Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
How Do Voters Respond to Information? Evidence from a Randomized Campaign. (2013). Trebbi, Francesco ; Nannicini, Tommaso ; Kendall, Chad.
In: IZA Discussion Papers.
RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7340.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 11

Citations received by this document

Cites: 37

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Designing Information Provision Experiments. (2020). Wohlfart, Johannes ; Roth, Christopher ; Haaland, Ingar.
    In: CAGE Online Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cge:wacage:484.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Dont Blame the Messenger: A Field Experiment on Delivery Methods for Increasing Tax Compliance. (2015). Ortega, Daniel.
    In: IDB Publications (Working Papers).
    RePEc:idb:brikps:91741.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Dont Blame the Messenger: A Field Experiment on Delivery Methods for Increasing Tax Compliance. (2015). Scartascini, Carlos ; Ortega, Daniel.
    In: IDB Publications (Working Papers).
    RePEc:idb:brikps:7284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Politics in the Balkan countryside: case study in Serbia. (2014). Tamara, Luki ; Tanja, Armenski ; Bubalo, Ivkovi Milka ; Branislav, Urev ; Bojan, Eran ; Ivana, Penjievi .
    In: Eastern European Countryside.
    RePEc:vrs:eaeuco:v:20:y:2014:i:1:p:99-124:n:5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Economic populism, partial deregulation of transport fuels and electoral outcomes in India. (2014). Srinivasan, Sunderasan.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:68:y:2014:i:c:p:465-475.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Men Vote in Mars, Women Vote in Venus: A Survey Experiment in the Field. (2013). Nannicini, Tommaso ; Galasso, Vincenzo.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7483.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Men Vote in Mars, Women Vote in Venus:A Survey Experiment in the Field. (2013). Nannicini, Tommaso ; Galasso, Vincenzo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:487.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The Distribution of Individual Conformity under Social Pressure across Societies. (2013). Spiro, Daniel ; Michaeli, Moti.
    In: Memorandum.
    RePEc:hhs:osloec:2014_012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Men Vote in Mars, Women Vote in Venus: A Survey Experiment in the Field. (2013). Nannicini, Tommaso ; Galasso, Vincenzo.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:9547.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Men Vote in Mars, Women Vote in Venus: A Survey Experiment in the Field. (2013). Nannicini, Tommaso ; Galasso, Vincenzo.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Ansolabehere, Stephen and James M. Snyder. 2000. “Valence Politics and Equilibrium in Spatial Election Models,”Public Choice, 103, 327–336.

  2. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: The Free Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder, and Charles Stewart, III. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections,”American Journal of Political Science, 45, 136–159.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Aragones, Enriqueta and Thomas R. Palfrey. 2002. “Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate,”Journal of Economic Theory, 103, 131–161.

  5. Ashworth, Scott and Ethan Bueno de Mesquita. 2009. “Elections with Platform and Valence Competition,” Games and Economic Behavior, 67, 191–216.

  6. Banerjee, Abhijit, Donald Green, and Rohini Pande. 2012. “Can Voters be Primed to Choose Better Legislators? Evidence from Voter Campaigns in India,” MIT manuscript.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Banerjee, Abhijit, Selvan Kumar, Rohini Pande, and Felix Su. 2011. “Do Informed Voters Make Better Choices? Experimental Evidence from Urban India,” MIT manuscript.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Blass, Asher A., Saul Lach, and Charles F. Manski. 2010. “Using Elicited Choice Probabilities to Estimate Random Utility Models: Preferences for Electricity Reliability,”International Economic Review, 51, 421–440.

  9. Cox, David R. 1958. Planning of Experiments. New York: Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Dewan, Torun, Macartan Humphreys, and Daniel Rubenson. 2010. “The Impact of Leaders and the Messages They Convey,” LSE manuscript.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Di Tella, Rafael, Robert J. MacCulloch, and Andrew J. Oswald. 2001. “Preferences over Inflation and Unemployment: Evidence from Surveys of Happiness,”American Economic Review, 91, 335–341.

  12. Dominitz, Jeff and Charles Manski. 1996. “Eliciting Student Expectations of the Returns to Schooling,” Journal of Human Resources, 31, 1–26.

  13. Duffy, John and Margit Tavits. 2008. “Beliefs and Voting Decisions: A Test of the Pivotal Voter Model,” American Journal of Political Science, 52, 603–618.

  14. Farlie, Dennis J. 1960. “The Performance of Some Correlation Coefficients for a General Bivariate Distribution,” Biometrika 47, 307–323.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Fujiwara, Thomas and Leonard Wantchekon. 2013. “Can Informed Public Deliberation Overcome Clientelism? Experimental Evidence from Benin,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, forthcoming.

  16. Garthwaite, Paul H., Joseph B. Kadane, and Anthony O’Hagan. 2005. “Statistical Methods for Eliciting Probability Distributions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 680–700.

  17. Gerber Elisabeth R. and Jeffrey B. Lewis. 2004. “Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation,” Journal of Political Economy, 112, 1364– 1383.

  18. Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment,” American Political Science Review, 94, 653–63.

  19. Gerber, Alan S., Donald P. Green, and Ron Shachar. 2003. “Voting May Be Habit-Forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment,” American Journal of Political Science, 47, 540–50.

  20. Gerber, Alan S., James G. Gimpel, Donald P. Green, and Daron Shaw. 2011. “How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment,” American Political Science Review, 105, 135–150.

  21. Gill, Jeff and Lee D. Walker. 2005. “Elicited Priors for Bayesian Model Specifications in Political Science Research,” Journal of Politics, 67, 841–872.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber. 2004. Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Groseclose, Timothy. 2001. “A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage,”American Journal of Political Science, 45, 862–886.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Lee, David, Enrico Moretti and Matthew J. Butler. 2004. “Do Voters Affect or Elect Policies? Evidence from the U.S. House,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 807–859.

  25. Liu, Scott and Patricia Stout. 1987. “Effects of Message Modality and Appeal on Advertising Acceptance,” Psychology and Marketing, 4, 167–87.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Manski,Charles F. and Francesca Molinari. 2010. “Rounding Probabilistic Expectations in Surveys,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 28, 219–231.

  27. Miller, George A. 1956. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information,” Psychological Review 63, 81–97.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Nickerson, David W. 2008. “Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments,” American Political Science Review, 102, 49–57.

  29. Rubin, Donald B. 1978. “Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization,” The Annals of Statistics, 79, 1–20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Savage, Leonard. 1971. “Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 783–801.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Schofield, Norman. 2003. “Valence Competition in the Spatial Stochastic Model,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15, 371–383.

  32. Sklar Abe. 1959. “Fonctions de rı1 2 partition ı1 2 n dimensions et leurs marges,” Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Universitı1 2 de Paris, 8, 229–231.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Vicente, Pedro C. 2013. “Is Vote-buying Effective? Evidence from a Field Experiment in West Africa,” Economic Journal, forthcoming.

  34. Vuong, Quang H. 1989. “Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses, ” Econometrica, 2, 307–333.

  35. Wantchekon, Leonard. 2003. “Clientelism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin,” World Politics, 55, 399–422.

  36. Wattenberg, Martin P. and Craig L. Brians. 1999. “Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?” American Political Science Review, 93, 891–899.

  37. Zafar, Basit. 2009. “College Major Choice and the Gender Gap,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report No. 364.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Signalling, Incumbency Advantage, and Optimal Reelection Thresholds. (2012). Morelli, Massimo ; Cunningham, Thomas ; Caselli, Francesco ; de Barreda, Ines Moreno.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:17833.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Candidate quality in a Downsian model with a continuous policy space. (2012). Xefteris, Dimitrios ; aragones, enriqueta ; Aragons, Enriqueta .
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:75:y:2012:i:2:p:464-480.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Signalling, Incumbency Advantage, and Optimal Reelection Thresholds. (2012). Morelli, Massimo ; Caselli, Francesco ; Cunningham, Tom ; de Barreda, Ines Moreno.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8832.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Signalling, Incumbency Advantage, and Optimal Reelection Rules. (2012). Moreno de Barreda, Ines ; Morelli, Massimo ; Caselli, Francesco ; Cunningham, Tom .
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Strategic Behavior and Organizational Structure in Religions. (2012). Wittman, Donald.
    In: Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cdl:ucscec:qt0r38m12v.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. An empirical analysis of valence in electoral competition. (2011). Rossignol, Stéphane ; Hollard, Guillaume ; GOURET, Fabian.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:37:y:2011:i:2:p:309-340.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Electoral competition in 2-dimensional ideology space with unidimensional commitment. (2011). Roy, Jaideep ; Dziubiński, Marcin ; Dziubiski, Marcin.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:36:y:2011:i:1:p:1-24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Political Motivations and Electoral Competition: Equilibrium Analysis and Experimental Evidence. (2011). Vriend, Nicolaas ; Saporiti, Alejandro ; Drouvelis, Michalis.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:wp682.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Axioms for Euclidean preferences with a valence dimension. (2011). Azrieli, Yaron.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:47:y:2011:i:4:p:545-553.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Political Motivations and Electoral Competition: Equilibrium Analysis and Experimental Evidence. (2011). Vriend, Nicolaas ; Saporiti, Alejandro ; Drouvelis, Michalis.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bir:birmec:11-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The spatial model with non-policy factors: a theory of policy-motivated candidates. (2010). Peress, Michael.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:34:y:2010:i:2:p:265-294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Uncertain candidates, valence, and the dynamics of candidate position-taking. (2010). Erikson, Robert ; Bruter, Michael ; Strauss, Aaron.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:144:y:2010:i:1:p:153-168.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Serving the Public Interest. (2010). Tyran, Jean-Robert ; Markussen, Thomas.
    In: NRN working papers.
    RePEc:jku:nrnwps:2010_21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The instability of instability of centered distributions. (2010). Tovey, Craig A..
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:59:y:2010:i:1:p:53-73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. On the nature of equilibria in a Downsian model with candidate valence. (2010). Hummel, Patrick.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:70:y:2010:i:2:p:425-445.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Ideologues: Explaining Partisanship and Persistence in Politics (and Elsewhere). (2010). Kessler, Anke ; Buehler, Benno.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:7724.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Competition between Specialized Candidates. (2010). Polborn, Mattias K ; Krasa, Stefan.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_2930.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Model of the 2000 Presidential Election: Instrumenting for Ideology. (2009). Fernandez, Jose ; Cataiefe, Guido .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:16264.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Characterization of multidimensional spatial models of elections with a valence dimension. (2009). Azrieli, Yaron.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:14513.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Electoral Competition when Candidates are Better Informed than Voters. (2009). Jensen, Thomas.
    In: EPRU Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:kud:epruwp:09-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. A model of candidate location with endogenous valence. (2009). Zakharov, Alexei.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:138:y:2009:i:3:p:347-366.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Formal Models of Elections and Political Bargaining. (2009). Schofield, Norman ; Ozdemir, Ugur.
    In: Czech Economic Review.
    RePEc:fau:aucocz:au2009_207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Elections with platform and valence competition. (2009). de Mesquita, Ethan Bueno ; Ashworth, Scott .
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:67:y:2009:i:1:p:191-216.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Political Competition between Differentiated Candidates. (2009). Polborn, Mattias K ; Krasa, Stefan.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_2560.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. An alternative approach of valence advantage in spatial competition. (2008). Rossignol, Stéphane ; Hollard, Guillaume.
    In: Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers).
    RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-00267218.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Political equilibria with electoral uncertainty. (2007). Schofield, Norman.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:28:y:2007:i:3:p:461-490.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Modelling Politics. (2007). Schofield, Norman.
    In: ICER Working Papers.
    RePEc:icr:wpicer:33-2007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Candidate quality, pressure group endorsements and the nature of political advertising. (2007). Wittman, Donald.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:23:y:2007:i:2:p:360-378.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. A model of political competition with activists applied to the elections of 1989 and 1995 in Argentina. (2007). Schofield, Norman ; Cataife, Guido.
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:53:y:2007:i:3:p:213-231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Platform stickiness in a spatial voting model. (2007). .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2007:i:40:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Platform stickiness in a spatial voting model. (2007). Lambertini, Luca.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-07d70009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Oligopoly with Hyperbolic Demand: A Differential Game Approach. (2007). Lambertini, Luca.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bol:bodewp:597.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Signaling Character in Electoral Competition. (2007). McAfee, Randolph ; Kartik, Navin.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:97:y:2007:i:3:p:852-870.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Political Cycles : Issue Ownership and the Opposition Advantage. (2006). Soubeyran, Raphael ; Gautier, P..
    In: Working Papers MOISA.
    RePEc:umr:wpaper:200613.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Equilibria in the spatial stochastic model of voting with party activists. (2006). Schofield, Norman.
    In: Review of Economic Design.
    RePEc:spr:reecde:v:10:y:2006:i:3:p:183-203.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Political Bad Reputation. (2006). canegrati, emanuele.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:1018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Yardstick competition: a spatial voting model approach. (2006). canegrati, emanuele.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:1017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Valence Advantages and Public Goods Consumption: Does a Disadvantaged Candidate Choose an Extremist Position?. (2006). Soubeyran, Raphael.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.84.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. A theory of voting in large elections. (2006). Patty, John W. ; MCKELVEY, RICHARD D. ; RICHARD D. Mc KELVEY, .
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:57:y:2006:i:1:p:155-180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Political Cycles: the Opposition Advantage. (2005). Soubeyran, Raphael ; Gautier, Pascal.
    In: Public Economics.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwppe:0510019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Party competition in a heterogeneous electorate: The role of dominant-issue voters. (2005). Bischoff, Ivo.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:122:y:2005:i:1:p:221-243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. A spatial election with common values. (2005). Maravall Rodriguez, Carlos.
    In: UC3M Working papers. Economics.
    RePEc:cte:werepe:we052011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Electoral platforms, implemented policies and abstention. (2004). Llavador, Humberto.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. A Dynamic Model of Voting. (2004). Degan, Arianna.
    In: PIER Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:pen:papers:04-015.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Spatial Competition Between Two Candidates of Different Quality: The Effects of Candidate Ideology and Private Information. (2003). Palfrey, Thomas ; aragones, enriqueta.
    In: UFAE and IAE Working Papers.
    RePEc:aub:autbar:573.03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate. (2002). Palfrey, Thomas ; aragones, enriqueta.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:103:y:2002:i:1:p:131-161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Candidate ability and platform choice. (2002). Santore, Rudy ; Dix, Manfred.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:76:y:2002:i:2:p:189-194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. The Effect of Candidate Quality on Electoral Equilibrium: An Experimental Study. (2002). Palfrey, Thomas ; aragones, enriqueta.
    In: UFAE and IAE Working Papers.
    RePEc:aub:autbar:530.02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Dynamic Analysis of an Electoral Campaign.. (2001). Lambertini, Luca.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bol:bodewp:415.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Mixed equilibrium in a Downsian model with a favored candidate. (2000). Palfrey, Thomas ; aragones, enriqueta.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-16 21:48:21 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.