Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
The Implementation of Social Policy: A Factorial Survey Approach. (2017). Goos, Peter ; de Wilde, Marjolijn .
In: Working Papers.
RePEc:hdl:wpaper:1706.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 65

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Weighing up work willingness in social assistance: a balancing act on multiple levels. (2018). Marchal, Sarah ; de Wilde, Marjolijn .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hdl:wpaper:1808.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best Practice Recommendations for Designing and Implementing Experimental Vignette Methodology Studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Armacost, R. L., Hosseini, J. C., Morris, S. A., & Rehbein, K. A. (1991). An Empirical Comparison of Direct Questioning, Scenario, and Randomized Response Methods for Obtaining Sensitive Business Information. Decision Sciences, 22(5), 1073–1090.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Atzmüller, C., & Steiner, P. M. (2010). Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6(3), 128–138.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Auspurg, K., & Jäckle, A. (2015). First Equals Most Important? Order Effects in VignetteBased Measurement. Sociological Methods & Research.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., Liebig, S., & Sauer, C. (2015). The Factorial Survey as a Method for Measuring Sensitive Issues. In Improving Survey Methods. Lessons from recent Research.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bargain, O., Immervoll, H., & Viitamäki, H. (2012). No claim, no pain. Measuring the nontake -up of social assistance using register data. Journal of Economic Inequality, 10(3), 375– 395.

  7. Belfius. (2007). Lokale financiën. Sociaaleconomische typologie van de gemeenten. Belfius.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Benz, A. (2000). Two types of multi-level governance: Intergovernmental relations in German and EU regional policy. Regional & Federal Studies, 10(3), 21–44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Blommesteijn, M., van Geuns, R. C., Groenewoud, M., & Slotboom, S. T. (2012). Vakkundig aan de slag. Een onderzoek naar vakmanschap in de gemeentelijke re-integratiesector (p. 74). Amsterdam: Regioplan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Carpentier, S. (2016). Lost in Transition? Essays on Socio-Economic Trajectories of Social Assistance Beneficiaries. Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Carpentier, S., Neels, K., & Van den Bosch, K. (2014). How Do Exit Rates from Social Assistance Benefit in Belgium Vary with Individual and Local Agency Characteristics? In S. Carcillo, H. Immervoll, S. Jenkins P., S. Königs, & K. Tatsiramos (Eds.), Safety Nets and Benefit Dependence (pp. 151–187). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  13. Caussade, S., Ortúzar, J. de D., Rizzi, L. I., & Hensher, D. A. (2005). Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 39(7), 621–640.

  14. Champion, C., & Bonoli, G. (2011). Institutional fragmentation and coordination initiatives in western European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(4), 323–334.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. CSB Working Paper No. 16 / 06 Aiman-Smith, L., Scullen, S. E., & Barr, S. H. (2002). Conducting Studies of Decision Making in Organizational Contexts: A Tutorial for Policy-Capturing and Other Regression-Based Techniques. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 388–414.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. CSB Working Paper No. 16 / 06 De Deken, J., & Kittel, B. (2007). Social expenditure under scrutiny: the problems of using aggregate spending data for assessing welfare state dynamics. In J. Clasen & N. A. Siegel, Investigating Welfare State Change: The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. CSB Working Paper No. 16 / 06 Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. CSB Working Paper No. 16 / 06 Marchal, S., & van Mechelen, N. (2017). A New Kid in Town? Active Inclusion Elements in European Minimum Income Schemes. Social Policy & Administration, 51(1), 171–194.

  19. CSB Working Paper No. 16 / 06 Stokes, J., & Schmidt, G. (2012). Child Protection Decision Making: A Factorial Analysis Using Case Vignettes. Social Work, 57(1), 83–90.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Dülmer, H. (2007). Experimental Plans in Factorial Surveys Random or Quota Design? Sociological Methods & Research, 35(3), 382–409.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Dülmer, H. (2016). The Factorial Survey: Design Selection and its Impact on Reliability and Internal Validity. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(2), 304–347.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. DeShazo, J. R., & Fermo, G. (2002). Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(1), 123–143.

  23. Eardley, T., Bradshaw, J., Ditch, J., Gough, I., & Whiteford. (1996). Social Assistance in OECD Countries: Synthesis Report, Department of Social Security Research Report (No. 46). London: HMSO.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Eifler, S. (2010). Validity of a Factorial Survey Approach to the Analysis of Criminal Behavior. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6(3), 139–146.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Evans, P. M. (2007). (Not) taking account of precarious employment: Workfare policies and lone mothers in Ontario and the UK. Soc Policy Admin, 41(1), 29–49.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Goos, P., & Jones, B. (2011). Optimal Design of Experiments: A Case Study Approach (1st ed.). West-Sussex: Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Groves, R. M., Jr, F. J. F., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey Methodology. John Wiley & Sons.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Hölsch, K., & Kraus, M. (2006). European schemes of social assistance: an empirical analysis of set-ups and distributive impacts. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15(1), 50–62.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Heeringa, S., & Berglund, P. A. (2010). Applied survey data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Hermans, K. (2005). De actieve welvaartsstaat in werking. Een sociologische studie naar de implementatie van het activeringsbeleid op de werkvloer van de Vlaamse OCMW’s. KULeuven, Leuven.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Hooghe, L. (1996). Cohesion Policy and European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Jasso, G. (2006). Factorial Survey Methods for Studying Beliefs and Judgments. Sociological Methods & Research, 34(3), 334–423.

  34. Johnson, F. R. (2006). Comment on ‘Revealing Differences in Willingness to Pay Due to the Dimensionality of Stated Choice Designs: An Initial Assessment’. Environmental and Resource Economics, 34(1), 45–50.

  35. Karren, R. J., & Barringer, M. W. (2002). A Review and Analysis of the Policy-Capturing Methodology in Organizational Research: Guidelines for Research and Practice. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 337–361.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Kazepov, Y. (1999). At the Edge of Longitudinal Analysis. Welfare Institutions and Social Assistance Dynamics, 33(3), 305–322.

  37. Kazepov, Y. (2010). Rescaling Social Policies: Towards Multilevel Governance in Europe. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Kazepov, Y., & Barberis, E. (2012). Social Assistance Governance in Europe: Towards a Multilevel Perspective. In I. Marx & K. Nelson, Minimum Income Protection in Flux (pp. 217– 248).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Kirwan, J. R., Chaput de Saintonge, D. M., Joyce, C. R., & Currey, H. L. (1983). Clinical judgment in rheumatoid arthritis. I. Rheumatologists’ opinions and the development of ‘paper patients’. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 42(6), 644–647.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Kittel, B., & Obinger, H. (2003). Political parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(1), 20–45.

  41. Lødemel, I., & Trickey, H. (2001). ‘An Offer You Can’t Refuse’: Workfare in International Perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Langley, G. R., Tritchler, D. L., Llewellyn-Thomas, H. A., & Till, J. E. (1991). Use of written cases to study factors associated with regional variations in referral rates. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(4–5), 391–402.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Lorentzen, T., Dahl, E., & Harsløf, I. (2012). Welfare risks in early adulthood: A longitudinal analysis of social assistance transitions in Norway. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(4), 408–421.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Marchal, S., Marx, I., & Van Mechelen, N. (2014). The Great Wake-Up Call? Social Citizenship and Minimum Income Provisions in Europe in Times of Crisis. Journal of Social Policy, 43(02), 247–267.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Minas, R., Whrigth, S., & Van Berkel, R. (2012). Decentralization and centralization: Governing the activation of social assistance recipients in Europe. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(5/6), 286–298.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Morley, C. P. (2010). The effects of patient characteristics on ADHD diagnosis and treatment: a factorial study of family physicians. BMC Family Practice, 11(1), 11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Nybom, J. (2013). Activation and ‘coercion’ among Swedish social assistance claimants with different work barriers and socio-demographic characteristics: What is the logic? Int. J. Soc. Welf., 22(1), 45–57.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Oorschot, W. J. H. van, Uunk, W. J. G., & Jeene, M. D. (2008). Who should get what and why, under which conditions: Descriptions and explanations of public deservingness opinions.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Ortega, E. G., Baz, B. O., & Sánchez, F. L. (2012). Professionals’ Criteria for Detecting and Reporting Child Sexual Abuse. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(03), 1325–1338.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Peabody, J. W., Luck, J., Glassman, P., Dresselhaus, T. R., & Lee, M. (2000). Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(13), 1715–1722.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Piattoni, S. (2009). Multi-level Governance: a Historical and Conceptual Analysis. Journal of European Integration, 31(2), 163–180.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Priem, R. L., Walters, B. A., & Li, S. (2011). Decisions, Decisions! How Judgment Policy Studies Can Integrate Macro and Micro Domains in Management Research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 553–580.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Rice, D. (2012). Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Welfare State: Toward a MicroInstitutionalist Theory of Policy Implementation. Administration & Society, 45(9), 1038–1062.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Saraceno, C. (2002). Social Assistance Dynamics in Europe: National and Local Poverty Regimes. Bristol: The Policy Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Skarlicki, D. P., & Turner, R. A. (2014). Unfairness begets unfairness: Victim derogation bias in employee ratings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(1), 34–46.

  57. Stephenson, P. (2013). Twenty years of multi-level governance: ‘Where Does It Come From? What Is It? Where Is It Going?’ Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 817–837.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Tabin, J.-P., & Perriard, A. (2016). Active social policies revisited by social workers. European Journal of Social Work, 19(3–4), 441–454.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Taylor, B. J. (2006). Factorial Surveys: Using Vignettes to Study Professional Judgement.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Thoren, K. H. (2008). ‘Activation Policy in Action’: A Street-level Study of Social Assistance in the Swedish Welfare State. Växjö University, Växjö.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. van Berkel, R. (2006). The decentralisation of social assistance in The Netherlands. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(1/2), 20–31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Van Mechelen, N., Marchal, S., Goedemé, T., Marx, I., & Cantillon, B. (2011). The CSBMinimum Income Protection Indicators dataset (CSB-MIPI). CSB-Workingpaper.

  63. Wallander, L. (2009). 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review. Social Science Research, 38(3), 505–520.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Wallander, L. (2012). Measuring social workers’ judgements: Why and how to use the factorial survey approach in the study of professional judgements. Journal of Social Work, 12(4), 364–384.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Webster, S. W., O’Toole, R., O’Toole, A. W., & Lucal, B. (2005). Overreporting and underreporting of child abuse: Teachers’ use of professional discretion. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(11), 1281–1296. i In this paper we understand the term ‘discretion’ as ‘individual’ or ‘locally based’ decision making.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The Tragic Decline of the Poverty Reducing Capacity of the Welfare State: Lessons from Two Decades of Social Policy Research. (2022). Cantillon, Bea.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hdl:wpaper:2201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Quantifier le non-recours aux minima sociaux en Europe : un phénomène d’ampleur qui peine à susciter le débat. (2022). Le Gall, Rémi ; Rode, Antoine ; Hannafi, Cyrine ; Portela, Mickael ; Marc, Celine ; Laguerodie, Stephanie.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03618424.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Quantifier le non-recours aux minima sociaux en Europe : un phénomène d’ampleur qui peine à susciter le débat. (2022). Le Gall, Rémi ; Rode, Antoine ; Hannafi, Cyrine ; Portela, Mickael ; Marc, Celine ; Laguerodie, Stephanie.
    In: Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers).
    RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-03618424.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Incentivizing last-resort social assistance clients: Evidence from a Finnish policy experiment. (2021). Heikki, Palviainen.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tam:wpaper:2132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Claiming Costs Scale: A new instrument for measuring the costs potential beneficiaries face when claiming social benefits. (2021). Goedemé, Tim ; Ponnet, Koen ; Janssens, Julie.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0256438.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The Struggle of Being Poor and Claimant: Evidence on the Non-Take-Up of Social Policies in Italy. (2021). Gallo, Giovanni ; Boscolo, Stefano.
    In: Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP).
    RePEc:mod:cappmo:0174.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Can parental leave be shared?. (2021). Verdugo, Gregory ; Perivier, Helene.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03364048.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Does Social Interaction Matter for Welfare Participation?. (2021). Chareyron, Sylvain ; Lieno-Gaillardon, Lucie Fotsa ; Domingues, Patrick.
    In: Annals of Economics and Statistics.
    RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2021:i:141:p:49-70.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Moving towards fairer regional minimum income schemes in Spain. (2020). Hernández Martín, Adrián ; Riscado, Sara ; Picos, Fidel.
    In: JRC Working Papers on Taxation & Structural Reforms.
    RePEc:ipt:taxref:202004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. How Family Transfers Crowd-out Social Assistance in Germany. (2020). FOURRIER-NICOLAÏ, Edwin ; Fourrier-Nicolai, Edwin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-02874852.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Measuring non-take-up of social benefits in France: focus on the RSA and the PA. (2020). Le Gall, Rémi ; Hannafi, Cyrine.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03249950.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Ethnicity and tax filing behavior. (2020). Giebe, Thomas ; Bastani, Spencer ; Miao, Chizheng.
    In: Journal of Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:juecon:v:116:y:2020:i:c:s0094119019300920.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. How Family Transfers Crowd-out Social Assistance in Germany. (2020). FOURRIER-NICOLAÏ, Edwin ; Fourrier-Nicolai, Edwin.
    In: AMSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:aim:wpaimx:2023.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Ethnicity and tax filing behavior. (2019). Giebe, Thomas ; Miao, Chizheng ; Bastani, Spencer.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:97047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Non-Take-Up of Means-Tested Social Benefits in Germany. (2019). Harnisch, Michelle.
    In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
    RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp1793.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Ethnicity and tax filing behavior. (2019). Giebe, Thomas ; Bastani, Spencer ; Miao, Chizheng.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7576.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Toward a New Social Contract. (2018). Bussolo, Maurizio ; Sundaram, Ramya ; Peragine, Vito ; Davalos, Maria E.
    In: World Bank Publications.
    RePEc:wbk:wbpubs:30393.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Evaluation of the Finnish Income Disregard Reform. (2018). Heikki, Palviainen.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tam:wpaper:1819.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A social welfare approach for measuring welfare protection. (2018). Barcena, Elena ; Ayala, Luis ; Barcena-Martin, Elena.
    In: The Journal of Economic Inequality.
    RePEc:spr:joecin:v:16:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10888-017-9361-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. A social welfare approach for measuring welfare protection. (2018). Barcena, Elena ; Ayala, Luis ; Barcena-Martin, Elena.
    In: The Journal of Economic Inequality.
    RePEc:kap:jecinq:v:16:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10888-017-9361-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Pauvreté et non-recours aux dispositifs sociaux : lâétude du RSA « socle seul ». (2018). Chareyron, Sylvain.
    In: Economie & Prévision.
    RePEc:cai:ecoldc:ecop_213_0041.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Take‐Up of Social Assistance Benefits: The Case of the French Homeless. (2018). Chareyron, Sylvain ; Domingues, Patrick.
    In: Review of Income and Wealth.
    RePEc:bla:revinw:v:64:y:2018:i:1:p:170-191.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Raising the take-up of social assistance benefits through a simple mailing: evidence from a French field experiment. (2017). L'Horty, Yannick ; Gray, David ; Chareyron, Sylvain.
    In: TEPP Working Paper.
    RePEc:tep:teppwp:wp17-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Mechanics of replacing benefit systems with a basic income: comparative results from a microsimulation approach. (2017). Immervoll, Herwig ; Browne, James.
    In: The Journal of Economic Inequality.
    RePEc:spr:joecin:v:15:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10888-017-9366-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Reducing poverty and inequality through tax-benefit reform and the minimum wage: the UK as a case-study. (2017). Tasseva, Iva ; Sutherland, Holly ; Nolan, Brian ; Leventi, Chrysa ; Atkinson, Anthony B.
    In: The Journal of Economic Inequality.
    RePEc:spr:joecin:v:15:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10888-017-9365-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Mechanics of replacing benefit systems with a basic income: comparative results from a microsimulation approach. (2017). Immervoll, Herwig ; Browne, James.
    In: The Journal of Economic Inequality.
    RePEc:kap:jecinq:v:15:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10888-017-9366-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Reducing poverty and inequality through tax-benefit reform and the minimum wage: the UK as a case-study. (2017). Tasseva, Iva ; Sutherland, Holly ; Nolan, Brian ; Leventi, Chrysa ; Atkinson, Anthony B.
    In: The Journal of Economic Inequality.
    RePEc:kap:jecinq:v:15:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10888-017-9365-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Mechanics of Replacing Benefit Systems with a Basic Income: Comparative Results from a Microsimulation Approach. (2017). Browne, James ; Immervoll, Herwig.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11192.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Who is to Blame? An Overview of the Factors Contributing to the Non-Take-Up of Social Rights. (2017). van Mechelen, Natascha ; Janssens, Julie .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hdl:wpaper:1708.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The Implementation of Social Policy: A Factorial Survey Approach. (2017). Goos, Peter ; de Wilde, Marjolijn .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hdl:wpaper:1706.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Raising the take-up of social assistance benefits through a simple mailing: evidence from a French field experiment. (2017). L'Horty, Yannick ; Gray, David ; Chareyron, Sylvain.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01521963.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Reducing poverty and inequality through tax-benefit reform and the minimum wage: the UK as a case-study. (2017). Tasseva, Iva ; Sutherland, Holly ; Nolan, Brian ; Leventi, Chrysa ; Atkinson, Anthony B.
    In: EUROMOD Working Papers.
    RePEc:ese:emodwp:em13-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Obstacles to Takeup: Ecuadors Conditional Cash Transfer Program, The Bono de Desarrollo Humano. (2017). Rinehart, Chloe S ; McGuire, James W.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:97:y:2017:i:c:p:165-177.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Non-take-up of Student Financial Aid: A Microsimulation for Germany. (2016). Kalinowski, Michael ; Herber, Stefanie P.
    In: Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc16:145727.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Non-take-up of student financial aid: A microsimulation for Germany. (2016). Kalinowski, Michael ; Herber, Stefanie P.
    In: BERG Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:bamber:109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. A unified approach for measuring welfare protection under a decentralized framework. (2016). Barcena, Elena ; Ayala, Luis ; Barcena-Martin, Elena.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2016-405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Le non-recours aux aides sociales sous conditions de ressources. (2016). L'Horty, Yannick ; Chareyron, Sylvain.
    In: Erudite Ph.D Dissertations.
    RePEc:eru:erudph:ph16-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Evaluating the performance of means-tested benefits in Bulgaria. (2016). Tasseva, Iva.
    In: Journal of Comparative Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jcecon:v:44:y:2016:i:4:p:919-935.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Non-Take-Up of Student Financial Aid: A Microsimulation for Germany. (2016). Herber, Stefanie P ; Kalinowski, Michael .
    In: SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research.
    RePEc:diw:diwsop:diw_sp844.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Take-up of Social Assistance Benefits: The case of Homeless. (2015). Chareyron, Sylvain ; Domingues, Patrick.
    In: TEPP Working Paper.
    RePEc:tep:teppwp:wp15-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Are Recipients of Social Assistance Benefit Dependent? Concepts, Measurement and Results for Selected Countries. (2015). Königs, Sebastian ; Jenkins, Stephen ; Immervoll, Herwig ; Konigs, Sebastian.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8786.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Take-up of social assistance benefits: The case of homeless Take-up of Social Assistance Benefits: The Case of Homeless. (2015). Chareyron, Sylvain.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01292107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. The non-take up of long-term care benefit in France: A pecuniary motive?. (2015). ventelou, bruno ; Trannoy, Alain ; Davin, Bérengère ; Arrighi, Yves.
    In: Health Policy.
    RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:119:y:2015:i:10:p:1338-1348.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Microsimulation and policy analysis. (2014). Sutherland, Holly ; Paulus, Alari ; Figari, Francesco.
    In: ISER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ese:iserwp:2014-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Le esperienze italiane di misure di contrasto alla povertà: che cosa possiamo imparare?. (2013). Zanini, Nadir ; Trivellato, Ugo ; Spano, Angelo .
    In: ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE.
    RePEc:fan:eseses:v:html10.3280/es2013-002008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Evaluating the performance of means-tested benefits in Bulgaria. (2012). Tasseva, Iva.
    In: ISER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ese:iserwp:2012-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Evaluating the performance of means-tested benefits in Bulgaria. (2012). Tasseva, Iva.
    In: EUROMOD Working Papers.
    RePEc:ese:emodwp:em8-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Benefit underreporting in survey data and its consequences for measuring non-take-up: new evidence from linked administrative and survey data. (1906). Wiemers, Jurgen ; Riphahn, Regina T ; Bruckmeier, Kerstin.
    In: IAB Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:iab:iabdpa:201906.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-09 13:18:11 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.