- Backhouse, R.E. (2009), ‘Friedman’s 1953 essay and the marginalist controversy ’, in U. Mäki (ed.), The Methodology of Positive Economics: Reflections on the Milton Friedman Legacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–40.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bear, D.V.T. and D. Orr (1967), ‘Logical expediency in economic theorizing’, Journal of Political Economy, 75, 188–96.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Blaug, M. (1976), ‘Kuhn versus Lakatos, or paradigm versus research programmes in the history of economics’, in S.J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–80.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Blaug, M. (1980), The Methodology of Economics, or How Economists Explain, 1st edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Blaug, M. (1992), The Methodology of Economics, or How Economists Explain, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Blaug, M. (2009), ‘The debate over F53 after fifty years’, in U. Mäki (ed.), The Methodology of Positive Economics: Reflections on the Milton Friedman Legacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 349–54.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Boland, L.A. (1979), ‘A critique of Friedman’s critics’, Journal of Economic Literature, 17, 503–22.
Caldwell, B.J. (1991), ‘Clarifying Popper’, Journal of Economic Literature, 29, 1–33.
- Camerer, C. and G. Loewenstein (2004), ‘Behavioral economics: past, present, and future’, in Advances in Behavioral Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–51.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Caplin, A. and A. Schotter (eds) (2008), The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Chamberlin, E. (1933), The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- De Marchi, N. and M. Blaug (eds) (1991), Appraising Economic Theories. Studies in the Methodology of Research Programs, Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, VT, USA: Edward Elgar.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Friedman, M. (1953), ‘The methodology of positive economics’, in Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–43.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- GP08 is the new F53 263 Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Boumans-Mark_Blaug / Division: 17Chapter17 /Pg. Position: 19 / Date: 4/10 Marcel Boumans and Matthias Klaes - 9781781955666 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/02/2016 04:48:00AM via CitEc (NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, SHARING or POSTING) JOBNAME: Boumans PAGE: 20 SESS: 6 OUTPUT: Tue Oct 15 14:23:55 2013 Lester, R.A. (1946), ‘Shortcomings of marginal analysis for wage-employment problems’, American Economic Review, 36, 63–82.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- GP08 is the new F53 265 Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Boumans-Mark_Blaug / Division: 17Chapter17 /Pg. Position: 21 / Date: 23/8 Marcel Boumans and Matthias Klaes - 9781781955666 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/02/2016 04:48:00AM via CitEc (NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, SHARING or POSTING) JOBNAME: Boumans PAGE: 22 SESS: 4 OUTPUT: Tue Oct 15 14:23:55 2013 Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Boumans-Mark_Blaug / Division: 17Chapter17 /Pg. Position: 22 / Date: 23/8 Marcel Boumans and Matthias Klaes - 9781781955666 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/02/2016 04:48:00AM via CitEc (NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, SHARING or POSTING)
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Guala, F. (2011), ‘Are preferences for real? Choice theory, folk psychology, and the hard case for commonsensible realism’, in A. Lehtinen, J. Kuorikoski and P. Ylikoski (eds), Economics for Real: Uskali Mäki and the Place of Truth in Economics, London: Routledge, pp. 137–55.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gul, F. and W. Pesendorfer (2008), ‘The case for mindless economics’, in A. Caplin and A. Schotter (eds), The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–39.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hammond, J.D. (1993), ‘An interview with Milton Friedman on methodology’, in B.J. Caldwell (ed.), The Philosophy and Methodology of Economics, Vol. I, Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, VT, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 215–38.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hands, D.W. (2008), ‘Introspection, revealed preference and neoclassical economics: a critical response to Don Ross on the Robbins-Samuelson argument pattern’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 30, 1–26.
Hands, D.W. (2009), ‘Rejoinder to Ross: more on the Robbins–Samuelson argument pattern’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 31, 105–14.
Hands, D.W. (2010), ‘Stabilizing consumer choice: the role of “true dynamic stability†and related concepts in the history of consumer choice theory’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17, 313–43.
Hands, D.W. (2011a), ‘Back to the ordinalist revolution: behavioral economic concerns in early modern consumer choice theory’, Metroeconomica, 62, 386–410.
- Hands, D.W. (2011b), ‘Realism, commonsensibles, and economics: the case of contemporary revealed preference theory’, in A. Lehtinen, J. Kuorikoski and P. Ylikoski (eds), Economics for Real: Uskali Mäki and the Place of Truth in Economics, London: Routledge, pp. 156–78. Hands, D.W. (forthcoming a), ‘Paul Samuelson and revealed preference theory’, History of Political Economy. Hands, D.W. (forthcoming b), ‘Foundations of contemporary revealed preference theory’, Erkenntnis.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Harrison, G. and D. Ross (2010), ‘The methodologies of neuroeconomics’, The Journal of Economic Methodology, 17, 185–96.
Hausman, D.M. (1992), The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hausman, D.M. (2008), ‘Mindless or mindful economics: a methodological evaluation’, in A. Caplin and A. Schotter (eds), The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125–51.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hausman, D.M. (2012), Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Houthakker, H.S. (1950), ‘Revealed preference and the utility function’, Economica, 17, 159–74.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kahneman, D., P.B. Wakker and R. Sarin (1997), ‘Back to Bentham?’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 374–405.
- Klappholz, K. and J. Agassi (1959), ‘Methodological prescriptions in economics ’, Economica, 26, 60–74.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kuhn, T.S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Latsis, S.J. (ed.) (1976), Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mäki, U. (1986), ‘Rhetoric at the expense of coherence: a reinterpretation of Milton Friedman’s methodology’, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 4, 127–43.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mäki, U. (1992), ‘Friedman and realism’, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 10, 171–95.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mäki, U. (2000), ‘Reclaiming relevant realism’, The Journal of Economic Methodology, 7, 109–25.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mäki, U. (2002), ‘Some nonreasons for nonrealism about economics’, in U. Mäki (ed.), Fact and Fiction in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 90–104.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mäki, U. (2009b), ‘Reading the methodological essay in twentieth-century economics: map of multiple perspectives’, in U. Mäki (ed.), The Methodology of Positive Economics: Reflections on the Milton Friedman Legacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–67.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mäki, U. (2009c), ‘Unrealistic assumptions and unnecessary confusions: rereading and rewriting F53 as a realist statement’, in U. Mäki (ed.), The Methodology of Positive Economics: Reflections on the Milton Friedman Legacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 90–116.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mäki, U. (2012), ‘Realism and antirealism about economics’, in U. Mäki (ed.), Philosophy of Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland, pp. 3–24.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mäki, U. (ed.) (2009a), The Methodology of Positive Economics: Reflections on the Milton Friedman Legacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Marchionni, C. and J. Vromen (eds) (2010), ‘Neuroeconomics: hype or hope?’ The Journal of Economic Methodology, 17, 103–6.
- Mill, J.S. (1874), ‘On the definition of political economy; and on the method of investigation proper to it’, in Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, 2nd edition, London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Popper, K.R. (1965), Conjectures and Refutations, 2nd edition, New York: Harper and Row.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Popper, K.R. (1968), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 2nd edition, New York: Basic Books.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Popper, K.R. (1985), ‘The rationality principle’, in D. Miller (ed.), Popper Selections, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 357–65.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Popper, K.R. (1994), The Myth of the Framework: In Defense of Science and Rationality, London: Routledge.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Reiss, J. (2012), ‘Idealization and the aims of economics: three cheers for instrumentalism’, Economics and Philosophy, 28, 363–83.
- Robbins, L. (1935), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd edition, London: Macmillan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Robinson, J. (1933), The Economics of Imperfect Competition, London: Macmillan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ross, D. (1995), ‘Real patterns and the ontological foundations of microeconomics ’, Economics and Philosophy, 11, 113–36.
Ross, D. (2005), Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Ross, D. (2008b), ‘Reply to Lagueux: on a revolution in methodology of economics’, Erasmus Journal for Philosophy of Economics, 1, 56–60.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ross, D. (2011a), ‘Estranged parents and a schizophrenic child: choice in economics, psychology, and neuroeconomics’, The Journal of Economic Methodology, 18, 217–31.
- Ross, D. (2011b), ‘Mäki’s realism and the scope of economics’, in A. Lehtinen, J. Kuorikoski and P. Ylikoski (eds), Economics for Real: Uskali Mäki and the Place of Truth in Economics, London: Routledge, pp. 182-202.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ross, D. (2011c), ‘Neuroeconomics and economic methodology’, in J.B. Davis and D.W. Hands (eds), The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 61–93.
- Ross, D. (2012), ‘The economic agent: not human, but important’, in U. Mäki (ed.), Philosophy of Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland, pp. 691–735.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sunstein, C.R. and R.H. Thaler (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wong, S. (1973), ‘The “F-Twist†and the methodology of Paul Samuelson’, American Economic Review, 63, 312–25.