Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L. and Varga, A. (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge, Research Policy 31 (7), 1069–1085.

Alshamsi, A., F. Pinheiro and C. Hidalgo (2018) Optimal diversification strategies in the networks of related products and of related research areas. Nat. Commun. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03740-9.

Anselin, L., A. Varga and Z. Acs (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42 (3), 422–48.

Atkinson A. B. and Stiglitz J. E. (1969) A new view of technological change, Economic Journal 79, 573–578.

Audretsch, D. B. and M. P. Feldman (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review 86 (3), 630–40.

Autant-Bernard, C. (2001) Science and knowledge flows: evidence from the French case.

Azagra-Caro, J. M., F. Archontakis, A. Gutiérrez-Gracia, and I. Fernández-de-Lucio (2006) Faculty support for the objectives of university–industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: The importance of regional absorptive capacity, Research Policy 35, 37–55.

Balland, P.-A. and D. Rigby (2017) The geography of complex knowledge. Economic Geography 93(1), 1–23.

Balland, P.A., Jara-Figueroa, C., Petralia, S., Steijn, M., Rigby, D., and Hidalgo, C. (2020) Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities, Nature Human Behavior 4, 248–254.

Balland, P.A., R. Boschma, J. Crespo and D. Rigby (2019) Smart specialization policy in the EU: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification, Regional Studies 53(9), 1252-1268.

Bikard, M. and M. Marx (2020) Bridging academia and industry: how geographic hubs connect university science and corporate technology, Management Science 66(8), 3425-3443.

Bonaccorsi, A. (2017) Addressing the disenchantment: universities and regional development in peripheral regions, Journal of Economic Policy Reform 20 (4), 293-320.

Boschma, R. (2017) Relatedness as driver behind regional diversification: a research agenda, Regional Studies 51 (3), 351-364.

Boschma, R., G. Heimeriks, and P.A. Balland (2014) Scientific knowledge dynamics and relatedness in biotech cities. Research Policy 43 (1), 107–14.

Boschma, R., Minondo, A., and Navarro, M. (2013) The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: A proximity approach based on product relatedness. Economic Geography 89 (1), 29–51.

Boschma, R., P.A. Balland and D.F. Kogler (2015), Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in U.S. metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010, Industrial and Corporate Change 24 (1), 223-250.

Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Borner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64 (3), 351–374.

Callaert, J., M. Pellens and B. Van Looy (2014) Sources of Inspiration? Making Sense of Scientific References in Patents, Scientometrics 98 (3), 1617–29.

D'Este, P., F. Guy and S. Iammarino (2013) Shaping the formation of university–industry research collaborations: what type of proximity does really matter?, Journal of Economic Geography 13 (4), 537-558.

Davies, B. and D.C. Mare (2019) Relatedness, complexity and local growth, Institute of Labor Economics DP, no. 12223.

Dosi G. (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Research Policy 11, 147– 162.

Etzkowitz H. and L. Leydesdorff (2000) The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29, 109–123.

Fleming, L. and O. Sorenson (2004) Science as a map in technological search, Strategic Management Journal 25 (8–9), 909–28.

Fritsch, M. and V. Slavtchev (2007) Universities and innovation in space, Industry and Innovation 14 (2), 201-218.

Gittelman M and B. Kogut (2003) Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science 49, 366–382.

Goddard, J., L. Kempton, and P. Vallance (2013) Universities and Smart Specialisation: Challenges, Tensions and Opportunities for the Innovation Strategies of European Regions, Ekonomiaz 83 (2), 82–101.

Guevara, M.R., D. Hartmann, M. Aristarán, M. Mendoza and C.A. Hidalgo (2016) The research space: using career paths to predict the evolution of the research output of individuals, institutions, and nations, Scientometrics 109, 1695-1709.

Heimeriks, G. D. Li, W. Lamers, I. Meijer and A. Yegros (2019) Scientific knowledge production in European regions: patterns of growth, diversity and complexity, European Planning Studies, 27 (11), 2123-2143.

Hidalgo, C. and R. Hausmann (2009) The building blocks of economic complexity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 10570-10575.

Hidalgo, C., Balland, P.A., Boschma, R., Delgado, M., Feldman, M., Frenken, K., Glaeser, E., He, C., Kogler, D., Morrison, A., Neffke, F., Rigby, D., Stern, S., Zheng, S., and Zhu, S. (2018) The principle of relatedness, Springer Proceedings in Complexity, 451-457.

https://doi.org/10.6100/IR735405 Jaffe, A. B. (1989) Real effects of academic research, American Economic Review 79 (5), 957– 970.

Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R. (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 577–598.

Jones, B. F. (2009) The burden of knowledge and the death of the Renaissance Man: Is innovation getting harder? Review of Economic Studies 76 (1), 283–317.

Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G. (1995) On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24, 185–205.

Kogler, D.F., D.L. Rigby and I. Tucker (2013) Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities, European Planning Studies 21(9), 1374-1391.

Kogut, B., and U. Zander (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24, 625–645.

Laursen, K. and A. Salter (2004) Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy 33 (8), 1201–15.

Leten, B., P. Landoni, and B. Van Looy (2014) Science or graduates: How do firms benefit from the proximity of universities? Research Policy 43 (8), 1398–1412.

Leydesdorff, L. and I. Rafols (2009) A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(2), 348–362.

McCann P. and R. Ortega-Argilés (2015) Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to EU Cohesion Policy, Regional Studies 49 (8), 1291-1302.

McKelvey, M., Alm, H., Riccaboni, M. (2003) Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology–pharmaceutical sector? Research Policy 32, 483– 501.

Mewes, L.and T. Broekel (2020) Technological complexity and economic growth of regions.

Moodysson, J. (2008) Principles and practices of knowledge creation: On the organization of buzz and pipelines in life science communities, Economic Geography 84 (4), 449-469.

Moreno, R., Paci, R. and Usai, S. (2005) Spatial spillovers and innovation activity in European regions, Environment and Planning A 37, 1793–1812.

Neffke F., M. Henning and R. Boschma (2011) How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions, Economic Geography 87 (3), 237–265.

Patelli, A., G. Cimini, E. Pugliese and A. Gabrielli (2017) The scientific influence of nations on global scientific and technological development. Journal of Infometrics 11(4), 1229–37.

Pavitt, K. (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13, 343–373.

Petralia, S., Balland, P.A., Morrison, A. (2017) Climbing the ladder of technological development. Research Policy 46, 956–969.

Pezzoni, M., R. Veugelers and F. Visentin (2019) How fast is this novel technology going to be a hit? Antecedents predicting follow-on inventions, working papers of Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven.

Ponds, R., F. van Oort and K. Frenken (2007) The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration, Papers in Regional Science, 86 (3), 423-443.

Ponds, R., F.G. van Oort and K. Frenken (2010) Innovation, spillovers and university-industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach, Journal of Economic Geography 10, 231-255.

Power, D., and A. Malmberg (2008) The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: In what sense a regional problem? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1, 233–245.

Rigby, D. (2015) Technological relatedness and knowledge space. Entry and exit of US cities from patent classes, Regional Studies 49 (11), 1922-1937.

Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2001) Is R&D investment in lagging areas of Europe worthwhile? Theory and Empirical evidence, Papers in Regional Science 80, 275–295.

Roper, S. and J.H. Love (2006) Innovation and regional absorptive capacity: the labour market dimension. Annals of Regional Science 40 (2), 437–447.

Varga A. (2000) Local academic knowledge spillovers and the concentration of economic activity, Journal of Regional Science 40, 289–309.

Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., and Noyons, E. C. M. (2010) A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper