INSPIRE].

102. K.G. Chetyrkin and F.V. Tkachov, Integration by parts: the algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops, Nucl. Phys. B 192 (1981) 159 [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

103. R.N. Lee, Presenting LiteRed: a tool for the Loop InTEgrals REDuction, arXiv:1212.2685 [INSPIRE].

104. S. Laporta, High precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 5087 [hep-ph/0102033] [INSPIRE].

105. E.K. Leinartas, Factorization of rational functions of several variables into partial fractions, Izv. Vyssh. Uchegn. Zaved. Mat. 10 (1978) 47.

     MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

106. A. Raichev, Leinartas’s partial fraction decomposition, arXiv:1206.4740.

107. J. Boehm, M. Wittmann, Z. Wu, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang, IBP reduction coefficients made simple, JHEP 12 (2020) 054 [arXiv:2008.13194] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

108. M. Heller and A. von Manteuffel, MultivariateApart: generalized partial fractions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271 (2022) 108174 [arXiv:2101.08283] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

109. K.-T. Chen, Iterated path integrals, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 83 (1977) 831 [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

110. F. Brown, Iterated integrals in quantum field theory, in the proceedings of the 6^th Summer School on Geometric and Topological Methods for Quantum Field Theory , July 6–23, Villa de Leyva, Colombia (2013) [INSPIRE].

111. S. Abreu, L.J. Dixon, E. Herrmann, B. Page and M. Zeng, The two-loop five-point amplitude in \( \mathcal{N} \) = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 121603 [arXiv:1812.08941] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

112. D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia, Analytic result for a two-loop five-particle amplitude, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 121602 [arXiv:1812.11057] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

113. D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia, The two-loop five-particle amplitude in \( \mathcal{N} \) = 8 supergravity, JHEP 03 (2019) 115 [arXiv:1901.05932] [INSPIRE].

114. S. Abreu, L.J. Dixon, E. Herrmann, B. Page and M. Zeng, The two-loop five-point amplitude in \( \mathcal{N} \) = 8 supergravity, JHEP 03 (2019) 123 [arXiv:1901.08563] [INSPIRE].

115. S. Caron-Huot, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia, Multi-Regge limit of the two-loop five-point amplitudes in \( \mathcal{N} \) = 4 super Yang-Mills and \( \mathcal{N} \) = 8 supergravity, JHEP 10 (2020) 188 [arXiv:2003.03120] [INSPIRE].

116. D. Chicherin, J.M. Henn and G. Papathanasiou, Cluster algebras for Feynman integrals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 091603 [arXiv:2012.12285] [INSPIRE].

117. R. Bonciani et al., Evaluating a family of two-loop non-planar master integrals for Higgs + jet production with full heavy-quark mass dependence, JHEP 01 (2020) 132 [arXiv:1907.13156] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

118. H. Frellesvig, M. Hidding, L. Maestri, F. Moriello and G. Salvatori, The complete set of two-loop master integrals for Higgs + jet production in QCD, JHEP 06 (2020) 093 [arXiv:1911.06308] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

119. M. Becchetti, R. Bonciani, V. Del Duca, V. Hirschi, F. Moriello and A. Schweitzer, Next-to-leading order corrections to light-quark mixed QCD-EW contributions to Higgs boson production, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 054037 [arXiv:2010.09451] [INSPIRE].

120. R. Bonciani et al., Mixed strong-electroweak corrections to the Drell-Yan process, arXiv:2106.11953 [INSPIRE].

121. A.B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes, Math. Res. Lett. 5 (1998) 497 [arXiv:1105.2076] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

122. E. Remiddi and J.A.M. Vermaseren, Harmonic polylogarithms, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 725 [hep-ph/9905237] [INSPIRE].

123. A.B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives, math/0103059 [INSPIRE].

124. J. Vollinga and S. Weinzierl, Numerical evaluation of multiple polylogarithms, Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 177 [hep-ph/0410259] [INSPIRE].

125. J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

126. T. Ahmed, M. Mahakhud, P. Mathews, N. Rana and V. Ravindran, Two-loop QCD corrections to Higgs → b + \( \overline{b} \) + g amplitude, JHEP 08 (2014) 075 [arXiv:1405.2324] [INSPIRE].

Download references