Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Big Data, Accounting and International Development: Trends and challenges. (2022). Urquia-Grande, Elena ; Estebanez, Raquel Perez ; de Silva, Alberto Martinez.
In: Cuadernos de Gestión.
RePEc:ehu:cuader:55447.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 19

References cited by this document

Cocites: 45

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Research into microfinance and ICTs: A bibliometric analysis. (2023). Rodriguez-Lopez, Angel ; Lopez-Sanchez, Pilar ; Urquia-Grande, Elena ; Liu, Aiping.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:97:y:2023:i:c:s0149718922001690.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. (2016). A bibliometric study about the research based on hybridating the fuzzy logic field and the other computational intelligent techniques: A visual approach. International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems, 7(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.3233/his-20100102 López-Herrera, A. G., Cobo, M. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Bailón -Moreno, R., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2009). Visualization and evolution of the scientific structure of fuzzy sets research in Spain. Information Research, 14(4).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. (2018). Credit scoring for good: Enhancing financial inclusion with smartphone-based microlending. International Conference on Information Systems 2018, ICIS 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Adriaanse, L. S., & Rensleigh, C. (2011). Comparing Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar from an Environmental Sciences perspective.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ asi.5090140103 Kim, G. H., Trimi, S., & Chung, J. H. (2014). Big-data applications in the government sector. Communications of the ACM, 57(3), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500873 Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics, 74(2), 273-294. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-008-0217-x Kuusi, O., & Meyer, M. (2007). Anticipating technological breakthroughs: Using bibliographic coupling to explore the nanotubes paradigm.

  5. Hay, S. I., George, D. B., Moyes, C. L., & Brownstein, J. S. (2013). Big Data Opportunities for Global Infectious Disease Surveillance.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. https://www.open.ac.uk/ccig/sites/www.open.ac.uk.ccig/files/Mapping Refugee Media Journeys 16 May FIN MG_0.pdf Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing Scientific Collaboration through Co-Authorship. In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies on S&T systems (pp. 257-276).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. In Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 119-145. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0165551504042802 Gillespie, M., Ampofo, L., Cheesman, M., Faith, B., Iliadou, E., Issa, A., Osseiran, S., & Skleparis, D. (2016). Something About Refugee Media. In The Open University/France Medias Monde (Issue May).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 19, 173190. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.240705 Roy, M., Moreau, N., Rousseau, C., Mercier, A., Wilson, A., & Atlani -Duault, L. (2020). Ebola and Localized Blame on Social Media: Analysis of Twitter and Facebook Conversations During the 20142015 Ebola Epidemic. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 44(1), 5679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-019-09635-8 Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.4630240406 Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813. https://doi.

  9. Journal maps on the basis of scopus data: A comparison with the journal citation reports of the ISI. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 352-369. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.21250 Lim, S. S., Allen, K., Dandona, L., Forouzanfar, M. H., Fullman, N., Goldberg, E. M., Hay, S. I., Holmberg, M., Kutz, M. J., Larson, H. J., Lopez, A. D., McNellan, C. R., Mokdad, A. H., Mooney, M. D., Naghavi, M., Olsen, H. E., Pigott, D. M., Vos, T., Wang, H.,… Zonies, D. (2016). Measuring the health-related Sustainable Development Goals in 188 countries: a baseline analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet, 388(10053), 1813-1850. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31467-2 Linders, D. (2013). Towards open development: Leveraging open data to improve the planning and coordination of international aid.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Marshakova, I. V. (1981). Citation networks in information science.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Oliver, N., Matic, A., & Frias-Martinez, E. (2015). Mobile Network Data for Public Health: Opportunities and Challenges. Frontiers in Public Health, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00189 Óskarsdóttir, M., Sarraute, C., Bravo, C., Baesens, B., & Vanthienen, J.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2017-2880 Baldwin, C. Y., Tribendis, J. J., & Clark, J. P. (1984). The Evolution of Market Risk in the U.S. Steel Industry and Implications for Required Rates of Return. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 33(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098425 Bergmann, T., Dale, R., Sattari, N., Heit, E., & Bhat, H. S. (2017). The Interdisciplinarity of Collaborations in Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science, 41(5), 1412-1418. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12352 Bertot, J. C., Gorham, U., Jaeger, P. T., Sarin, L. C., & Choi, H. (2014). Big data, open government and e-government: Issues, policies and recommendations. Information Polity, 19(1–2), 5-16. https://doi.

  13. Price, D. J., & Beaver, D. D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Protopop, I. (2016). Big Data and Smallholder Farmers: Big Data Applications in the Agri-Food Supply Chain in Developing Countries.

  15. Quality and Quantity, 46(4), 1077-1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11135-011-9565-3 Nalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1971). Measurement of science: Study of the development of science as an information process. Washington , DC: Foreign Technology Division. In Naukometriya, Izucheniye Razvitiya Nauki kak Informatsionnogo Protsessa (p. 196).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Scientometrics, 3(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02021861 McKinney, E., Yoos, C. J., & Snead, K. (2017). The need for ‘skeptical’ accountants in the era of Big Data. Journal of Accounting Education, 38, 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.12.007 Management Letters / Cuadernos de Gestión 22/1 (2022) 193-213 Big Data, Accounting and International Development: Trends and challenges 213 Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-377. https://doi.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Scientometrics, 70(3), 759-777. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-007-0311-5 Landefeld, S. (2014). Uses of Big Data for Official Statistics: Privacy, Incentives, Statistical Challenges, and Other Issues Discussion Paper United Nations Global Working Group on Big Data for Official Statistics. 1-20. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/trade/events/2014/beijing/ Steve Landefeld - Uses of Big Data for official statistics.pdf Leydesdorff, L., De Moya-Anegón, F., & Guerrero-Bote, V. P. (2010).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. The American Psychologist, 21(11), 1011-1018. https://doi. org/10.1037/h0024051 PRITCHARD, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. The google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(3), 446-454. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.23056 López-Herrera, A. G., Cobo, M. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases. (2022). Gusenbauer, Michael.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04289-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. How much does a Ph.D. scholarship program impact an emerging economy research performance?. (2022). Basile, Fernando Antonio ; Mena-Chalco, Jesus Pascual ; Spatti, Ana Carolina ; Salles-Filho, Sergio ; Bin, Adriana.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04487-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Big Data, Accounting and International Development: Trends and challenges. (2022). Urquia-Grande, Elena ; Estebanez, Raquel Perez ; de Silva, Alberto Martinez.
    In: Cuadernos de Gestión.
    RePEc:ehu:cuader:55447.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Linguistic Diversity Index: A Scientometric Measure to Enhance the Relevance of Small and Minority Group Languages. (2021). Han, Gyuseog ; Choi, Eunsoo ; Oadoherty, Kieran ; Linkov, Vclav.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:21582440211009191.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. (2021). Park, Joo Young ; Kanaoka, Koichi S ; Chertow, Marian R.
    In: Journal of Industrial Ecology.
    RePEc:bla:inecol:v:25:y:2021:i:4:p:913-931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. How many preprints have actually been printed and why: a case study of computer science preprints on arXiv. (2020). Yu, Yao ; Lin, Jialiang ; Shi, Xiaodong ; Zhou, Zhiyang.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:124:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03430-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The open access citation premium may depend on the openness and inclusiveness of the indexing database, but the relationship is controversial because it is ambiguous where the open access boundary lie. (2019). Copiello, Sergio.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:121:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03221-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison. (2018). Orduna-Malea, Enrique ; Martin-Martin, Alberto ; Lopez-Cozar, Emilio Delgado.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:116:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2820-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. (2018). Martin-Martin, Alberto ; Lopez-Cozar, Emilio Delgado ; Thelwall, Mike ; Orduna-Malea, Enrique.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:12:y:2018:i:4:p:1160-1177.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The relationships between distance factors and international collaborative research outcomes: A bibliometric examination. (2018). Jiang, Ling ; Jun, Minjoon ; Xu, Shen ; Yang, Zhilin ; Zhu, Nibing.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:12:y:2018:i:3:p:618-630.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Microsoft Academic automatic document searches: Accuracy for journal articles and suitability for citation analysis. (2018). Thelwall, Mike.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:1-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Academic impact evaluation of Wechat in view of social media perspective. (2017). Wei, Mingkun ; Zhao, Rongying.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:112:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2439-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Research productivity in management schools of India during 1968-2015: A directional benefit-of-doubt model analysis. (2017). Sahoo, Biresh ; Mishra, Bineet ; Singh, Ramadhar ; Sankaran, Krithiga .
    In: Omega.
    RePEc:eee:jomega:v:66:y:2017:i:pa:p:118-139.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature. (2017). Halevi, Gali ; Bar-Ilan, Judit ; Moed, Henk .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:11:y:2017:i:3:p:823-834.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?. (2017). Martin-Martin, Alberto ; Lopez-Cozar, Emilio Delgado ; Harzing, Anne-Wil ; Orduna-Malea, Enrique.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:152-163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The scholarly communication of economic knowledge: a citation analysis of Google Scholar. (2016). Sun, Yutao ; Xia, Belle Selene.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:109:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2140-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. (2016). Paul-Hus, Adele ; Mongeon, Philippe.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:106:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1765-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus. (2016). Halevi, Gali ; Bar-Ilan, Judit ; Moed, Henk F.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:10:y:2016:i:2:p:533-551.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. (2016). Waltman, Ludo.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:10:y:2016:i:2:p:365-391.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields. (2015). Nabavi, Majid ; Jamali, Hamid R.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:105:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1642-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar. (2015). Ayllon, Juan M ; Orduna-Malea, Enrique ; Lopez-Cozar, Emilio Delgado ; Martin-Martin, Alberto.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:104:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1614-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Research Productivity in Management Schools of India: A Directional Benefit-of-Doubt Model Analysis. (2015). Sahoo, Biresh ; Sankaran, Krithiga ; Mishra, Bineet ; Singh, Ramadhar .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:67046.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Does massive funding support of researchers work?: Evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative. (2015). Fedderke, Johannes ; Goldschmidt, M..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:2:p:467-482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study. (2014). Zadpoor, Amir A ; Dodou, Dimitra .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:98:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1089-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The objectivity of national research foundation peer review in South Africa assessed against bibliometric indexes. (2013). Fedderke, Johannes.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:97:y:2013:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-013-0981-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners. (2013). Harzing, Anne-Wil.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:94:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0777-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Assessing researcher interdisciplinarity: a case study of the University of Hawaii NASA Astrobiology Institute. (2013). Gazan, Rich ; Gowanlock, Michael .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:94:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0765-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. (2012). Aguillo, Isidro F.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:91:y:2012:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0582-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Relative Performance Measurement of Researchers: The Impact of Data Source Selection. (2012). Meyer, Matthias ; Waldkirch, Rudiger W. ; Zaggl, Michael A..
    In: Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr).
    RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:64:y:2012:i:4:p:308-330.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. The Objectivity of National Research Foundation Peer Review Based Ratings in South Africa. (2012). Fedderke, Johannes.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:rza:wpaper:300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Measuring economic journals’ citation efficiency: a data envelopment analysis approach. (2011). Tzeremes, Nickolaos ; HALKOS, GEORGE.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:88:y:2011:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0421-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The end of the beginning: a reflection on the first five years of the HRI conference. (2011). Bartneck, Christoph.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:86:y:2011:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-010-0281-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Measuring economic journals’ citation efficiency: A data envelopment analysis approach. (2011). Tzeremes, Nickolaos ; HALKOS, GEORGE.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:29893.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Measuring Economic Journals Citation Efficiency: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. (2011). Tzeremes, Nickolaos ; HALKOS, GEORGE ; George Emm. Halkos, .
    In: EERI Research Paper Series.
    RePEc:eei:rpaper:eeri_rp_2011_13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. «Cité ou oublié»:les supports de la notoriété des professeurs en sciences de gestion vus à travers Google Scholar. (2011). Charreaux, Gerard.
    In: Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie.
    RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:14:y:2011:i:q4:p:129-166..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. (2010). Ins, Markus ; Larsen, Peder Olesen .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:84:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-010-0202-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar. (2010). Franceschet, Massimo.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:83:y:2010:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0021-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. (2010). Bar-Ilan, Judit.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:82:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-010-0185-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Use of Scopus and Google Scholar to measure social sciences production in four major Spanish universities. (2010). Gomez-Uranga, Mikel ; Etxebarria, Goio .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:82:y:2010:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0043-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator. (2010). Kousha, Kayvan ; Rezaie, Somayeh ; Thelwall, Mike.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:4:y:2010:i:1:p:124-135.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry—Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published e. (2009). Bornmann, Lutz ; Thor, Andreas ; Marx, Werner ; Schier, Hermann ; Daniel, Hans-Dieter ; Rahm, Erhard .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:3:y:2009:i:1:p:27-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Benchmarking Google Scholar with the New Zealand PBRF research assessment exercise. (2008). Smith, Alastair G.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:74:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-008-0219-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. (2008). Bar-Ilan, Judit.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:74:y:2008:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-008-0216-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Ranking forestry journals using the h-index. (2008). Vanclay, Jerome K..
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:2:y:2008:i:4:p:326-334.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-23 01:43:12 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.