Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Incumbency Advantage in an Electoral Contest. (2013). Pastine, Ivan ; Cole, Matthew.
In: Working Papers.
RePEc:fiu:wpaper:1304.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 34

References cited by this document

Cocites: 46

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. ————. 1981. “Incumbents’ Advantages in the 1978 U.S. Congressional Elections,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 6(2), 183-200.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. ————. 1985. “Money and Votes Reconsidered: Congressional Elections, 1972-1982,” Public Choice, 47(1): 7–62.

  3. ————. 1990. “Rebuttal to Jacobson’s ‘New Evidence for Old Arguments’,” American Journal of Political Science, 34(2): 363–372.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. ————. 1990. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments,” American Journal of Political Science, 34(2): 334–362.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. ————. 1991. “Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections,” Journal of Politics, 53(1): 34-56.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. ————. 2003. “Campaign Financing and the Stagnation of Congressional Elections.” In Life After Reform: Foreseeing the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act in Practice, eds.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. ————. 2004. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 6th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. ————. 2009. Strategy and Dynamics in Contests, New York: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. ————. 2012. “Incumbency Advantage and the Cost of Ruling in Ireland’s Lower House of Parliament: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis,” National University of Ireland Maynooth, mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Abrajano, Marisa A. and Rebecca B Morton. 2004. “All Style and No Substance? The Strategic Calculus of CampaignAdvertising,” NYU Manuscript.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Anderson, Simon P. and Gerhard Glomm, 1992. “Incumbency Effects in Political Campaigns, ” Public Choice, 74: 207-219.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Erik Snowberg and James Snyder. 2006. “Television and the Incumbency Advantage in US Elections,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 31(4): 469-490.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Austen-Smith, David. 1987. “Interest Groups, Campaign Contributions, and Probabilistic Voting,” Public Choice, 54: 123–139.

  14. Baron, David. 1994. “Electoral Competition with Informed and Uninformed Voters, American Political Science Review,” 88(1): 33-47.

  15. Bernhardt, M. Daniel and Daniel E. Ingberman. 1985. “Candidate reputations and Incumbency Effect,” Journal of Public Economics, 27: 47-67.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Campbell, James E. 2002. “Is the House Incumbency Advantage Mostly a Campaign Finance Advantage?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the New England Political Science Association, Portland, Maine.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Coate, Stephen. 2004a. “Political Competition with Campaign Contributions and Informative Advertising,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(5): 772–804.

  18. Cox, Gary W. and Jonathan N. Katz. 1996. “Why Did Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow?” American Journal of Political Science, 40(2): 478-497.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Green, Donald and Jonathan Krasno. 1988. “Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Re-estimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections,” American Journal of Political Science, 32(4): 884–907.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Hirano, Shigeo and James M. Snyder, Jr. 2009. “Using Multimember District Elections to Estimate the Sources of the Incumbency Advantage,” American Journal of Political Science, 53(2): 292-306.

  21. Jacobson, Gary. 1978. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections,” American Political Science Review, 72(2): 469–491.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Jia, Hao. 2008, “A Stochastic Derivation of the Ratio Form of Contest Success Functions, ” Public Choice, 135(3-4): 125-130.

  23. Kahn, Kim F. and Patrick J. Kenney. 1999. The Spectacle of US Senate Campaigns, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Kazee, Thomas. 1983. “The Deterrent Effect of Incumbency on Recruiting Challengers in U.S. House Elections,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 8(3): 469-480.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Levitt, Steven D. and Catherine D. Wolfram. 1997. “Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22(1): 45-60.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Meirowitz, Adam. 2008. “Electoral Contests, Incumbency Advantages, and Campaign Finance,” Journal of Politics, 70(3): 681–699.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  27. Mueller, Denis C. and Thomas Stratmann. 1994. “Informative and Persuasive Campaigning, ” Public Choice, 81(1/2): 55–77.

  28. Pastine, Ivan and Tuvana Pastine, 2012, “Incumbency Advantage and Political Campaign Spending Limits,” Journal of Public Economics, 96: 20-32.

  29. Potters, Jan, Randolph Sloof and Frans van Winden. 1997. “Campaign Expenditures, Contributions and Direct Endorsements: The Strategic Use of Information and Money to Influence Voter Behavior,”European Journal of Political Economy, 13: 1–13.

  30. Prat, Andrea. 2002a. “Campaign Advertising and Voter Welfare,” Review of Economic Studies, 69(4): 999–1017.

  31. Prior, Markus. 2006.“The Incumbent in the Living Room: The Rise of Television and the Incumbency Advantage in US House Elections,”Journal of Politics, 68(3): 657-673.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Redmond, Paul. 2013. “Comparing Incumbent-Challenger and Open Seat Elections in a Model of Spatial Electoral Competition,” National University of Ireland Maynooth, mimeo.

  33. Stratmann, Thomas. 2009. “How Prices Matter in Politics: The Returns to Campaign Advertising,” Public Choice, 140(3-4): 357-377.

  34. Uppal, Yogesh. 2010. “Estimating Incumbency Effects in U.S. State Legislatures: A QuasiExperimental Study,” Economics and Politics, 22(2): 180-199

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. A Theory of Small Campaign Contributions. (2024). Castanheira, Micael ; de Moura, Micael Castanheira ; Bouton, Laurent ; Drazen, Allan.
    In: ULB Institutional Repository.
    RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/378528.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Shaking the tin cup: Celebrity candidate fundraising in American elections. (2024). Longoria, Richard T.
    In: Social Science Quarterly.
    RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:4:p:1140-1151.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from Multiparty Systems, 1993-2017. (2022). Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint).
    RePEc:hal:pseptp:hal-03389172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from Multiparty Systems, 1993-2017. (2022). Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03389172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The heterogeneous price of a vote: Evidence from multiparty systems, 1993–2017. (2022). Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:206:y:2022:i:c:s004727272100195x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. It Takes Money to Make MPs: Evidence from 150 Years of British Campaign Spending. (2021). Dewitte, Edgard ; Cage, Julia.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1dp7827s4n8ht8fk3qhmeuvd0o.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. It Takes Money to Make MPs: Evidence from 150 Years of British Campaign Spending. (2021). Cage, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard.
    In: Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/1dp7827s4n8ht8fk3qhmeuvd0o.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. It Takes Money to Make MPs: Evidence from 150 Years of British Campaign Spending. (2021). Dewitte, Edgard ; Cage, Julia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03384143.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from Multiparty Systems, 1993-2017. (2020). Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/10lirmbd5p8h4ae52oi51b4cka.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from Multiparty Systems, 1993-2017. (2020). Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/10lirmbd5p8h4ae52oi51b4cka.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from Multiparty Systems, 1993-2017. (2020). Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine ; Dewitte, Edgard.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03389172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A Theory of Small Campaign Contributions. (2020). Castanheira, Micael ; Drazen, Allan ; de Moura, Micael Castanheira ; Bouton, Laurent.
    In: Working Papers ECARES.
    RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/313224.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from Multiparty Systems, 1993-2017. (2020). Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:15150.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2019). Cagé, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2ahul47tb09rvqfl9eelv7o5ca.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2019). Cagé, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/2ahul47tb09rvqfl9eelv7o5ca.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2019). Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03393084.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Inside the revolving door: campaign finance, lobbying meetings and public contracts. An investigation for Argentina. (2019). Moncarz, Pedro ; Sofietti, P ; Avramovich, C ; Freille, S.
    In: Research Department working papers.
    RePEc:dbl:dblwop:1392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2018). Cagé, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:thk:wpaper:68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2018). Cagé, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine ; Cage, Julia.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7rcgbs4v788terphdvb6a5e8t8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2018). Bekkouche, Yasmine ; Cage, Julia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03393149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Incumbency Advantage in an Electoral Contest. (2018). Cole, Matthew ; Pastine, Tuvana .
    In: The Economic and Social Review.
    RePEc:eso:journl:v:49:y:2018:i:4:p:419-436.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The Price of a Vote: Evidence from France, 1993-2014. (2018). Cagé, Julia ; Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12614.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Campaign finance regulations and policy convergence: The role of interest groups and valence. (2014). Köppl-Turyna, Monika ; Koppl-Turyna, Monika.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:33:y:2014:i:c:p:1-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Campaign Spending and Electoral Competition: Towards More Policy Relevant Research. (2013). Milyo, Jeffrey.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umc:wpaper:1311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Civic duty and political advertising. (2013). Degan, Arianna.
    In: Economic Theory.
    RePEc:spr:joecth:v:52:y:2013:i:2:p:531-564.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Incumbency Advantage in an Electoral Contest. (2013). Pastine, Ivan ; Cole, Matthew.
    In: Economics, Finance and Accounting Department Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:may:mayecw:n242-13.pdf.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Incumbency Advantage in an Electoral Contest. (2013). Pastine, Ivan ; Cole, Matthew.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fiu:wpaper:1304.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. ESTIMATING INCUMBENCY EFFECTS IN U.S. STATE LEGISLATURES: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY. (2010). Uppal, Yogesh.
    In: Economics and Politics.
    RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:22:y:2010:i:2:p:180-199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending. (2008). Marsh, Michael ; Benoit, Kenneth.
    In: American Journal of Political Science.
    RePEc:wly:amposc:v:52:y:2008:i:4:p:874-890.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The impact of money on elections: evidence from open seat races in the United States House of Representatives, 1990-2004. (2008). Caudill, Steven B ; Duquette, Christopher ; Franklin Mixon, Jr., ; Franklin Mixon, Jr., .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-08d70004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Campaign Spending with Office-Seeking Politicians, Rational Voters and Multiple Lobbies. (1998). Prat, A.
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:30b6424e-efe1-48c7-9709-713f2669d6c9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Campaign Spending with Office-Seeking Politicians, Rational Voters and Multiple Lobbies. (1998). Prat, Andrea.
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:30b6424e-efe1-48c7-9709-713f2669d6c9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Interest groups : A survey of empirical models that try to assess their influence. (1996). Sloof, Randolph ; Potters, Jan ; Potters, J. J. M., .
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:ff27d5d8-f584-4386-a1fc-52f791f087d5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. TWO POLITICIANS, A PAC, AND HOW THEY INTERACT: TWO EXTENSIVE FORM GAMES. (1992). Edelman, Susan A..
    In: Economics and Politics.
    RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:4:y:1992:i:3:p:289-306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Looking for leverage in PAC markets: Corporate and labor contributions considered. (1988). Keim, Gerald ; Zardkoohi, Asghar.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:58:y:1988:i:1:p:21-34.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Laissez-faire in campaign finance. (1988). Crain, W. ; Tollison, Robert ; Leavens, Donald .
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:56:y:1988:i:3:p:201-212.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. A note on senatorial mass mailing expenditure and the quest for reelection. (1987). Mikesell, John.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:53:y:1987:i:3:p:257-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Patterns of political action committee contributions to the 1980 campaigns for the United States House of Representatives. (1985). Romer, Thomas ; Poole, Keith .
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:47:y:1985:i:1:p:63-111.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-12 14:43:23 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.