Ade, F., & Freier, R. (2011). When can we trust population thresholds in regression discontinuity designs? DIW discussion paper 1136.
Arnold, F., & Freier, R. (2013). Signature requirements and citizen initiatives: Quasi-experimental evidence from germany. DIW discussion paper 1311.
Asatryan, Z., Baskaran, T., Grigoriadis, T., & Heinemann, F. (2013). Direct democracy and local public finances under cooperative federalism. ZEW Discussion paper 13–038.
- Barankay, I., Sciarini, P., & Trechsel, A. H. (2003). Institutional openness and the use of referendums and popular initiatives: Evidence from swiss cantons. Swiss Political Science Review, 9(1), 169–199.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Blume, L., Döring, T., & Voigt, S. (2011). Fiscal effects of reforming local constitutions: Recent german experiences. Urban Studies, 48, 2123–2140.
Blume, L., Müller, J., & Voigt, S. (2009). The economic effects of direct democracy: A first global assessment. Public Choice, 140(3/4), 431–461.
- Boehmke, F. J., Osborn, T. L., & Schilling, E. (2013). Pivotal politics and initiative use in the american states. Working paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Brollo, F., Nannicini, T., Perotti, R., & Tabellini, G. (2009). Federal transfers, corruption, and political selection: Evidence from brazil. University of Bocconi Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Campa, P. (2012). Gender quotas, female politicians and public expenditures: Quasi-experimental evidence. Stockholm University Working Paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Eder, C., Vatter, A., & Freitag, M. (2009). Institutional design and the use of direct democracy: Evidence from the german länder. West European Politics, 32(3), 611–633.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Egger, P., & Koethenbuerger, M. (2010). Government spending and legislative organization: Quasi-experimental evidence from germany. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(4), 200–212.
- Eggers, A. C. (2013). Proportionality and turnout: Evidence from french municipalities. Unpublished manuscript.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Feld, L. P., & Matsusaka, J. G. (2003). Budget referendums and government spending: evidence from swiss cantons. Journal of Public Economics, 87(12), 2703–2724.
Ferraz, C., & Finan, F. (2009). Motivating politicians: The impacts of monetary incentives on quality and performance. NBER working paper 14906.
Freier, R., Geys, B., & Holm, J. (2013). Religious heterogeneity and fiscal policy: Evidence from german reunification. DIW discussion paper 1266.
Funk, P., & Gathmann, C. (2011). Does direct democracy reduce the size of government? New evidence from historical data, 1890–2000*. The Economic Journal, 121(557), 1252–1280.
Funk, P., & Gathmann, C. (2013). Voter preferences, direct democracy and government spending. European Journal of Political Economy, 32, 300–319.
Gagliarducci, S., & Nannicini, T. (2009). Do better paid politicians perform better? Disentangling incentives from selection. IZA discussion paper 4400.
- Gerber, E. R. (1999). The populist paradox: Interest group influence and the promise of direct legislation. Princeton University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Grembi, V., Nannicini, T., & Troiano, U. (2012). Policy responses to fiscal restraints: A difference-in-discontinuities design. IZA Discussion paper 6952.
Imbens, G. W., & Kalyanaraman, K. (2012). Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 79(3), 933–959.
Litschig, S., & Morrison, K. (2010). Government spending and re-election: Quasi-experimental evidence from brazilian municipalities. University of Pompeu Fabra working paper.
- Lupia, A., & Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). Direct democracy: New approaches to old questions. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 463–482.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Matsusaka, J. G. (1995). Fiscal effects of the voter initiative: Evidence from the last 30 years. Journal of Political Economy, 103(3), 587–623.
Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). For the many or the few: The initiative, public policy, and American democracy. University of Chicago Press.
Matsusaka, J. G. (2005). Direct democracy works. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(2), 185–206.
Matsusaka, J. G. (2010). Popular control of public policy: A quantitative approach. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 5(2), 133–167.
Matsusaka, J. G., & McCarty, N. M. (2001). Political resource allocation: Benefits and costs of voter initiatives. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 17(2), 413–448.
McCrary, J. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 698–714.
- Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2001). Does the size of the legislature affect the size of government? evidence from two natural experiments. Working paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2012). Does the size of the legislature affect the size of government? evidence from two natural experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 96(3), 269–278.
Romer, T., & Rosenthal, H. (1978). Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo. Public Choice, 33(4), 27–43.
- Tukiainen, J., & Lyytikäinen, T. (2013). Voters are rational. VATT working paper 50.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tyrefors Hinnerich, B., & Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2010). Democracy, redistribution, and political participation: Evidence from sweden 1919–1950. Stockholm University working paper.