Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review. (2021). Mergel, Ines ; Hansen, Anne Vorre ; Fuglsang, Lars ; Rohnebak, Maria Taivalsaari.
In: Administrative Sciences.
RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:58-:d:570781.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 85

References cited by this document

Cocites: 36

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Public Value Co-Creation in Living Labs—Results from Three Case Studies. (2021). Mergel, Ines ; Haug, Nathalie.
    In: Administrative Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:74-:d:599704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alford John; O’Flynn Janine. Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. International Journal of Public Administration 2009, 32, 171-91.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Almirall Esteve; Lee Melissa; Wareham Jonathan. Mapping living labs in the landscape of innovation methodologies. Technology Innovation Management Review 2012, 2, 12-18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Angelini Leonardo; Carrino Stefano; Khaled Omar A.; Riva-Mossman Susie; Mugellini Eleena. Senior living lab: An ecological approach to foster social innovation in an ageing society. Future Internet 2016, 8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Arundel Anthony; Bloch Carter; Ferguson Barry. Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy 2019, 48, 789-98.

  5. Äyväri Anne; Jyrämä Annuka. Rethinking value proposition tools for living labs. Journal of Service Theory and Practice 2017, 27, 1024-39.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Baccarne Bastian; Logghe Sara; Schuurman Dimitri; De Marez Lieven. Governing quintuple helix innovation: Urban living labs and socio-ecological entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review 2016, 6, 22-30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Ballon Pierre; Schuurman Dimitri. Living labs: Concepts, tools and cases. Information and Learning Science 2015, 17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bergvall-Kåreborn Birgitta; Ståhlbröst Anna. Living lab: An open and citizen-centric approach for innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development 2009, 1, 356-70.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Björgvinsson Erling; Ehn Pelle; Hillgren Per-Anders. Agonistic participatory design: Working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 2012, 8, 127-44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Bloch Carter; Bugge Markus M. Public sector innovation—From theory to measurement?. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 2013, 27, 133-45.

  11. Bryson John M.; Crosby Barbara C.; Bloomberg Laura. Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review 2014, 74, 445-56.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Buhr Katarina; Federley Maija; Karlsson Anja. Urban living labs for sustainability in suburbs in need of modernization and social uplift. Technology Innovation Management Review 2016, 6, 27-34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Cardullo Paolo; Kitchin Rob; Di Feliciantonio Cesare. Living labs and vacancy in the neoliberal city. Cities 2018, 73, 44-50.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Carstensen Helle V.; Bason Christian. Powering collaborative policy innovation: Can innovation labs help?. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal 2012, 17, 4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Chen Jiyao Y.; Walker Richard M.; Sawhney Mohanbir. Public service innovation: A typology. Public Management Review 2019, 22, 1674-95.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Christensen Tom; Lægreid Per. Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration—Theoretical and Empirical Challenges. Public Administration Review 2011, 11, 407-23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Cossetta Anna; Palumbo Mauro. The co-production of social innovation: The case of living lab. Smart City; Dameri Renata Paola; Rosenthal-Sabroux Camille. Springer: Cham, 2014; pp. 221-36.

  18. Criado J. Ignacio; Dias Thiago F.; Sano Hironubu; Rojas-Martín Francisco; Silvan Aitor; Filho Antonio I. Public Innovation and Living Labs in Action: A Comparative Analysis in post-New Public Management Contexts. International Journal of Public Administration 2021, 44, 451-64.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. De Vries Hannah; Bekker Victor; Tummers Lars. Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration Review 2016, 94, 146-66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Dekker Rianne; Contreras Juan Franco; Meijer Albert. The living lab as a methodology for public administration research: A systematic literature review of its applications in the social sciences. International Journal of Public Administration 2020, 43, 1207-17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Dekker Rianne; Geuijen Karin; Oliver Caroline. Tensions of evaluating innovation in a living lab: Moving beyond actionable knowledge production. Evaluation 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Dell’Era Claudio; Landoni Paolo. Living Lab: A methodology between user-centred design and participatory design. Creativity and Innovation Management 2014, 23, 137-54.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Dezuanni Michael; Foth Marcus; Mallan Kerry; Hughes Hilary; Osborne Roger. Social living labs for digital participation and connected learning. Digital Participation through Social Living Labs: Valuing Local Knowledge and Enhancing Engagement; Dezuanni Michael; Foth Marcus; Mallan Kerry; Hughes Hillary. Chandos: Cambridge, 2018; pp. 1-17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Dutilleul Benoït; Birrer Frans A. J.; Mensink Wouter. Unpacking european living labs: Analysing innovation’s social dimensions. Central European Journal of Public Policy 2010, 4, 60-85.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  25. Edwards-Schachter Monica E.; Matti Cristian E.; Alcantara Enrique. Fostering quality of life through social innovation: A living lab methodology study. Review of Policy Research 2012, 29, 672-92.

  26. Eriksson Mats; Niitamo Veli-Pekka; Kulkki Seija. State-of-the-Art in Utilizing Living Labs Approach to User-Centric ICT Innovation—A European Approach; Center for Distance-Spanning Technology, Lulea University of Technology: Luleå, 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Evans James; Jones Ross; Karvonen Andrew; Millard Lucy; Wendler Jana. Living labs and co-production: University campuses as platforms for sustainability science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2015, 16, 1-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Følstad Asbjørn. Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: A literature review. Electronic Journal of Virtual Organisations 2008, 10, 99-131.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Franz Yvonne. Designing social living labs in urban research. Info 2015, 17, 53-66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Fuglsang Lars. Bricolage and invisible innovation in public service innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics 2010, 1, 67-87.

  31. Gago David; Rubalcaba Luis. The role of soft skills to leverage co-creation in living labs: Insights from Spain. Innovation Journal 2020, 25, 1-23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Gascó Mila. Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly 2017, 34, 90-98.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Gatta Valerio; Marcucci Edoardo; Le Pira Michela. Smart urban freight planning process: Integrating desk, living lab and modelling approaches in decision-making. European Transport Research Review 2017, 9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Greenwood Royston; Raynard Mia; Kodeih Farah; Micelotta Evelyn R.; Lounsbury Michael. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals 2011, 5, 317-71.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Greve Katharina; Leminen Seppo; De Vita Riccardo; Westerlund Mika. Unveiling the diversity of scholarly debate on living labs: A bibliometric approach. International Journal of Innovation Management 2020, 24, 2040003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Grisenti Andrea; Nollo Giandomenico; Dalprá Michela; De Natale Francesco; De Cecco Mariolino; Francesconi Andrea; Fornaser Alberto; Tomasin Paolo; Garau Nicola; Guandalini Luca. Technological Infrastructure Supports New Paradigm of Care for Healthy Aging: The Living Lab Ausilia. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 2021, 725, 85-99.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Haider Christian; Kopp Ursula; Pajones Markus. Sustainable transport in upper Austria—Case study for setting up a living lab concept to accelerate innovations. Journal of Technology Management Innovation 2016, 11, 101-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Hakkarainen Louna; Hyysalo Sampsa. The evolution of intermediary activities: Broadening the concept of facilitation in living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review 2016, 6, 45-58.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Hansen Anne Vorre; Fuglsang Lars. Living Labs as an innovation tool for public value creation: Possibilities and pitfalls. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal 2020, 25, 4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Hartley Jean. Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management 2005, 25, 27-34.

  41. Hernández-Pérez Oskar; Vilariño Fernando; Domènech Miquel. Public Libraries Engaging Communities through Technology and Innovation: Insights from the Library Living Lab. Public Library Quarterly 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Hesseldal Louise; Kayser Lars. Healthcare innovation—The epital: A living lab in the intersection between the informal and formal structures. Qualitative Sociological Review 2016, 12, 60-80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Hossain Motker; Leminen Seppo; Westerlund Miko. A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019, 213, 976-88.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Jesson Jill K.; Matheson Lydia; Lacey Fiona M. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques; Sage: London, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Jørgensen Torben B.; Bozeman Barry. Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society 2007, 39, 354-81.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Kanstrup Anne M. Living in the lab: An analysis of the work in eight living laboratories set up in care homes for technology innovation. CoDesign International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 2017, 13, 49-64.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Keijzer-Broers Wally J. W.; Florez-Atehortua Lucas; de Reuver Mark. Prototyping a multi-sided health and wellbeing platform. Paper presented at the 24th International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD2015 Harbin), Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, August 25–27, 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Lehmann Valerie; Frangioni Marina; Dubé Patrick. Living Lab as knowledge system: An actual approach for managing urban service projects?. Journal of Knowledge Management 2015, 19, 1087-107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  49. Leminen Seppo; Nyström Anna-Greta; Westerlund Mika; Kortelainen Mika J. The effect of network structure on radical innovation in living labs. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 2016, 31, 743-57.

  50. Leminen Seppo; Westerlund Mika; Nyström Anna-Greta. Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review 2012, 2, 6-11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Leminen Seppo; Westerlund Mika. Categorization of innovation tools in living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review 2017, 7, 15-25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Liedtke Christa; Welfens Maria J.; Rohn Holger; Nordmann Julia. Living lab: User-driven innovation for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 2012, 13, 106-18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Martinez Santiago; Berkås Silje; Fensli Rune. Agder living lab: Co-creation of inclusive health solutions for and with citizens. International Journal of Integrated Care 2016, 16, 1-2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  54. McGann Michael; Blomkamp Emma; Lewis Jenny M. The rise of public sector innovation labs: Experiments in design thinking for policy”. Policy Sciences 2018, 51, 249-67.

  55. McGann Michael; Wells Tamas; Blomkamp Emma. Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving. Public Management Review 2019, 23, 297-316.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Meijer Albert; Bolivar Manuel P. R. Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences 2015, 82, 392-408.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  57. Moher David; Liberati Alessandro; Tetzlaff Jennifer; Altman Douglas G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009, 151, 264-69.

  58. Moore Michael H. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1995.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Nesti Giorgia. Living labs: A new tool for co-production?. Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions; Bisello Adrano; Vettorat Daniele; Stephens Rochard; Elisei Pietro. Springer: Cham, 2017; pp. 267-81.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Niitamo Veli-Pekka; Kulkki Seija; Eriksson Mats; Hribernik Karl A. State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs. Paper presented at 2006 IEEE International Technology Management Conference, Milan, Italy, June 26–28, 2006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Nyström Anna-Greta; Leminen Seppo; Westerlund Mika; Kortelainen Miko. Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs. Industrial Marketing Management 2014, 43, 483-95.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. O’Flynn Janine. From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration 2007, 66, 353-66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Olejniczak Karol; Borkowska-Waszak Sylwia; Domaradzka-Widła Anna; Park Yaerin. Policy labs: The next frontier of policy design and evaluation?. Policy & Politics 2020, 48, 89-110.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  64. Osborne Stephen P. The new public governance?. Public Management Review 2006, 8, 377-87.

  65. Pallot Marc; Trousse Brigitte; Senach Bernard; Scapin Dominique. Living lab research landscape: From user centred design and user experience towards user cocreation. Paper presented at the First European Summer School “Living Labs”, Paris, France, August 15, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Poldma Tiiu; Labbé Delphine; Bertin Sylvain; Kehayia Eva; Swaine Bonnie; Ahmed Sara; Le Dorze Guylaine; Fung Joyce; Archambault Philippe; Lamontagne Anouk. Users, stakeholders and researchers: Dilemmas of research as practice and the role of design thinking in the case study of a rehabilitation living lab. Paper presented at the Design Research Society’s 2014 Conference at Umeå Institute of Design, Umeå, Sweden, June 16–19, 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Redström Johan. Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design. Design Studies 2006, 27, 123-39.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Reiter Sandrine; Gronier Guillaume; Valoggia Philippe. Citizen involvement in local environmental governance: A methodology combining human centred design and living lab approaches. Electronic Journal of e-Government 2014, 12, 108-16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Ruijer Erna; Meijer Albert. Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment. Public Performance and Management Review 2020, 43, 613-35.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Salminen Juho; Konsti-Laaks Suvi. Collaborative Innovation Methods in Lahti Living Lab: Lappeenranta University of Technology; Lahti School of Innovation: Lahti, 2010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Schliwa Gabriele; McCormick Kes. Living labs—Users, citizens and transitions. Experimental City; Evans James; Karvonen Andrew; Raven Rob. Routledge: New York, 2016; pp. 163-78.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Schuurman Dimitri; Tõnurist Piret. Innovation in the public sector: Exploring the characteristics and potential of living labs and innovation labs. Technology Innovation Management Review 2017, 7, 7-14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  73. Snyder Hannah. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research 2019, 104, 333-39.

  74. Sørensen Eva. Enhancing policy innovation by redesigning representative democracy. Policy and Politics 2016, 44, 155-70.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Ståhlbröst Anna; Holst Marita. Reflecting on actions in living lab research. Technology Innovation Management Review 2017, 7, 27-34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Ståhlbröst Anna. A set of key principles to assess the impact of living labs. International Journal of Product Development 2012, 17, 60-75.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Ståhlbröst Anna. Forming Future IT—The Living Lab Way of User Involvement. Ph.D. thesis; Luleå University of Technology: Lulea, Sweden, 2008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Steen Kris; Van Bueren Ellen. The defining characteristics of urban living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review 2017, 7, 21-32.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Stoker Gerry. Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance?. The American Review of Public Administration 2006, 36, 41-57.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  80. Tõnurist Piret; Kattel Rainer; Lember Veiko. Innovation labs in the public sector: What they are and what they do?. Public Management Review 2017, 19, 1455-79.

  81. Torfing Jacob. Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review 2019, 21, 1-11.

  82. Torraco Richard J. Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review 2016, 15, 404-28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Van Der Sloot Bart; Lanzing Marjolein. The Continued Transformation of the Public Sphere: On the Road to Smart Cities, Living Labs and a New Understanding of Society. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 2021, 36, 319-45.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Veeckman Carina; Schuurman Dimitri; Leminen Seppo; Westerlund Mika. Linking living lab characteristics and their outcomes: Towards a conceptual framework. Technology Innovation Management Review 2013, 3, 6-15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Windeløw-Lidzélius Christer. The school as a living lab: The case of kaospilot. Digital Participation through Social Living Labs; Dezuanni Michael; Foth Marcus; Mallan Kerry; Hughes Hilary. Chandos: Cambridge, 2018; pp. 77-96.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Does public employment foster or inhibit entrepreneurial intentions?. (2024). Yang, Xiangyu ; Sheng, Shibin ; Zhao, Mengli.
    In: Asia Pacific Journal of Management.
    RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:41:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10490-022-09852-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore. (2024). Acik, Ahmet Coskun ; Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif ; Cinar, Emre ; Simms, Chris.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:53:y:2024:i:2:s0048733323001993.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The costs of collaborative innovation. (2023). Audretsch, David B ; Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif ; Vivona, Roberto.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:48:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10961-022-09933-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Conceptualising Digital Transformation in Cities: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for the Analysis of Public Sector Innovation. (2023). Bianchi, Irene ; Mariani, Ilaria.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8741-:d:1158460.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance. (2023). Prabhu, Jaideep C ; Zaman, Hasanuzzaman ; Banerjee, Sourindra ; Vassallo, Jarrod P.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:52:y:2023:i:6:s0048733323000525.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Proposition of a structural model for business value creation based on circular business models, innovation, and resource recovery in the pet industry. (2023). Sehnem, Simone ; Kuzma, Edson.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:516-537.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Putting Sense and Mind into Your Enterprise Systems: A Qualitative Study of IS Assimilation in Large Public Organizations in India. (2022). Gupta, Sumeet ; Singh, Jitendra Pratap.
    In: IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review.
    RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:126-145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Legitimation and Effects of Mission-Oriented Innovation Policies: A Spillover Perspective. (2022). Jansen, Matthijs.
    In: Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics.
    RePEc:hpe:journl:y:2022:v:243:i:4:p:7-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really comitted?. (2022). Revest, Valerie ; Liotard, Isabelle.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03524203.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really comitted?. (2022). Revest, Valerie ; Liotard, Isabelle.
    In: CEPN Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:cepnwp:hal-03524203.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Exploring the knowledge base of innovation research: Towards an emerging innovation model. (2022). Sengoku, Shintaro ; Islam, Nazrul ; Avila-Robinson, Alfonso.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:182:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522003286.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The effect of collectivism-based organisational culture on employee commitment in public organisations. (2022). Matos, Joo J ; Pea-Vinces, Jesus ; Triguero-Sanchez, Rafael .
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:83:y:2022:i:c:s0038012122001252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. (2022). Hansen, Anne Vorre ; Fuglsang, Lars.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:51:y:2022:i:1:s0048733321001864.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Employee-driven digital innovation: A systematic review and a research agenda. (2022). Jaccheri, Letizia ; Engesmo, Jostein ; Pappas, Ilias O ; Opland, Leif Erik.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:143:y:2022:i:c:p:255-271.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Impact of ICT adoption on absorptive capacity and open innovation for greater firm performance. The mediating role of ACAP. (2022). Parga-Montoya, Neftali ; Aguirre, Joao ; Cuevas-Vargas, Hector.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:140:y:2022:i:c:p:11-24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really committed?. (2021). Liotard, Isabelle ; Revest, Valerie.
    In: LEM Papers Series.
    RePEc:ssa:lemwps:2021/14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. GOVERNANCE INNOVATION: ONE-STOP INTEGRATED SERVICE TO ENHANCE QUALITY SERVICE AND PUBLIC SATISFACTION. (2021). Avianto, Bhakti Nur ; Muksin, Ahmad.
    In: Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management.
    RePEc:rom:terumm:v:16:y:2021:i:1:p:40-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Innovation in the public services at the local and regional level. (2021). Slijepcevic, Suncana ; Rasic, Ivana ; Dokic, Irena .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:iez:wpaper:2101.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review. (2021). Mergel, Ines ; Hansen, Anne Vorre ; Fuglsang, Lars ; Rohnebak, Maria Taivalsaari.
    In: Administrative Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:58-:d:570781.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Development of Innovation Economy - Activity of Local Government in Poland. (2021). Mankowska, Dominika ; Mempel-Sniezyk, Anna ; Derlukiewicz, Niki.
    In: European Research Studies Journal.
    RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2:p:175-195.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Development of Innovation Economy - Activity of Local Government in Poland. (2021). Mankowska, Dominika ; Mempel-Sniezyk, Anna ; Derlukiewicz, Niki.
    In: European Research Studies Journal.
    RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2-part1:p:175-195.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Depoliticizing the European immigration debate: How to employ public sector innovation to integrate migrants. (2021). Vivona, Roberto ; Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:50:y:2021:i:2:s0048733320302250.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Playing 3D chess, or how firms can thrive under complexity: The mediating role of innovation capabilities in the use of innovation input. (2021). Molden, Lars Hovdan ; Clausen, Tommy Hoyvarde.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:125:y:2021:i:c:p:1-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Innovations at the edge: how local innovations are established in less favourable environments. (2020). Richter, Ralph.
    In: EconStor Open Access Articles.
    RePEc:zbw:espost:224997.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Innovation in the U.S. Government. (2020). de Figueiredo, John M ; Bruce, Joshua R.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27181.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Innovation in the US Government. (2020). de Figueiredo, John M ; Bruce, Joshua R.
    In: NBER Chapters.
    RePEc:nbr:nberch:14381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Does Social Inducement Lead to Higher Open Innovation Investment? An Experimental Study. (2020). Dai, Shuanping ; Yang, Guanzhong.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:2115-:d:330395.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. A Study on the Transformation of Accounting Based on New Technologies: Evidence from Korea. (2020). Yoon, Sora.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8669-:d:431271.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Icebergs of Expertise-Based Leadership: The Role of Expert Leaders in Public Administration. (2020). Wise, Graham ; Ahsan, Ali ; Hanif, Sadia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4544-:d:366664.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. (2020). Misuraca, Gianluca ; Kuziemski, Maciej.
    In: Telecommunications Policy.
    RePEc:eee:telpol:v:44:y:2020:i:6:s0308596120300689.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation. (2019). Gallouj, Faïz ; Djellal, Faridah ; Desmarchelier, Benoit.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-02445373.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Towards a servitization of innovation networks: from traditional innovation networks to public service innovation networks for social innovation. (2019). Gallouj, Faïz ; Djellal, Faridah ; Desmarchelier, Benoit.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03177975.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Towards a servitization of innovation networks: a mapping. (2019). Gallouj, Faïz ; Djellal, Faridah ; Desmarchelier, Benoit.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02498297.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-12 20:40:24 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.