Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Specification of merger gains in the Norwegian electricity distribution industry. (2016). Bjørndal, Endre Jostein ; Bjorndal, Mette ; Saastamoinen, Antti .
In: Discussion Papers.
RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2016_007.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 55

References cited by this document

Cocites: 41

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Has the unbundling reform improved the service efficiency of Chinas power grid firms?. (2021). Anaya, Karim ; Zhang, Zhen-jiang ; Xie, Bai-Chen.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:95:y:2021:i:c:s0140988320303339.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Çelen, A. (2013). The effect of merger and consolidation activities on the efficiency of electricity distribution regions in Turkey. Energy Policy, 59, 674–682.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Agrell, P. J., Bogetoft, P., & Grammeltvedt, T. E. (2015). The efficiency of the regulation for horizontal mergers among electricity distribution operators in Norway. Conference publication: 12th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), May 2015, DOI: 10.1109/EEM.2015.7216685 (Last accessed 8.3.2016).

  3. Ajodhia, V., & Hakvoort, R. (2005). Economic regulation of quality in electricity distribution networks. Utilities Policy, 13(3), 211–221.

  4. Akhavein, J. D., Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). The effects of megamergers on efficiency and prices: Evidence from a bank profit function. Review of Industrial Organization, 12, 95–139.

  5. Amundsveen, R., O.-P., Kordahl, Kvile, H. M., & Langset, T. (2014). Second stage adjustment for firm heterogeneity in DEA: A novel approach used in regulation of Norwegian electricity DSOs. In: Emrouznejad, A., R. Banker R., S. M. Doraisamy and B. Arabi (2014). Recent Developments in Data Envelopment Analysis and its Applications: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of DEA, April 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Andor, M., & Hesse, F. (2014). The StoNED age: the departure into a new era of efficiency analysis? A monte carlo comparison of StoNED and the “oldies” (SFA and DEA). Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41, 85-109.

  6. Bagdadioglu, N., Price, C. W., & Weyman-Jones, T. G. (2007). Measuring potential gains from mergers among electricity distribution companies in Turkey using a non-parametric model. Energy Journal, 28(2), 83–110.

  7. Barnum, D. T., & Gleason, J. M. (2008). Bias and precision in the DEA two-stage method. Applied Economics, 40(18), 2305–2311.

  8. Baumol, W. J. (1977). On the proper cost tests for natural monopoly in a multiproduct industry. The American Economic Review, 67(5), 809-822.

  9. Bjørndal, E., Bjørndal, M., & Fange, K.-A. (2010). Benchmarking in regulation of electricity networks in Norway: An overview. In Bjørndal, E., Bjørndal, M., PArdalos, P. M., & Rönnqvist, M. (eds.) Energy, Natural Resources and Environmental Economics, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Bogetoft, P., & Otto, L. (2011). Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 157, Springer, New York, USA.

  11. Bogetoft, P., & Otto, L. (2015). Package ‘Benchmarking’. Available at: https://cran.rproject.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. Bogetoft, P., & Wang, D. (2005). Estimating the potential gains from mergers. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23(2), 145–171.

  13. Bruner, R. F. (2002). Does M&A pay? A survey of evidence for the decision-maker. Journal of Applied Finance, 12(1), 48–68.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Cheng, X., Bjørndal, E., & Bjørndal, M. (2014). Cost efficiency analysis based on the DEA and StoNED models: Case of Norwegian electricity distribution companies. NHH Discussion Papers, 28/2014.

  15. Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2005). Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: A probabilistic approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24, 93–121.

  16. Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2007). Conditional nonparametric frontier models for convex and nonconvex technologies: A unifying approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28, 13–32.

  17. De Witte, K., & Dijkgraaf, E. (2010). Mean and bold? On separating merger economies from structural efficiency gains in the drinking water sector. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(2), 222–234.

  18. Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (2001). Scale economies and synergies in horizontal merger analysis. Antitrust Law Journal, 68, 685-710.

  19. Filippini, M. (1998). Are municipal electricity distribution utilities natural monopolies? Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 69(2), 157–174.

  20. Filippini, M., & Wild, J. (2001). Regional differences in electricity distribution costs and their consequences for yardstick regulation of access prices. Energy Economics, 23, 477–488.

  21. Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., Schmidt, S. S., & Yaisawarng, S. (2002). Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 157– 174.

  22. Fried, H. O., Schmidt, S. S., & Yaisawarng, S. (1999). Incorporating the operating environment into a nonparametric measure of technical efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 12, 249–267.

  23. Giannakis, D., Jamasb, T., & Pollitt, M. (2005). Benchmarking and incentive regulation of quality of service: an application to the UK electricity distribution networks. Energy Policy, 33(17), 2256– 2271.

  24. Growitsch, C., Jamasb, T., & Pollitt, M. (2009). Quality of service, efficiency and scale in network industries: an analysis of European electricity distribution. Applied Economics, 41(20), 2555–2570.

  25. Growitsch, C., Jamasb, T., & Wetzel, H. (2012). Efficiency effects of observed and unobserved heterogeneity: Evidence from Norwegian electricity distribution networks. Energy Economics, 34(2), 542–548.

  26. Halkos, G. E., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2013). Estimating the degree of operating efficiency gains from a potential bank merger and acquisition: A DEA bootstrapped approach. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(5), 1658–1668.

  27. Haney, A. B., & Pollitt, M. G. (2009). Efficiency analysis of energy networks: An international survey of regulators. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5814–5830. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.047 Hildreth, C. (1954). Point estimates of ordinates of concave functions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 598-619.

  28. Jamasb, T., & Pollitt, M. (2001). Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience. Utilities Policy, 9, 107–130.

  29. Jamasb, T., & Pollitt, M. (2007). Incentive regulation of electricity distribution networks: Lessons of experience from Britain. Energy Policy, 35(12), 6163–6187.

  30. Johnson, A. L., & Kuosmanen, T. (2011). One-stage estimation of the effects of operational conditions and practices on productive performance: asymptotically normal and efficient , rootn consistent StoNEZD method. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36, 219–230.

  31. Johnson, A. L., & Kuosmanen, T. (2015). An introduction to CNLS and StoNED methods for efficiency analysis: computational aspects and formulations. In: Ray, S., Kumbhakar, S., and Dua, P. (eds.) Benchmarking for performance evaluation: A frontier approach. Springer.

  32. Korhonen, P. J., & Syrjänen, M. (2003). Evaluation of cost efficiency in finnish electricity distribution. Annals of Operations Research, 121, 105–122.

  33. Kristensen, T., Bogetoft, P., & Pedersen, K. M. (2010). Potential gains from hospital mergers in Denmark. Health Care Management Science, 13(4), 334–45.

  34. Kumbhakar, S. C., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press, UK.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Kumbhakar, S. C., Amundsveen, R., Kvile, H. M., & Lien, G. (2015). Scale economies, technical change and efficiency in Norwegian electricity distribution, 1998–2010. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 43, 295-305.

  36. Kuosmanen, T. (2012). Stochastic semi-nonparametric frontier estimation of electricity distribution networks : Application of the StoNED method in the Finnish regulatory model. Energy Economics, 34, 2189–2199.

  37. Kuosmanen, T., & Kortelainen, M. (2012). Stochastic non-smooth envelopment of data: semiparametric frontier estimation subject to shape constraints. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38(1), 11-28.

  38. Kuosmanen, T., Saastamoinen, A., & Sipiläinen, T. (2013). What is the best practice for benchmark regulation of electricity distribution? Comparison of DEA, SFA and StoNED methods. Energy Policy, 61, 740-750.

  39. Kwoka, J. E. (2005). Electric power distribution: economies of scale, mergers, and restructuring.

  40. Kwoka, J., & Pollitt, M. (2010). Do mergers improve efficiency? Evidence from restructuring the US electric power sector. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(6), 645–656.

  41. Lee, C. Y., Johnson, A. L., Moreno-Centeno, E., & Kuosmanen, T. (2013). A more efficient algorithm for convex nonparametric least squares. European Journal of Operational Research, 227(2), 391-400.

  42. Neuberg, L. G. (1977). Two issues in the municipal ownership of electric power distribution systems. The Bell Journal of Economics, 303-323.

  43. Norwegian Environment Agency (2010). Webpage: http://www.environment.no/topics/biodiversity/land/ (Last visited: 30.3.2016).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. NVE (2007). Sammenslåing av nettselskap under det nye reguleringsregimet. A NVE document, written in Norwegian (Informal translation of the title: ”Mergers under new regulatory regime”), available at: https://www.nve.no/elmarkedstilsynet-marked-og-monopol/okonomiskregulering -av-nettselskap/reguleringsmodellen/ (Last visited: 22.2.2016).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. OED (2014). Et bedre organisert strømnett. A report for the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, written in Norwegian. Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/oed/pdf_filer_2/rapport_et_bedre_organise rt_stroemnett.pdf (Last accessed: 17.3.2015).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. org/web/packages/Benchmarking/Benchmarking.pdf (Last accessed: 1.4.2016).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Peyrache, A. (2013). Industry structural inefficiency and potential gains from mergers and break-ups: A comprehensive approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 230(2), 422–430.

  48. Röller, L.-H., Stennek, J., & Verboven, F. (2000). Efficiency gains from mergers. IUI Working Paper, The Research Institute of Industrial Economics, (543), Stockholm, Sweden.

  49. Resti, A. (1998). Regulation can foster mergers , can mergers foster efficiency ? The Italian case. Journal of Economics and Business, 50, 157–169.

  50. Ruggiero, J. (1998). Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 11, 461-469.

  51. Saastamoinen, A. (2013). Heteroscedasticity or production risk? A synthetic view. Journal of Economic Surveys, published online. DOI:10.1111/joes.12054 Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 31–64.

  52. Simper, R., & Weyman-Jones, T. (2008). Evaluating gains from mergers in a non-parametric public good model of police services. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 79(1), 3–33.

  53. Thakur, T., Deshmukh, S. G., & Kaushik, S. C. (2006). Efficiency evaluation of the state owned electric utilities in India. Energy Policy, 34(17), 2788–2804.

  54. Wang, Y., Wang, S., Dang, C., & Ge, W. (2014). Nonparametric quantile frontier estimation under shape restriction. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(3), 671–678.

  55. Zschille, M. (2014). Consolidating the water industry: An analysis of the potential gains from horizontal integration in a conditional efficiency framework. Journal of Productivity Analysis, published online, DOI: 10.1007/s11123-014-0407-x Wang, H.-J., & Schmidt, P. (2002). One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18(2), 129-144.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Carbon pricing and system reliability impacts on pathways to universal electricity access in Africa. (2024). Winchester, Benedict ; Few, Sheridan ; Mittal, Shivika ; Beath, Hamish ; Gambhir, Ajay ; Nelson, Jenny ; Markides, Christos N ; Sandwell, Philip.
    In: Nature Communications.
    RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-48450-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Cost-efficiency and quality regulation of energy network utilities. (2023). Ovaere, Marten.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:120:y:2023:i:c:s0140988323000865.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Service quality and the share of renewable energy in electricity generation. (2021). Shu, Lingli ; Jian, Xianzhong ; Xiao, Erliang ; Yao, Jingyuan.
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:69:y:2021:i:c:s0957178720301557.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Impacts on efficiency of merging the Swedish district courts. (2020). Agrell, Per ; Mnsson, Jonas ; Mattsson, Pontus.
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:288:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03304-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Predictability and strategic behavior under frontier regulation. (2020). Teusch, Jonas ; Agrell, Per J.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:137:y:2020:i:c:s030142151930727x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Is welfare higher when utilities are owned by customers instead of investors? Evidence from electricity distribution in New Zealand. (2020). Soderberg, Magnus ; Meade, Richard.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:86:y:2020:i:c:s0140988320300396.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Cubic reward penalty structure for power distribution companies. (2019). Krishna, Aneesh ; Potdar, Vidyasagar ; Sumesh, Sreenithya.
    In: International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management.
    RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:10:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00783-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Potential efficiency effects of merging the Swedish district courts. (2019). Tidan, Claes ; Mattsson, Pontus.
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:67:y:2019:i:c:p:58-68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The impacts of market power on power grid efficiency: Evidence from China. (2019). Huang, Ruting ; Yao, Xin ; Du, Kerui.
    In: China Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:chieco:v:55:y:2019:i:c:p:99-110.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. A multi-criteria decision analysis method for regulatory evaluation of electricity distribution service quality. (2018). de Souza, Ailson ; Gonalves, Marco Aurelio ; Shayani, Rafael Amaral .
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:53:y:2018:i:c:p:38-48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Regulatory and ownership determinants of unbundling regime choice for European electricity transmission utilities. (2018). Meletiou, Alexis ; Masera, Marcelo ; Cambini, Carlo.
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:50:y:2018:i:c:p:13-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Efficiency in the Consolidation of the Italian Water Sector. (2017). Giolitti, Anna ; Fraquelli, Giovanni ; Erbetta, Fabrizio ; Bruno, Clementina ; Abrate, Graziano.
    In: Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA).
    RePEc:spr:waterr:v:31:y:2017:i:8:d:10.1007_s11269-016-1376-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Decomposition of potential efficiency gains from hospital mergers in Greece. (2017). Niakas, Dimitris ; Aletras, Vassilis ; Flokou, Angeliki.
    In: Health Care Management Science.
    RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:20:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10729-016-9365-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A risk-based model for performance-based regulation of electric distribution companies. (2017). Ghasemi, Mostafa ; Dashti, Reza.
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:45:y:2017:i:c:p:36-44.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Specification of merger gains in the Norwegian electricity distribution industry. (2017). Saastamoinen, Antti ; Bjorndal, Mette.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:102:y:2017:i:c:p:96-107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Specification of merger gains in the Norwegian electricity distribution industry. (2016). Bjørndal, Endre Jostein ; Bjorndal, Mette ; Saastamoinen, Antti .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2016_007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The cost of electricity interruptions in Portugal: Valuing lost load by applying the production-function approach. (2016). Faias, Sergio ; Esteves, Jorge ; Castro, Rui.
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:40:y:2016:i:c:p:48-57.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The sustainability of Turkish electricity distributors and last-resort electricity suppliers: What did transition from vertically integrated public monopoly to regulated competition with privatized an. (2016). Ozbugday, Fatih Cemil ; Ozbuday, Fatih Cemil ; Alma, Hasan ; Ounlu, Bilal .
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:39:y:2016:i:c:p:50-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. A dynamic model for firm-response to non-credible incentive regulation regimes. (2016). Agrell, Per ; Grifell-Tatje, Emili .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:90:y:2016:i:c:p:287-299.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Quality frontier of electricity distribution: Supply security, best practices, and underground cabling in Finland. (2016). Kuosmanen, Timo ; Saastamoinen, Antti .
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:53:y:2016:i:c:p:281-292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Merger Incentives Under Yardstick Competition : a Theoretical Model. (2016). Teusch, Jonas.
    In: CORE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cor:louvco:2016037.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Refinancing under yardstick regulation with investment cycles: The case of long-lived electricity network assets. (2015). Schober, Dominik ; Weber, Christoph.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:15065.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. A Menu Approach to Revealing Generator Reliability using a Stochastic Bilevel Mathematical Program. (2015). Lynch, Muireann ; Devine, Mel.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:esr:wpaper:wp518.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Design of experiments applied to environmental variables analysis in electricity utilities efficiency: The Brazilian case. (2014). Paiva, Anderson P. ; Steele Santos, Paulo E., ; Leme, Rafael C. ; Balestrassi, Pedro P. ; Galvão, Leandro de Lima, .
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:45:y:2014:i:c:p:111-119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Investitions- und Innovationsanreize: Ein Vergleich zwischen Revenue Cap und Yardstick Competition. (2013). Stronzik, Marcus.
    In: WIK Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:wikdps:379.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. An assessment of Incentive Regulation in electricity networks: The story so far. (2013). Khalfallah, Haikel .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00931301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Refinancing under Yardstick Regulation with Investment Cycles–The Case of Long-Lived Electricity Network Assets. (2013). Schober, Dominik.
    In: EWL Working Papers.
    RePEc:dui:wpaper:1321.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Performance assessment of Turkish electricity distribution utilities: An application of combined FAHP/TOPSIS/DEA methodology to incorporate quality of service. (2012). ELEN, Aydn ; Yaln, Nee .
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:23:y:2012:i:c:p:59-71.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Experiences of modern rate of return regulation in Finland. (2012). Partanen, Jarmo ; Viljainen, Satu ; Honkapuro, Samuli ; Tahvanainen, Kaisa .
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:21:y:2012:i:c:p:32-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. ‘Standard’ incentive regulation hinders the integration of renewable energy generation. (2012). Hurink, Johann L. ; Nykamp, Stefan ; Andor, Mark.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:47:y:2012:i:c:p:222-237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Choix dinvestissement sous incertitude des gestionnaires des réseaux de distribution (GRD) en Europe à lhorizon 2030. (2012). Keppler, Jan Horst ; Andaluz-Alcazar, Alvaro .
    In: Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine.
    RePEc:dau:thesis:123456789/10862.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Zusammenhang zwischen Anreizregulierung und Eigenkapitalverzinsung. IRIN Working Paper im Rahmen des Arbeitspakets: Smart Grid-gerechte Weiterentwicklung der Anreizregulierung. (2011). Stronzik, Marcus.
    In: WIK Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:wikdps:357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The value of continuous power supply for Flemish households. (2011). Pepermans, Guido.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:39:y:2011:i:12:p:7853-7864.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Estimating Marginal Cost of Quality Improvements: The Case of the UK Electricity Distribution Companies. (2010). Pollitt, Michael ; Orea, Luis ; Jamasb, Tooraj.
    In: Efficiency Series Papers.
    RePEc:oeg:wpaper:2010/03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Incentive regulation, service quality, and standards in U.S. electricity distribution. (2010). Kwoka, John ; Ter-Martirosyan, Anna.
    In: Journal of Regulatory Economics.
    RePEc:kap:regeco:v:38:y:2010:i:3:p:258-273.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. The Value of Continuous Power Supply for Flemish Households. (2010). Pepermans, Guido.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hub:wpecon:201024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Messung und Bewertung von Versorgungsqualität. (2008). Wissner, Matthias.
    In: WIK Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:wikdps:309.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Incentive regulation of electricity distribution networks: Lessons of experience from Britain. (2007). Pollitt, Michael ; Jamasb, Tooraj.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:35:y:2007:i:12:p:6163-6187.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Incorporating the Price of Quality in Efficiency Analysis: the Case of Electricity Distribution Regulation in the UK. (2007). Pollitt, Michael ; Jamasb, Tooraj ; Yu, W..
    In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cam:camdae:0736.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Incentive Regulation of Electricity Distribution Networks: Lessons of Experience from Britain. (2007). Pollitt, Michael ; Jamasb, Tooraj.
    In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cam:camdae:0709.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Indikatoren zur Messung von Qualität und Zuverlässigkeit in Strom- und Gasversorgungsnetzen. (2006). Schaffner, Daniel ; Muller, Gernot ; Wissner, Matthias ; Stronzik, Marcus.
    In: WIK Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:wikdps:273.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-18 21:24:27 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.