Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
‘Yes-in-my-backyard’: Spatial differences in the valuation of forest services and local co-benefits for carbon markets in México. (2015). Torres, Arturo Balderas ; Skutsch, Margaret ; Lovett, Jon C. ; MacMillan, Douglas C..
In: Ecological Economics.
RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:109:y:2015:i:c:p:130-141.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 14

Citations received by this document

Cites: 112

References cited by this document

Cocites: 53

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Is carbon footprint reduction always preferred over offsetting? An analysis of tourists preferences in the Mallorca region. (2024). Font, Antoni Riera ; Bestard, Angel Bujosa ; Femenias, Lloren B.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:1371-1381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Preferences for climate change policies: the role of co-benefits. (2023). Pettenella, Davide ; Mavsar, Robert ; Mantau, Udo ; Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth ; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark ; Abildtrup, Jens ; Vidale, Enrico ; Varela, Elsa ; Stenger, Anne ; Schubert, Florian ; Prokofieva, Irina.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04132398.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Climate Action for (My) Children. (2022). Hauser, Oliver ; Fornwagner, Helena.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:81:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-021-00620-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The demand for voluntary carbon sequestration: Experimental evidence from a reforestation project in Germany. (2021). Löschel, Andreas ; Kesternich, Martin ; Loschel, Andreas ; Bartels, Lara.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:21088.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Preferences for Distributional Impacts of Climate Policy. (2020). Thorsen, Bo ; Svenningsen, Lea S.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:75:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00386-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Do parents invest into voluntary climate action when their children are watching? Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment. (2020). Hauser, Oliver P ; Fornwagner, Helena.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2020-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Environmentally friendly breeding, spatial heterogeneity and effective carbon offset design in beef cattle. (2019). Goddard, Ellen ; Mohapatra, Sandeep ; Boaitey, Albert.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:84:y:2019:i:c:p:35-45.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Carbon offsets out of the woods? Acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes in the lab. (2018). Carattini, Stefano ; Baranzini, Andrea ; Borzykowski, Nicolas.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:87732.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Voluntary action for climate change mitigation does not exhibit locational preferences. (2018). Diederich, Johannes ; Goeschl, Timo.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:90:y:2018:i:c:p:175-180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Carbon offsets out of the woods? Acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes in the lab. (2018). Carattini, Stefano ; Borzykowski, Nicolas ; Baranzini, Andrea.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:32:y:2018:i:c:p:1-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Distributive outcomes matter: Measuring social preferences for climate policy. (2017). Svenningsen, Lea Skrap.
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2017_11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Preferences for distributional impacts of climate policy. (2017). Thorsen, Bo ; Jellesmark, BO ; Svenningsen, Lea Skrap.
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2017_10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Does Mitigation Begin At Home?. (2017). Goeschl, Timo ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0634.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Economic valuation of ecosystem services in Mexico: Current status and trends. (2016). Perez-Verdin, Gustavo ; Marquez-Linares, Marco Antonio ; Hernandez-Trejo, Victor ; Hernandez-Diaz, Jose Ciro ; Galicia, Leopoldo ; Sanjurjo-Rivera, Enrique.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:21:y:2016:i:pa:p:6-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abildtrup, J. Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation. 2011 En : Paper Prepared for Presentation at the EAAE 2011 Congress Change and Uncertainty. August 30 to September 2, 2011 ETH Zurich, Switzerland. :

  2. Adaman, F. What determines urban households' willingness to pay for CO2 emission reductions in Turkey: a contingent valuation survey. 2011 Energy Policy. 39 689-698

  3. Adger, N. ; Brown, K. ; Cervigni, R. ; Moran, D. Total economic value of forests in Mexico. 1995 Ambio. 24 286-296
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Akter, S. Respondent uncertainty in a contingent market for carbon offsets. 2009 Ecol. Econ.. 68 1858-1863

  5. Angelsen, A. Realizing REDD: National Strategy and Policy Options. 2009 Center for International Forestry: Bogor, Indonesia
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Baerenklau, K.A. A latent class approach to modeling endogenous spatial sorting in zonal recreation demand models. 2010 Land Econ.. 86 800-816

  7. Balderas Torres, A. Demanda local requerida para un mercado local de servicios forestales de mitigación del cambio climático entre la Reserva de la Biósfera Bosque La Primavera y la ciudad de Guadalajara, Jalisco. 2014 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Balderas Torres, A. The valuation of forest carbon services by Mexican citizens: the case of Guadalajara city and La Primavera biosphere reserve. 2012 Reg. Environ. Chang.. 1–20 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Balderas Torres, A. Yes in My Backyard: Market Based Mechanisms for Forest Conservation and Climate Change Mitigation in La Primavera, México. 2012 University of Twente: Enschede, The Netherlands
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Balderas Torres, A. ; MacMillan, D.C. ; Skutsch, M. ; Lovett, J.C. Payments for ecosystem services and rural development: Landowners' preferences and potential participation in western Mexico. 2013 Ecosyst. Serv.. -

  11. Balderas Torres, A. ; Ontiveros Enríquez, R. ; Skutsch, M. ; Lovett, J.C. Potential for climate change mitigation in degraded forests: a study from La Primavera, México. 2013 Forests. 4 1032-1054
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Balderas Torres, A. ; Skutsch, M. ; Lovett, J.C. Retos para la valoracion de los servicios forestales de mitigacion del cambio climatico. 2013 En : Hernandez-Alvarez, E. Recursos Forestales en el Occidente de Mexico: Manejo, Produccion y Aprovechamiento Tomo II. AMAYA Ediciones, U. de G.: Mexico
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Bamberg, S. ; Möser, G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. 2007 J. Environ. Psychol.. 27 14-25
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Bateman, I.J. The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. 2006 Ecol. Econ.. 60 450-460

  15. Baumgardner, D. The role of a peri-urban forest on air quality improvement in the Mexico City megalopolis. 2012 Environ. Pollut.. 163 174-183
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Beerling, D.J. ; Woodward, F.I. Vegetation and Terrestrial Carbon Cycle: Modeling the First 400MillionYears. 2004 Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Bennett, J. Choice modeling and the transfer of environmental values. 2006 En : Rolfe, J. ; Bennett, J. Choice Modelling and the Transfer of Environmental Values. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK

  18. Bennett, J. ; Adamowicz, V. Some fundamentals of environmental choice modeling. 2001 En : Bennett, J. ; Blamey, R. The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK

  19. Birol, E. ; Smale, M. ; Gyovai, Á. Using a choice experiment to estimate farmers valuation of agrobiodiversity on Hungarian small farms. 2006 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 34 439-469

  20. Boyle, K.J. ; Bergstrom, J.C. Benefit transfer studies: myths, pragmatism, and idealism. 1992 Water Resour. Res.. 28 657-663
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Brey, R. ; Riera, P. ; Mogas, J. Estimation of forest values using choice modelling: an application to Spanish forests. 2007 Ecol. Econ.. 64 305-312

  22. Brouwer, R. ; Brander, L. ; Van Beukering, P. “A convenient truth”: air travel passengers' willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions. 2008 Clim. Chang.. 90 299-313
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Brouwer, R. ; Martin-Ortega, J. ; Berbel, J. Spatial preference heterogeneity: a choice experiment. 2010 Land Econ.. 86 552-568

  24. Campbell, D. ; Hutchinson, W.G. ; Scarpa, R. Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments. 2008 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 41 401-417

  25. Campbell, D. ; Hutchinson, W.G. ; Scarpa, R. Using choice experiments to explore the spatial distribution of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements. 2007 En : Working Paper in Economics 6/07. University of Waikato Department of Economics:

  26. Campbell, D. ; Hutchinson, W.G. ; Scarpa, R. Using choice experiments to explore the spatial distribution of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements. 2009 Environ. Plan. A. 41 97-111

  27. Canadell, J.G. ; Raupach, M.R. Managing forests for climate change mitigation. 2008 Science. 320 1456-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Carlsson, F. ; Martinsson, P. Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments?. 2001 J. Environ. Econ. Manag.. 41 179-192
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Carvalho, A. Forest fires in a changing climate and their impacts on air quality. 2011 Atmos. Environ.. 45 5545-5553
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. CEC, 2003/0173 Proposal for a Directive Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community, in Respect of the Kyoto Protocol's Project Mechanism. 2003 Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, Belgium
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Christie, M. ; Hanley, N. ; Hynes, S. Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and contingent behavior methods. 2007 J. For. Econ.. 13 75-102

  32. CONAFOR, Estrategia Nacional para REDD+. 2012 Comision Nacional Forestal: Mexico
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. CONAFOR, Visión de México sobre REDD+. 2010 Comisión Nacional Forestal: México
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. De Jong, B.H.J. Community forest management and carbon sequestration: a feasibility study from Chiapas, México. 1995 Interciencia. 20 409-416
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Diederich, J. ; Goeschl, T. Willingness to pay for individual greenhouse gas emissions reductions: evidence from a large field experiment. 2011 En : Department of Economics, Discussion Paper Series No. 517. University of Heidelberg: Germany

  36. DOF, DECRETO por el que se reforman, adicionan y derogan diversas disposiciones de la Ley del Impuesto al Valor Agregado; de la Ley del Impuesto Especial sobre Producción y Servicios; de la Ley Federal de Derechos, se expide la Ley del Impuesto sobre la Renta, y se abrogan la Ley del Impuesto Empresarial a Tasa Única, y la Ley del Impuesto a los Depósitos en Efectivo (Continúa en la Tercera Sección). 2013 En : . :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Elabakidze, L. ; McCarl, B.A. Sequestration offsets versus direct emission reductions: consideration of environmental co-effects. 2007 Ecol. Econ.. 60 564-571

  38. Engel, S. ; Pagiola, S. ; Wunder, S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. 2008 Ecol. Econ.. 65 663-674

  39. Feng, H. ; Kurkalova, L.A. ; Kling, C.L. ; Gassman, P.W. Transfers and environmental co-benefits of carbon sequestration in agricultural soils: retiring agricultural land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. 2007 Clim. Chang.. 80 91-107

  40. Galindo, L.M. La economía del cambio climático en México: síntesis. 2009 SHCP/SEMARNAT: D.F. México
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Garrod, G. Heterogeneity of preferences for the benefits of environmental stewardship: a latent-class approach. 2012 Ecol. Econ.. 76 104-111

  42. Glenk, K. ; Colombo, S. Designing policies to mitigate the agricultural contribution to climate change: an assessment of soil based carbon sequestration and ancillary effects. 2011 Clim. Chang.. 105 43-66
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  43. Hatton-MacDonald, D. ; Morrison, M. The Value of Habitat and Agriculture. 2005 CSIRO Land and Water:

  44. Hausman, J.A. ; McFadden, D. Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. 1984 Econometrica. 52 1219-1240

  45. Hoyos, D. The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments. 2010 Ecol. Econ.. 69 1595-1603

  46. INEGI, Presentación de resultados encuesta nacional de ingresos y gastos de los hogares ENIGH 2010. 2011 INEGI: Mexico
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. IPCC, Climate Change 2001: Mitigation Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. 2001 Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Johnson, E. ; Nemet, G.F. Willingness to pay for climate policy: a review of estimates. 2010 En : La Follette School Working Paper No. 2010–011. University of Wisconsin: Madison, USA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  49. Johnston, R.J. ; Duke, J.M. Willingness to pay for land preservation across states and jurisdictional scale: implications for benefit transfer. 2009 Land Econ.. 85 217-223

  50. Johnston, R.J. ; Ramachandran, M. ; Schultz, E.T. ; Segerson, K. ; Besedin, E.Y. Willingness to pay hot spots and the distribution of ecosystem service values: implications for benefit transfer. 2011 En : Presented at Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (AERE) Summer Conference, Seattle, June 8–10. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  51. Johnston, R.J. ; Swallow, S.K. ; Bauer, D.M. Spatial factors and stated preference values for public goods: considerations for rural land development. 2002 Land Econ.. 78 481-500

  52. Karousakis, K. Promoting biodiversity co-benefits in REDD. 2009 En : Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Environment Working Papers 11. :

  53. Krinsky, I. ; Robb, A. Approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. 1986 Rev. Econ. Stat.. 68 715-719

  54. Krook Riekkola, A. ; Ahlgren, E.O. ; Soderholm, P. Ancillary benefits of climate policy in a small open economy: the case of Sweden. 2011 Energy Policy. 39 4985-4998

  55. La Jornada, Controlan incendio en bosque de Jalisco; la capital, cubierta de humo. 2005 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  56. Lancaster, K. A new approach to consumer theory. 1966 J. Polit. Econ.. 74 132-157

  57. Layton, D.F. ; Brown, G. Heterogeneous preferences regarding global climate change. 2000 Rev. Econ. Stat.. 82 616-624

  58. Linacre, N. ; Kossoy, A. ; Ambrosi, P. State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2011. 2011 The World Bank: Washington

  59. Longo, A. ; Hoyos, D. ; Markandya, A. Willingness to pay for ancillary benefits of climate change mitigation. 2012 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 51 119-140

  60. Loomis, J.B. ; Roach, B. ; Ward, F. ; Ready, R. Testing the transferability of recreation demand models across regions: a study of corps of engineers reservoirs. 1995 Water Resour. Res.. 31 721-730
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Loomis, J.B. ; Rosenberger, R.S. Reducing barriers in future benefit transfers: needed improvements in primary study design and reporting. 2006 Ecol. Econ.. 60 343-350

  62. Lopez-Mosquera, N. ; Sanchez, M. The influence of personal values in the economic-use valuation of peri-urban green spaces: an application of the means-end chain theory. 2011 Tour. Manag.. 32 875-889

  63. MacKerron, G.J. Willingness to pay for carbon offset certification and co-benefits among (high-)flying young adults in the UK. 2009 Energy Policy. 37 1372-1381

  64. Maddala, G.S. Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. 1983 Cambridge University Press: USA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Marland, G. ; McCarl, B.A. ; Schneider, U. Soil and carbon policy and economics. 1999 En : Rosenberg, N.J. ; Isaurralde, R.C. ; Malone, E.L. Carbon Sequestration in Soils: Science Monitoring and Beyond. Battelle Press: Columbus, OH
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. McCarl, B.A. ; Schneider, U.A. Greenhouse gas mitigation in U.S. agriculture and forestry. 2001 Science. 294 2481-2482
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. McFadden, D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. 1974 En : Zarembka, P. Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press: New York
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. McPherson, E.G. Midwest community tree guide: benefits, costs, and strategic planting. 2006 En : Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-199. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: Davis, CA, Albany, CA, U.S.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  69. Morrison, M. Aggregation biases in stated preference studies. 2000 Aust. Econ. Pap.. 39 215-230

  70. Morrison, M. ; Bennett, J. Valuing New South Wales rivers for use in benefit transfer. 2004 Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ.. 48 591-612

  71. Morrison, M. ; Bergland, O. Prospects for the use of choice modelling for benefit transfer. 2006 Ecol. Econ.. 60 420-428

  72. Muñoz Piña, C. Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: analysis, negotiations and results. 2008 Ecol. Econ.. 65 725-736
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Muradian, R. Payments for ecosystem services as incentives for collective action. 2013 Soc. Nat. Resour. Int. J.. 26 1155-1169
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Nemet, G.F. ; Holloway, T. ; Meier, P. Implication of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. 2010 Environ. Res. Lett.. 5 014007-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. OECD, Ancillary benefits and costs of GHG mitigation: policy conclusions. 2002 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris, France
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  76. Pate, J. ; Loomis, J.B. The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. 1997 Ecol. Econ.. 20 199-207

  77. Pattanayak, S.K. . 2002 En : Water Quality Co-benefits of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Incentives in U.S. Agriculture: Final Report. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Pearce, D.W. Policy frameworks for the side effects of climate change policies. 2000 En : Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Proceedings of an Expert Workshop Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France. OECD:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Pearce, D.W. The secondary benefits of greenhouse gas control. 1992 En : CSERGE Working Paper 92-12. CSERGE University College: London, England
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. PECC, Programa Especial de Cambio Climático 2009–2012. 2009 Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales: México
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Peters-Stanley, M. ; Gonzalez, G. Sharing the Stage: State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2014. 2014 Ecosystem Marketplace/Forest Trends: U.S.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Peters-Stanley, M. ; Hamilton, K. Developing Dimension: State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets. 2012 Ecosystem Marketplace/Forest Trends, Bloomberg New Energy Finance: U.S.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Peters-Stanley, M., et al., 2011. Back to the future: state of the voluntary carbon markets 2011. Ecosystem marketplace: Washington, DC, USA and Bloomberg New Energy Finance: New York, NY, USA.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Pirard, R. Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services: a lexicon. 2012 Environ. Sci. Policy. 19–20 59-68
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  85. Plantinga, A.J. ; Wu, J. Co-benefits from carbon sequestration in forests: evaluating reductions in agricultural externalities from an afforestation policy in Wisconsin. 2003 Land Econ.. 79 74-85

  86. Poe, G. ; Giraud, K. ; Loomis, J. Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions. 2005 Am. J. Agric. Econ.. 87 353-365

  87. Ribaudo, M.O. Water quality benefits from the conservation reserve program. 1989 En : . U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service: Washington, DC

  88. Rolfe, J. ; Bennett, J. ; Louviere, J. Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation. 2000 Ecol. Econ.. 35 289-302

  89. Rosenberger, R.S. ; Phipps, T.T. Correspondence and convergence in benefit transfer accuracy: a meta-analytic review of the literature. 2007 En : Navrud, S. ; Ready, R. Environmental Values Transfer: Issues and Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  90. Scarpa, R. Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation. 2009 Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ.. 36 151-174

  91. SEMARNAT, México. Cuarta comunicación nacional ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático. 2009 SEMARNAT: México
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  92. Smith, J. ; Scheer, S.J. Capturing the value of forests for local livelihoods. 2003 World Dev.. 31 2143-2160

  93. Sterk, W. ; Mersmann, F. Domestic emission trading systems in developing countries — state of play and future prospects. 2011 En : JIKO Policy Paper 2/2011. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Germany
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Stern, N. Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. 2006 Cambridge University Press: UK
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Strassburg, Reducing emissions from deforestation—the “combined incentives” mechanism and empirical simulations. 2009 Glob. Environ. Chang.. 19 265-278
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  96. Termansen, M. ; Zandersen, M. ; McClean, C. Spatial substitution patterns in forest recreation. 2008 Reg. Sci. Urban Econ.. 38 81-97

  97. Thurston, W. Non-market valuation on the internet. 2006 En : Alberini, A. ; Kahn, J.R. ; Alberini, A. ; Kahn, J.R. Handbook of Contingent Valuation. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK

  98. Tietenberg, T. The tradable-permits approach to protecting the commons: lessons for climate change. 2003 Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy. 19 400-419

  99. UN, . 2010 En : Report of the Secretary-General's High-level Advisory Group on Climate Change Financing. United Nations: New York
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. UNESCO, Man and the Biosphere Programme. 2012 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  101. UNFCCC, . 2002 En : Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Seventh Session, Held at Marrakesh From 29 October to 10 November 2001. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  102. UNFCCC, . 2004 En : Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Ninth Session, Held at Milan From 1 to 12 December 2003. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  103. UNFCCC, . 2012 En : Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Seventeenth Session, Held in Durban From 28 November to 11 December 2011. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  104. UNFCCC, . 2013 En : Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Eighteenth Session, Held in Doha From 26 November to 8 December 2012. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  105. Van Bueren, M. ; Bennett, J. Towards the development of a transferable set of value 30 estimates for environmental attributes. 2004 Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ.. 48 1-32

  106. Van den Berg, T.P. Assessing the accuracy of benefits transfers: evidence from a multisite contingent valuation study of groundwater quality. 2001 En : Bergstrom, John C. ; Boyle, Kevin J. ; Poe, Gregory L. The Economic Value of Water Quality. Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA

  107. Voss, J.P. Innovation processes in governance: the development of ‘emissions trading’ as a new policy instrument. 2007 Sci. Public Policy. 34 329-343
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  108. Welsch, H. ; Kuhling, J. Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: the role of reference groups and routine behavior. 2009 Ecol. Econ.. 69 166-176

  109. Willis, K.G. ; Garrod, G.D. Angling and recreation values of low-flow alleviation in rivers. 1999 J. Environ. Manag.. 57 71-83
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  110. Wilson, M.A. ; Hoehn, J.P. Valuing environmental goods and services using benefit transfer: the state-of-the art and science. 2006 Ecol. Econ.. 60 335-342

  111. Woodward, R.T. ; Wui, Y.S. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. 2001 Ecol. Econ.. 37 257-270

  112. Ziegler, A. ; Schwarzkopf, J. ; Hoffmann, V.H. Stated versus revealed knowledge: determinants of offsetting CO2 emissions from fuel consumption in vehicle use. 2012 Energy Policy. 40 422-431

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The role of peers in promoting energy conservation among Chinese university students. (2023). Lin, Boqiang ; Jia, Huanyu.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01682-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Preferences for climate change policies: the role of co-benefits. (2023). Pettenella, Davide ; Mavsar, Robert ; Mantau, Udo ; Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth ; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark ; Abildtrup, Jens ; Vidale, Enrico ; Varela, Elsa ; Stenger, Anne ; Schubert, Florian ; Prokofieva, Irina.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04132398.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Temporal Stability of Attitudes towards Climate Change and Willingness to Pay for the Emissions Reduction Options in Queensland, Australia. (2023). Williams, Galina.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:3879-:d:1138753.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Does Proximity to a Power Plant Affect Housing Property Values of a City in South Korea? An Empirical Investigation. (2023). Yoo, Seung-Hoon ; Kim, Young-Kuk.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1983-:d:1071125.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Pricing and carbon reduction strategies for vertically differentiated firms under Cap-and-Trade regulation. (2023). Yang, Lei ; Li, Tao ; Ji, Jingna.
    In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.
    RePEc:eee:transe:v:171:y:2023:i:c:s1366554523000522.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Trust in Government and Its Determinants: An Empirical Study of Public Acceptability for Carbon Tax in Malaysia. (2022). Hanefah, Mustafa Mohd ; Hamid, Suhaila Abdul ; Ibrahim, Mohd Adha ; Mohd, Norfakhirah Nazihah ; Muhammad, Izlawanie.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15684-:d:983848.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Multi-Criteria Analysis for Evaluating Constructed Wetland as a Sustainable Sanitation Technology, Jordan Case Study. (2022). , Ahmed ; Belotti, Marika ; Alfarra, Amani ; Sorlini, Sabrina.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14867-:d:969134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Will the public in emerging economies support renewable energy? Evidence from Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. (2022). Kittner, Noah ; Thuy, Truong Dang ; Yamaguchi, Kensuke ; Yu, Ying.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:169:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122008231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Evaluating the optimal air pollution reduction rate: Evidence from the transmission mechanism of air pollution effects on public subjective well-being. (2022). Sun, Chuanwang ; Wang, Wei ; Cai, Weiyi ; Ma, Tiemeng ; Yi, Xiangyu.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:161:y:2022:i:c:s0301421521005711.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Household acceptability of energy efficiency policies in the European Union: Policy characteristics trade-offs and the role of trust in government and environmental identity. (2022). Schleich, Joachim ; Whittle, Colin ; Whitmarsh, Lorraine ; Tu, Gengyang ; Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte ; Faure, Corinne.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:192:y:2022:i:c:s0921800921003268.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Cooperation on climate change and ongoing urbanization. (2021). Kotani, Koji ; Nakagawa, Yoshinori ; Shahrier, Shibly.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:kch:wpaper:sdes-2021-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Study on the interactive relationship between urban residents’ expenditure and energy consumption of production sectors. (2021). Hu, Guangwen ; Lu, Yutong ; Zhang, Zheng ; Kong, LI ; Chen, Jian ; Mu, Xianzhong ; Tu, Chuang.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:157:y:2021:i:c:s0301421521003724.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Public acceptance of carbon taxes in Australia. (2021). Crosby, Paul ; Best, Rohan ; Hammerle, Mara.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:101:y:2021:i:c:s0140988321003145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Critical analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in a comparison of e-commerce and traditional retail. (2020). Schmitz, Tanja.
    In: Journal of Applied Leadership and Management.
    RePEc:zbw:hkjalm:251927.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. A Conceptual Framework to Understand Households’ Energy Consumption. (2019). Udalov, Vladimir ; Marique, Anne-Francoise ; Vasseur, Veronique.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:22:p:4250-:d:284718.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Use intention of mobility-management travel apps: The role of users goals, technophile attitude and community trust. (2019). Pereira, Francisco Camara ; Nielsen, Otto Anker ; de Abreu, Joao ; Kaplan, Sigal ; Dastjerdi, Aliasghar Mehdizadeh.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:126:y:2019:i:c:p:114-135.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Factors influencing the electricity generation preferences of Turkish citizens: Citizens attitudes and policy recommendations in the context of climate change and environmental impact. (2019). Ozcan, Mustafa.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:132:y:2019:i:c:p:381-393.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Haze, health, and income: An integrated model for willingness to pay for haze mitigation in Shanghai, China. (2019). Sun, Chuanwang ; Zhuang, Wuxu ; Ouyang, Xiaoling.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:84:y:2019:i:c:s0140988319303305.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The Impact of Social Awareness and Lifestyles on Household Carbon Emissions in China. (2019). Zhang, Dayong ; Su, Bin ; Li, Jun.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:160:y:2019:i:c:p:145-155.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Does social interaction have an impact on residents’ sustainable lifestyle decisions? A multi-agent stimulation based on regret and game theory. (2019). Chen, Hong ; Long, Ruyin ; Cheng, Xiu ; Yang, Jiahui.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:251:y:2019:i:c:95.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Economic benefit of leptospirosis prevention in Kelantan, Malaysia: Willingness‐to‐contribute approach. (2019). Sukeri, Surianti ; Saizan, Sarah ; Aziah, Daud ; Maztura, Tengku Zetty ; Malina, Osman ; Rukman, Awang Hamat ; Shafei, Mohd Nazri ; Zahiruddin, Wan Mohd.
    In: International Journal of Health Planning and Management.
    RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:1:p:e817-e823.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Public acceptance of environmentally friendly heating in Beijing: A case of a low temperature air source heat pump. (2018). Jingchao, Zhang ; Kotani, Koji ; Saijo, Tatsuyoshi.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:117:y:2018:i:c:p:75-85.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Willingness to pay for green electricity in Tianjin, China: Based on the contingent valuation method. (2018). Xie, Bai-Chen ; Zhao, Wei.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:114:y:2018:i:c:p:98-107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Are Korean Households Willing to Pay a Premium for Induction Cooktops over Gas Stoves?. (2017). Yoo, Seung-Hoon ; Lim, Seul-Ye ; Kim, Hyo-Jin.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1546-:d:110354.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Economics of climate change and green employment: A general equilibrium investigation for Turkey. (2017). Yeldan, Erinc ; Kolsuz, Gunes .
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:70:y:2017:i:c:p:1240-1250.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Are the off-grid customers ready to pay for electricity from the decentralized renewable hybrid mini-grids? A study of willingness to pay in rural Bangladesh. (2017). Alam, Majbaul ; Bhattacharyya, Subhes .
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:139:y:2017:i:c:p:433-446.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Estimation of the environmental values of electric vehicles in Chinese cities. (2017). Lin, Boqiang ; Tan, Ruipeng.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:104:y:2017:i:c:p:221-229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Household willingness to pay for green electricity in urban and peri-urban Tigray, northern Ethiopia: Determinants and welfare effects. (2017). Tadesse, Tewodros ; Arega, Tiruwork .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:100:y:2017:i:c:p:292-300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Green Returns to Education: Does Schooling Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviours? Evidence from Thailand. (2017). Chankrajang, Thanyaporn ; Muttarak, Raya.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:131:y:2017:i:c:p:434-448.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Public Acceptability of Climate Change Mitigation Policies: A Discrete Choice Experiment. (2016). Zagórska, Katarzyna ; Ščasný, Milan ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Zvinova, Iva ; Zagorska, Katarzyna ; Kysela, Eva .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2016-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Impact of Asymmetric Carbon Information on Supply Chain Decisions under Low-Carbon Policies. (2016). Zheng, Chenshi ; Ji, Jingna ; Yang, Lei.
    In: Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society.
    RePEc:hin:jnddns:1369589.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Designing Policy Mixes for Resource Efficiency: The Role of Public Acceptability. (2016). .
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:366-:d:68173.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Exploring the Spatial Heterogeneity of Individual Preferences for Ambient Heating Systems. (2016). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Rose, John ; moretto, michele ; Franceschinis, Cristiano ; Thiene, Mara ; Cavalli, Raffaele.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:6:p:407-:d:70766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Social acceptance towards the air pollution in China: Evidence from publics willingness to pay for smog mitigation. (2016). Sun, Chuanwang ; Yao, Xin ; Yuan, Xiang .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:92:y:2016:i:c:p:313-324.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The role of question format for the support for national climate change mitigation policies in Germany and the determinants of WTP. (2016). Uehleke, Reinhard .
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:55:y:2016:i:c:p:148-156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Public Preferences for Carbon Tax Attributes. (2015). Gevrek, Eylem Z. ; Uyduranoglu, Ayse .
    In: Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
    RePEc:knz:dpteco:1515.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Willingness to Pay for Carbon Sequestration and Co-Benefits of Forests in Turkey. (2015). Basullu, alar ; Tolunay, Ahmet .
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:3:p:3311-3337:d:47043.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Public preferences for carbon tax attributes. (2015). Gevrek, Eylem Z ; Uyduranoglu, Ayse .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:118:y:2015:i:c:p:186-197.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Reprint of ‘Yes-in-my-backyard’: Spatial differences in the valuation of forest services and local co-benefits for carbon markets in México. (2015). Torres, Arturo Balderas ; Lovett, Jon C ; Skutsch, Margaret ; MacMillan, Douglas C.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:117:y:2015:i:c:p:283-294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. ‘Yes-in-my-backyard’: Spatial differences in the valuation of forest services and local co-benefits for carbon markets in México. (2015). Torres, Arturo Balderas ; Skutsch, Margaret ; Lovett, Jon C. ; MacMillan, Douglas C..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:109:y:2015:i:c:p:130-141.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Is the value of environmental goods sensitive to the public funding scheme? Evidence from a marine restoration programme in the Black Sea. (2014). Nunes, Paulo ; Koundouri, Phoebe ; Adaman, Fikret ; Remoundou, Kyriaki.
    In: Empirical Economics.
    RePEc:spr:empeco:v:47:y:2014:i:4:p:1173-1192.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Non-market valuation in France: An overview of the research activity. (2014). Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Riera, Pere ; Kristrom, Bengt ; Craste, Romain .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01087365.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Train travel passengers willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions in Korea. (2014). Yoo, Seung-Hoon ; Lim, Hea-Jin .
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:32:y:2014:i:c:p:526-531.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. The role of social norms on preferences towards climate change policies: A meta-analysis. (2014). Loureiro, Maria ; Allo, Maria.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:73:y:2014:i:c:p:563-574.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. The determinants of household energy-saving behavior: Survey and comparison in five major Asian cities. (2013). Nogata, Daisuke ; Hori, Shiro ; Kondo, Kayoko ; Ben, Han .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:52:y:2013:i:c:p:354-362.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Is the value of an environmental public good sensitive to the providing institution?. (2012). Koundouri, Phoebe ; Remoundou, Kyriaki ; Kountouris, Yiannis .
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:34:y:2012:i:3:p:381-395.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Loads of green washing—can behavioural economics increase willingness-to-pay for efficient washing machines in the UK?. (2012). Bull, Joe .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:50:y:2012:i:c:p:242-252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. Citizens’ preferences on nuclear and renewable energy sources: Evidence from Turkey. (2012). Özkaynak, Begüm ; Zenginobuz, Ünal ; Adaman, Fikret ; Ozkaynak, Begum ; Ertor-Akyaz, Pnar .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:47:y:2012:i:c:p:309-320.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. Is the Value of Environmental Goods Sensitive to the Source of Public Funding? Evidence from a Marine Restoration Programme in the Black Sea. (). Nunes, Paulo ; Koundouri, Phoebe ; Adaman, Fikret ; Remoundou, Kyriaki.
    In: DEOS Working Papers.
    RePEc:aue:wpaper:1321.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  53. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-10 12:24:16 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.