Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the reaction π+p → ρ0Δ++ at 11.7 GeV/c incident momentum

II. — An interpretation in terms of Regge-pole exchange

Аналиэ реакций π+p → ρ0Δ++ при начальном импульсе 11.7 ГзВ/с

II: Интерпретация на основе обмена полюсами Редже

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

Summary

A model-independent analysis is made to determine the relative contribution of natural and unnatural parity exchange in the reactions (1) π+p→ρ0Δ++ at 11.7 GeV/c and (2) πp→ρ0n at 11 GeV/c. A simple evasive Regge-pole model with only π-trajectory exchange has been applied to the data of reaction (1) and then to the combined data of reactions (1) and (2). A satisfactory fit to the data is obtained. The parameters determined in fitting reaction (1) have been used to make predictions for the same reaction at 8, 13.1 and 18.5 GeV/c. A comparison with experimental data at these momenta has been made. Considering the severe nature of this test for the evasive model there is altogether satisfactory agreement between the predictions and the data.

Riassunto

Un’analisi che prescinde da ogni modello specifico permette di separare il contributo relativo degli scambi di parità naturale e non naturale nelle reazioni (1) π+p → ρ0Δ++ a 11.7 GeV/c e (2) πp → ρ0n a 11.2 GeV/c. In base ai risultati di tale analisi, dapprima si interpreta la reazione (1) mediante un semplice modello di Regge con scambio di un π di tipo evasivo; poi si interpretano i dati di entrambe le reazioni (1) e (2) congiuntamente, ottenendo risultati soddisfacenti. I parametri così determinati si usano quindi per ottenere le dovute previsioni sull’andamento della sezione d’urto differenziale dσ/d|t| per la reazione (1) da confrontare con dati esistenti a 8, 13.1 e 18.5 GeV/c. Considerato il carattere particolarmente severo della verifica cui il modello di Regge di tipo evasivo è qui sottoposto, l’accordo tra dati sperimentali e previsioni teoriche può ritenersi soddisfacente. Tuttavia il modello evasivo non è in grado di riprodurre il persistente picco in avanti presentato a tutte le energie dai dati sperimentali.

Реэюме

Проводится аналиэ, не эависяший от модели, для определения относительного вклада обмена с естественной и неестественной четностью в реакциях (1) π+p → ρ0Δ++ при 11.7 ГзВ/с и (2) πp → ρ0n при 11 ГзВ/с. Была применена простая модель « неуловимых » полюсов Редже с обменом единственной π-траекторией к данным реакции (1), а эатем к комбинированным данным реакций (1) и (2). Получается удовлетворительное соответствие. Параметры, полученные иэ подгонки первой реакции, были испольэованы для получения предскаэаний для той же реакции при начальных импульсах 8, 13.1 и 18.5 ГзВ/с. Было проведено сравнение с зкспериментальными данными при зтих импульсах. Учитывая строгий характер зтой проверки модели « неуловимых » полюсов, получается удовлетворительное согласие между предскаэаниями и полученными данными.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. L. L. Wang:Phys. Rev.,153, 1664 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Frautschi andL. Jones,Phys. Rev. 164, 1918 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Le Bellac:Phys. Lett.,25 B, 524 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Arbab andR. C. Brower:Phys. Rev.,175, 1991 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Haber, U. Maor, G. Yekutieli andE. Gotsman:Phys. Rev.,168, 1773 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. I. Bander, V. Linke andH. J. Rothe:Nuovo Cimento,54 A, 407 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. A. Gaidos, R. B. Willmann, J. W. Lamsa andC. R. Ezell:Phys. Rev. D,1, 3190 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. L. M. Nath andD. G. George:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,1, 111 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Cohen-Tannoudji, A. Morel andPh. Salin:Nuovo Cimento,55 A, 412 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aachen-Berlin-CERN Collaboration:Phys. Lett.,27 B, 174 (1968).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aachen-Berlin-CERN Collaboration:Phys. Lett.,22, 533 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. The value quoted here for ρ0,0 has been evaluated by the authors on the basis of the (ρ0,0 — ρ1,1) distribution reported in ref. (1g).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. N. N. Biswas, N. M. Cason, M. S. Farber, J. A. Helland, M. J. Hones, V. P. Kenney, J. T. McGahan, J. A. Poirier, J. T. Powers, O. R. Sander andW. D. Shephard:Phys. Rev. D,2, 2529 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Caso, F. Conte, P. Benz, D. Cords, P. Schilling, L. Casè, M. L. Faccini, L. Mandelli, S. Ratti, G. Vegni, C. Besliu, P. Daronian, A. Daudin, B. Gandois, C. Kochowski, M. A. Jabiol, C. Lewin andL. Mosca:Nuovo Cimento,62 A, 755 (1969). Note that the experimental distributions used in the present paper are obtained with increased statistics.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. R. O. Maddock, G. F. Pinter, D. Evans, C. Caso, F. Conte, D. Teodoro, G. Tomasini, H. Fesefeldt, P. von Handel, H. Nagel, P. K. Schilling, G. Cecchet, L. Mandelli, S. Ratti, L. Tallone Lombardi, M. Chaumet, A. Daudin, M. Faccini, M. A. Jabiol, J. F. Lefur, C. Lewin andJ. Mallet:Nuovo Cimento,5 A, 433 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. P. Ader, M. Capdeville, G. Cohen-Tannoudji andPh. Salin:Nuovo Cimento,56 A, 952 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. P. R. Auvil andF. Halzen:Nucl. Phys.,19 B, 29 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. M. Drouffe andH. Navelet:Nuovo Cimento,2 A, 39 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. D. Jackson:Nuovo Cimento,34, 1644 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. G. C. Sheppey: CERN Computer, 6600 Series, Program Library D 505.

  21. Except for the parametrization of the residues, this formalism is identical to that of ref. (7).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. R. C. Arnold:Phys. Rev.,153, 1506 (1967).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. See, for example,G. H. Hite:Rev. Mod. Phys.,41, 669 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. A quite similar method, but applied to a different model, has already been developed byDonohue (16).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. J. T. Donohue:Nuovo Cimento,55 A, 527 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the Science Research Council.

Supported in part by the Ministerium für Bildung and Wissenschaft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maddock, R.O., Pinter, G.F., Caso, C. et al. Analysis of the reaction π+p → ρ0Δ++ at 11.7 GeV/c incident momentum. Nuov Cim A 5, 457–477 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723467

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723467

Navigation