- BECKER G., 1996, Accounting for Tastes, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- BOLTANSKI L, THEVENOT L. , 1991, De la justification, les economies de la grandeur, Paris, Gallimard, NRF essais.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- BOLTANSKI L., THEVENOT L., 2000, The Reality of Moral Expectations, Philosophical Explorations, 3(3), 208-23 1.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- BONNY S., 2003, Why are most Europeans opposed to GMOs? Factors explaining rejection in France and Europe, Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 6(1), 50-7 1.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- BOY. D., 2003, Lévaluation des opinions sur les biotechnologies dans lUnion européenne, Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée, 10(2), 207-218.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- BRENDAHL L., 2001, Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regards to genetically modified foods, Journal of Consumer Policy, 24, 26-61.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
CAPPELLARI L., JENKINS S.P., 2003, Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood, Stata Journal, 3(3), 278-294.
- CHAKLATTI S., ROUSSELIERE D., 2006, Le débat européen sur les biotechnologies agricoles: la place des associations dans lemergence dune politique publique in De lintérêt général a lutilité sociale, Paris, LHarmattan, Logiques sociales.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
COOK A.J., KERR G.N., MOORE K., 2002, Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM Food, Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 557-572.
- DEBRU C., 2003, Le possible et les Biotechnologies, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- DESQUILBET, M., BULLOCK, D, 2001, Evaluation ex ante des coUts potentiels en cas de coexistence 0GM / non-OGM en France in LEMARIE, S., DESQUILBET, M., DIEMER, A., MARETTE, S., LEVERT, F., CARRERE, M., BULLOCK, D. (eds.), Les repartitions possibles entre les acteurs de la filiere agroalimentaire des gains éventuels tires des plantes transgéniques, Etude financée par le Commissariat Général du Plan, 122-185.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- FREWER L., LASSEN J., KETTLITZ B., SCHOLDERER J., BEEKMAN V., BERDAL K.G., 2004, Societal aspects of genetically modified foods Food and Chemical Toxicology, 42, 118 1-1193.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- GASKELL G., ALLUM N., WAGNER W., KRONBERGER N., TORGERSEN H., HAMPEL J., BARDES J., 2004, GM foods and the misperception of risk perception, Risk Analysis, 24(1), 185-194.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- GODARD 0., 2004, De la pluralite des ordres - les problèmes denvironnement et de developpement durable a la lumière de la théorie de la justification, Géographie, Economie et Société, 6(3), 303-330.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- GREENE W. (2003) Econometric Analysis, 5th edition, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- HUFFMAN W., 2003, Consumers acceptance of (and resistance to) genetically modified foods in high-income countries, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(5), 11121118.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- HUFFMAN W.E., ROUSU M., SHOGREN J.F. AND TEGENE A., 2004, Who do consumers trust for information?, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(5), 12221229.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- JOLY P.B., MARRIS C., 2003 a, La participation contre la mobilisation? Une analyse comparée du Débat sur les 0GM en France et au Royaume-Uni, Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée, 10(2), 195-206.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- JOLY P.B., MARRIS C., 2003 b, Les américains ont-ils accepté les 0GM ? Analyse comparée de la construction des 0GM comme problème public en France et aux Etats-Unis, Cahiers dEconomie et Sociologie Rurales, 68-69, 12-45.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- LANG J.T., ONEILL K.M., HALLMAN W.K., 2003, Expertise, trust, and communication about food biotechnology, AgBioForum, 6(4), 185-190.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- MARRIS C., 2001, Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths, European Molecular Biology Organization Reports, 2(7), 545-548.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
NOUSSAIR C., ROBIN S., RUFFIEUX B., 2003, De lopinion publique aux comportements des consommateurs. Faut-il une filière sans 0GM?, Revue Economique, 54 (1), 47-70.
- PARDO R., MIDDEN C., MILLER J.D., 2002, Attitudes toward biotechnology in the European Union, Journal of Biotechnology, 98, 9-24.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
PRIEST S.H., BONFADELLI K., RUSANEN M., 2003, The trust gap hypothesis: predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors, Risk Analysis, 23(4), 75 1-766.
PROUTEAU L., WOLFF F.C., 2004, Relational goods and associational participation, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(3), 43 1-463.
- STURGIS P., COOPER H., FIFE-SCHAW C., 2005, Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public, New Genetics and Society, 24(1), 35-58.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- THEVENOT L., MOODY M., LAFAYE C., 2000, Forms of Valuing Nature: Arguments and Modes of Justification in French and American Environmental Disputes in LAMONT M., THEVENOT L. (eds.), Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 229272.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- THOMPSON P., 1997, Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective, London: Chapman & Hall.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- TODT 0., 2003, Designing trust, Futures, 35, 239-25 1.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- WOOLDRIGE J. (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now