Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Constant-Sum Paired Comparisons for Eliciting Stated Preferences: A Tutorial. (2015). Skedgel, Chris ; Regier, Dean.
In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
RePEc:spr:patien:v:8:y:2015:i:2:p:155-163.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 5

Citations received by this document

Cites: 43

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The design of welfare: unraveling taxpayers preferences. (2024). Vliet, Olaf ; Collewet, Marion ; van Vliet, Olaf ; Knoef, Marike ; Kessels, Roselinde ; Fairley, Kim.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:4am7e.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Towards machine learning for moral choice analysis in health economics: A literature review and research agenda. (2023). Chorus, Caspar G ; de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:326:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623002678.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Preference estimation from point allocation experiments. (2023). Koster, Paul ; Collewet, Marion.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:48:y:2023:i:c:s1755534523000313.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Does the use of the proportional shortfall help align the prioritisation of health services with public preferences?. (2018). Chen, Gang ; Maxwell, Aimee ; Iezzi, Angelo ; Richardson, Jeff.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:19:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s10198-017-0923-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Does a patients health potential affect the social valuation of health services?. (2018). Maxwell, Aimee ; Iezzi, Angelo ; Richardson, Jeff.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0192585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aizaki H. Basic functions for supporting an implementation of choice experiments in R. J Stat Softw Code Snippets. 2012;50:1–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Baron J, Greene J. Determinants of insensitivity to quantity in valuation of public goods: contribution, warm glow, budget constraints, availability, and prominence. J Exp Psychol Appl. 1996;2:107–25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Bartels DM, Medin DL. Are morally motivated decision makers insensitive to the consequences of their choices? Psychol Sci. 2007;18:24–8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bridges JFP, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14:403–13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bridges JFP, Kinter ET, Schmeding A, Rudolph I, Mühlbacher A. Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks? Patient Patient Cent Outcome Res. 2011;4:267–75.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Broqvist M, Garpenby P. To accept, or not to accept, that is the question: citizen reactions to rationing. Health Expect. 2014;17:82–92.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Carlsson F, Martinsson P. Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Econ. 2003;12:281–94.

  8. Carson RT, Louviere JJ. A common nomenclature for stated preference elicitation approaches. Environ Resour Econ. 2011;49:539–59.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Chan HM, Cheung GMY, Yip AKW. Selection criteria for recipients of scarce donor livers: a public opinion survey in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2006;12:40–6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Croissant Y, Millo G. Panel data econometrics in R: the plm package. J Stat Softw. 2008;27:1–43.

  11. Damschroder LJ, Roberts TR, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA. Why people refuse to make tradeoffs in person tradeoff elicitations: a matter of perspective? Med Decis Making. 2007;27:266–80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Desser AS, Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen JA, Grepperud S, Kristiansen IS. Societal views on orphan drugs: cross sectional survey of Norwegians aged 40 to 67. BMJ. 2010;341:c4715.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Fischer GW, Carmon Z, Ariely D, Zauberman G. Goal-based construction of preferences: task goals and the prominence effect. Manage Sci. 1999;45:1057–75.

  14. Fleck LM. Just caring: health reform and health care rationing. J Med Philos. 1994;19:435–43.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Green C. On the societal value of health care: what do we know about the person trade-off technique? Health Econ. 2001;10:233–43.

  16. Greene WH. Econometric analysis. 7th ed. Boston: Prentice Hall; 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Hensher DA, Greene WH, Rose JM. Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Kjær T. A review of the discrete choice experiment—with emphasis on its application in health care. University of Southern Denmark; 2005. Available from: http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles//Files/Om_SDU/Centre/c_ist_sund oke/Forskningsdokumenter/publications/Workingpapers/20051pdf.pdf .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Kuhfeld WF. Marketing research methods in SAS. Marketing research methods in SAS. 2010. Available from: http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/tnote/tnote_marketresea rch.html . Accessed 1 Dec 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Lancsar E, Louviere J, Flynn T. Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1738–53.

  21. Lancsar E, Louviere J. Deleting, “irrational” responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences? Health Econ. 2006;15:797–811.

  22. Linley WG, Hughes DA. Societal views on NICE, cancer drugs fund and value-based pricing criteria for prioritising medicines: a cross-sectional survey of 4118 adults in Great Britain. Health Econ. 2013;22(8):948–64.

  23. Long J. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1997.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Conjoint preference elicitation methods in the broader context of random utility theory preference elicitation methods. In: Gustafsson A, Herrmann A, Huber F, editors. Conjoint measurement: methods and applications. Berlin: Springer; 2000. pp. 167–98.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Mathews KE, Freeman ML, Desvousges WH. How and how much? Valuing environmental amenities using stated choice studies. Netherlands: Springer; 2007. pp. 111–33.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Mullen PM. Public involvement in health care priority setting: an overview of methods for eliciting values. Health Expect. 1999;2:222–34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Nord E. The person-trade-off approach to valuing health-care programs. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:201–8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna; 2013. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/ . Accessed 3 Mar 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Ratcliffe J. Public preferences for the allocation of donor liver grafts for transplantation. Health Econ. 2000;9:137–48.

  30. Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, Kilambi V, Mühlbacher A, Regier DA, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16:3–13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Rossi PE, Allenby GM, McCulloch R. Bayesian statistics and marketing. 1st ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Ryan M, Netten A, Skatun D, Smith P. Using discrete choice experiments to estimate a preference-based measure of outcome: an application to social care for older people. J Health Econ. 2006;25:927–44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Ryan M, Scott DA, Reeves C, Bate A, van Teijlingen ER, Russell EM, et al. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1–186.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Schwappach DL, Strasmann TJ. “Quick and dirty numbers”? The reliability of a stated-preference technique for the measurement of preferences for resource allocation. J Health Econ. 2006;25:432–48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Schwappach DL. Does it matter who you are or what you gain? An experimental study of preferences for resource allocation. Health Econ. 2003;12:255–67.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Scott A. Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: an application in health care. J Econ Psychol. 2002;23:383–98.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Skedgel CD, Wailoo AJ, Akehurst RL. Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences. Health Expectations. Epub 12 Jun 2013. doi: 10.1111/hex.12098 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Swallow SK, Opaluch JJ, Weaver TF. Strength-of-preference indicators and an ordered-response model for ordinarily dichotomous, discrete choice data. J Environ Econ Manag. 2001;41:70–93.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Ubel PA, Loewenstein G. Public perceptions of the importance of prognosis in allocating transplantable livers to children. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:234–41.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Wagstaff A. QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off. J Health Econ. 1991;10:21–41.

  41. Wheeler B. AlgDesign: algorithmic experimental design. 2014. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AlgDesign .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  42. Whitty JA, Lancsar E, Rixon K, Golenko X, Ratcliffe J. A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting. Patient. Epub 19 May 2014.

  43. Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2010.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Climate change and migration decisions: A choice experiment from the Mekong Delta, Vietnam.. (2022). Munro, Alistair ; Trinh, Tra Thi.
    In: GRIPS Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ngi:dpaper:22-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Valuation of small and multiple health risks: A critical analysis of SP data applied to food and water safety. (2014). Svensson, Mikael ; Hole, Arne ; Andersson, Henrik.
    In: Karlstad University Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:kaunek:0011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. ESTIMATING WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR RELIABLE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY: A CHOICE EXPERIMENT STUDY. (2013). Jenkins, Glenn ; Ozbafli, Aygul .
    In: Development Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:qed:dpaper:224.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments. (2013). Rose, John ; Bliemer, Michiel.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:40:y:2013:i:5:p:1021-1041.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Trading off dietary choices, physical exercise and cardiovascular disease risks. (2013). Longo, Alberto ; Boeri, Marco ; Grisolia, Jose M. ; Hutchinson, George ; Kee, Frank.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:93:y:2013:i:c:p:130-138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. A fair share: Burden-sharing preferences in the United States and China. (2013). Sterner, Thomas ; Lampi, Elina ; Kataria, Mitesh ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Krupnick, Alan ; Lofgren, SA ; Qin, Ping.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:35:y:2013:i:1:p:1-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Inferred vs. stated attribute non-attendance in choice experiments: A study of doctors’ prescription behaviour. (2013). Riise, Julie ; Hole, Arne ; Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Kolstad, Julie Riise .
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:96:y:2013:i:c:p:21-31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Do administrators have the same priorities for risk reductions as the general public?. (2012). Carlsson, Fredrik ; Jaldell, Henrik ; Daruvala, Dinky.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:45:y:2012:i:1:p:79-95.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Is the value of an environmental public good sensitive to the providing institution?. (2012). Koundouri, Phoebe ; Remoundou, Kyriaki ; Kountouris, Yiannis .
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:34:y:2012:i:3:p:381-395.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Junior doctors’ preferences for specialty choice. (2012). Witt, Julia ; Sivey, Peter ; Scott, Anthony ; Humphreys, John ; Joyce, Catherine .
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:31:y:2012:i:6:p:813-823.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Trading off dietary choices, physical exercise and cardiovascular disease risks. (2012). Longo, Alberto ; Grisolia, Jose M. ; Hutchinson, George ; Kee, Frank.
    In: 2012 AAEA/EAAE Food Environment Symposium.
    RePEc:ags:aaeafe:123527.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Do EPA Administrators Recommend Environmental Policies That Citizens Want?. (2011). Lampi, Elina ; Kataria, Mitesh ; Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:87:y:2011:i:1:p:60-74.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Incorrectly accounting for taste heterogeneity in choice experiments: Does it really matter for welfare measurement?. (2011). Hanley, Nick ; Torres Figuerola, Catalina M. ; Colombo, Sergio.
    In: Stirling Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:stl:stledp:2011-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Income redistribution: how to divide the pie?. (2011). Neustadt, Ilja ; Zweifel, Peter.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:35427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Discrete-Choice-Experimente zur Ermittlung der Präferenzen für Umverteilung. (2011). Pfarr, Christian ; Ulrich, Volker .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:31707.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. How wrong can you be? Implications of incorrect utility function specification for welfare measurement in choice experiments. (2011). Riera Font, Antoni ; Hanley, Nick ; Torres Figuerola, Catalina M..
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:62:y:2011:i:1:p:111-121.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. How wrong can you be? Implications of incorrect utility function specification for welfare measurement in choice experiments. (2010). Hanley, Nick ; Torres Figuerola, Catalina M. ; Riera, Antoni.
    In: Stirling Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:stl:stledp:2010-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Is the Welfare State Sustainable? Experimental Evidence on Citizens’ Preferences for Redistribution. (2010). Neustadt, Ilja ; Zweifel, Peter.
    In: SOI - Working Papers.
    RePEc:soz:wpaper:1003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. A Fair Share : Burden-Sharing Preferences in the United States and China. (2010). Sterner, Thomas ; Löfgren, Åsa ; Lampi, Elina ; Kataria, Mitesh ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Krupnick, Alan ; Chung, Susie ; Lofgren, SA ; Qin, Ping.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0471.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Understanding the impact of economic evidence on clinical decision making: A discrete choice experiment in cardiology. (2010). Torbica, Aleksandra ; Fattore, Giovanni.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:10:p:1536-1543.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Explorations of the effect of experience on preferences for a health-care service. (2010). Neuman, Einat .
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:39:y:2010:i:3:p:407-419.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Valuing quality changes in Caribbean coastal waters for heterogeneous beach visitors. (2010). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Beharry-Borg, Nesha.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:69:y:2010:i:5:p:1124-1139.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Choice experiment adaptive design benefits: a case study. (2010). Kerr, Geoffrey N. ; Sharp, Basil M. H., .
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:162024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The implications of incorrect utility function specification for welfare measurement in choice experiments. (2009). Hanley, Nick ; Torres Figuerola, Catalina M. ; Riera, Antoni.
    In: Stirling Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:stl:stledp:2009-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Toll product preferences and implications for alternative payment options and going cashless. (2009). Rose, John ; Hensher, David.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:36:y:2009:i:2:p:131-145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Dealing with ignored attributes in choice experiments on valuation of Sweden’s environmental quality objectives. (2009). Lampi, Elina ; Kataria, Mitesh ; Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models. (2009). Rose, John ; Hensher, David ; Bliemer, Michiel ; Bliemer, Michiel C. J., .
    In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.
    RePEc:eee:transb:v:43:y:2009:i:1:p:19-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Using choice experiments to value river and estuary health in Tasmania with individual preference heterogeneity. (2009). Bennett, Jeffrey.
    In: 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare09:48058.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Using Choice Experiment to Estimate Consumer Valuation: the Role of Experiment Design and Attribute Information Loads. (2009). Yu, Xiaohua ; Gao, Zhifeng ; House, Lisa O..
    In: 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
    RePEc:ags:aaea09:49406.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Employer recruitment preferences and discrimination: a stated preference experiment. (2008). Bergmann, Eric Ariel ; Mc Quaid, Ronald, .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:30801.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. The implications of incorrect utility function specification for welfare measurement in choice experiments. (2008). Riera Font, Antoni ; Hanley, Nick ; Torres Figuerola, Catalina M..
    In: CRE Working Papers (Documents de treball del CRE).
    RePEc:pdm:wpaper:2008/6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Do EPA administrators recommend environmental policies that citizens want?. (2008). Lampi, Elina ; Kataria, Mitesh ; Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0297.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Developing a Questionnaire for Valuing Changes in Natural Resource Management in the George Catchment, Tasmania. (2008). Kragt, Marit ; Bennett, Jeffrey.
    In: Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports.
    RePEc:een:eenhrr:0808.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Emotions and decision rules in discrete choice experiments for valuing health care programmes for the elderly. (2008). Hanemann, Michael ; Araña, Jorge ; Leon, Carmelo J. ; Araa, Jorge E..
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:27:y:2008:i:3:p:753-769.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Developing a Questionnaire for Valuing Changes in Natural Resource Management in the George Catchment, Tasmania. (2008). Bennett, Jeffrey ; Kragt, Marit .
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:eerhrr:94807.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Consumers want safer meat - but not at all costs. (2008). Mørkbak, Morten ; Gyrd-Hansen, D. E. ; Christensen, T. ; Morkbak, M. R..
    In: 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium.
    RePEc:ags:eaae08:44319.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Does energy efficiency label alter consumers f purchase decision? A latent class approach on Shanghai data. (2007). Shen, Junyi ; Saijo, Tatsuyoshi.
    In: OSIPP Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:osp:wpaper:07e005.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Design and development of a stated choice experiment for interdependent agents: accounting for interactions between buyers and sellers of urban freight services. (2007). Rose, John ; Hensher, David ; Collins, Andrew ; Puckett, Sean .
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:34:y:2007:i:4:p:429-451.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Development of commuter and non-commuter mode choice models for the assessment of new public transport infrastructure projects: A case study. (2007). Rose, John ; Hensher, David.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:41:y:2007:i:5:p:428-443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Designing Choice Experiments with Many Attributes: An Application to Setting Priorities for Orthopaedic Waiting Lists. (2006). Witt, Julia ; Scott, Anthony ; Osborne, Richard H..
    In: Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:iae:iaewps:wp2006n24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. How much is too much? - An investigation of the effect of the number of choice sets, starting point and the choice of bid vectors in choice experiments. (2006). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0191.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Towards a practical method to establish comparable values of travel time savings from stated choice experiments with differing design dimensions. (2006). Hensher, David.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:40:y:2006:i:10:p:829-840.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Analysis of Vocational and Residential Preferences of Rural Population: Application of an Experimental Technique to Rural Slovenia. (2006). Zanni, Alberto ; Davidova, Sophia ; Bailey, Alastair.
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae06:25534.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Empirical investigation of experimental design properties of discrete choice experiments in health care. (2005). Viney, Rosalie ; Savage, Elizabeth ; Louviere, Jordan.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:14:y:2005:i:4:p:349-362.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Experimental Designs for Environmental Valuation with Choice-Experiments: A Monte-Carlo Investigation. (2005). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Ferrini, Silvia.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:wai:econwp:05/08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates. (2005). Hensher, David ; Caussade, Sebastin ; Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, ; Rizzi, Luis I..
    In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.
    RePEc:eee:transb:v:39:y:2005:i:7:p:621-640.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Evaluating the welfare effects of improved water quality using the choice experiment method. (2004). Carlsson, Fredrik ; Abou-Ali, Hala.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Demand for pharmaceutical drugs: A choice modelling experiment. (2003). Merino, Anna.
    In: Working Papers, Research Center on Health and Economics.
    RePEc:upf:upfses:704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Demand for pharmaceutical drugs: A choice modelling experiment. (2003). Merino, Anna.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Using stated preference methods to evaluate the impact of water on health: the case of metropolitan Cairo. (2003). Abou-Ali, Hala.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-04 17:28:18 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.