Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
Reviewing Counterfactual Analyses to Assess Impacts of EU Rural Development Programmes: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the 2007–2013 Ex-Post Evaluations?. (2019). Blanco, Maria ; Castao, Javier ; Martinez, Pilar.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1105-:d:207509.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 13

Citations received by this document

Cites: 64

References cited by this document

Cocites: 43

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The Impact of RDP Measures on the Rural Development: The Case of Romania. (2022). Budic, Bogdan ; Dragomir, Laureniu ; Pirvu, Ramona ; Enea, Lili ; Dinulescu, Sorin ; Bratu, Rducu-Tefan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4857-:d:796547.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Winners and Losers of the CAP’s Rural Development Policy in Poland. (2022). Smoliska, Kinga ; Wickowska, Barbara ; Kiryluk-Dryjska, Ewa.
    In: Agriculture.
    RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:676-:d:812067.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The socioeconomic impacts of the CAP: Systematic literature review. (2022). Fertő, Imre ; Viira, Ants-Hannes ; Lillemets, Juri.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:114:y:2022:i:c:s0264837721006918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Evaluations of agri-environmental schemes based on observational farm data: The importance of covariate selection. (2022). Hüttel, Silke ; Huttel, Silke ; Petrick, Martin ; Uehleke, Reinhard.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:114:y:2022:i:c:s0264837721006736.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Environmental and farm impacts of the EU RDP agri-environmental measures: Evidence from Slovak regions. (2022). Michalek, Jerzy.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:113:y:2022:i:c:s0264837721006475.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. An integrated socio-cyber-physical system framework to assess responsible digitalisation in agriculture: A first application with Living Labs in Europe. (2022). Bartolini, Fabio ; Obi, Chinedu ; Ciliberti, Stefano ; Metta, Matteo ; Brunori, Gianluca ; Klerkx, Laurens.
    In: Agricultural Systems.
    RePEc:eee:agisys:v:203:y:2022:i:c:s0308521x2200169x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The Coevolution of Policy Support and Farmers Behaviour. An investigation on Italian agriculture over the 2008-2019 period.. (2022). Esposti, Roberto.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:anc:wpaper:464.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Impact of Changes to Procedures on the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Forms of Professional Activation in Poland. (2021). Dmytrow, Krzysztof ; Bieszk-Stolorz, Beata.
    In: Economies.
    RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:88-:d:567904.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Review of International Approaches to Evaluating Rural and Community Development Investment and Supports. (2021). , Seamusmcguinness ; McGuinness, Seamus ; Whelan, Adele ; Barrett, Alan.
    In: Research Series.
    RePEc:esr:resser:rs124.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The Effect of the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Program on Farm Income in South Korea. (2020). Park, Jong Hoon ; Choi, Eunji ; Lee, Seongwoo.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6877-:d:403417.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Improving the Landscape and Tourism in Marginal Areas: The Case of Land Consolidation Associations in the North-West of Italy. (2020). Beltramo, Riccardo ; Rostagno, Andrea ; Bonadonna, Alessandro.
    In: Land.
    RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:6:p:175-:d:364712.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Success or Waste of Taxpayer Money? Impact Assessment of Rural Development Programs in Hungary. (2019). Fertő, Imre ; Benedek, Zsófia ; Bakucs, Zoltan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2158-:d:221779.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Andersson A.; Höjgård S.; Rabinowicz E. Evaluation of results and adaptation of EU Rural Development Programmes. Land Use Policy 2017, 67, 298-314.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Arata L.; Sckokai P. The impact of agri-environmental schemes on farm performance in five EU member states: A DID-matching approach. Land Econ. 2016, 92, 167-186.

  3. Assessing RDP Achievements and Impacts in 2019. Part IV—Technical Annex; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Better Regulation Guidelines; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Cagliero R.; Cisilino F.; Scardera A. Evaluating Rural Development Programmes Using FADN Data. Rete Rurale Nazionale 2007–2013; Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali: Roma, Italy, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Can the Commission and the Member States Show that EU Budget Allocated to the Rural Development Policy Is Well Spent?; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. CAP Implementation: Flexibility Given to Member States—State of Play and Perspectives; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Capturing the Success of Your RDP: Guidelines for the ex Post Evaluation of 2007–2013 RDPs; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Colen L.; Gomez y Paloma S.; Latacz-Lohmann U.; Lefebvre M.; Préget R.; Thoyer S. Economic experiments as a tool for agricultural policy evaluation: Insights from the European CAP. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 2016, 64, 667-694.

  10. D’Alberto R.; Zavalloni M.; Raggi M.; Viaggi D. AES Impact Evaluation with Integrated Farm Data: Combining Statistical Matching and Propensity Score Matching. Sustainability 2018, 10.

  11. Design and Commissioning of Counterfactual Impact Evaluations. A Practical Guidance for ESF Managing Authorities; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Evaluación Intermedia Programa de Desarrollo Rural FEADER de la región de Murcia 2007–2013; Red2Red Consultores S.L.: Madrid, Spain, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Evaluating EU Activities: A Practical Guide for the Commission Services; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, 2004; ISBN 92-894-7928-0.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Evaluating EU Expenditure Programmes: A Guide. Ex Post and Intermediate Evaluation; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, 1997; ISBN 92-827-9436-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Ex Post Evaluation of Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013; European Economic and Social Committee: Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Ex Post Evaluation of the Rural Development Programme of Malta (2007–2013); KPMG Advisory Ltd.: Budapest, Hungary, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Ex-post Evaluation of Rural Development Programmes 2000–2006; Kantor Management Consultants and Institute for Rural Development Research (IfLS): Athens, Greece, 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Ex-Post Evaluation of the Rural Development Programme Ireland (2007–2013); Indecon International Economic Consultants in association with the Countryside and Community Research Institute (University of Gloucestershire): Dublin, Ireland, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Ex-Post Evaluation of the Scotland Rural Development Programme 2007–2013; Scottish Government: Edinburgh, UK, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Ex-Post Evaluation Study of the National Rural Development Programme 2007–2013; ACZ Consulting SRL: Craiova, Romania, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Gertler P.J.; Martinez S.; Premand P.; Rawlings L.B.; Vermeersch C.M. Impact Evaluation in Practice; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Giua M. Spatial discontinuity for the impact assessment of the EU regional policy: The case of Italian objective 1 regions. J. Reg. Sci. 2017, 57, 109-131.

  23. Grealis E.; O’Donoghue C. The Bio-Economy Input Output Model: Development and Uses; Teagasc Rural Economy Research Centre: Galway, Ireland, 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Guidelines for the Mid-term Evaluation of Rural Development Programmes 2000–2006 Supported from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation of the Rural Development Programmes; European Commission—Agriculture and Rural Development: Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Hazners J.; Benga E.; Veveris A. Evaluation of Latvian Rural Development Programme Measures with Propensity Score Matching. Recent Advances in Environmental Sciences and Financial Development, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Environment, Energy, Ecosystems and Development (EEEAD 2014), Athens, Greece, 28–30 November 2014; Europment: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2014; ISBN 978-1-61804-255-2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Heinrich C.; Maffioli A.; Vazquez G. A Primer for Applying Propensity-Score Matching; Inter-American Development Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.

  28. How to Apply for Microdata?; European Commission: Luxembourg, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Imbens G.W.; Lemieux T. Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. J. Econom. 2008, 142, 615-635.

  30. Informe de Evaluación ex-post del Programa de Desarrollo Rural de Castilla y León 2007–2013—Tomo I; FGUVA: Valladolid, Spain, 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Informe de Evaluación Expost Programa de Desarrollo Rural de la Región de Murcia 2007–2013; Red2Red Consultores S.L.: Madrid, Spain, 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Jacob R.; Zhu P.; Somers M.A.; Bloom H. A Practical Guide to Regression Discontinuity; MDRC: New York, NY, USA, 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Khandker S.R.; Koolwal G.B.; Samad H.A. Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Kirchweger S.; Kantelhardt J. The dynamic effects of government-supported farm-investment activities on structural change in Austrian agriculture. Land Use Policy 2015, 48, 73-93.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Kuhfuss L.; Subervie J. Do European Agri-environment Measures Help Reduce Herbicide Use? Evidence from Viticulture in France. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 149, 202-211.

  36. López L.A.; Monsalve F.; Zafrilla J.E. Análisis Input-Output de la eficacia de la Política Europea de Desarrollo Rural 2007–2013: Propuesta metodológica y resultados para Castilla-La Mancha. Estudios de economía aplicada 2011, 29, 8-23.

  37. Laporta L.; Martins H.; da Silva Vieira R.; Alves M.; Santos J.; Teixeira R.; Morais T.; Ferreira G.; Godinho R. Relatório Final da Avaliação Ex-post do Programa de Desenvolvimento Rural do Mainlande 2007–2013 (ProDeR); Domingos T.; Oliveira das Neves A.; Marta-Pedroso C. Instituto Superior Técnico, Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Económicos e Instituto Politécnico de Bragança: Bragança, Portugal, 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Leeuw F.L.; Vaessen J. Impact Evaluations and Development: NONIE Guidance on Impact Evaluation; Network of Networks on Impact Evaluation: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; ISBN 1-60244-120-0.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Loi M.; Rodrigues M. A Note on the Impact Evaluation of Public Policies: The Counterfactual Analysis; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2012.

  40. Matthews A. Member State CAP Allocations and Progress on the MFF (Online). 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Medonos T.; Ratinger T.; Hruska M.; Spicka J. The assessment of the effects of investment support measures of the Rural Development Programmes: The case of the Czech Republic. Agris on-line Pap. Econ. Inform. 2012, 4, 35.

  42. Methodological Assessment of Mid-term Evaluation Reports of 2007–2013 Rural Development Programmes; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Michalek J. Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of EU Rural Development Programmes—Propensity Score Matching Methodology Applied to Selected EU Member States. Volume 1: A Micro-level Approach; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Michalek J. Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of EU Rural Development Programmes—Propensity Score Matching Methodology Applied to Selected EU Member States. Volume 2: A Regional Approach; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2012.

  45. Michalek J.; Ciaian P.; Kancs D.A. Investment crowding out: Firm-level evidence from northern Germany. Reg. Stud. 2016, 50, 1579-1594.

  46. Monsalve F.; Zafrilla J.E.; Cadarso M.Á. Where have all the funds gone? Multiregional input-output analysis of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development. Ecol. Econ. 2016, 129, 62-71.

  47. Morton M. Applicability of impact evaluation to cohesion policy. An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations; Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI): Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Papadopoulou E.; Papalexiou C.; Hasanagas N. Participatory evaluation of rural development programmes: A qualitative approach in the case of modernisation of agricultural holdings in Greece. Reg. Sci. Inq. J. 2012, 4, 81-94.

  49. Pellegrini G.; Terribile F.; Tarola O.; Muccigrosso T.; Busillo F. Measuring the effects of European Regional Policy on economic growth: A regression discontinuity approach. Reg. Sci. 2013, 92, 217-233.

  50. Poppe K.; Vrolijk H. Microdata: A critical source for policy evaluation. EuroChoices 2018, 17, 28-35.

  51. Pufahl A.; Weiss C.R. Evaluating the effects of farm programmes: results from propensity score matching. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2009, 36, 79-101.

  52. Rural Development 2007–2013—Handbook on Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework. Guidance Document; Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development: Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Rural Development 2014–2020—Country Files. Various Fiches (Online).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Rural Development in the European Union. Statistical and Economic Information. Report 2013; Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Rural Development in the European Union—Statistical and Economic Information—Report 2008; European Union, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development: Brussels, Belgium, 2008. RDP Public Expenditures.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Rural Development Programme for Malta 2007–2013. Mid-term Evaluation Report; Adi Associates Environmental Consultants Ltd.: San Gwann, Malta, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Schroeder L.A.; Gocht A.; Britz W. The impact of pillar II funding: Validation from a modelling and evaluation perspective. J. Agric. Econ. 2015, 66, 415-441.

  58. Strengthening the Foundations of Smart Regulation—Improving Evaluation; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Technical Handbook on the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework of the Common Agricultural Policy 2014–2020; Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development: Brussels, Belgium, 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Terluin I.J.; Roza P. Evaluation Methods for Rural Policy; LEI—Wageningen UR: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2010; ISBN 978-90-8615-423-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. The Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the Common Agricultural Policy 2014–2020; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2015; ISBN 978-92-79-43025-1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Udagawa C.; Hodge I.; Reader M. Farm level costs of Agri-environment measures: The impact of entry level stewardship on cereal farm incomes. J. Agric. Econ. 2014, 65, 212-233.

  63. Vidueira P.; Rivera M.; Mesa B.; Díaz-Puente J.M. Mid-Term Impact Estimation on Evaluations of Rural Development Programs. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 191, 1596-1600.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Working Paper on Approaches for Assessing the Impacts of the Rural Development Programmes in the Context of Multiple Intervening Factors; Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Did crop diversity criterion from CAP green payments affect both economic and environmental farm performances? Quasi-experimental evidence from France. (2025). Vdrine, Lionel ; Diop, Thierno Bocar.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:227:y:2025:i:c:s0921800924003021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. How Differently Do Farms Respond to Agri-environmental Policies? A Probabilistic Machine-Learning Approach. (2024). Varacca, Alessandro ; Esposti, Roberto ; Coderoni, Silvia.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:100:y:2024:i:2:p:370-397.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Linking innovations adoption with farm sustainability: Empirical evidence from rainwater harvesting and fertilizer micro-dosing in Tanzania. (2024). Sckokai, Paolo ; Rommel, Jens ; Mausch, Kai ; Jaramillo, Diana Escobar ; Fasse, Anja ; Chopin, Pierre ; Arata, Linda.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:183:y:2024:i:c:s0305750x2400202x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Unraveling spatial agglomeration patterns in agri-environmental schemes: Evidence from the improvement of steppe habitats in the Natura 2000 network in Catalonia (Spain). (2024). Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio ; Pierri-Daunt, Ana Beatriz ; Perez-Sanchez, Cristina.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:142:y:2024:i:c:s026483772400098x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. A European perspective on acceptability of innovative agri-environment-climate contract solutions. (2024). Bartolini, F ; Schaller, L ; Targetti, S ; Viaggi, D ; D'Alberto, R ; Vergamini, D ; Runge, T ; Nikolov, D ; le Gloux, F ; Harmanny, K ; Haltia, E ; Eichhorn, T.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:141:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724000723.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Economic and Environmental Efficiency, Subsidies and Spatio-Temporal Effects in Agriculture. (2024). Galli, Federica ; Bernini, Cristina.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:218:y:2024:i:c:s092180092400017x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Do agri-environment measures help improve environmental and economic efficiency? Evidence from Bavarian dairy farmers. (2023). Sauer, Johannes ; Mennig, Philipp ; Sidhoum, Amer Ait.
    In: European Review of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:oup:erevae:v:50:y:2023:i:3:p:918-953..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Sustainable Intensification Farming as an Enabler for Farm Eco-Efficiency?. (2023). Huttel, Silke ; Weltin, Meike.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:84:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-022-00718-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The capitalization of CAP subsidies into land prices in the EU. (2023). Ciaian, Pavel ; Baldoni, Edoardo.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:134:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723003666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Sustainability strategies and stakeholder management for upland farming. (2023). Yagi, Hironori ; Garrod, Guy ; Ogawa, Keishi.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:131:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723001734.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. A birds eye view of farm size and biodiversity: The ecological legacy of the iron curtain. (2022). Levers, Christian ; Kamp, Johannes ; Larsen, Ashley ; Noack, Frederik.
    In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:104:y:2022:i:4:p:1460-1484.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Combining the best of two methodological worlds? Integrating Q methodology-based farmer archetypes in a quantitative model of agri-environmental scheme uptake. (2022). Uehleke, Reinhard ; Braito, Michael ; Leonhardt, Heidi.
    In: Agriculture and Human Values.
    RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:39:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10460-021-10242-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Using Machine Learning to Identify Heterogeneous Impacts of Agri-Environment Schemes in the EU: A Case Study. (2022). Sauer, Johannes ; Mennig, Philipp ; Stetter, Christian.
    In: European Review of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:oup:erevae:v:49:y:2022:i:4:p:723-759..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Evaluations of agri-environmental schemes based on observational farm data: The importance of covariate selection. (2022). Hüttel, Silke ; Huttel, Silke ; Petrick, Martin ; Uehleke, Reinhard.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:114:y:2022:i:c:s0264837721006736.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Environmental and farm impacts of the EU RDP agri-environmental measures: Evidence from Slovak regions. (2022). Michalek, Jerzy.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:113:y:2022:i:c:s0264837721006475.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Technical change and the Common Agricultural Policy. (2022). Vigani, Mauro ; Khafagy, Amr.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:109:y:2022:i:c:s0306919222000483.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Enhancing the efficiency of governmental intervention in the venture capital market: The monitoring effect. (2022). Kwak, Gihyun ; Jang, Pilseong ; Oh, Seunghwan.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:75:y:2022:i:c:p:450-463.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Who participates in agri-environmental schemes? A mixed-methods approach to investigate the role of farmer archetypes in scheme uptake and participation level. (2021). Uehleke, Reinhard ; Braito, Michael ; Leonhardt, Heidi.
    In: FORLand Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:forlwp:272021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Are Grassland Conservation Programs a Cost-Effective Way to Fight Climate Change? Evidence from France. (2021). Chabé-Ferret, Sylvain ; Voia, Anca ; Chabe-Ferret, Sylvain.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:125928.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Ex-ante assessment of the cost-effectiveness of public policies to sequester carbon in soils. (2021). Sierra, Jorge ; Thomas, Alban ; Moulla, Sarah ; Guinde, Loic ; Causeret, Franois ; Paul, Jacky ; Julie, Subervie ; Blazy, Jean-Marc.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03340601.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. FADN data to support policymaking: The potential of an additional survey. (2021). Zanuttig, Gabriele ; Zilli, Greta ; Cisilino, Federica.
    In: ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE.
    RePEc:fan:ecaqec:v:html10.3280/ecag2021oa12756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Do differential payments for agri-environment schemes affect the environmental benefits? A case study in the North-Eastern Italy. (2021). Povellato, Andrea ; Longhitano, Davide ; Vergamini, Daniele ; Bartolini, Fabio.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:107:y:2021:i:c:s0264837719305976.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy. (2021). Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio ; Herzon, Irina ; Kovacs, Eszter ; Brown, Calum ; Zinngrebe, Yves ; Olsson, Johanna Alkan ; McCracken, Davy ; Grammatikopoulou, Ioanna ; Galanaki, Antonia ; Albizua, Amaia.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:101:y:2021:i:c:s0264837720304865.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Ex-ante assessment of the cost-effectiveness of public policies to sequester carbon in soils. (2021). Sierra, J ; Thomas, A ; Moulla, S ; Guinde, L ; Causeret, F ; Paul, J ; Subervie, J ; Blazy, J.-M., .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:190:y:2021:i:c:s092180092100272x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Estimating the effects of agri-environmental measures using difference-in-difference coarsened exact matching. (2020). Olper, Alessandro ; Curzi, Daniele ; Aletti, Giacomo ; Bertoni, Danilo.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:90:y:2020:i:c:s0306919219306128.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Die Wirkung von Agrarumweltmaßnahmen auf betriebliche Stickstoffbilanzen – Empirische Ergebnisse aus Nordrhein-Westfalen. (2020). Schwarze, Stefan ; Roggendorf, Wolfgang.
    In: 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020.
    RePEc:ags:gewi18:305604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Are Grassland Conservation Programs a Cost-Effective Way to Fight Climate Change? Evidence from France. (2019). Voia, Anca ; Chab-Ferret, Sylvain.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:cx8j6_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Reviewing Counterfactual Analyses to Assess Impacts of EU Rural Development Programmes: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the 2007–2013 Ex-Post Evaluations?. (2019). Blanco, Maria ; Castao, Javier ; Martinez, Pilar.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1105-:d:207509.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Understanding the Spatial Agglomeration of Participation in Agri-Environmental Schemes: The Case of the Tuscany Region. (2019). Vergamini, Daniele ; Bartolini, Fabio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2753-:d:230994.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Rural development programs’ impact on environment: An ex-post evaluation of organic faming. (2019). Bodini, Antonella ; Cisilino, Federica ; Zanoli, Agostina.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:85:y:2019:i:c:p:454-462.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Assessing the effectiveness of Japans community-based direct payment scheme for hilly and mountainous areas. (2019). Feuer, Hart ; Kitano, Shinichi ; Ito, Junichi ; Asahi, Haruka.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:160:y:2019:i:c:p:62-75.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Large-scale Irrigation Impacts Socio-cultural Values: An Example from Rural Navarre, Spain. (2019). Corbera, Esteve ; Pascual, Unai ; Albizua, Amaia.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:159:y:2019:i:c:p:354-361.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Do european agri-environment measures help reduce herbicide use ? Evidence from viticulture in France. (2018). Kuhfuss, Laure ; Subervie, Julie.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02109204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. AES Impact Evaluation With Integrated Farm Data: Combining Statistical Matching and Propensity Score Matching. (2018). Viaggi, Davide ; Raggi, Meri ; Dalberto, Riccardo ; Zavalloni, Matteo.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4320-:d:184432.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Do European Agri-environment Measures Help Reduce Herbicide Use? Evidence From Viticulture in France. (2018). Subervie, Julie ; Kuhfuss, Laure.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:149:y:2018:i:c:p:202-211.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Exploring Agri-environmental effectiveness using counterfactual analysis. (2018). Lasorella, Maria Valentina ; Zanoli, Agostina ; Bodini, Antonella ; Cisilino, Federica .
    In: 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary.
    RePEc:ags:eaa162:271958.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Economic and social impact of grape growing in Northeastern Brazil. (2018). Sckokai, Paolo ; Hauschild, Sofia ; Arata, Linda.
    In: Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal.
    RePEc:ags:aieabj:276297.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Uptake and Additionality in a Green Payment Program: A Panel Data Study of the Maryland Cover Crop Program. (2018). Newburn, David ; Lichtenberg, Erik ; Wang, Haoluan.
    In: 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea18:274455.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Socio-economic impact of grape growing in North-eastern Brazil. (2017). Sckokai, Paolo ; Hauschild, Sofia ; Arata, Linda.
    In: 2017 Sixth AIEAA Conference, June 15-16, Piacenza, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:aiea17:261264.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-03-11 18:38:46 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.