Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Electric Vehicles Ready for Breakthrough in MaaS? Consumer Adoption of E-Car Sharing and E-Scooter Sharing as a Part of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS). (2021). Hampl, Nina ; Brezovec, Paula.
In: Energies.
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:1088-:d:502199.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 6

Citations received by this document

Cites: 79

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. User preference and willingness-to-pay for operation strategies that enhance safety and convenience of E-scooter sharing services. (2024). Yang, Byungsoo ; Chung, Yongjin ; Kang, Seongmin ; Kim, Jinhee ; Lee, Jun.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:146:y:2024:i:c:p:31-41.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Designing corporate mobility as a service – Decision support and perspectives. (2024). Walther, Grit ; Klopfer, Antonia ; Frank, Laura.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:182:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424000594.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. A Sustainable Transport System—The MMQUAL Model of Shared Micromobility Service Quality Assessment. (2022). Stawiarski, Patryk ; Zioko, Monika ; Hamerska, Monika.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4168-:d:784346.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Predicting Mobility as a Service (MaaS) use for different trip categories: An artificial neural network analysis. (2022). Deng, Hepu ; Molla, Alemayehu ; Tay, Richard ; Duan, Sophia Xiaoxia.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:166:y:2022:i:c:p:135-149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Product bundling for accelerating electric vehicle adoption: A mixed-method empirical analysis of Swiss customers. (2022). Gamma, Karoline ; Plananska, Jana.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:154:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121010303.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aapaoja A.; Eckhardt J.; Nykänen L.; Sochor J. MaaS service combinations for different geographical areas. Proceedings of the 24th world congress on intelligent transportation systems, Montreal, QC, Canada, 29 October–2 November 2017, .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Adamowicz W.; Louviere J.; Williams M. Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1994, 26, 271-292.

  3. Alonso-González M.J.; Hoogendoorn-Lanser S.; van Oort N.; Cats O.; Hoogendoorn S. Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service (MaaS)–A latent class cluster analysis of attitudes. Transp.Res. Part. A Policy Pract. 2020, 132, 378-401.

  4. Ambrosino G.; Nelson J.D.; Boero M.; Pettinelli I. Enabling intermodal urban transport through complementary services: From flexible mobility services to the shared use mobility agency: Workshop 4. Developing inter-modal transport systems. Res. Transp. Econ. 2016, 59, 179-184.

  5. Audouin M.; Finger M. The development of mobility-as-a-service in the Helsinki metropolitan area: A multi-level governance analysis. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2018, 27, 24-35.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Axhausen K.W.; Simma A.; Golob T.F. Pre-commitment and usage: Season tickets, cars and travel. Arbeitsb. Verk. Raumplan. 2000, 495, 24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Bozdogan H. Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika 1987, 52, 345-370.

  8. Caiati V.; Rasouli S.; Timmermans H. Bundling, pricing schemes and extra features preferences for mobility as a service: Sequential portfolio choice experiment. Transp. Res.Part. A Policy Practice 2020, 131, 123-148.

  9. Car Sharing Market. Statistics-Global Growth Trends 2026.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Choi J.P. Bundling new products with old to signal quality, with application to the sequencing of new products. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 2003, 21, 1179-1200.

  11. Chrzan K.; Orme B. An overview and comparison of design strategies for choice-based conjoint analysis. Sawtooth Softw. res. Pap. Ser. 2000, 98382, 360.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Collins C.M.; Chambers S.M. Psychological and situational influences on commuter-transport-mode choice. Environ. Behave. 2005, 37, 640-661.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Cooper P.; Tryfonas T.; Crick T.; Marsh A. Electric vehicle mobility-as-a-service: Exploring the “Tri-Opt” of novel private transport business models. J. Urban. Technol. 2019, 26, 35-56.

  14. Creutzig F.; Ravindranath N.H.; Berndes G.; Bolwig S.; Bright R.; Cherubini F.; Fargione J. Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: An assessment. Gcb Bioenerg. 2015, 7, 916-944.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Diana M. From mode choice to modal diversion: A new behavioural paradigm and an application to the study of the demand for innovative transport services. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2010, 77, 429-441.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Durand A.; Harms L.; Hoogendoorn-Lanser S.; Zijlstra T. Mobility-as-a-Service and Changes in Travel Preferences and Travel Behaviour: A Literature Review. KiM| Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy Analysis: Hague, The Netherlands, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Eggers F.; Sattler H.; Teichert T.; Völckner F. Choice-based conjoint analysis. Handbook of Market Research; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. ElHaffar G.; Durif F.; Dubé L. Towards closing the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 275, 122556.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Esztergár-Kiss D.; Kerényi T. Creation of mobility packages based on the MaaS concept. Travel Behav. Soc. 2019, 21, 307-317.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Gardner B. Modelling motivation and habit in stable travel mode contexts. Transp. Res. Part. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2009, 12, 68-76.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Giesecke R.; Surakka T.; Hakonen M. Conceptualising Mobility as a Service; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1-11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Gnann T.; Plötz P.; Funke S.; Wietschel M. What is the market potential of plug-in electric vehicles as commercial passenger cars? A case study from Germany. Transp. Res. Part. D Transp. Environ. 2015, 37, 171-187.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Golden B.R. The past is the past—or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Manag. J. 1992, 35, 848-860.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Goodall W.; Dovey T.; Bornstein J.; Bonthron B. The rise of mobility as a service. Deloitte Rev. 2017, 20, 112-129.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Gould E.; Wehrmeyer W.; Leach M. Transition pathways of e-mobility services. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2015, 194, 349-359.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Green P.E.; Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. J. Consum. Res. 1978, 5, 103-123.

  27. Green P.E.; Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. J. Market. 1990, 54, 3-19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Grosse-Ophoff A.; Hausler S.; Heineke K.; Möller T. How Shared Mobility Will Change the Automotive Industry; McKinsey & Company: Washington DC, USA, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Guidon S.; Wicki M.; Bernauer T.; Axhausen K. Transportation service bundling–for whose benefit? Consumer valuation of pure bundling in the passenger transportation market. Transp. Res. Part. A Policy Pract. 2020, 131, 91-106.

  30. Hampl N.; Loock M. Sustainable development in retailing: What is the impact on store choice?. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2013, 22, 202-216.

  31. Harris J.; Blair E.A. Consumer preference for product bundles: The role of reduced search costs. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 2006, 34, 506-513.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Heikkilä S. Mobility as a Service–A Proposal for Action for the Public Administration, Case Helsinki. Master’s Thesis; Aalto University: Espoo, Finland, 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Hensher D.A. Future bus transport contracts under a mobility as a service (MaaS) regime in the digital age: Are they likely to change?. Transp. Res. Part. A Policy Practice 2017, 98, 86-96. Bert J.; Collie B.; Gerrits M.; Xu G. What’s Ahead for Car Sharing? The New Mobility and Its Impact on Vehicle Sales.

  34. Hiscock R.; Macintyre S.; Kearns A.; Ellaway A. Means of transport and ontological security: Do cars provide psycho-social benefits to their users?. Transp. Res. Part. D Transp. Environ. 2002, 7, 119-135.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Ho C.; Hensher D.A.; Mulley C.; Wong Y. Prospects for switching out of conventional transport services to mobility as a service subscription plans–A stated choice study. Proceedings of the International Conference Series on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport, (Thredbo 15), Stockholm, Sweden, 13–17 August 2017, .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Ho C.Q.; Hensher D.A.; Mulley C.; Wong Y.Z. Potential uptake and willingness-to-pay for Mobility as a Service (MaaS): A stated choice study. Transp. Res. Part. A Policy Practice 2018, 117, 302-318.

  37. Ho C.Q.; Mulley C.; Hensher D.A. Public preferences for mobility as a service: Insights from stated preference surveys. Transp. Res. Part. A Policy Practice 2020, 131, 70-90.

  38. Huber J.; Train K. On the similarity of classical and Bayesian estimates of individual mean partworths. Market. Lett. 2001, 12, 259-269.

  39. Huwer U. Public transport and car-sharing—benefits and effects of combined services. Transport. Policy 2004, 11, 77-87.

  40. Kamargianni M.; Li W.; Matyas M.; Schäfer A. A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport. Transp. Res. Proced. 2016, 14, 3294-3303.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Karlsson I.C.M.; Mukhtar-Landgren D.; Smith G.; Koglin T.; Kronsell A.; Lund E.; Sochor J. Development and implementation of Mobility-as-a-Service–A qualitative study of barriers and enabling factors. Transp. Res. Part. A Policy Practice 2020, 131, 283-295.

  42. Karlsson I.M.; Sochor J.; Strömberg H. Developing the ‘Service’in Mobility as a Service: Experiences from a field trial of an innovative travel brokerage. Transp. Res. Proced. 2016, 14, 3265-3273. Whim. All Your Journeys.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Kostiainen J.; Tuominen A. Mobility as a service—Stakeholders’ challenges and potential implications. Towards User-Centric Transport in Europe; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2019; pp. 239-254.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Kubli M.; Loock M.; Wüstenhagen R. The flexible prosumer: Measuring the willingness to co-create distributed flexibility. Energy Policy 2018, 114, 540-548.

  45. Lathia N.; Capra L. How Smart is your Smartcard? Measuring Travel Behaviours, Perceptions, and Incentives; ACM: Beijing, China, 2011; pp. 291-300.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Li Y.; Voege T. Mobility as a service (MaaS): Challenges of implementation and policy required. J. Transp. Technol. 2017, 7, 95-106.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Louviere J.J.; Hensher D.A.; Swait J.D. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000.

  48. Louviere J.J.; Street D.; Burgess L.; Wasi N.; Islam T.; Marley A.A. Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information. J. Choice Modell. 2008, 1, 128-164.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Lutsey N. Global climate change mitigation potential from a transition to electric vehicles. Int. Counc. Clean Transp. 2015, 2015, 5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Magidson J.; Vermunt J.K. Latent class models. The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2004; pp. 175-198.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  51. Matyas M.; Kamargianni M. Survey design for exploring demand for Mobility as a Service plans. Transportation 2019, 46, 1525-1558.

  52. Matyas M.; Kamargianni M. The potential of mobility as a service bundles as a mobility management tool. Transportation 2018, 46, 1-18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Mola L.; Berger Q.; Haavisto K.; Soscia I. Mobility as a service: An exploratory study of consumer mobility behaviour. Sustainability 2020, 12.

  54. Mulley C.; Ho C.; Balbontin C.; Hensher D.; Stevens L.; Nelson J.D.; Wright S. Mobility as a service in community transport in Australia: Can it provide a sustainable future?. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Practice 2020, 131, 107-122.

  55. Mulley C.; Nelson J.D.; Wright S. Community transport meets mobility as a service: On the road to a new a flexible future. Res. Transp. Econ. 2018, 69, 583-591.

  56. Orme B. Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research; Research Publishers LLC: Madison, WI, USA, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Orme B.K.; Chrzan K. Becoming an Expert in Conjoint Analysis: Choice Modelling for Pros; Sawtooth Software: Sun Valley, ID, USA, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Paffumi E.; de Gennaro M.; Martini G.; Scholz H. Assessment of the potential of electric vehicles and charging strategies to meet urban mobility requirements. Transportmetrica A Transport. Sci. 2015, 1, 22-60.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  59. Pinto J.; Morales M.E.; Fedoruk M.; Kovaleva M.; Diemer A. Servitization in support of sustainable cities: What are steel’s contributions and challenges?. Sustainability 2019, 11.

  60. Priessner A.; Hampl N. Can product bundling increase the joint adoption of electric vehicles, solar panels and battery storage? Explorative evidence from a choice-based conjoint study in Austria. Ecol. Econ. 2020, 167, 106381.

  61. Ramaswamy V.; de Sarbo W.S.; Reibstein D.J.; Robinson W.T. An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Market. Sci. 1993, 12, 103-124.

  62. Reinders M.J.; Frambach R.T.; Schoormans J.P. Using product bundling to facilitate the adoption process of radical innovations. J. Product Innov. Manag. 2010, 27, 1127-1140.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Road Transport: Reducing CO2 Emissions from Vehicles. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  64. Salm S.; Hille S.L.; Wüstenhagen R. What are retail investors’ risk-return preferences towards renewable energy projects? A choice experiment in Germany. Energy Policy 2016, 97, 310-320.

  65. Schad H.; Flamm M.; Wagner C.; Frey T. New, Integrated Mobility Services, NIM; Project A3 of the National Research Programme (NRP): Bern, Switzerland, 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  66. Schikofsky J.; Dannewald T.; Kowald M. Exploring motivational mechanisms behind the intention to adopt mobility as a service (MaaS): Insights from Germany. Transp. Res. Part. A Policy Practice 2020, 131, 296-312.

  67. Shaheen S.A.; Cohen A.P. Carsharing and personal vehicle services: Worldwide market developments and emerging trends. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2013, 7, 5-34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  68. Simonin B.L.; Ruth J.A. Bundling as a strategy for new product introduction: Effects on consumers’ reservation prices for the bundle, the new product, and its tie-in. J. Bus. Res. 1995, 33, 219-230.

  69. Smith G.; Sarasini S.; Karlsson I.M.; Mukhtar-Landgren D.; Sochor J. Governing Mobility-as-a-Service: Insights from Sweden and Finland. The Governance of Smart Transportation Systems; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2019; pp. 169-188.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Sochor J.; Strömberg H.; Karlsson I.C.M. Implementing Mobility as a Service challenges in integrating user, commercial, and societal perspectives. Transp. Res. Record 2015, 4, 1-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Sochor J.; Strömberg H.; Karlsson I.C.M. Trying out mobility as a service experiences from a field trial and implications for understanding demand. Proceedings of the 95th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 1 January 2016, .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Sochor J.L.; Strömberg H.; Karlsson M. An innovative mobility service to facilitate changes in travel behavior and mode choice. Proceedings of the 22nd World Congress on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Bordeaux, France, 5–9 October 2015, .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. The CBC Latent Class Technical Paper (Version 3); Sawtooth Software: Sequim, WA, USA, 2004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. The CBC/HB System for Hierarchical Bayes Estimation Version 5.0 Technical Paper; Sawtooth Software: Sequim, WA, USA, 2009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Thøgersen J. Promoting public transport as a subscription service: Effects of a free month travel card. Trans. Policy 2009, 16, 335-343.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Turcksin L.; Mairesse O.; Macharis C. Private household demand for vehicles on alternative fuels and drive trains: A review. Eur. Transport. Res. Rev. 2013, 5, 149-164.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Utriainen R.; Pöllänen M. Review on mobility as a service in scientific publications. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2018, 27, 15-23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Wittink D.R.; Cattin P. Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update. J. Market. 1989, 53, 91-96.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  79. Wright S.; Nelson J.D.; Cottrill C.D. MaaS for the suburban market: Incorporating carpooling in the mix. Transp. Res. Part. A Policy Practice 2020, 131, 206-218.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Changing with the Tide: Semiparametric Estimation of Preference Dynamics. (2014). Koster, Paul ; Dekker, Thijs ; Brouwer, Roy.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:i:4:p:717-745.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The impact of policy elements on the financing costs of RE investment: The case of wind power in Germany. (2011). Breitschopf, Barbara ; Giebel, Olaf .
    In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
    RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s112011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Estimating the Value of Achieving ‘Good Ecological Status’ under the Water Framework Directive in the Boyne River Catchment: A Mixed Multinomial Logit Approach. (2011). Hynes, Stephen ; Hanley, Nick ; Campbell, Danny ; Stithou, Mavra .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:semrui:148928.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Consumers’ Stated Choices versus Purchasing Desires: Case of Hawaii Food Baskets. (2009). Hu, Wuyang ; Cox, Linda.
    In: Agricultural Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:aergaa:56632.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Testing Different Types of Benefit Transfer in Valuation of Ecosystem Services: New Zealand Winegrowing Case Studies. (2009). Cullen, Ross ; Colombo, Sergio ; Baskaran, Ramesh.
    In: 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare09:48189.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Alternative Approaches to Incorporating the Opportunity Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Models. (2008). Crooker, John ; Azevedo, Christopher.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umn:wpaper:0803.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Natural disturbances and natural hazards in mountain forests: a framework for the economic valuation. (2008). Paletto, Alessandro ; Notaro, Sandra.
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:trn:utwpde:0808.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Kilkuwe, Enoch ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science. (2007). Whitehead, John ; Pattanayak, Subhrendu ; Gelso, Brett R. ; Van Houtven, George L..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:05-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources?. (2006). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
    RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:25:y:2006:i:4:p:855-874.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Using Expert Judgment to Assess Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change: Evidence From a Conjoint Choice Survey. (2006). Chiabai, Aline ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; DavidF. Layton, .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. DOES THE CONSUMERS VARIETY-SEEKING BEHAVIOR CONDITION THE WILLINGNESS TO TRAVEL FURTHER?. (2006). Nicolau, Juan.
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale. (2006). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. (2005). Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Bech, Mickael.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:14:y:2005:i:10:p:1079-1083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Public Preferences for Land usesÂ’ changes - valuing urban regeneration projects at the Venice Arsenale. (2005). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand. (2005). Herriges, Joseph ; Jeon, Yongsik.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:12473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Giuda, Alita ; Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). (2004). Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:909-912.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. (2004). Savage, Elizabeth ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:901-907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Time is Money: Improved Valuation of Time and Transportation Costs. (2004). Earnhart, Dietrich.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:29:y:2004:i:2:p:159-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Altruism and the Economic Values of Environmental and Social Policies. (2004). Vázquez Rodríguez, María Xosé.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:233-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. A RANDOM PARAMETER LOGIT APPROACH TO THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAYS AND LENGTH OF STAY. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare - transportation of farm animals to slaughter versus the use of mobile abattoirs. (2004). Carlsson, Fredrik ; Lagerkvist, Carl Johan ; Frykblom, Peter .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Heterogeneous preferences for marine amenities: A choice experiment applied to water quality. (2004). Eggert, HÃ¥kan ; Olsson, Bjorn.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Experience, Expectations and Hindsight: Evidence of a Cognitive Wedge in Stated Preference Retrospectives. (2004). Provencher, Bill ; Bishop, Richard ; Bennett, Michael.
    In: Staff Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:wisagr:468.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A choice modelling approach to investigate biases in individual and aggregated benefit estimates due to omission of distance. (2004). .
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Effects of distance on non-use values. (2004). .
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Curbside Recycling: Waste Resource or Waste of Resources?. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0310001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Cheap Talk Revisited: New Evidence from CVM. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0301001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48. (2002). Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:her:chedps:48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. A COMPARISON OF STATED AND REVEALED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. (2002). Hicks, Robert.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. (2001). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. LOGIT MODELS FOR POOLED CONTINGENT VALUATION AND CONTINGENT RATING AND RANKING DATA: VALUING BENEFITS FROM FOREST BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION. (2001). Siikamäki, Juha ; Siikamaki, Juha ; Layton, David F. ; DavidF. Layton, .
    In: 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea01:20616.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple-format, stated-preference approach. (2000). Banzhaf, Melissa Ruby ; Desvousges, William H. ; Johnson, Reed F..
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:295-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Combining Averting Behavior and Contingent Valuation Data: An Application to Drinking Water Treatment. (2000). Nunes, Luis ; Cunha-E-Sa, Maria A., ; Ducla-Soares, Maria M. ; ROSADO, MARCIA A. ; Cunha-e-Sa, Maria A., .
    In: FEUNL Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Comparing Ranking and Contingent Valuation for Valuing Human Lives, Applying Nested and Non-Nested Logit Models. (2000). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:17:y:2000:i:1:p:1-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Binary Choice Valuation Studies with Heteregeneous Preferences Regarding the Program Being Valued. (2000). Huhtala, Anni.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:3:p:263-279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Preference Structures, Property Rights, and Paired Comparisons. (1999). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:13:y:1999:i:1:p:107-122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. What do doctors want? developing incentives for doctors to serve in Indonesias rural and remote areas. (1998). Azwar, Azrul ; Widiyarti, ; Ismail, Nusye ; Chomitz, Kenneth M. ; Setiadi, Gunawan.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1888.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Willingness to Pay for Quality Improvements: Can Revealed and Stated Preferences Data be Combined?. (1997). Whitehead, John ; Haab, Tim ; Huang, Ju-Chin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:wop:eacaec:9704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Air Quality in Hamilton-Wentworth: A Choice Experiment. (1997). .
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mcm:deptwp:1997-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. (1996). Englin, Jeffrey ; Cameron, Trudy.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:7:y:1996:i:2:p:133-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-12 00:17:37 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.