Angrist, Joshua D., and Jörn-Steffen Pischke. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Ashton, H. A., L. Gao, L. G. Kim, P. S. Druce, S. G. Thompson, and R. A. P. Scott. 2007. “Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms.†British Journal of Surgery 94 (6): 696–701.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Barreca, Alan I., Melanie Guldi, Jason M. Lindo, and Glen R. Waddell. 2011. “Saving babies? Revisiting the effect of very low birth weight classification.†The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4): 2117–2123.
- Cosford, Paul A., Gillian C. Leng, and Justyn Thomas. 2007. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Review 2. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Davis, Meryl, Mike Harris, and Jonothan J. Earnshaw. 2013.“Implementation of the National Health Service Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Program in England.†Journal of Vascular Surgery 57 (5): 1440–1445.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Engström, Per, Patrik Hesselius, and Malin Persson. 2007. Excess use of temporary parental benefit. Working Paper 2007:18. Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fredriksson, Peter, and Björn Öckert. 2013. “Life-cycle Effects of Age at School Start.†The Economic Journal 124 (September): 977–1004.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gürtelschmid, Mikael, Martin Björck, and Anders Wanhainen. 2014. “Comparison of three ultrasound methods of measuring the diameter of the abdominal aorta.â€ÂBritish Journal of Surgery 101 (6): 633–636.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hansson, Anders, John Brodersen, Susanne Reventlow, and Monica Pettersson. 2012. “Opening Pandora’s box: The experiences of having an asymptomatic aortic aneurysm under surveillance.†Health, Risk & Society 14 (4): 341–359.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Imbens, Guido W., and Thomas Lemieux. 2008. “Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice.†Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 615–635.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lederle, F. A. 2008. “Screening for AAA in the USA.†Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 97 (2): 139–141.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lee, David S., and David Card. 2008. “Regression discontinuity inference with specification error.†Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 655–674.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lee, David S., and Thomas Lemieux. 2010. “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics.
- Lindholt, J. S., and P Norman. 2008. “Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Reduces Overall Mortality in Men. A Meta-analysis of the Mid-and Long-term Effects of Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.†European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 36 (2): 167–171.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lindholt, J. S., J. Sørensen, R. Søgaard, and E. W. Henneberg. 2010.“Long-term benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms from a randomized controlled trial.†British Journal of Surgery 97 (6): 826–834.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lindholt, J. S., S. Vammen, H. Fasting, and E. W. Henneberg. 2000. “Psychological Consequences of Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Conservative Treatment of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.†European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 20 (1): 79–83.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lucarotti, M. E., B. P. Heather, E. Shaw, and K. R. Poskitt. 1997. “Psychological Morbidity Associated with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening.†European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 14 (6): 499–501.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McGregor, J. C., J. G. Pollock, and H. C. Anton. 1975. “The Value of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.†Scottish Medical Journal 20 (3): 133–137.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McHorney, Colleen A., John E. Ware Jr., and Anastasia E. Raczek. 1993. “The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs.†Medical Care 31 (3): 247–263.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Moll, F. L., J. T. Powell, G. Fraedrich, F. Verzini, S. Haulon, M. Waltham, J. A. van Herwaarden, et al. 2011. “Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.†European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 41:S1–S58.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Participants, The UK Small Aneurysm Trial. 1998. “Health service costs and quality of life for early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms.†The Lancet 352 (9141): 1656–1660.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sakalihasan, N., R. Limet, and O. D. Defawe. 2005. “Abdominal aortic aneurysm.†The Lancet 365 (9470): 1577–1589.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- SBU. 2008. Screening för bukaortaaneurysm. SBU Alert-Rapport 2008-04. SBU.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Slemrod, Joel, Marsha Blumenthal, and Charles Christian. 2001. “Taxpayer response to an increased probability of audit: evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. †Journal of Public Economics 79 (3): 455–483.
- Spencer, Carole A., Paul E. Norman, Konrad Jamrozik, Raywin Tuohy, and Michael Lawrence-Brown. 2004. “Is screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm bad for your health and well-being?†ANZ Journal of Surgery 74 (12): 1069–1075.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Strömberg, David. 2004. “Radio’s Impact on Public Spending.†The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1): 189–221.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Svensjö, Sverker, Martin Björck, Mikael Gürtelschmid, Khatereh Djavani Gidlund, Anders Hellberg, and Anders Wanhainen. 2011. “Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease.†Circulation 124 (10): 1118–1123.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- The EuroQol Group. 1990. “EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of healthrelated quality of life.†Health Policy 16 (3): 199–208.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Thompson, S. G., H. A. Ashton, L. Gao, M. J. Buxton, and R. A. P. Scott. 2012. “Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.†British Journal of Surgery 99 (12): 1649– 1656.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wanhainen, A. 2008. “How to Define an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm – Influence on Epidemiology and Clinical Practice.†Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 97 (2): 105.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wanhainen, Anders, and Martin Björck. 2011. “The Swedish experience of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.†Journal of Vascular Surgery 53 (4): 1164–1165.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wanhainen, Anders, David Bergqvist, Kurt Boman, Torbjörn K Nilsson, Jörgen Rutegård, and Martin Björck. 2005. “Risk factors associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm: a population-based study with historical and current data.†Journal of Vascular surgery 41 (3): 390–396.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ware, John E., and Cathy Donald Sherbourne. 1992. “The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection.â€ÂMedical Care 30 (6): 473–483.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ware, John E., Mark Kosinski, James E. Dewey, and Barbara Gandek. 2000. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston, Massachusetts: Quality Metric Inc.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge and London: MIT press.
Zhao, Meng, Yoshifumi Konishi, and Paul Glewwe. 2013. “Does information on health status lead to a healthier lifestyle? Evidence from China on the effect of hypertension diagnosis on food consumption.†Journal of Health Economics 32 (2): 367–385. A Appendix The appendix consists of two parts. In section A.1 the estimates for the outcomes not included in the main analysis are presented. In section A.2 we provide two additional sensitivity analyses. A.1 Other outcomes In Table A1 the estimates for the outcomes which were not included in the main analysis are presented. As the figures in section 6.1 suggest, the estimates are more noisy. There is no statistically significant result. However, it should be noted that the direction of the point estimates in general are in line with the outcomes in the main analysis.