- AREEDA P., TURNER D. (1975), Predatory Pricing and Related Practices Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 88, N4, 697-73 3.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- BANKER R., KEMERER C. (1994), <<Evidence on Economies of Scale in Software Development >~, Information & Software Technolog), Vol. 36, N5, 275-282.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
BANKER R., SLAUGHTER 5. (1997), <<A Field Study of Scale Economies in Software Maintenance >~, Management Science, Vol. 43, N 12, 1709-1725.
BAUMOL W. (1996), Predation and the Logic of the Average Variable Cost Test, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 39, N1, 49-72.
BENSON C., HANWECK C., HUMPHREY D. (1982), <<Scale Economies in Banking: A Restructuring and Reassessement >~, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 14, N 4, 435-456.
- BOYER K. (1996), <<Can Market Power Really Be Estimated? >~, Review of Industrial Organisation, Vol. 11, 115-124.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- CARLTON D., PERLOFF J. (1994), Modern Industrial Organisation, Reading, Addison - Wesley Longman.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
CARLTON D., WALDMAN M. (2002), <<The strategic use of tying to preserve and create market power in evolving industries >~, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 33, N2, 194-220.
- CLARK J., SPEAKER P. (1994), <<Economies of Scale and Scope in Banking: Evidence from a Generalised Translog Cost Function >~, Quarter!) Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 33, N2, 3-25.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- COHEN W. (1995), <<Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity >~, in Stoneman P. ed., Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford, Blackwell.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- COHEN W., LEVIN R., MOWERY D. (1987) <<Firm size and R&D intensity: A reexamination >~, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 35, N 4, 545-563.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- COWIE J., RIDDINGTON G. (1996), <<Measuring the efficiency of European railways >~, Applied Economics, Vol. 28, 1027-1035.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
DEMSETZ H. (1982), <<Barriers To Entry >~, The American Economic Review, Vol. 72, 47-57.
GAGNEPAIN P. (1998), <<Structures productives de lindustrie du transport urbain et effets des schemas reglementaires >~, Economic et Prevision, Vol. 135, N4, 95-107.
- GATHON H. (1987), <<Etude comparative de la performance des societes de transport urbain: une approche internationale >>, Revue dEconomie Régionale et Urbaine, N 4, 641-656.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- GENTHON C. (2004), Anai)se sectorielle. méthodologie et applications aux technologies de 1 `information, Paris, LHarmattan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- GILBERT R., KATZ M. (2001), An Economists Guide to U.S. vs. Microsoft, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15, N 2, 25-44.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
GISSER M., ALLEN M. (2001), One Monopoly Is Better Than Two: Antitrust Policy and Microsoft, Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 19, 211-225.
- HALL R. (1988), <<The Relationship between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry >~, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 70, 55-65.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
HYDE C., PERLOFF J. (1995), <<Can Market Power be Estimated `?>~, Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 10, 465-485.
KATRISHEN F., SCORDIS N. (1998), <<Economies of Scale in Services: A Study of Multinational Insurers >~, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 29, N 2, 305-324.
- KHAN S., ISLAM F., AHMED 5. (2004), <<Is Microsoft a Monopoly: An Empirical Test >~, American Business Review, Vol. 22, 130-134.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
KLEIN B. (2001), <<The Microsoft Case: What Can a Dominant Firm Do to Defend Its Market Position? >~, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15, N 2, 45-62.
- LECLERC A., FORTIN M., THIVIERGE C. (1999), <<Estimation des economies dechelle et de gamme dans les petites cooperatives de services financiers >~, AnnaL~ of Public and Cooperative Economics, Vol. 70, N 3, 447-475.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- LIEBENSTEIN H. (1966), ~<Allocative efficiency vs. X-efficiency >~, American Economic Review, Vol. 56, 392-4 15.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
MACDONALD J., OLLINGER M. (2000), <<Scale Economies and Consolidation in Hog Slaughter >~, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 82, N2, 334346.
- MCKENZIE R., LEE D. (2002), < How Digital Economies Revises Antitrust Thinking >~> in Slottje, op. cit., 175-210.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- MCNULTY J. (2000), <<Another Look at Scale Economies at Large Commercial Banks >>, American Business Review, Vol. 18, N 2, 96-104.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
PANZAR J., ROSSE J. (1987), <<Testing for Monopoly Equilibrium >~, The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 35, 443-456.
PLEATSIKAS C., TEECE D. (2001), <<The analysis of market definition and market power in the context of rapid innovation >~, International Journal of Industrial Organisation, n 19, 665-693.
REDDY B., EVANS D., NICOLS A., SCHMALENSEE R. (2001), <<A Monopolist Would Still Charge More for Windows: A Comment on Werden >~, Review of Industrial Organisation, Vol. 18, N 3, 263-268.
REDDY B., EVANS D., NICOLS A., SCHMALENSEE R. (2001), <<A Monopolist Would Still Charge More for Windows: A Comment on Werden s Reply >~, Review of Industrial Organisation, Vol. 18, N 3, 273-274.
- SCHMALENSEE R. (1999), <<Direct Testimony on the Microsoft Case >>, http :/Microsoft.comlpresspass/trial/schmal/schmal.asp (access the 28/10/2002).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
SHY 0. (2001), The Economics of Networks Industries, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- TEECE D., COLEMAN M. (1998), <<The meaning of monopoly: antitrust analysis in high-technology industries >>, The Antitrust Bulletin, Fall-Winter, 80 1-857.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- WEBSTER A., SCOTT R. (1996), <<Costs Structures and Economies of Scale for Efficiently Operated Banks >>, American Business Review, Vol. 14, N 2, 120-124.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
WERDEN C. (2001), <<Microsoft Pricing of Windows and the Economics of Derived Demand Monopoly >>, Review of Industrial Organisation, Vol. 18, N 3, 257-262.