[1] Anna Alberini, Maureen Cropper, Alan Krupnick, and Nathalie B. Simon. Does the value of a statistical life vary with the age and health status?: Evidence from the usa and canada. Journal of Environmental Economics and Mama gement, 48(1): 769-792, 2004.
[10] Richard T. Carson, Nicholas E. Flores, and Norman F. Meade. Contin- 20 gent valuation: Controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economcis, 19(2):173-210, 2001.
[11] Bishop Richard C. Champ, Patricia A. and, Thomas C. Brown, and Daniel W. McCollum. Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse ben- efits from public goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Man- agement, 33(2):51-162, 1997.
- [12] Patricia A. Champ and Richard C. Bishop. Donation payment mecha- nism and contingent valuation: An empirical study of hypothetical bias. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19(4):383-402, 2001.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
[13] Phaedra S. Corso, James K. Hammitt, and John D. Graham. Valuing mortality-risk reduction: Using visual aids to improve the validity of con- tingent valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23(2):165-184, 2001.
- [14] W. H. Desvousges, Johnson F. Reed, R. W. Dunford, K. J. Boyle, S. P. Hudson, and K. N. Wilson. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, chapter Measuring Natural Resource Damage with Contingent Valuation: A Test of Validity and Reliability, pages 91-159. Norht-Holland, Amster- dam, The Netherlands, 1993.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
[15] Peter A. Diamond and Jerry A. Hausman. Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspective, 8(4): 45-64, 1994.
[16] Shane Frederick. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4) :25-42, 2005.
- [17] 5. Frederick and B. Fischhoff. Scope (in)sensitivity in elicited valuations. Risk, Decision,, and Policy, 3:109-123, 1998.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
[18] Donald Green, Karen E. Jacowitz, Daniel Kahneman, and Daniel McFad- den. Referendum contingent valuation anchoring and willingness to pay for public goods. Resource and Energy Economics, 20(2):85-116, 1998.
[19] Henrik Hammar and Olof Johansson-Stenman. The value of risk-free cigarettes - do smokers underestimate the risk? Health Economics, 13(1): 59-71, 2004.
[2] Henrik Andersson. The value of safety as revealed in the swedish car market: An application of the hedonic pricing approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30(3):211-239, 2005.
[20] James K. Hammitt and John D. Graham. Willingness to pay for health protection: Inadequate sensitivity to probability? Journal of Risk and 21 Uncertainty, 18(1): 33-62, 1999.
- [21] James K. Hammitt. Valuing mortality risk: Theory and practice. Envi- ronmental Science ~ Technology, 34(8):1396- 1400, 2000.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- [22] James K. Hammitt. Evaluating contingent valuation of environmental health risks: The proportionality test. AERE (Association of Environ- mental and Resource Economics) Newsletter, 20(1):14-19, May 2000.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- [23] W. Michael Hanemann. Valuing the environment trough contingent val- uation. Jouranl of Economic Perspectives, 8(4):19-43, 1994.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
[24] Thomas A. Heberlein, Matthew A. Wilson, Richard C. Bishop, and Nora Cate Schaeffer. Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for va- lidity in contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50(1):1-22, 2005.
[25] Lars Hultkrantz, Gunnar Lindberg, and Camilla Andersson. The value of improved road safety. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32(2): Forthcoming, 2006.
[26] Magnus Johannesson, Per-Olov Johansson, and Richard M. OConnor. The value of private safety versus the value of public safety. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 13(3):263-275, 1996.
[27] Michael W. Jones-Lee. The value of changes in the probability of death or injury. Journal of Political Economy, 82(4):835-849, 1974.
[28] Daniel Kahneman and Jack L. Knetsch. Valuing public goods: The pur- chase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(1):57-70, 1992.
- [29] Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. Subjective probability: A judge- ment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3:430-454, 1972.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- [3] K. Arrow, R. Solow, P. Portney, E. Leamer, R. Radner, and Schuman H. Report of the noaa panel on contingent valuation. 58 Federal Register 46, 1993.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- [30] Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky. Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1982.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
[31] Daniel Kahneman, Ilana Ritov, and David Schkade. Economic preferences or attitude expressions?: An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1-3):203--235, 1999.
[32] Daniel Kahneman. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behav- 22 ioral economics. Americam Ecomomics Review, 93(5):1449-1475, 2003.
[33] James J Murphy, P. Geoffrey Allen, Thomas H. Stevens, and Darryl Weatherhead. A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Emvirommemtal amd Resonrce Ecomomics, 30(3): 3 13-325, 2005.
- [34] Ulf Persson and Magnus Cedervall. The value of risk reduction: Results of a swedish sample survey. THE Working Paper 1991:6, The Swedish Tnstitute for Health Economics, 1991.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
[35] Ulf Persson, Anna Norinder, Krister Hjalte, and Katarina Gralén. The value of a statistical life in transport: Findings from a new contingent valuation study in sweden. Jonrmal of Risk amd Umcertaimty, 23(2):121- 134, 2001.
[36] John W. Pratt and Richard J. Zeckhauser. Willingness to pay and the distribution of risk and wealth. Jonrmal of Political Ecomomy, 104(4): 747-763, 1996.
- [37] Matthew Rabin. Tnference by believers in the law of small numbers. Qnarterly Jonrmal of Ecomomics, 117(3):775-816, 2002.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
[38] Sherwin Rosen. The value of changes in life expectancy. Jonrmal of Risk amd Umcertaimty, 1(3):285-304, 1988.
- [39] STKA. Kalkylvãrden och kalkylmetoder - en sammanfattning av verks- gruppens rekommendationer 2005. Pm 2005:16, STKA (Swedish Tnstitute for Transport and Communications Analysis), Stockholm, Sweden, March 2005.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- [4] Daniel J. Benjamin and Jesse M. Shapiro. Does cognitive ability reduce psychological bias? Harvard University, Mimeo, February 2005.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- [40] V. Kerry. Smith. Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature ver- dicts. Jonrmal of Emvirommemtal Ecomomics amd Mamagememt, 22(1):71- 89, 1992.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
[41] Hal R. Varian. Commentary on economic preferences of attitude expres- sions?: An analysis of dollar responses to public issues by kahneman et al. Jonrmal of Risk amd Umcertaimty, 19(1-3):241--242, 1999.
[42] Milton C. Weinstein, Donald S. Shepard, and Joseph S. Pliskin. The economic value of changing mortality probabilities: A decision-theoretic approach. Qnarterly Jonrmal of Ecomomics, 94(2):373-396, 1980. 23 w Fig. 1. The value of a statistical life: the marginal rate of substitution between mortality risk (p) and wealth (w), and WTP for a non-marginal risk reduction
[5] Karen Blumenschein, Magnus Johannesson, Glenn C. Blomquist, Bengt Liljas, and Richard M. OConor. Experimental results on expressed cer- tainty and hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Southern Economic Journal, 65(1):169-177, 1998.
[6] Karen Blumenschein, Magnus Johannesson, Krista K. Yokoyama, and Patricia R. Freeman. Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: results from a field experiment. Journal of Health Economics, 20(3):441-457, 2001.
[7] Karen Blumenschein, Glenn C. Blomquist, Magnus Johannesson, Nancy Horn, and Patricia Freeman. Eliciting willingness to pay without bias: Evidence from a field experiment. Mimeo, University of Kentucky, Lex- ington, KY, USA, February 2005.
[8] Fredrik Carlsson, Olof Johansson-Stenman, and Peter Martinsson. Is transport safety more valuable in the air. Journal of Risk and Uncer- tainty, 28(2):147-163, 2004.
[9] Richard T. Carson and Robert Cameron Mitchell. Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(2):155-173, 1995.