Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Structural Change and Global Trade. (2020). Zhang, Jing ; Sposi, Michael ; Monarch, Ryan ; Lewis, Logan.
In: Working Paper Series.
RePEc:fip:fedhwp:92684.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 50

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Structural Change With Long?Run Income and Price Effects. (2021). Mestieri, Martí ; Comin, Diego ; Lashkari, Danial.
    In: Econometrica.
    RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:89:y:2021:i:1:p:311-374.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Structural change and global trade flows: Does an emerging giant matter?. (2020). Can, Talan B ; Dennis, Benjamin N.
    In: Review of International Economics.
    RePEc:bla:reviec:v:28:y:2020:i:5:p:1191-1231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. , “Engel’s Law in the Global Economy: Demand-Induced Patterns of Structural Change, Innovation, and Trade,” Econometrica, 2019, 87 (2), 497–528.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. , “Global Trade: What’s Behind the Slowdown?,” in “World Economic Outlook,” Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund, October 2016, pp. 63–119.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. , “Putting per-capita income back into trade theory,” Journal of International Economics, July 2013, 90 (2), 255–265.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. , “The home market effect and patterns of trade between rich and poor countries,” 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. A Appendix A.1 Data Appendix This section describes the data used to construct the empirical counterfactual in Section 2 and to estimate the model in Section 4. These data cover 1970–2015 for 27 countries /regions: Australia, Austria, Belgium-Luxembourg, Brazil, Canada, China, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom, and United States, plus a “Rest of World”. The empirical counterfactual requires time series of 1) total exports and imports of goods and services and 2) final expenditure in goods and services. The model estimation requires these series as well as 3) bilateral goods and services trade data; 4) input-output coefficients; 5) value added to gross output ratios; 6) sectoral price indices; and 7) the aggregate wage bill, and 8) total employment.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Alvarez, Fernando and Robert E. Lucas, “General equilibrium analysis of the Eaton–Kortum model of international trade,” Journal of Monetary Economics, September 2007, 54 (6), 1726–1768.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Baier, Scott L. and Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, “The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity,” Journal of international Economics, 2001, 53 (1), 1–27.

  8. Betts, Caroline, Rahul Giri, and Rubina Verma, “Trade, Reform, and Structural Transformation in South Korea,” IMF Economic Review, November 2017, 65 (4), 745–791.

  9. Bilateral goods and services trade by sector and country As with total goods trade, when not taken directly from the WIOD, goods trade between two regions in our sample is generated by splicing importer-reported bilateral goods trade data in the IMF DOTS database with WIOD data, using the same three-year splicing factors as above. Bilateral services data are sparse, so instead of splicing, we simply apply average bilateral shares (e.g., U.S. imports from Canada as a share of U.S. imports from the world) over three year periods to the total services trade data calculated as above. Again, for all years prior to 1995, we use average bilateral shares from 1995-1997, and for all years after 2011, we use average bilateral shares from 2009-2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Boppart, Timo, “Structural Change and the Kaldor Facts in a Growth Model with Relative Price Effects and Non-Gorman Preferences,” Econometrica, 2014, 82 (6), 2167–2196.

  11. Caliendo, Lorenzo, Fernando Parro, Esteban Rossi-Hansberg, and Pierre-Daniel Sarte, “The Impact of Regional and Sectoral Productivity Changes on the U.S. Economy, ” The Review of Economic Studies, October 2018, 85 (4), 2042–2096.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. Caron, Justin, Thibault Fally, and James R. Markusen, “International Trade Puzzles: A Solution Linking Production and Preferences *,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 2014, 129 (3), 1501–1552.

  13. Comin, Diego, Danial Lashkari, and Martí Mestieri, “Structural Change with Long-run Income and Price Effects,” 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Costinot, Arnaud and Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, “Trade Theory with Numbers: Quantifying the Consequences of Globalization,” Handbook of International Economics, January 2014, 4, 197–261.

  15. Cravino, Javier and Sebastian Sotelo, “Trade-Induced Structural Change and the Skill Premium,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, July 2019, 11 (3), 289– 326.

  16. Fajgelbaum, Pablo D. and Amit K. Khandelwal, “Measuring the Unequal Gains from Trade,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 2016, 131 (3), 1113–1180.

  17. Fieler, Ana Cecília, “Nonhomotheticity and Bilateral Trade: Evidence and a Quantitative Explanation,” Econometrica, July 2011, 79 (4), 1069–1101.

  18. For each country we linearly interpolate between the observed years and then splice the shares series to that from the WIOD data in 1995. If these data do not overlap with 1995, we linearly extrapolate forward until 1995, using data from the latest two years, and then splice. This gives us an unbalanced panel from which we can observe variation across countries and over time prior to 1995. This helps provide discipline on the estimated shares that we impute prior to 1995 for countries that have no data. Using our unbalanced panel we first estimate: log λikt 1−λikt = α +β log(yit) +εit, (A.1) and then impute the ratio, log( λikt 1−λikt ), for missing country-years using the observed GDP per worker, yit and the estimates of α and β. The imputed value for λikt is ensured to be between 0 and 1. We follow a similar procedure to impute values for γigst and γisst, and then set γiggt = 1−γigst and γisgt = 1−γisst.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Hanoch, Giora, “Production and Demand Models with Direct or Indirect Implicit Additivity, ” Econometrica, 1975, 43 (3), 395–419.

  20. Herrendorf, Berthold, Richard Rogerson, and kos Valentinyi, “Two Perspectives on Preferences and Structural Transformation,” American Economic Review, December 2013, 103 (7), 2752–2789.

  21. Hoekman, Bernard, “Trade and growth – end of an era?,” in “The Global Trade Slowdown: A New Normal?,” VoxEU.org, June 2015, pp. 3–19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Hottman, Colin J. and Ryan Monarch, “Estimating Unequal Gains across U.S. Consumers with Supplier Trade Data,” International Finance Discussion Paper, January 2018, 2018 (1220), 1–51.

  23. IMF, “Direction of Trade Statistics,” 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Inklaar, Robert and Marcel P. Timmer, “The Relative Price of Services,” Review of Income and Wealth, December 2014, 60 (4), 727–746.

  25. Input-output coefficients and value added to gross output ratios To construct γikn, the country-specific share of intermediate inputs that sector k sources from sector n, we use the numbers directly from WIOD for 1995-2011. The value added to gross output ratio in sector k, λik is also a straightforward manipulation of data in the WIOD for 1995-2011. 27Results are qualitatively similar defining construction as a goods category, but given the lack of direct trade in construction, categorizing it as a service will make goods sectoral openness higher and services sectoral openness lower. Both the model-based counterfactual and especially the reduced-form counterfactual would be smaller in magnitude relative to the data.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Irwin, Douglas A., “Long-run trends in world trade and income,” World Trade Review, 2002, 1 (1), 89–100.

  27. Kehoe, Timothy J., Kim J. Ruhl, and Joseph B. Steinberg, “Global Imbalances and Structural Change in the United States,” Journal of Political Economy, December 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Kongsamut, Piyabha, Sergio Rebelo, and Danyang Xie, “Beyond Balanced Growth,” The Review of Economic Studies, 2001, 68 (4), 869–882.

  29. Krugman, Paul, Richard N. Cooper, and T. N. Srinivasan, “Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995, 1995 (1), 327–377.

  30. Labor endowment by country We take total employment data in the Penn World Table as our measure of Li. These data correspond to the number of workers engaged in market activity. Since these data only go through 2014, we splice WDI total employment data in 2015 to the Penn World Table data in order to estimate the model through 2015. Wage by country Dividing aggregate value added in current US$ by the labor endowment gives the imputed wage wi.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Levchenko, Andrei A. and Jing Zhang, “The evolution of comparative advantage: Measurement and welfare implications,” Journal of Monetary Economics, April 2016, 78, 96–111.

  32. Markusen, James R., “Explaining the Volume of Trade: An Eclectic Approach,” The American Economic Review, 1986, 76 (5), 1002–1011.

  33. Matsuyama, Kiminori, “Structural Change in an Interdependent World: A Global View of Manufacturing Decline,” Journal of the European Economic Association, April 2009, 7 (2-3), 478–486.

  34. McMillan, Margaret S. and Dani Rodrik, “Globalization, Structural Change and Productivity Growth,” Working Paper 17143, National Bureau of Economic Research June 2011.

  35. Nigai, Sergey, “On Measuring the Welfare Gains from Trade Under Consumer Heterogeneity, ” The Economic Journal, 2016, 126 (593), 1193–1237.

  36. Our strategy is to work with the World Input-Output Database (WIOD) from 19952011, which is described in Timmer, Dietzenbacher, Los, Stehrer and de Vries (2015), then build the rest of the time sample out from those numbers using splicing techniques with other longer-running datasets. For pre-1995 trade data, we compute the annual changes from the relevant data source then extrapolate the levels off of the 1995 value from WIOD.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Rose, Andrew K., “Why Has Trade Grown Faster Than Income?,” The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d’Economique, 1991, 24 (2), 417–427.

  38. Simonovska, Ina, “Income Differences and Prices of Tradables: Insights from an Online Retailer,” The Review of Economic Studies, October 2015, 82 (4), 1612–1656.

  39. Since the WIOD covers only 1995-2011, we impute γikn and λik for the remaining years by (i) supplementing the WIOD with incomplete country-specific input-output tables to create a longer, yet unbalanced, panel and (ii) imputing all missing country-year observations based on an estimated relationship between the shares and real income per worker.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Świ˛ ecki, Tomasz, “Determinants of structural change,” Review of Economic Dynamics, March 2017, 24, 95–131.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Sposi, Michael, “Evolving comparative advantage, sectoral linkages, and structural change,” Journal of Monetary Economics, May 2019, 103, 75–87.

  42. Teignier, Marc, “The role of trade in structural transformation,” Journal of Development Economics, January 2018, 130, 45–65.

  43. The specific countries and years that we add are the following: Japan (1970, 1973-1995, from the Japan Industrial Productivity Database); South Korea (1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1990, 1993, 1995, from the Bank of Korea); United States (1972, 1977, 1982, 1987, 1992, 1997, from the Bureau of Economic Analysis);. We also appeal to data from the OECD: Australia (1968, 1974, 1986, 1989); Canada (1971, 1976, 1981, 1986, 1990); Denmark (1972, 1977, 1980, 1985, 1990); France (1972, 1977, 1980, 1985, 1990); (West) Germany (1978, 1986, 1988, 1990); Italy (1985); Netherlands (1972, 1977, 1981, 1986); United Kingdom (1968, 1979, 1984, 1990).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Timmer, Marcel P., Erik Dietzenbacher, Bart Los, Robert Stehrer, and Gaaitzen J. de Vries, “An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input-Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production: User Guide to World Input-Output Database,” Review of International Economics, August 2015, 23 (3), 575–605.

  45. Total exports and imports by country For each of the 27 groupings above, we take total goods and services exports and imports from the WIOD from 1995-2011. Then, for all other years (i.e. 1970-1994 and 2012-2015), we splice with other data. The splicing procedure divides the average of three years of the WIOD data by the average of three years of a longer dataset to generate a splicing factor, then applying that splicing factor to the longer dataset in non-WIOD years. The averages are calculated from 1995-1997 for all years before 1995, and from 2009-2011 for all years after 2011. For goods trade, we splice the WIOD trade data with total trade from the IMF Direction of Trade Statistics (IMF 2016a) database from 1970 to 2015. For services, we use aggregate services exports and imports data from the World Development Indicators (WDI) from 1970 to 2015 as the comparison. If WDI data on services are not available, we supplement in growth rates where necessary with OECD services data.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. UN, “UN National Accounts Main Aggregates Database,” 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Uy, Timothy, Kei-Mu Yi, and Jing Zhang, “Structural change in an open economy,” Journal of Monetary Economics, September 2013, 60 (6), 667–682.

  48. Value added by sector and country For value added data, we rely on the UN Main Aggregates Database (UN 2017). We take nominal goods value added in a country to be the combination of expenditure in “Agriculture, hunting, forestry, fishing” and “Mining, Manufacturing, Utilities”, while services value added is expenditure in “Construction”, “Wholesale, retail trade, restaurants and hotels”, “Transport, storage, and communication”, and “Other Activities”.27 Years: 1970-2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. We do the same thing for post-2011 data. This ensures that the WIOD-based input-output coefficients generate sensible expenditure shares during WIOD years—otherwise, the inputoutput coefficients would be applied to trade data that may not match the underlying WIOD data used to generate those coefficients.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Yi, Kei-Mu, “Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade?,” The Journal of Political Economy, February 2003, 111 (1), 52–102.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The effect of the Uruguay round on the intensive and extensive margins of trade. (2012). buono, ines ; Lalanne, Guy.
    In: Journal of International Economics.
    RePEc:eee:inecon:v:86:y:2012:i:2:p:269-283.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Trade between China and the Netherlands: a Case Study of Globalization. (2008). Den Butter, Frank ; Frank A. G. den Butter, ; Hayat, Raphie .
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20080016.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Regionalization, Changes in Home Bias, and the Growth of World Trade. (2007). Xin, Xian ; Whalley, John.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:13023.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The European Union preferential trade with developing countries. Total trade restrictiveness and the case of sugar. (2007). Salvatici, Luca ; Hallam, David ; Conforti, Piero ; Rapsomanikis, George ; Ford, Deep.
    In: Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:mol:ecsdps:esdp07037.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Dual gravity : Using spatial econometrics to control for multilateral resistance. (2007). KOCH, Wilfried ; Ertur, Cem ; Behrens, Kristian.
    In: LEG - Document de travail - Economie.
    RePEc:lat:legeco:2007-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The wise use of dummies in gravity models: export potentials in the Euromed region. (2007). Vilarrubia, Josep ; Ruiz, Juan.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bde:wpaper:0720.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Is the Iceberg Melting Less Quickly? International Trade Costs after World War II. (2006). Novy, Dennis.
    In: The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS).
    RePEc:wrk:warwec:764.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Preferential trade agreements and their role in world trade. (2006). Medvedev, Denis.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:4038.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. On the Empirics of Market Integration in ECOWAS. (2006). Gbetnkom, Daniel .
    In: Journal of Economic Policy Reform.
    RePEc:taf:jpolrf:v:9:y:2006:i:4:p:289-303.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Is Gravity Linear?. (2006). Millimet, Daniel ; Henderson, Daniel.
    In: Departmental Working Papers.
    RePEc:smu:ecowpa:0517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Domestic support and tariff reductions in the presence of non-tariff barriers: A gravity model for primary and processed agricultural products. (2006). Tamini, Lota ; Ghazalian, Pascal ; Gervais, Jean-Philippe ; Larue, Bruno.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:2743.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Trade Costs in the First Wave of Globalization. (2006). Novy, Dennis ; Meissner, Christopher ; Jacks, David.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:12602.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Trade Verticality and Structural Change in Industries:The Cases of Taiwan and South Korea. (2006). Chang, Yang-Ming ; Chen, Hung-Yi .
    In: Open Economies Review.
    RePEc:kap:openec:v:17:y:2006:i:3:p:321-340.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Portuguese Intra-Industry Trade: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis. (2006). Leitão, Nuno ; Faustino, Horácio ; Leito, Nuno C..
    In: Working Papers Department of Economics.
    RePEc:ise:isegwp:wp212006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The Free Trade Agreement Morocco-EU: a simulation of the impact on EU exports.. (2006). Milgram Baleix, Juliette ; Blanes, Jose.
    In: ThE Papers.
    RePEc:gra:wpaper:06/09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Chinese growth: a source of U.S. export opportunities. (2006). Poole, William.
    In: Review.
    RePEc:fip:fedlrv:y:2006:i:nov:p:471-484:n:v.88no.6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Trade integration, competition, and the decline in exchange-rate pass-through. (2006). Vigfusson, Robert ; Leduc, Sylvain ; Gust, Christopher.
    In: International Finance Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:fip:fedgif:864.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Transport costs and trade: Empirical evidence for Latin American imports from the European union. (2005). Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada ; Suarez-Burguet, Celestino ; Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada.
    In: The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development.
    RePEc:taf:jitecd:v:14:y:2005:i:3:p:353-371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Estimating Models of Complex FDI: Are There Third-Country Effects?. (2005). Pfaffermayr, Michael ; Egger, Peter ; Baltagi, Badi.
    In: Center for Policy Research Working Papers.
    RePEc:max:cprwps:73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Integration and Tax Competition: An Empirical Study of OECD Countries. (2005). Olofsdotter, Karin ; Hansson, Åsa.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2005_004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Can the standard international business cycle model explain the relation between trade and comovement?. (2005). Yi, Kei-Mu ; Kose, Ayhan.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fip:fedpwp:05-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Vertical specialization and the border effect puzzle. (2005). Yi, Kei-Mu.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fip:fedpwp:05-24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Unilateral and regional trade liberalization: Chinas WTO accession and FTA with ASEAN. (2005). saygili, mesut ; Wong, Kar-yiu .
    In: Proceedings.
    RePEc:fip:fedfpr:y:2005:x:22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?. (2005). Bergstrand, Jeffrey ; Baier, Scott.
    In: FRB Atlanta Working Paper.
    RePEc:fip:fedawp:2005-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Trade effects of the euro: evidence from sectoral data. (2005). Skudelny, Frauke ; Baldwin, Richard ; Taglioni, Daria.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecb:ecbwps:2005446.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Accounting for Pairwise Heterogeneity in Bilateral Trade Flows: A Stochastic Varying Coefficient Gravity Model. (2005). Tzouvelekas, Vangelis.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:crt:wpaper:0519.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Can Comparative Advantage Explain the Growth of US Trade?. (2005). Maffezzoli, Marco ; Cunat, Alejandro ; Cuat, Alejandro.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5348.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Changes in Infrastructure and Tariff Barriers: Local Vs. Global Impacts. (2005). Tabuchi, Takatoshi ; Ottaviano, Gianmarco ; Lamorgese, Andrea ; Behrens, Kristian.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Can Comparative Advantage Explain the Growth of US Trade?. (2005). Maffezzoli, Marco ; Cunat, Alejandro ; Cuat, Alejandro.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0669.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. On the geography of trade : distance is alive and well. (2004). Schiff, Maurice ; CARRERE, CELINE.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. The Importance of Being British? Imperial Factors and the Growth of British Exports, 1870-1960. (2004). Magee, Gary.
    In: Department of Economics - Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:mlb:wpaper:923.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Cartel Stability and Economic Integration. (2004). Schröder, Philipp.
    In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
    RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp432.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. El modelo gravitacional y el TLC entre Colombia y Estados Unidos. (2004). Cardenas, Mauricio ; Garciajimeno, Camilo .
    In: WORKING PAPERS SERIES. DOCUMENTOS DE TRABAJO.
    RePEc:col:000123:002527.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The perversity of preferences : GSP and developing country trade policies, 1976 - 2000. (2003). Reinhardt, Eric ; Ozden, Caglar.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:2955.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Growth of Asian Regional Trade and Income Convergence: Evidence from ASEAN+3 Based on Extended Helpman-Krugman Hypothesis and Flexible Modelling Approach. (2003). Tran, Van Hoa ; VANHOA, Tran ; Van Hoa, Tran .
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:uow:depec1:wp03-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Energy Prices and the Expansion of World Trade. (2003). .
    In: Departmental Working Papers.
    RePEc:lsu:lsuwpp:2003-14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Can Comparative Advantage Explain the Growth of US Trade?. (2003). Maffezzoli, Marco ; Cunat, Alejandro.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:241.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Productive capacity, product varieties, and the elasticities approach to the trade balance. (2003). Gagnon, Joseph.
    In: International Finance Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:fip:fedgif:781.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Long-run supply effects and the elasticities approach to trade. (2003). Gagnon, Joseph.
    In: International Finance Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:fip:fedgif:754.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Core-Periphery Patterns of Generalized Transport Costs: France, 1978-98. (2003). Lafourcade, Miren ; Combes, Pierre-Philippe.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:3958.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Closed Jaguar, Open Dragon: Comparing Tariffs in Latin America and Asia before World War II. (2002). Williamson, Jeffrey ; Clemens, Michael.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:9401.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Trade Integration and Risk Sharing. (2002). Ventura, Jaume ; Kraay, Aart.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:8804.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Has Distance Died? Evidence from a Panel Gravity Model. (2002). Guillaumont, Patrick ; de Melo, Jaime ; CARRERE, CELINE ; Brun, Jean.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:3500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Globalization and Inequality: Historical Trends. (2001). O'Rourke, Kevin.
    In: CEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:tcd:tcdceg:20015.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Reductions in Real versus Tariff Barriers: The Effects on Industry Concentration. (2001). Schröder, Philipp ; Jørgensen, Jan ; Jorgensen, Jan G. ; Schroder, Philipp J. H., .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:124.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Market Size and Factor Endowment: Explaining Comparative Advantage in Bilateral Trade by Differences in Income and Per Capita Income. (2001). Schumacher, Dieter.
    In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
    RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Globalization and Inequality: Historical Trends. (2001). O'Rourke, Kevin.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:2865.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Increasing Returns versus National Product Differentiation as an Explanation for the Pattern of U.S.-Canada Trade. (2001). Ries, John ; Head, Keith.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:91:y:2001:i:4:p:858-876.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Can vertical specialization explain the growth of world trade?. (2000). Yi, Kei-Mu.
    In: Staff Reports.
    RePEc:fip:fednsr:96.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Insecurity and the Pattern of Trade: An Empirical Investigation. (2000). Marcouiller, Douglas ; Anderson, James.
    In: Boston College Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:boc:bocoec:418.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-12 00:30:05 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.