Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?. (2018). , Tom ; Blees, Tom ; Brook, Barry W ; Hong, Sanghyun.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:302-:d:128486.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 91

References cited by this document

Cocites: 29

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Strategic Planning of Oil and Gas Companies: The Decarbonization Transition. (2022). Rutenko, Evgeniya ; Cherepovitsyn, Alexey.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6163-:d:896980.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Energy and Climate Policy—An Evaluation of Global Climate Change Expenditure 2011–2018. (2020). Connolly, Ronan ; Quinn, Gerre ; Ohaiseadha, Coilin ; Soon, Willie.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4839-:d:414440.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Internet of Energy (IoE) and High-Renewables Electricity System Market Design. (2019). Fomina, Alena ; Streimikiene, Dalia ; Strielkowski, Wadim ; Semenova, Elena.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:24:p:4790-:d:298423.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. At the crossroads: An uncertain future facing the electricity‐generation sector in South Korea. (2018). Hong, Sanghyun ; Brook, Barry W.
    In: Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies.
    RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:5:y:2018:i:3:p:522-532.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alonso A.; Brook B.W.; Meneley D.A.; Misak J.; Blees T.; van Erp J.B. Why nuclear energy is essential to reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emission rates. EPJ Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2015, 1, 3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Alvarez R.A.; Pacala S.W.; Winebrake J.J.; Chameides W.L.; Hamburg S.P. Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 6435-6440.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Baek J. Do nuclear and renewable energy improve the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 66, 352-356.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Bird D.K.; Haynes K.; van den Honert R.; McAneney J.; Poortinga W. Nuclear power in Australia: A comparative analysis of public opinion regarding climate change and the Fukushima disaster. Energy Policy 2014, 65, 644-653.

  5. Birol F.; Besson C. World Energy Outlook 2012-Special Report-Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas, World Energy Outlook Special Report on Unconventional Gas; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bistline J.E.; Blanford G.J. More than one arrow in the quiver: Why “100% renewables” misses the mark. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E3988.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Blees T. Prescription for the Planet: The Painless Remedy for Our Energy & Environmental Crises; Booksurge: Charleston, SC, USA, 2008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Boldon L.M.; Sabharwall P. Small Modular Reactor: First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) and Nth-of-a-Kind (NOAK) Economic Analysis; Idaho National Lab.(INL): Idaho Falls, ID, USA, 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Bradbury K.; Pratson L.; Patiño-Echeverri D. Economic viability of energy storage systems based on price arbitrage potential in real-time U.S. electricity markets. Appl. Energy 2014, 114, 512-519.

  10. Breyer C.; Bogdanov D.; Komoto K.; Ehara T.; Song J.; Enebish N. North-East Asian super grid: Renewable energy mix and economics. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 54, 08KJ01.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Brook B.W. Could nuclear fission energy, etc., solve the greenhouse problem? The affirmative case. Energy Policy 2012, 42, 4-8.

  12. Brook B.W.; Blomqvist L. Innovations and limits in methods of forecasting global environmental change. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2016, 17, 565-575.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Brook B.W.; van Erp J.B.; Meneley D.A.; Blees T.A. The case for a near-term commercial demonstration of the Integral Fast Reactor. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2015, 3, 2-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Buttler A.; Dinkel F.; Franz S.; Spliethoff H. Variability of wind and solar power—An assessment of the current situation in the European Union based on the year 2014. Energy 2016, 106, 147-161. Trembath A.; Jenkins J. Gas Boom Poses Challenges for Renewables and Nuclear.

  15. Clarke L.; Edmonds J.; Jacoby J.; Pitcher H.; Reilly J.; Richels R.; Parson E.; Burkett V.; Fisher-Vanden K.; Keith D. Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations; Department of Energy, Office of Biological & Environmental Research: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Clinton W.J. U.S. President: 1993 State of the Union Address; Addressed before a Joint Session of Congress on Administration Goals; Washington, DC, USA, 1993. GIF Portal.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Cochran J.; Mai T.; Bazilian M. Meta-analysis of high penetration renewable energy scenarios. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 29, 246-253.

  18. Connolly D.; Lund H.; Mathiesen B.V. Smart snergy Europe: The technical and economic impact of one potential 100% renewable energy scenario for the European Union. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 60, 1634-1653.

  19. De Gouw J.A.; Parrish D.D.; Frost G.J.; Trainer M. Reduced emissions of CO2, NOx, and SO2 from U.S. power plants owing to switch from coal to natural gas with combined cycle technology. Earth’s Future 2014, 2, 75-82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Delucchi M.A.; Jacobson M.Z. Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 1170-1190.

  21. Demirbas A. Energy from boron and non-nuclear metallic fuels. Energy Sources Part A 2008, 30, 1108-1113.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Dubberley A.E.; Boardman C.E.; Carroll D.G.; Ehrman C.; Walter C.E. S-PRISM Fuel Cycle Study; ICAPP: Cordoba, Spain, 2003; pp. 4-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Eerkens J.W. The Nuclear Imperative; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Elliston B.; Diesendorf M.; MacGill I. Simulations of scenarios with 100% renewable electricity in the Australian National Electricity Market. Energy Policy 2012, 45, 606-613.

  25. Forsberg C.W. Nuclear energy for a low-carbon-dioxide-emission transportation system with liquid fuels. Nucl. Technol. 2008, 164, 348-367.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Frew B.A.; Becker S.; Dvorak M.J.; Andresen G.B.; Jacobson M.Z. Flexibility mechanisms and pathways to a highly renewable US electricity future. Energy 2016, 101, 65-78.

  27. Gaede J.; Meadowcroft J. Carbon Capture and Storage Demonstration and Low-Carbon Energy Transitions: Explaining Limited Progress. The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy; Graaf T.V.D.; Sovacool B.K.; Ghosh A.; Kern F.; Klare M.T. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK, 2016; pp. 319-340.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Gerland P.; Raftery A.E.; Ševčíková H.; Li N.; Gu D.; Spoorenberg T.; Alkema L.; Fosdick B.K.; Chunn J.; Lalic N. World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science 2014, 346, 234-237.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Haegel N.M.; Margolis R.; Buonassisi T.; Feldman D.; Froitzheim A.; Garabedian R.; Green M.; Glunz S.; Henning H.-M.; Holder B. Terawatt-scale photovoltaics: Trajectories and challenges. Science 2017, 356, 141-143.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Hannum W.H. The technology of the integral fast reactor and its associated fuel cycle. Prog. Nucl. Energy 1997, 31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Hansen J.; Kharecha P.; Sato M.; Masson-Delmotte V.; Ackerman F.; Beerling D.J.; Hearty P.J.; Hoegh-Guldberg O.; Hsu S.-L.; Parmesan C. Assessing “dangerous climate change”: Required reduction of carbon emissions to protect young people, future generations and nature. PLoS ONE 2013, 8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Haubenreich P.N.; Engel J. Experience with the molten-salt reactor experiment. Nucl. Appl. Technol. 1970, 8, 118-136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Hayden H. The Solar Fraud; Vales Lake: Pueblo West, CO, USA, 2004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Health Risk Assessment: From the Nuclear Accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami: Based on a Preliminary Dose Estimation; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. Fast Neutron Reactors.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Heard B.P.; Brook B.W.; Wigley T.M.L.; Bradshaw C.J.A. Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 1122-1133.

  36. Hoffert M.I.; Caldeira K.; Benford G.; Criswell D.R.; Green C.; Herzog H.; Jain A.K.; Kheshgi H.S.; Lackner K.S.; Lewis J.S. Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: Energy for a greenhouse planet. Science 2002, 298, 981-987.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Hohmeyer O.H.; Bohm S. Trends toward 100% renewable electricity supply in Germany and Europe: A paradigm shift in energy policies. WIREs Energy Environ. 2015, 4, 74-97.

  38. Hong S.; Bradshaw C.J.A.; Brook B.W. Nuclear power can reduce emissions and maintain a strong economy: Rating Australia’s optimal future electricity-generation mix by technologies and policies. Appl. Energy 2014, 136, 712-725.

  39. Hong S.; Brook B.W. A nuclear-to-gas transition in South Korea: Is it environmentally friendly or economically viable?. Energy Policy 2018, 112, 67-73.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Hong S.; Qvist S.; Brook B.W. Economic and environmental costs of replacing nuclear fission with solar and wind energy in Sweden. Energy Policy 2018, 112, 56-66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Hughes J.D. Energy: A reality check on the shale revolution. Nature 2013, 494, 307-308.

  42. International Energy Outlook 2016; Energy Information Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Jacobson M.Z.; Delucchi M.A. A path to sustainable energy by 2030. Sci. Am. 2009, 301, 58-65.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Jacobson M.Z.; Delucchi M.A. Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 1154-1169.

  45. Jacobson M.Z.; Delucchi M.A.; Bauer Z.A.F.; Goodman S.C.; Chapman W.E.; Cameron M.A.; Bozonnat C.; Chobadi L.; Clonts H.A.; Enevoldsen P. 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight all-sector energy roadmaps for 139 countries of the world. Joule 2017, 1, 108-121.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Jacobson M.Z.; Delucchi M.A.; Cameron M.A.; Frew B.A. Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 15060-15065.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Kerr R.A. Technology is turning U.S. oil around but not the world’s. Science 2012, 335, 522-523.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Kong Z.; Dong X.; Zhou Z. Seasonal imbalances in natural gas imports in major Northeast Asian countries: Variations, reasons, outlooks and countermeasures. Sustainability 2015, 7, 1690-1711.

  49. Koomey J.; Hultman N.E. A reactor-level analysis of busbar costs for US nuclear plants, 1970–2005. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 5630-5642.

  50. Kriegler E.; Luderer G.; Rogelj J.; Riahi K.; Schaeffer M.; Pietzcker R.C.; Krey V. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 519-527.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  51. Li Y.; Cao H.; Wang S.; Jin Y.; Li D.; Wang X.; Ding Y. Load shifting of nuclear power plants using cryogenic energy storage technology. Appl. Energy 2014, 113, 1710-1716.

  52. Lightfoot H.D.; Manheimer W.; Meneley D.A.; Pendergast D.; Stanford G.S. Nuclear fission fuel is inexhaustible. Proceedings of the EIC Climate Change Technology, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 10–12 May 2006, ; pp. 1-8. Shuster J.; Archambeau C.; Blees T.; Chang T.; Hunter R.; Ware R.; Wooley J. Economic and Business Case for the Pyroprocessing of Spent Nuclear Fuel (Snf): 100 Ton/Yr Pyroprocessing Demonstration Plant. Multilateral Approaches to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Preliminary Views of the IAEA Secretariat for the Proposed Study. Fukushima Accident—World Nuclear Association.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Lovering J.R.; Yip A.; Nordhaus T. Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors. Energy Policy 2016, 91, 371-382. GE Hitachi PRISM|The future of nuclear energy.

  54. Luo X.; Wang J.; Dooner M.; Clarke J. Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation. Appl. Energy 2015, 137, 511-536.

  55. Lynas M. The God Species: How the Planet Can Survive the Age of Humans; Fourth Estate: London, UK, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  56. MacDonald A.E.; Clack C.T.M.; Alexander A.; Dunbar A.; Wilczak J.; Xie Y. Future cost-competitive electricity systems and their impact on US CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 6, 526-531.

  57. MacKay D.J.C. Sustainable energy—Without the hot air. Am. J. Phys. 2010, 78, 222-223.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Mountouris A.; Voutsas E.; Tassios D. Solid waste plasma gasification: Equilibrium model development and exergy analysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 2006, 47, 1723-1737.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  59. Murakami K.; Ida T.; Tanaka M.; Friedman L. Consumers’ willingness to pay for renewable and nuclear energy: A comparative analysis between the US and Japan. Energy Econ. 2015, 50, 178-189.

  60. Myhrvold N.P.; Caldeira K. Greenhouse gases, climate change and the transition from coal to low-carbon electricity. Environ. Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 014019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Nicholson M.; Biegler T.; Brook B.W. How carbon pricing changes the relative competitiveness of low-carbon baseload generating technologies. Energy 2011, 36, 305-313.

  62. Orhan M.F.; Dincer I.; Naterer G.F.; Rosen M.A. Coupling of copper–chloride hybrid thermochemical water splitting cycle with a desalination plant for hydrogen production from nuclear energy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 1560-1574.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Parker D.T. Building Victory: Aircraft Manufacturing in the Los Angeles Area in World War II; Cypress: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Pielke R.; Wigley T.M.L.; Green C. Dangerous assumptions. Nature 2008, 452, 531-532.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  65. Prins G.; Rayner S. Time to ditch Kyoto. Nature 2007, 449, 973-975.

  66. Purvins A.; Papaioannou I.T.; Debarberis L. Application of battery-based storage systems in household-demand smoothening in electricity-distribution grids. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 65, 272-284. Powerwall|The Tesla Home Battery.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  67. Qvist S.A.; Brook B.W. Environmental and health impacts of a policy to phase out nuclear power in Sweden. Energy Policy 2015, 84, 1-10.

  68. Raftery A.E.; Li N.; Ševčíková H.; Gerland P.; Heilig G.K. Bayesian probabilistic population projections for all countries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 13915-13921. Ras Al Khair Desalination Plant, Saudi Arabia.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  69. Rangel L.E.; Leveque F. Revisiting the cost escalation curse of nuclear power: New lessons from the french experience. Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 2015, 4.

  70. Renn O.; Marshall J.P. Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “Energiewende”. Energy Policy 2016, 99, 224-232.

  71. Report for Review of the Black System South Australia Report; Australia Energy Market Operator: Melbourne, Australia, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Rittel H.W.J.; Webber M.M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 1973, 4, 155-169. Trembath A.; Pielke R.; Nordhaus T.; Caine M.; Moss T.; Sarewitz D.; Shellenberger M.; Lloyd J.; Roy J.; Margonelli L. Our High-Energy Planet: A Climate Pragmatism Project.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  73. Shannon M.A.; Bohn P.W.; Elimelech M.; Georgiadis J.G.; Mariñas B.J.; Mayes A.M. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 2008, 452, 301-310.

  74. Sims R.E.H.; Schock R.N.; Adegbululgbe A.; Fenhann J.; Konstantinaviciute I.; Moomaw W.; Nimir H.B.; Schlamadinger B. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 (AR4)—Climate Change 2007: Working Group III: Mitigation of Climate Change; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Cambridge, UK, 2007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  75. Smil V. Energy Myths and Realities: Bringing Science to the Energy Policy Debate; Government Institutes: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.

  76. Smil V. Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects; Praeger: Toronto, AB, Canada, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  77. Smith S.J.; Edmonds J.; Hartin C.A.; Mundra A.; Calvin K. Near-term acceleration in the rate of temperature change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 333-336.

  78. Steinke F.; Wolfrum P.; Hoffmann C. Grid vs. storage in a 100% renewable Europe. Renew. Energy 2013, 50, 826-832.

  79. Technical Committee Meeting on Evaluation of Radioactive Materials Release and Sodium Fires in Fast Reactors; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 1996.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Till C.E.; Chang Y.I. Plentiful Energy: The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor; CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform: Idaho Falls, ID, USA, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  81. Trainer T. Can renewables etc. solve the greenhouse problem? The negative case. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 4107-4114.

  82. Triplett B.S.; Loewen E.P.; Dooies B.J. PRISM: A competitive small modular sodium-cooled reactor. Nucl. Technol. 2012, 178, 186-200.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Truong C.N.; Naumann M.; Karl R.C.; Müller M.; Jossen A.; Hesse H.C. Economics of Residential Photovoltaic Battery Systems in Germany: The Case of Tesla’s Powerwall. Batteries 2016, 2, 14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  84. Van den Broek M.; Berghout N.; Rubin E.S. The potential of renewables versus natural gas with CO2 capture and storage for power generation under CO2 constraints. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 49, 1296-1322.

  85. Verbruggen A. Renewable and nuclear power: A common future?. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 4036-4047.

  86. Wigley T.M.L. Coal to gas: The influence of methane leakage. Clim. Chang. 2011, 108, 601-608.

  87. Wilson I.A.G.; Rennie A.J.R.; Ding Y.; Eames P.C.; Hall P.J.; Kelly N.J. Historical daily gas and electrical energy flows through Great Britain’s transmission networks and the decarbonisation of domestic heat. Energy Policy 2013, 61, 301-305.

  88. World Energy Outlook 2016; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Zero Carbon Australia Stationary Energy Plan; Beyond Zero Emissions: Melbourne, Australia, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Ziolkowska J.R. Is Desalination Affordable?—Regional Cost and Price Analysis. Water Resour. Manag. 2015, 29, 1385-1397.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Zweibel K.; Mason J.; Fthenakis V. A solar grand plan. Sci. Am. 2008, 298, 64-73.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Banks’ environmental policies and banks’ financial stability. (2024). Pisera, Stefano ; Paltrinieri, Andrea ; Goodell, John W ; Dreassi, Alberto ; Chiaramonte, Laura.
    In: Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money.
    RePEc:eee:intfin:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s1042443123001956.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. How Tripartite Stakeholders Promote Green Technology Innovation of China’s Heavily Polluting Enterprises?. (2023). Sun, Jun ; Hu, Shiliang ; Huang, Yongchun ; Zhao, Ying.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9650-:d:1172484.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Identifying and Explaining Public Preferences for Renewable Energy Sources in Qatar. (2022). Nassar, Ahmed K.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13835-:d:952530.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Risk Perceptions and Amplification Effects over Time: Evaluating Fukushima Longitudinal Surveys. (2022). Pijawka, David K ; Opejin, Adenike ; Hagen, Bjoern.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7896-:d:850846.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The future of nuclear energy in India: Evidence from a nationwide survey. (2021). Silva, Carol L ; Jenkins-Smith, Hank C ; Fox, Andrew S ; Ripberger, Joseph T ; Gupta, Kuhika.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:156:y:2021:i:c:s0301421521002585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Application of a novel structure-adaptative grey model with adjustable time power item for nuclear energy consumption forecasting. (2021). Zhou, Weijie ; Wu, Shu ; Li, Ruojin ; Ding, Song.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:298:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921005572.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Preferences for Nuclear Power in Post-Fukushima Japan: Evidence from a Large Nationwide Household Survey. (2020). schröder, carsten ; Rehdanz, Katrin ; Okubo, Toshihiro ; Schroder, Carsten ; Narita, Daiju.
    In: EconStor Open Access Articles.
    RePEc:zbw:espost:223358.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Clusterization of public perception of nuclear energy in relation to changing political priorities. (2020). Kriktolaitis, Ria Ardas ; Genys, Dainius.
    In: Insights into Regional Development.
    RePEc:ssi:jouird:v:2:y:2020:i:4:p:750-764.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Rare disaster and renewable energy in the USA: new insights from wavelet coherence and rolling-window analysis. (2020). Sharif, Arshian ; Ahmad, Hafizah Hammad ; Aman, Ameenullah ; Dogan, Eyup ; Zaighum, Isma.
    In: Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards.
    RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:103:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04100-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The economic cost of natural disasters the case of the tsunami and nuclear emergency in Japan in 2011. (2020). Giraldo, Sebastian ; Ospina-Valencia, Sebastian ; Barrientos-Marin, Jorge Hugo.
    In: Lecturas de Economía.
    RePEc:lde:journl:y:2020:i:93:p:225-260.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Preferences for nuclear power in post-Fukushima Japan: Evidence from a large nationwide household survey. (2020). schröder, carsten ; Rehdanz, Katrin ; Okubo, Toshihiro ; Narita, Daiju.
    In: Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:keo:dpaper:2020-003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Clusterization of public perception of nuclear energy in relation to changing political priorities. (2020). Kriktolaitis, Riardas ; Genys, Dainius.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03271859.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Preferences for Nuclear Power in Post-Fukushima Japan: Evidence from a Large Nationwide Household Survey. (2020). schröder, carsten ; Rehdanz, Katrin ; Okubo, Toshihiro ; Narita, Daiju.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:11:p:2938-:d:368759.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Understanding the coevolution of electricity markets and regulation. (2020). van Ackere, Ann ; Larsen, Erik Reimer ; Gencer, Busra.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:143:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520303256.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Environmental beliefs and public acceptance of nuclear energy in China: A moderated mediation analysis. (2020). Gu, Jibao ; Wu, Jianlin ; Li, Yazhou ; Wang, Jing ; Xu, Shuo.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:137:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519307281.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Visitors’ preferences of renewable energy options in “green” hotels. (2019). Martinat, S ; Buchecker, M ; Picha, K ; Navratil, J ; Knotek, J ; Brezinova, M ; Svec, R.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:138:y:2019:i:c:p:1065-1077.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Factors influencing the electricity generation preferences of Turkish citizens: Citizens attitudes and policy recommendations in the context of climate change and environmental impact. (2019). Ozcan, Mustafa.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:132:y:2019:i:c:p:381-393.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?. (2018). , Tom ; Blees, Tom ; Brook, Barry W ; Hong, Sanghyun.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:302-:d:128486.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Property values and tax rates near spent nuclear fuel storage. (2018). Munro, Kirstin ; Tolley, George .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:123:y:2018:i:c:p:433-442.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Out of sight, out of mind? Investigating the longitudinal impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on public opinion in the United States. (2018). Soni, Anmol .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:122:y:2018:i:c:p:169-175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Turkish public preferences for energy. (2018). Ediger, Volkan ; Kentmen-In, Idem ; Ucal, Meltem ; Elebi, Emre ; Kirkil, Gokhan.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:120:y:2018:i:c:p:492-502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Technical and social problems of nuclear waste. (2018). Ramana, M V.
    In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment.
    RePEc:bla:wireae:v:7:y:2018:i:4:n:e289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Swaying public opinion on nuclear energy: A field experiment in Hong Kong. (2017). Kwok, Tin Fai ; Xu, Yuan ; Yeung, Chung Hang .
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:46:y:2017:i:c:p:48-57.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. When it is unfamiliar to me: Local acceptance of planned nuclear power plants in China in the post-fukushima era. (2017). Ren, Tao ; Guo, Yue.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:100:y:2017:i:c:p:113-125.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Revisiting the relationships between non-renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Iran. (2016). Esfahani, Mohammad Nasre ; Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:71124.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Post-Fukushima public acceptance on resuming the nuclear power program in China. (2016). Sun, Chuanwang ; Meng, Xiaochun ; Zhu, Xiting .
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:685-694.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Chinese Public Willingness to Pay to Avoid Having Nuclear Power Plants in the Neighborhood. (2014). Sun, Chuanwang ; Ouyang, Xiaoling ; Lyu, Nan .
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:10:p:7197-7223:d:41315.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-03-10 23:53:17 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.