Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Science linkages and innovation performance: An analysis on CIS-3 firms in Belgium. (2007). Zuniga, Pluvia ; veugelers, reinhilde ; Cassiman, Bruno.
In: IESE Research Papers.
RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0671.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 49

References cited by this document

Cocites: 27

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The dual impact of ‘excellent’ research on science and innovation: the case of Europe. (2018). Jonkers, Koen ; Sachwald, Frederique.
    In: Science and Public Policy.
    RePEc:oup:scippl:v:45:y:2018:i:2:p:159-174..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Trend monitoring for linking science and strategy. (2017). Timofeev, Anton ; Kuzminov, Ilya ; Chulok, Alexander ; Bakhtin, Pavel ; Saritas, Ozcan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:111:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2347-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The determinants of partner choice for cooperative innovation: The effect of competition. (2015). Ibaez-Zarate, Guiomar .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:urv:wpaper:2072/252214.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Formal and Informal Technology Transfer from Academia to Industry: Complementarity Effects and Innovation Performance. (2008). Hussinger, Katrin ; Grimpe, Christoph.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:7422.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Acs~ Z.J., D.B. Audretsch and M.P. Feldman (1992), Real Effects of Acalemic Research, Amelcan Economic Re,ieiv, 82, pp. 363-367.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Adams, J., E Oliang and J. Jensen (2000), The influence of federal laboratory R&D on industrial research, NBERworking paper 7612.

  3. Adams, J.D. (1990), Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth, Journal of Political Economy, 98, pp. 673- 702.

  4. Arora, A. and A. Gambardella (1990), Complementarity and External linkages: the strategies of the large firms in Biotechnology, Journal of Industrial Economics 38, pp. 361-379.

  5. Arrow, K.J. (1962), Economic welfare and the allocation of re~urces for invention, Richard R. Nelson (ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity, Princeton Univer~ty Press, Princeton.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Arundel, A. and A. Geuna (2004), Proximity and the Use of Public ~ience by Innovative European Firms, Economics of Innovation and New Teiinology, 13, pp. 559- 580.

  7. Audret~h, D.B. ~id RE S~Dhan (1996), C~mpany~-sdent~st ocat~on~ Hnks: the case of b~ot~hno~ogy~ Am~iia~n EwnomicP~eii~i, 86. pp. 641-652.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Branstetter, L. (2004), Exploring the Link between Academic ~ience and Industrial innovation, unpublished working paper.

  9. Cockburn, I. and R Henderson (1994), Racing to Invest? The Dynamics of Competition in Ethical Drug Di~overy, Journal of Economics & Mana~eiie~it .S~rat~y, Blackwell Publi~iing, vol. 3(3), pp. 481-519, Fall.

  10. Cockburn, I. and R. Henderson (1998), Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug di~overy, The Journal of Industrial Economics 46 (2), pp. 157-182.

  11. Cockburn, I., R Henderson and S. Stern (1999), The Diffusion of ~ience-Driven Drug Di~overy: Organizational Olange in Pharmaceutical Research, NBER document de travail no. 7359, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  12. Cohen W. M, Lejinthal D.A. (1990), Absorptive capacity, a n~ per~ective of learning and innovation, Administrative Science Qjart&y 35, pp. 128-152.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Cohen W.M. and D.A. Lejinthal (1989), Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D, The Economic Journal 99, pp. 569- 596.

  14. Cohen, Wedey M. and Richard Nelson, R Wal~i, and P. John (2002), Unks and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D, Manage-nent Sdenc~ 48(1), pp. 1-23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Darby, M. and L.G. Zucker (2005), Gilichesian breakthroughs: Inventions of methods of invention and firm entry in nanotechnology, Annal~ dEconomie ~ &`atistique~ forthcoming.

  16. Darby, M.R. and L.G. Zucker (2001), Oiange or die: The adoption of biotechnology in the Japanese and U.S. pharmaceutical industries, R~. Tech. Innovation, Mana~nent, Policy 7, pp. 85-125.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Evenson, Robert E and Y.A. Kislej (1976), Stochastic Model of Applied Re~arch, Journal of Political Economy 84, pp. 265-281.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  18. Fleming, L., and 0. Sorenson (2004), Science as a map in technological search, Strategic Management Journal, 25, pp. 909-928.

  19. Gambardella, A. (1994), The changing technology of technical change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labor, R~~rch Policy, 23, pp. 523-532.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Griliches, Z. (1979), Issues in Assessing the contribution of research an d~ielopment to productivity growth, Bdl Journal of Economics, 10 (1), pp. 92-116.

  21. Harhoff, Dietmar and Francis Narin, F.M. ~herer and Katrin Vopel (1999), atation Fr~uency and The Value of Patented Inventions, The Review of Economics and &`atistics MIT Press, vol. 81(3), pp. 511-515.

  22. Henderson, Rand I. Cockburn (1996), Scale, scope and ~illovers: thedeterminantsof research productivity in drug di~overy, R4ND Journal of Economics 27 (1), pp. 401-424.

  23. Hicks, D., T. Breitzman, D. aivastro and K. Hamilton (2001), The changing compo~tion of innovative activity in the US a portrait based on patent analysis, P~~rch Policy, 30, pp. pp. 681-703.

  24. I Bu~ness ahool- Lkiiversity of Navarra - 11 Darby, M.R and LynneG. Zucker (2002), ~ing public when you can in biotechnology, NBER working paper, no. 9854.

  25. I Bu~ness ahool- Lkiiversity of Navarra - 13 Salter, A. and B.R Martin (2001), The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical reiiew, R~~rch Policy, 30, pp. 509-532.

  26. Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg and R Hender~n (1993), ~ographic Localization of knowledge ~illovers as ~iidenced by patent citations, Qjart&y Journal of Economics, 108, pp. 577-598.

  27. Jaffe, A., (1989), The Real Effects of Acalemic Research, American Economic Review, 79 (5): 957-70.

  28. Jensen, R. and M. Thur~y (2001), Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University lnventions~ Amelcan Economic Re~Aew, 91(1), pp. 240-59.

  29. Kamien, Morton I. and Israel Zang (2000), Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive cap~ity, International Journal of Industrial aganization, Elsejier, vol. 18, (7), pp. 995-1012, (~tober.

  30. Kim, J., Sangjoon and G. Marschke (2005), The influence of univer~ty research on industrial innovation, NBERworking Paper 11447, June2005.

  31. Mansfield, E. (1995), Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics, and Financing, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, pp. 55-65.

  32. Nagaoka, Sadao (2005), Patent quality, cumulative innovation and market value: Evidence from Japanese firm level panel data, Hitotsubashi University, mimeo.

  33. Narin, F. and RP. Rozek (1988), Bibliometric Analysis of US Pharmaceutical Industry Research Performance, R~~rch Policy, 17, pp. 139-15.

  34. Narin, F., K. Hamilton and D. aivastro (1997), The increa~ng linkage between US technology and public science, P~~rdi Policy26, pp. 31 7-330.

  35. Nelson, R.R, and S.G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Olange, Cambridge (Ma~.).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Nelson, RR. (1982), The role of knowledge ~illovers in R&D efficiency, Cbarterly Journal of Economics, 97, pp. 297-306.

  37. OE~D (2001), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Deielopment.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Poyago-Theotoky, J. Beath, and D.S. Siegel J. (2002), Universities and fundamental research: reflections on the growth of univer~ty-industry partner~1ips, Oxford Re,ieiv of Economic Policy, 18(1), pp. 10-21.

  39. Reitzig, M. (2003), What do patent indicators really measure? A structural test of novelty and inventive step as determinants of patent profitability, LEFIC WP 2003-1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Ro~nberg, N. (1990), Why do firms do basic research (with their own mon~i)?, R~~rch Policy, 19, pp. 165-174.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Stern, Scott (1999), Do Scientists Pay to Be Scientists?, NBER Working Papers 7410, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  42. Thur~y J.G. and M.C. Thur~y (2002), Who is selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of growth in university licen~ng, Manag~nent Scie-ice, 48, pp. 90-104.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Trajtenberg, M. (1990), A penny for your quotes: patent citations and thevalueof innovation, R4ND Journal of Economics, 21(1), pp. 172-187.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Uebeskind J.P., A.L. aiver, L. Zucker and M. Brewer (1996), Social networks~ learning, and flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms, aganization .~ienc~7(4), pp. 428-442.

  45. Van Looy, Bart, Tom Magerman and Koenraad Debackere (2004), Deieloping technology in the vicinity of science: An examination of the relationship between science intensity and technological productivity within the field of biotechnology, KU Leuven, mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  46. Veugelers, R and B. Cas~man (2005), R&D Cooperation between firms and universities: Some empirical eiidence from Belgian manufacturing, forthcoming International Journal of Industrial 0-ganization.

  47. Zucker, Lynne G. and Michael R. Darby (2001), Capturing Technological Cpportunity via Japans Star ~ientists: Evidence from Japanese Firms Biotech Patents and Products, The Journal of Tedinology Transfer, ~ri nger, 26(1-2), pp. 37-58.

  48. Zucker, Lynne G., Michael R Darby and Michael Br~er (1998), Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises, American Economic Re,ieiv, 88, pp. 290-306.

  49. Zucker, Lynne G., Michael R Darby, and Jeff S. Armstrong (2002), Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology, Managel7ent Sd~ic~ 48(1).

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Personal ties in university-industry linkages: a case-study from Argentina. (2017). Carattoli, Mariela ; Arza, Valeria.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:42:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10961-016-9544-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Guiding the Economy Toward the Target Inflation Rate: An Evolutionary Game Theory Approach. (2017). Asako, Yasushi ; Okuda, Tatsushi.
    In: IMES Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:ime:imedps:17-e-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Learning from disaster: Community-based marine protected areas in Fiji. (2013). Takasaki, Yoshito.
    In: Tsukuba Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:tsu:tewpjp:2013-001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Impact on firms of the use of knowledge providers: a systematic review of the literature. (2012). Barge-Gil, Andrés ; Vivas-Augier, Carlos .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:41042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Performance of knowledge interactions between public research centres and industrial firms in Spain: a project-level analysis. (2012). Barge-Gil, Andrés ; Nuez-Sanchez, R. ; Modrego-Rico, A..
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:37:y:2012:i:3:p:330-354.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Firms’ rationales for interaction with research universities and the principles for public co-funding. (2012). Broström, Anders ; Brostrom, Anders.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:37:y:2012:i:3:p:313-329.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit. (2012). dutrénit, gabriela ; De Fuentes, Claudia ; Dutrenit, Gabriela.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:41:y:2012:i:9:p:1666-1682.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The State of Patenting at Research Institutions in Developing Countries: Policy Approaches and Practices. (2011). .
    In: WIPO Economic Research Working Papers.
    RePEc:wip:wpaper:4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The State of Patenting at Research Institutions in Developing Countries: Policy Approaches and Practices. (2011). Zuniga, Pluvia.
    In: WIPO Economic Research Working Papers.
    RePEc:wip:wpaper:04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. A three-stage model of the Academy-Industry linking process: the perspective of both agents. (2010). dutrénit, gabriela ; De Fuentes, Claudia ; Dutrenit, Gabriela.
    In: Papers in Innovation Studies.
    RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2010_006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Organizing links with science: Cooperate or contract?: A project-level analysis. (2010). Cassiman, Bruno ; Diguardo, Maria Chiara ; di Guardo, Maria Chiara ; Valentini, Giovanni.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:39:y:2010:i:7:p:882-892.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Diversity of science linkages and innovation performance: some empirical evidence from Flemish firms. (2009). Zuniga, Pluvia ; veugelers, reinhilde ; Cassiman, Bruno.
    In: Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:ifwedp:200930.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. An analysis of science–industry collaborative patterns in a large European University. (2009). Roux, Pascale ; Levy, Rachel ; Wolff, Sandrine.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:34:y:2009:i:1:p:1-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. How do Organisational and Cognitive Distances Shape Firms’ Interactions with Universities and Public Research Institutes?. (2009). Broström, Anders ; Brostrom, Anders ; McKelvey, Maureen.
    In: Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation.
    RePEc:hhs:cesisp:0188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Why Do Some Firms Undertake R&D Whereas Others Do Not?. (2009). Harris, Richard ; Trainor, Mary .
    In: SERC Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:sercdp:0020.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Is there any Impact of University–Industry Knowledge Transfer on Innovation and Productivity? An Empirical Analysis Based on Swiss Firm Data. (2008). Woerter, Martin ; Arvanitis, Spyros ; Sydow, Nora .
    In: Review of Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:kap:revind:v:32:y:2008:i:2:p:77-94.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Do specific forms of university-industry knowledge transfer have different impacts on the performance of private enterprises? An empirical analysis based on Swiss firm data. (2008). Woerter, Martin ; Arvanitis, Spyros ; Sydow, Nora .
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:33:y:2008:i:5:p:504-533.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness?. (2008). Lööf, Hans ; Broström, Anders ; Loof, Hans ; Brostrom, Anders.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:33:y:2008:i:1:p:73-90.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Science linkages and innovation performance: An analysis on CIS-3 firms in Belgium. (2007). Zuniga, Pluvia ; veugelers, reinhilde ; Cassiman, Bruno.
    In: IESE Research Papers.
    RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0671.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999. (2005). Stephan, Paula ; Adams, James ; Black, Grant C. ; Clemmons, Roger J..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:34:y:2005:i:3:p:259-285.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. (2005). veugelers, reinhilde ; Cassiman, Bruno.
    In: International Journal of Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:eee:indorg:v:23:y:2005:i:5-6:p:355-379.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Foreign direct investment in industrial R&D and exchange rate uncertainty in the UK. (2004). Hall, Stephen ; Becker, Bettina.
    In: Money Macro and Finance (MMF) Research Group Conference 2003.
    RePEc:mmf:mmfc03:4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Which firms have cooperative R&D agreements with universities? Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing.. (2003). veugelers, reinhilde ; Cassiman, Bruno.
    In: IESE Research Papers.
    RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. R&D Cooperation Between Firms and Universities: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing. (2003). veugelers, reinhilde ; Cassiman, Bruno.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:3951.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS2. (2002). Mohnen, Pierre ; Hoareau, Cathy.
    In: Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umamer:2002009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. What Type Of Enterprise Forges Close Links With Universities And Government Labs? Evidence From CIS 2. (2002). Mohnen, Pierre ; Hoareau, Cathy.
    In: CIRANO Working Papers.
    RePEc:cir:cirwor:2002s-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Industry-University Cooperative Research Centers. (2000). Chiang, Eric ; Adams, James ; Starkey, Katara.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:7843.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-28 23:41:44 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.