References contributed by pwa594-11250
Anton, J., & Yao, D. (1994). Expropriation and inventions: Appropriable rents in the absence of property rights. The American Economic Review, 84, 190–209. Anton, J., & Yao, D. (2002). The sale of ideas: Strategic disclosure, property rights, and contracting. The Review of Economic Studies, 69, 513–531.
Anton, J., & Yao, D. (2003). Patents, invalidity, and the strategic transmission of enabling information. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12, 151–178.
Anton, J., & Yao, D. (2004). Little patents and big secrets: Managing intellectual property. The RAND Journal of Economics, 35, 1–22.
- Anton, J., & Yao, D. (2006). ‘Finding "lost" profits: An equilibrium analysis of patent infringement damages’. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 23, 186–207.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Aoki, R., & Hu, J. (1999). Licensing vs. litigation: The effect of the legal system on incentives to innovate. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 8, 133–160.
Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609–626). Princeton University Press.
Beggs, A. (1992). The licensing of patents under asymmetric information. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10, 171–191.
Bhattacharya, S., & Ritter, J. (1983). Innovation and communication: Signalling with partial disclosure. The Review of Economic Studies, 50, 331–346.
Brander, J., & Spencer, B. (1983). Strategic commitment with R&D: The symmetric case. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 225–235.
Busom, I. (2000). An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9, 111–148.
- Bustamante, M. (2012). The dynamics of going public. Review of Finance, 16, 577–618.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Chang, H. (1995). Patent scope, antitrust policy, and cumulative innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 26, 34–57.
Chen, M. (1991). The role of R&D subsidies when incomplete information is an entry-barrier. Journal of International Economics, 31, 251–270.
Cho, I., & Kreps, D. (1987). Signaling games and stable equilibria. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 179–221.
Cho, I., & Sobel, J. (1990). Strategic stability and uniqueness in signaling games. Journal of Economic Theory, 50, 381–413.
Choi, J. (2009). Alternative damage rules and probabilistic intellectual property rights: Unjust enrichment, lost profits, and reasonable royalty remedies. Information Economics and Policy, 21, 145–157.
Chu, A. (2011). The welfare cost of one-size-fits-all patent protection. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 876–890.
Chu, A., & Furukawa, Y. (2011). On the optimal mix of patent instruments. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 1964–1975.
Czarnitzki, D., & Toole, A. (2007). Business R&D and the interplay of R&D subsidies and product market uncertainty. Review of Industrial Organization, 31, 169–181.
David, P., Hall, B., & Toole, A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29, 497–529.
- Denicolo, V. (1996). Patent races and optimal patent breadth and length. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 44, 249–265.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (2008). How strong are weak patents? The American Economic Review, 98, 1347–1369.
- Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1991). Game theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gallini, N., & Wright, B. (1990). Technology transfer under asymmetric information. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 147–160.
Gick, W. (2008). Little firms and big patents: A model of small-firm patent signaling. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 17, 913–935.
Gilbert, R., & Shapiro, C. (1990). Optimal patent length and breadth. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 106–112.
Gonzalez, X., & Pazo, C. (2008). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? Research Policy, 37, 371–389.
Green, J., & Scotchmer, S. (1995). On the division of profit in sequential innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 26, 20–33.
Grenadier, S., & Malenko, A. (2011). Real options signaling games with applications to corporate finance. Review of Financial Studies, 24, 3993–4036.
Grossman, G., & Horn, H. (1988). Infant industry protection reconsidered: The case of informational barriers to entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 767–787.
- H. Jeon International Review of Economics and Finance 62 (2019) 332–354
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hall, B. (2002). The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18, 35–51.
- Hesse, R. (2015). Business review letter from the acting assistant attorney general of the Antitrust Division. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/atr/legacy/2015/02/ 02/311470.pdf.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hinloopen, J. (1997). Subsidizing cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. Journal of Economics, 66, 151–175.
Hsu, Y., & Lambrecht, B. (2007). Preemptive patenting under uncertainty and asymmetric information. Annals of Operations Research, 151, 5–28.
- Huisman, K. (2001). Technology investment: A game theoretic real options approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hussinger, K. (2008). R&D and subsidies at the firm level: An application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23, 729–747.
Jeon, H., & Nishihara, M. (2018). Optimal patent policy in the presence of vertical separation. European Journal of Operational Research, 270, 682–697.
Kang, M. (2006). Trade policy mix: IPR protection and R&D subsidies. Canadian Journal of Economics, 39, 744–757.
Klemperer, P. (1990). How broad should the scope of patent protection be? The RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 113–130.
- Klette, T., & Møen, J. (2012). R&D investment responses to R&D subsidies: A theoretical analysis and a microeconometric study. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 9, 169–203.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Klette, T., Møen, J., & Griliches, Z. (2000). Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies. Research Policy, 29, 471–495.
Lach, S. (2002). Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50, 369–390.
Lahiri, S., & Ono, Y. (1999). R&D subsidies under asymmetric duopoly: A note. The Japanese Economic Review, 50, 104–111.
Leahy, D., & Neary, J. (1997). Public policy towards R&D in oligopolistic industries. The American Economic Review, 87, 642–662.
Lemley, M., & Shapiro, C. (2005). Probabilistic patents. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 75–98.
Lerner, J. (1999). The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Business, 72, 285–318.
Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2004). Efficient patent pools. The American Economic Review, 94, 691–711.
Llobet, G. (2003). Patent litigation when innovation is cumulative. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1135–1157.
Llobet, G., & Padilla, J. (2016). The optimal scope of the royalty base in patent licensing. The Journal of Law and Economics, 59, 45–73.
- Lu, L., & Liu, J. (2004). R&D in China: An empirical study of Taiwanese IT companies. R & D Management, 34, 453–465.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Martimort, D., Poudou, J., & Sand-Zantman, W. (2010). Contracting for an innovation under bilateral asymmetric information. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 58, 324–348.
Miltersen, K., & Schwartz, E. (2004). R&D investments with competitive interactions. Review of Finance, 8, 355–401.
Morellec, E., & Schürhoff, N. (2011). Corporate investment and financing under asymmetric information. Journal of Financial Economics, 99, 262–288.
Nelson, R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67, 297–306.
Ramey, G. (1996). D1 signaling equilibria with multiple signals and a continuum of types. Journal of Economic Theory, 69, 508–531.
Sakakibara, M. (1997). Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: An empirical examination of motives. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 143–164.
Schmitz, P. (2002). On monopolistic licensing strategies under asymmetric information. Journal of Economic Theory, 106, 177–189.
Scotchmer, S. (1991). Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 29–41.
Scotchmer, S. (1999). On the optimality of the patent renewal system. The RAND Journal of Economics, 30, 181–196.
- Scotchmer, S. (2004). Innovation and incentives. London: MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Shapiro, C. (2008). Patent reform: Aligning reward and contribution. In A. Jaffe, J. Lerner, & S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation policy and the economy (pp. 111–156). University of Chicago Press.
Shepard, A. (1987). Licensing to enhance demand for new technologies. The RAND Journal of Economics, 18, 360–368.
Spence, M. (1984). Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica, 52, 101–121.
Wallsten, S. (2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the small business innovation research program. The RAND Journal of Economics, 31, 82–100.
Wright, D. (1999). Optimal patent breadth and length with costly innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17, 419–436.