- Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best Practice Recommendations for Designing and Implementing Experimental Vignette Methodology Studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Armacost, R. L., Hosseini, J. C., Morris, S. A., & Rehbein, K. A. (1991). An Empirical Comparison of Direct Questioning, Scenario, and Randomized Response Methods for Obtaining Sensitive Business Information. Decision Sciences, 22(5), 1073–1090.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Atzmüller, C., & Steiner, P. M. (2010). Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6(3), 128–138.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Auspurg, K., & Jäckle, A. (2015). First Equals Most Important? Order Effects in VignetteBased Measurement. Sociological Methods & Research.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., Liebig, S., & Sauer, C. (2015). The Factorial Survey as a Method for Measuring Sensitive Issues. In Improving Survey Methods. Lessons from recent Research.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bargain, O., Immervoll, H., & Viitamäki, H. (2012). No claim, no pain. Measuring the nontake -up of social assistance using register data. Journal of Economic Inequality, 10(3), 375– 395.
- Belfius. (2007). Lokale financiën. Sociaaleconomische typologie van de gemeenten. Belfius.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Benz, A. (2000). Two types of multi-level governance: Intergovernmental relations in German and EU regional policy. Regional & Federal Studies, 10(3), 21–44.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Blommesteijn, M., van Geuns, R. C., Groenewoud, M., & Slotboom, S. T. (2012). Vakkundig aan de slag. Een onderzoek naar vakmanschap in de gemeentelijke re-integratiesector (p. 74). Amsterdam: Regioplan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Carpentier, S. (2016). Lost in Transition? Essays on Socio-Economic Trajectories of Social Assistance Beneficiaries. Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Carpentier, S., Neels, K., & Van den Bosch, K. (2014). How Do Exit Rates from Social Assistance Benefit in Belgium Vary with Individual and Local Agency Characteristics? In S. Carcillo, H. Immervoll, S. Jenkins P., S. Königs, & K. Tatsiramos (Eds.), Safety Nets and Benefit Dependence (pp. 151–187). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Caussade, S., Ortúzar, J. de D., Rizzi, L. I., & Hensher, D. A. (2005). Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 39(7), 621–640.
- Champion, C., & Bonoli, G. (2011). Institutional fragmentation and coordination initiatives in western European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(4), 323–334.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- CSB Working Paper No. 16 / 06 Aiman-Smith, L., Scullen, S. E., & Barr, S. H. (2002). Conducting Studies of Decision Making in Organizational Contexts: A Tutorial for Policy-Capturing and Other Regression-Based Techniques. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 388–414.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- CSB Working Paper No. 16 / 06 De Deken, J., & Kittel, B. (2007). Social expenditure under scrutiny: the problems of using aggregate spending data for assessing welfare state dynamics. In J. Clasen & N. A. Siegel, Investigating Welfare State Change: The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- CSB Working Paper No. 16 / 06 Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
CSB Working Paper No. 16 / 06 Marchal, S., & van Mechelen, N. (2017). A New Kid in Town? Active Inclusion Elements in European Minimum Income Schemes. Social Policy & Administration, 51(1), 171–194.
- CSB Working Paper No. 16 / 06 Stokes, J., & Schmidt, G. (2012). Child Protection Decision Making: A Factorial Analysis Using Case Vignettes. Social Work, 57(1), 83–90.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dülmer, H. (2007). Experimental Plans in Factorial Surveys Random or Quota Design? Sociological Methods & Research, 35(3), 382–409.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dülmer, H. (2016). The Factorial Survey: Design Selection and its Impact on Reliability and Internal Validity. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(2), 304–347.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
DeShazo, J. R., & Fermo, G. (2002). Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(1), 123–143.
- Eardley, T., Bradshaw, J., Ditch, J., Gough, I., & Whiteford. (1996). Social Assistance in OECD Countries: Synthesis Report, Department of Social Security Research Report (No. 46). London: HMSO.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Eifler, S. (2010). Validity of a Factorial Survey Approach to the Analysis of Criminal Behavior. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6(3), 139–146.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Evans, P. M. (2007). (Not) taking account of precarious employment: Workfare policies and lone mothers in Ontario and the UK. Soc Policy Admin, 41(1), 29–49.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Goos, P., & Jones, B. (2011). Optimal Design of Experiments: A Case Study Approach (1st ed.). West-Sussex: Wiley.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Groves, R. M., Jr, F. J. F., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey Methodology. John Wiley & Sons.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hölsch, K., & Kraus, M. (2006). European schemes of social assistance: an empirical analysis of set-ups and distributive impacts. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15(1), 50–62.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Heeringa, S., & Berglund, P. A. (2010). Applied survey data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hermans, K. (2005). De actieve welvaartsstaat in werking. Een sociologische studie naar de implementatie van het activeringsbeleid op de werkvloer van de Vlaamse OCMW’s. KULeuven, Leuven.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hooghe, L. (1996). Cohesion Policy and European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jasso, G. (2006). Factorial Survey Methods for Studying Beliefs and Judgments. Sociological Methods & Research, 34(3), 334–423.
Johnson, F. R. (2006). Comment on ‘Revealing Differences in Willingness to Pay Due to the Dimensionality of Stated Choice Designs: An Initial Assessment’. Environmental and Resource Economics, 34(1), 45–50.
- Karren, R. J., & Barringer, M. W. (2002). A Review and Analysis of the Policy-Capturing Methodology in Organizational Research: Guidelines for Research and Practice. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 337–361.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kazepov, Y. (1999). At the Edge of Longitudinal Analysis. Welfare Institutions and Social Assistance Dynamics, 33(3), 305–322.
- Kazepov, Y. (2010). Rescaling Social Policies: Towards Multilevel Governance in Europe. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kazepov, Y., & Barberis, E. (2012). Social Assistance Governance in Europe: Towards a Multilevel Perspective. In I. Marx & K. Nelson, Minimum Income Protection in Flux (pp. 217– 248).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kirwan, J. R., Chaput de Saintonge, D. M., Joyce, C. R., & Currey, H. L. (1983). Clinical judgment in rheumatoid arthritis. I. Rheumatologists’ opinions and the development of ‘paper patients’. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 42(6), 644–647.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kittel, B., & Obinger, H. (2003). Political parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(1), 20–45.
- Lødemel, I., & Trickey, H. (2001). ‘An Offer You Can’t Refuse’: Workfare in International Perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Langley, G. R., Tritchler, D. L., Llewellyn-Thomas, H. A., & Till, J. E. (1991). Use of written cases to study factors associated with regional variations in referral rates. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(4–5), 391–402.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lorentzen, T., Dahl, E., & Harsløf, I. (2012). Welfare risks in early adulthood: A longitudinal analysis of social assistance transitions in Norway. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(4), 408–421.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Marchal, S., Marx, I., & Van Mechelen, N. (2014). The Great Wake-Up Call? Social Citizenship and Minimum Income Provisions in Europe in Times of Crisis. Journal of Social Policy, 43(02), 247–267.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Minas, R., Whrigth, S., & Van Berkel, R. (2012). Decentralization and centralization: Governing the activation of social assistance recipients in Europe. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(5/6), 286–298.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Morley, C. P. (2010). The effects of patient characteristics on ADHD diagnosis and treatment: a factorial study of family physicians. BMC Family Practice, 11(1), 11.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nybom, J. (2013). Activation and ‘coercion’ among Swedish social assistance claimants with different work barriers and socio-demographic characteristics: What is the logic? Int. J. Soc. Welf., 22(1), 45–57.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Oorschot, W. J. H. van, Uunk, W. J. G., & Jeene, M. D. (2008). Who should get what and why, under which conditions: Descriptions and explanations of public deservingness opinions.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ortega, E. G., Baz, B. O., & Sánchez, F. L. (2012). Professionals’ Criteria for Detecting and Reporting Child Sexual Abuse. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(03), 1325–1338.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Peabody, J. W., Luck, J., Glassman, P., Dresselhaus, T. R., & Lee, M. (2000). Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(13), 1715–1722.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Piattoni, S. (2009). Multi-level Governance: a Historical and Conceptual Analysis. Journal of European Integration, 31(2), 163–180.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Priem, R. L., Walters, B. A., & Li, S. (2011). Decisions, Decisions! How Judgment Policy Studies Can Integrate Macro and Micro Domains in Management Research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 553–580.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rice, D. (2012). Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Welfare State: Toward a MicroInstitutionalist Theory of Policy Implementation. Administration & Society, 45(9), 1038–1062.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Saraceno, C. (2002). Social Assistance Dynamics in Europe: National and Local Poverty Regimes. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Skarlicki, D. P., & Turner, R. A. (2014). Unfairness begets unfairness: Victim derogation bias in employee ratings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(1), 34–46.
- Stephenson, P. (2013). Twenty years of multi-level governance: ‘Where Does It Come From? What Is It? Where Is It Going?’ Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 817–837.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Tabin, J.-P., & Perriard, A. (2016). Active social policies revisited by social workers. European Journal of Social Work, 19(3–4), 441–454.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Taylor, B. J. (2006). Factorial Surveys: Using Vignettes to Study Professional Judgement.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Thoren, K. H. (2008). ‘Activation Policy in Action’: A Street-level Study of Social Assistance in the Swedish Welfare State. Växjö University, Växjö.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- van Berkel, R. (2006). The decentralisation of social assistance in The Netherlands. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(1/2), 20–31.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Van Mechelen, N., Marchal, S., Goedemé, T., Marx, I., & Cantillon, B. (2011). The CSBMinimum Income Protection Indicators dataset (CSB-MIPI). CSB-Workingpaper.
- Wallander, L. (2009). 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review. Social Science Research, 38(3), 505–520.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wallander, L. (2012). Measuring social workers’ judgements: Why and how to use the factorial survey approach in the study of professional judgements. Journal of Social Work, 12(4), 364–384.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Webster, S. W., O’Toole, R., O’Toole, A. W., & Lucal, B. (2005). Overreporting and underreporting of child abuse: Teachers’ use of professional discretion. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(11), 1281–1296. i In this paper we understand the term ‘discretion’ as ‘individual’ or ‘locally based’ decision making.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now