Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
A New Mechanism to Alleviate the Crises of Confidence in Science-With An Application to the Public Goods Game. (2020). Villeval, Marie Claire ; List, John ; grossman, philip ; Butera, Luigi ; Houser, Daniel.
In: NBER Working Papers.
RePEc:nbr:nberwo:26801.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 15

Citations received by this document

Cites: 72

References cited by this document

Cocites: 23

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Heterogeneous productivity stabilizes public good contributions under certainty, uncertainty and ambiguity. (2024). Hassan, Gazi M ; Tucker, Steven ; Dorner, Zack.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:110:y:2024:i:c:s2214804324000466.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Multiple testing with covariate adjustment in experimental economics. (2023). Vayalinkal, Atom ; List, John ; Shaikh, Azeem M.
    In: Journal of Applied Econometrics.
    RePEc:wly:japmet:v:38:y:2023:i:6:p:920-939.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Overcoming problems of coordination and freeriding in a game with multiple public goods: dynamic contribution with information provision. (2023). Seki, Erika ; Takeuchi, AI.
    In: The Japanese Economic Review.
    RePEc:spr:jecrev:v:74:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s42973-023-00133-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Generation Next: Experimentation with AI. (2023). List, John ; Jabarian, Brian ; Charness, Gary.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00777.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Coordination and free-riding problems in the provision of multiple public goods. (2023). Seki, Erika ; Takeuchi, AI.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:206:y:2023:i:c:p:95-121.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Do Pre-registration and Pre-analysis Plans Reduce P-Hacking and Publication Bias?. (2022). Cook, Nikolai ; Brodeur, Abel ; Heyes, Anthony ; Hartley, Jonathan S.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp15476.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Experimental evidence of common pool resource use in the presence of uncertainty. (2022). Suter, Jordan F ; Palm-Forster, Leah H.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:194:y:2022:i:c:p:139-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The role of open science practices in scaling evidence-based prevention programs. (2021). List, John ; Suskind, Dana ; Supplee, Lauren ; Duggan, Anne ; Ammerman, Robert.
    In: Natural Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:natura:00741.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Multiple Testing with Covariate Adjustment in Experimental Economics. (2021). Vayalinkal, Atom ; Shaikh, Azeem ; List, John.
    In: Natural Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:natura:00732.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The power of experiments: How big is your n?. (2020). Zacharodimou, Panagiota ; Buehren, Christoph ; Asanov, Igor.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:202032.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. ——— (1990): “Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving,” The Economic Journal, 100, 464–477.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. ——— (1995): “Cooperation in public goods experiments: Kindness or confusion?” American Economic Review, 85, 891–904.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. ——— (2008): “Naturally Occurring Markets and Exogenous Laboratory Experiments: A Case Study of the Winner’s Curse,” The Economic Journal, 118, 822–843.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. ——— (2017): “Replication in Labor Economics: Evidence from Data, and What It Suggests, ” American Economic Review, 107, 37–40.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. ——— (2017): “To Replicate or Not To Replicate? Exploring Reproducibility in Economics through the Lens of a Model and a Pilot Study,” The Economic Journal, 127, F209–F235.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Abadie, A. (2018): “Statistical Non-Significance in Empirical Economics,” Mimeo. Abdulkadiroglu, A., J. Angrist, and P. Pathak (2014): “The Elite Illusion: Achievement Effects at Boston and New York Exam Schools,” Econometrica, 82, 137– 196.

  7. Abeler, J., D. Nosenzo, and C. Raymond (2019): “Preferences for truth-telling,” Econometrica, 87, 1115–1153.

  8. Ambrus, A. and P. Pathak (2011): “Cooperation over finite horizons: A theory and experiments,” Journal of Public Economics, 95, 500–512.

  9. Anderson, S. and C. A. Goere, Jacob K.and Holt (1998): “A Theoretical Analysis of Altruism and Decision Error in Public Goods Games,” Journal of Public Economics, 70, 297–323.

  10. Andreoni, J. (1988): “Why Free Ride? Strategies and Learning in Public Goods Experiments, ” Journal of Public Economics, 37, 291–304.

  11. Andrews, I. and M. Kasy (2017): “Identification of and correction for publication bias,” Working paper.

  12. Berry, J., L. C. Coffman, D. Hanley, R. Gihleb, and A. J. Wilson (2017): “Assessing the rate of replication in economics,” American Economic Review, 107, 27– 31.

  13. Bjork, L., M. Kocher, P. Martinsson, and P. Nam Khanh (2016): “Cooperation under risk and ambiguity,” Working Paper in Economics, University of Gothenburg, 683.

  14. Bochet, O. and L. Putterman (2009): “Not just babble: Opening the black box of communication in a voluntary contribution experiment,” European Economic Review, 53, 309–326.

  15. Bochet, O., T. Page, and L. Putterman (2006): “Communication and Punishment in Voluntary Contribution Experiments,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60, 11–26.

  16. Bolton, G. E. and A. Ockenfels (2000): “ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition,” American Economic Review, 90, 166–193.

  17. Brandts, J. and A. Schram (2001): “Cooperation and Noise in Public Goods Experiments: Applying the Contribution Function Approach,” Journal of Public Economics, 79, 399–427.

  18. Butera, L. and J. A. List (2017): “An Economic Approach to Alleviate the Crisis of Confidence in Science: With an Application to the Public Goods Game,” NBER Working Papers, 23335.

  19. Camerer, C. F., A. Dreber, E. Forsell, T.-H. Ho, J. Huber, M. Johannesson, M. Kirchler, J. Almenberg, A. Altmejd, T. Chan, et al. (2016): “Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics,” Science, 351, 1433–1436.

  20. Cameron, A., J. Gelbach, and D. Miller (2008): “Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 414–427.

  21. Cesarini, D., E. Lindqvist, R. Ostling, and B. Wallace (2016): “Wealth, Health, and Child Development: Evidence from Administrative Data on Swedish Lottery Players, ” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 687–738.

  22. Charness, G. and M. Rabin (2002): “Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817–869.

  23. Chaudhuri, A. (2011): “Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature,” Experimental Economics, 14, 47–83.

  24. Chen, D. L., M. Schonger, and C. Wickens (2016): “oTreeAn open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88–97.

  25. Coffman, L. C. and M. Niederle (2015): “Pre-analysis plans have limited upside, especially where replications are feasible,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 81–97.

  26. Coffman, L. C., M. Niederle, and A. J. Wilson (2017): “A Proposal to Organize and Promote Replications,” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 107, 41–45.

  27. Correia, S. (2017): “Linear models with high-dimensional fixed effects: An efficient and feasible estimator,” Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Cox, J. C., D. Friedman, and S. Gjerstad (2007): “A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness,” Games and Economic Behavior, 59, 17–45.

  29. de Ree, J., K. Muralidharan, M. Pradhan, and H. Rogers (2018): “Double for Nothing? Experimental Evidence on an Unconditional Teacher Salary Increase in Indonesia, ” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133, 993–1039.

  30. Drazen, A. and E. Y. Ozbay (2019): “Does being chosen to lead induce non-selfish behavior? Experimental evidence on reciprocity,” Journal of Public Economics, 174, 13–21.

  31. Drazen, A., A. D. Almenberg, E. Y. Ozbay, and E. Snowberg (2019): “A JournalBased Replication of Being Chosen to Lead,” NBER Working Papers, No. w26444.

  32. Dreber, A., d. A. J. Pfeiffer, Thomas a, S. Isaksson, B. Wilson, Y. Chen, B. A. Nosek, and M. Johannesson (2015): “Using Prediction Markets to Estimate the Reproducibility of Scientific Research,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 15343–15347.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Dufwenberg, M. and G. Kirchsteiger (2004): “A theory of sequential reciprocity,” Games and Economic Behavior, 47, 268–298.

  34. Eckel, C. C. and P. J. Grossman (2008): “Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68, 1–17.

  35. Falkinger, J., E. Fehr, S. Gaechter, and R. Winter-Ebmer (2000): “A Simple Mechanism for the Efficient Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence,” American Economic Review, 90, 247–264.

  36. Fehr, E. and S. Gaechter (2000): “Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments,” American Economic Review, 90, 980–994.

  37. Fischbacher, U. and F. Föllmi-Heusi (2013): “Lies in disguisean experimental study on cheating,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 11, 525–547.

  38. Fischbacher, U. and S. Gaechter (2010): “Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free-riding in public good experiments,” American Economic Review, 100, 541–556.

  39. Fischbacher, U., S. Gaechter, and E. Fehr (2001): “Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment,” Economics Letters, 71, 397– 404.

  40. Fischbacher, U., S. Schudy, and S. Teyssier (2014): “Heterogeneous reactions to heterogeneity in returns from public goods,” Social Choice and Welfare, 43, 195–217.

  41. Fischer, R. (1935): The Design of Experiments, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Fisher, J., R. Isaac, J. Schatzberg, and J. Walker (1995): “Heterogenous Demand for Public Goods: Behavior in the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism,” Public Choice, 85, 249–266.

  43. Franco, A., N. Malhotra, and G. Simonovits (2014): “Social science. Publication bias in the social sciences: unlocking the file drawer,” Science, 345, 1502–1505.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Frey, B. S. and S. Meier (2004): “Pro-social behavior in a natural setting,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54, 65–88.

  45. Gaechter, S., E. Renner, and M. Sefton (2008): “The long run benefits of punishment, ” Science, 322, 1510.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Gangadharan, L. and V. Nemes (2009): “Experimental analysis of risk and uncertainty in provisioning private and public goods,” Economic Inquiry, 47, 146–164.

  47. Hamermesh, D. S. (2007): “Viewpoint: Replication in economics,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 40, 715–733.

  48. Harrison, G. W. and J. A. List (2004): “Field Experiments,” Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 1009–1055.

  49. Houser, D. and D. Kurzban (2002): “Revisiting Kindness and Confusion in Public Goods Experiments,” American Economic Review, 92, 1062–1069.

  50. Ioannidis, J. (2005): “Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research,” Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 218–228.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Kessler, J. B. and S. Meier (2014): “Learning from (failed) replications: Cognitive load manipulations and charitable giving,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 102, 10–13.

  52. Kesternich, M., A. Lange, and B. Sturm (2014): “The Impact of Burden Sharing Rules on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organisation, 105, 107–123.

  53. Kosfeld, M., A. Okada, and A. Riedl (2009): “Institution Formation in Public Goods Games,” American Economic Review, 99, 1335–1355.

  54. Landy, J., M. Jia, I. Ding, D. Viganola, W. Tierney, A. Dreber, M. Johanneson, T. Pfeiffer, C. Ebersole, Q. Gronau, et al. (2019): “Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results,” Psychological Bulletin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Ledyard, J. (1995): “Public goods: A survey of experimental research,” in The Handbook of Experimental Economics, ed. by J. H. Kagel and A. E. Roth, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Levati, M. V., A. Morone, and A. Fiore (2009): “Voluntary contributions with imperfect information: An experimental study,” Public Choice, 138, 199–216.

  57. Maniadis, Z., F. Tufano, and J. A. List (2015): How to make experimental economics research more reproducible: lessons from other disciplines and a new proposal, vol. 18, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

  58. Masclet, D., C. Noussair, S. Tucker, and M. C. Villeval (2003): “Monetary and Non-Monetary Punishment in the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism,” American Economic Review, 93, 366–380.

  59. McEvoy, D. M., J. J. Murphy, J. M. Spraggon, and J. K. Stranlund (2011): “The problem of maintaining compliance within stable coalitions: experimental evidence,” Oxford Economic Papers, 63, 475–498.

  60. Meghir, C., M. Palme, and E. Simeonova (2018): “Education and Mortality: Evidence from a Social Experiment,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10, 234–256.

  61. Moonesinghe, R., M. J. Khoury, and A. C. J. Janssens (2007): “Most Published Research Findings Are False – But a Little Replication Goes a Long Way,” PLOS Medicine, 4, e28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Nikiforakis, N. (2010): “Feedback, punishment and cooperation in public good experiments, ” Games and Economic Behavior, 68, 689–702.

  63. Palfrey, T. and J. Prisbrey (1997): “Anomalous Behavior in Public Goods Experiments: How Much and Why?” American Economic Review, 87, 829–846.

  64. Putterman, L., J.-R. Tyran, and K. Kamei (2011): “Public goods and voting on formal sanction schemes,” Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1213–1222.

  65. Rabin, M. (1993): “Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics,” American Economic Review, 83, 1281–1302.

  66. Reuben, E. and J.-R. Tyran (2010): “Everyone is a winner: promoting cooperation through all-can-win intergroup competition,” European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 25–35.

  67. Sefton, M., R. Shupp, and J. Walker (2007): “The Effect of Rewards and Sanctions in the Provision of Public Goods,” Economic Inquiry, 45, 671–690.

  68. Smith, V. (2018): Learning from Experiments that Fail to Confirm Beliefs: Three Cases, Doctorate Honoris Causa lecture – GATE, Lyon.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Smith, V. L., G. Suchanek, and A. Williams (1988): “Bubbles, Crashes, and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets,” Econometrica, 56, 1119–1151. Theroude, V. and A. Zylbersztejn (Forthcoming): “Cooperation in a risky world,” Journal of Public Economic Theory.

  70. Villeval, M. C. (2019): “Public goods, norms and cooperation,” in Handbook of Experimental Game Theory, ed. by M. Capra, R. Croson, M. Rigdon, and T. Rosenblat, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Wacholder, S., S. Chanock, M. Garcia-Closas, L. El Ghormli, and N. Rothman (2004): “Assessing the Probability That a Positive Report is False: An Approach for Molecular Epidemiology Studies,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96, 434– 442.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Ziliak, S. and D. McCloskey (2008): The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives. Economics, Cognition, And Society, University of Michigan Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Why North Korean Refugees are Reluctant to Compete: The Roles of Cognitive Ability. (2021). Lee, Sokbae (Simon) ; Choi, Syngjoo ; Kim, Byung-Yeon.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2108.08097.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. A New Mechanism to Alleviate the Crises of Confidence in Science-With An Application to the Public Goods Game. (2020). Villeval, Marie Claire ; List, John ; grossman, philip ; Butera, Luigi ; Houser, Daniel.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:26801.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. A New Mechanism to Alleviate the Crises of Confidence in Science - With an Application to the Public Goods Game. (2020). List, John ; grossman, philip ; Villeval, Marie Claire ; Houser, Daniel ; Butera, Luigi.
    In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mos:moswps:2020-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Gender-specific Role of Body Weight for Health, Earnings and Life Satisfaction in Piecewise and Simultaneous Equations Models. (2020). Hübler, Olaf ; Olaf, Hubler.
    In: Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik).
    RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:240:y:2020:i:5:p:653-676:n:3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. A New Mechanism to Alleviate the Crises of Confidence in Science With An Application to the Public Goods GameA Review. (2020). List, John ; grossman, philip ; Villeval, Marie ; Houser, Daniel ; Butera, Luigi.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-02512932.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. A New Mechanism to Alleviate the Crises of Con?dence in Science With An Application to the Public Goods Game. (2020). Villeval, Marie Claire ; List, John ; Houser, Daniel ; grossman, philip ; Butera, Luigi.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gat:wpaper:2011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. A New Mechanism to Alleviate the Crises of Confidence in Science - With an Application to the Public Goods Game. (2020). List, John ; Houser, Daniel ; Grossman, Philip ; Butera, Luigi ; Villeval, Marie-Claire.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00684.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Pulling starters. (2020). Mills, Brian ; Finigan, Duncan ; Stone, Daniel F.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:89:y:2020:i:c:s2214804320300409.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Text classification of ideological direction in judicial opinions. (2020). Ash, Elliott ; Schubert, Marcel H ; Hausladen, Carina I.
    In: International Review of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0144818819303667.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Publication Bias under Aggregation Frictions: Theory, Evidence, and a New Correction Method. (2019). Furukawa, Chishio .
    In: EconStor Preprints.
    RePEc:zbw:esprep:194798.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Pulling Starters. (2019). Mills, Brian ; Stone, Daniel ; Finigan, Duncan.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:te4wg.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of). (2019). List, John ; Jimenez-Gomez, David ; Czibor, Eszter.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25451.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Publication Bias and Editorial Statement on Negative Findings. (2019). Brodeur, Abel ; Blanco-Perez, Cristina .
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12493.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Role of Body Weight for Health, Earnings and Life Satisfaction. (2019). Hubler, Olaf.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of). (2019). List, John ; Jimenez-Gomez, David ; Czibor, Eszter.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00648.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The Role of Body Weight for Health, Earnings, and Life Satisfaction. (2019). Hubler, Olaf.
    In: SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research.
    RePEc:diw:diwsop:diw_sp1024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Evidence-based policymaking: Promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research. (2018). Leuz, Christian.
    In: CFS Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:cfswop:611.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Labor Market Effects of U.S. Sick Pay Mandates.. (2018). Ziebarth, Nicolas ; Pichler, Stefan.
    In: Upjohn Working Papers and Journal Articles.
    RePEc:upj:weupjo:18-293.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Methods Matter: P-Hacking and Causal Inference in Economics. (2018). Cook, Nikolai ; Brodeur, Abel ; Heyes, Anthony.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ott:wpaper:1809e.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Evidence-Based Policymaking: Promise, Challenges and Opportunities for Accounting and Financial Markets Research. (2018). Leuz, Christian.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24535.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Methods Matter: P-Hacking and Causal Inference in Economics. (2018). Cook, Nikolai ; Brodeur, Abel ; Heyes, Anthony.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11796.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Raising aspirations and higher education: evidence from the UK’s Widening Participation policy. (2018). Rizzica, Lucia.
    In: Temi di discussione (Economic working papers).
    RePEc:bdi:wptemi:td_1188_18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-02 07:05:56 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.