- A positive relationship between foreign and domestic R&D of Swiss firms is also found by Ben Hamida and Piscitello (2008), but these authors do not take account of different motivations of foreign R&D. TABLES
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ambos, T.C., Ambos, B. and B.B. Schlegelmilch ( 2006): Learning from Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Investigation of Headquarters’ Benefits from Reverse Knowledge Transfers, International Business Review, 15, 294-312.
Arvanitis, S. (2008): Innovation and Labour Productivity in the Swiss Manufacturing Sector: An Analysis based on Firm Panel Data, in C. van Beers, A. Kleinknecht, R. Ortt and R. Verburg (eds.), Determinants of Innovative Behaviour: A Firm’s Internal Practices and Its External Environment, Palgrave: London, pp 188-216.
Arvanitis, S. and H. Hollenstein (2001): Technologiestandort Schweiz im Zuge der Globalisierung. Eine explorative Analyse der F&E-Aktivitäten schweizerischer Industrieunternehmen im Ausland, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 137, 129-148.
Arvanitis, S. and H. Hollenstein (2007): Determinants of Swiss Firms’ R&D Activities at Foreign Locations: An Empirical Analysis Based on Firm-level Data, in: G.R.G. Benito and H.R. Greve (eds.), Progress in International Business Research, Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 61-90.
- Ben Hamida, L. and L. Piscitello (2008): The Relationship Between Overseas and Domestic R&D Activities: Evidence for Switzerland, Paper Presented at the EIBA Conference on International Business, Tallin, December 11-13.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Buckley, P.J. and M.C. Casson (1985): The Economic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise, London: McMillan.
Cantwell, J. (1995): The Globalisation of Technology: What Remains of the Product Cycle Model? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 155-174.
Cantwell, J. and L. Piscitello (2005): Recent Location of Foreign-Owned Research and Development Activities by Large Multinational Corporations in the European Regions: The Role of Spillovers and Externalities, Regional Studies, 39, 1-16.
Cantwell, J. and O. Janne (1999): Technological Globalisation and Innovative Centres: the Role of Corporate Technological Leadership and Local Hierarchy, Research Policy, 28, 119-149.
Cantwell, J. and R. Narula (2001): The Eclectic Paradigm in the Global Economy, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8, 155-172.
Capron, H. and M. Cincera (2004): Industry-University S&T Transfer: What Can We Learn from Belgium CIS-2 Data? CEPR Discussion Paper Series No. 4685, London.
- Caves, R.E. (1982): Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal (1989): Innovation and Learning: The two Faces of R&D, Economic Journal, 99, 569-596.
- Coviello, N.E. and A. McAuley (1999): Internationalisation and the Smaller Firm: A Review of Contemporary Empirical Research, Management International Review, 39, 223-256.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Driffield, N. and J.H. Love (2005): Who Gains from Whom? Spillovers, Competition and Technology Sourcing in the Foreign-owned Sector of UK Manufacturing, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52, 663-686.
- Dunning, J.H. (1988): Explaining International Production, London: Unwin Hyman.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dunning, J.H. (1993): Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Workingham: AddisonWesley.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dunning, J.H. (2000): The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and Business Theories of MNE Activity, International Business Review, 9, 163-190.
Dunning, J.H. and S.M. Lundan (2008): Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Second Edition, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Ethier, W.J. (1986): The Multinational Firm, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 805-833.
Florida, R. (1997): The Globalization of R&D: Results of a Survey of Foreign-affiliated R&D Laboratories in the USA, Research Policy, 26, 85-103.
- Fors, G. (1996): R&D and Technology Transfer by Multinational Enterprises, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Frost, T.S. (2001): The Geographic Sources of Foreign Subsidiaries’ Innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 101-123.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Greene, W.H. (2003): Econometric Analysis, New York: Prentice-Hall.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Griffith, R., Harrison, R. and J. van Reenen (2004): How Special is the Special Relationship? Using the Impact of US R&D Spillovers on UK Firms as a Test of Technology Sourcing, CEPR Discussion Paper Series No. 4698, London.
Gupta, A.K. and V. Govindarajan (1994): Organizing for Knowledge Flows within MNCs, International Business Review, 3, 443-457.
Heckman, J.J. (1979): Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error, Econometrica, 47, 153-161.
Helpman, E. (1984): A Simple Theory of International Trade with Multinational Corporations, Journal of Political Economy 92, 451-471.
Hollenstein, H. (2009): Characteristics of Foreign R&D Strategies of Swiss Firms: Implications for Policy, in: D. Foray (ed.), The New Economics of Technology Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 248-271.
- However, there is evidence for some weakening of the stepwise process of internationalization, in particular in case of (small- and medium-sized) high-tech and knowledge-intensive firms; see the review of the literature based on the “network perspective of internationalization†(Coviello and McAuley, 1999) and the “Born Globalâ€-approach (Rialp et al., 2005). Due to strong multicollinearity it was not possible to include in the innovation equation the three motive variables at once (see Table A.6 in the Appendix).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hymer, S. (1976): The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Iwasa, T. and H. Odagiri (2004): Overseas R&D, Knowledge Sourcing, and Patenting: An Empirical Study of Japanese R&D Investment in the US, Research Policy, 33, 807-828.
Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M. and R. Henderson (1993): Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577-598.
Johanson, J. and J.-E. Vahlne (1977): The Internationalisation Process of the Firm. A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments, Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 22-32.
Kuemmerle, W. (1999): The Drivers of Foreign Direct Investment into Research and Development: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 1-24.
Le Bas, C. and C. Sierra (2002): Location versus Home Country Advantages in R&D Activities: Some Further Results on Multinationals Locations Strategies, Research Policy, 31, 589-609.
- Mansfield, E. and A. Romeo (1984): Reverse Transfer of Technology Flows from Overseas Subsidiaries to American Firms, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 3, 122-127.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mohnen, P. and C. Hoareau (2003): What type of Enterprises Forges Close Links with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from CIS-2 Data, Managerial & Decision Economics, 24, 133-145.
- Mundell, R.A. (1957): International Trade and Factor Mobility, American Economic Review, 47, 321-347.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- OECD (1998): Internationalisation of Industrial R&D: Patterns and Trends, Paris: OECD.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Patel, P. and M. Vega (1999): Patterns of Internationalization of Corporate Technology: Location vs. Home Country Advantages, Research Policy, 28, 145-155.
- Rammer, C. and A. Schmiele (2008): Globalisation of Innovation in SMEs: Why They Go Abroad and What They Bring Back Home, Applied Economics Quarterly, 54, Supplement, 173-212.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rialp, A., Rialp, J. and G.A. Knight (2005): The Phenomenon of Early Internationalizing Firms: What Do we Know After a Decade (1993-2003) of Scientific Inquiry? International Business Review, 14, 147-166.
Rivers, D. and Q.H. Vuong (1988): Limited Information Estimators and Exogeneity Tests for Simultaneous Probit Models, Journal of Econometrics, 39, 347-366.
Ronstadt, R.C. (1978): International R&D. The Establishment and Evolution of Research and Development Abroad by Seven U.S. Multinationals, Journal of International Business Studies, 9, 7-28.
Schmidt, T. (2007): Motives for Innovation Cooperation – Evidence from the Canadian Survey of Innovation, ZEW Working Paper No. 07-018, Mannheim.
- See Belderbos et al. (2004), Capron and Cincera (2004) and Schmidt (2007) for a similar approach regarding the analysis of motives for R&D cooperation. See also the discussion on this issue in Mohnen and Hoareau (2003) and Schmidt (2007).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Teece, D.J. and G. Pisano (1998): The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms, in: G. Dosi, D.J. Teece and J. Chytry (eds.), Technology, Organisation, and Competitiveness. Perspectives on Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 193-212.
- The STATA procedure ‘mprobit’ estimates M-equation probit models by the method of simulated maximum likelihood. The Geweke-Hajivassiliou-Keane (GHK)-simulator is applied to evaluate the M-dimensional Normal integrals in the likelihood function (for a description of the GHK-simulator see Greene (2003)). See Table A.3 and Table A.4 in the appendix for the endogeneity tests with respect to the R&D_FOR and the three motive variables in the innovation and the productivity equation. Table A.5 in the appendix shows the estimates of the underlying instrument equations.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Todo, Y. and S. Shimizutani (2008): Overseas R&D Activities and Home Productivity Growth: Evidence from Japanese Firm-level Data, Journal of Industrial Economics, 56, 752-777.
Veugelers, R., Dachs, B., Mahroum, S., Nones, B., Schibany, A. and R. Falk (2005): Internationalisation of R&D: Trends, Issues and Implications for S&T Policies. A Review of the Literature, Background Report Presented at the Forum on the Internationalisation of R&D, Brussels, Brussels, 29-30 March. Footnotes Versions of the questionnaire in German, French and Italian are available at www.kof.ethz.ch. Since we did not correct for a possible sample selection bias for firms that did not perform R&D the results can be interpreted as applicable only to firms investing in R&D See the Appendix for the descriptive statistics of the model variables (Table A.2) and the corresponding correlation matrix (Table A6). See Table 1 for some descriptive statistics of the motive variables and Table 2 for the exact construction of the variables.