Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
Cardinal Revealed Preference, Price-Dependent Utility, and Consistent Binary Choice. (2018). Serrano, Roberto ; Aguiar, Victor.
In: Working Papers.
RePEc:bro:econwp:2018-3.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 43

References cited by this document

Cocites: 25

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Cardinal revealed preference: Disentangling transitivity and consistent binary choice. (2021). Serrano, Roberto ; Aguiar, Victor H.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:94:y:2021:i:c:s0304406820301397.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Simple Preference Intensity Comparisons. (2019). Gerasimou, Georgios.
    In: Discussion Paper Series, School of Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:san:wpecon:1905.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Afriat, S. N. (1967). The construction of utility functions from expenditure data. International economic review, 8(1):67–77.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Aguiar, V. H. and Serrano, R. (2017). Slutsky matrix norms: The size, classification, and comparative statics of bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Theory, 172:163 – 201.

  3. Ahn, D., Choi, S., Gale, D., and Kariv, S. (2014). Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment. Quantitative Economics, 5(2):195–223.

  4. Andreoni, J. and Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to garp: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70(2):737–753.

  5. Bagwell, L. S. and Bernheim, B. D. (1996). Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. The American Economic Review, 86:349–373.

  6. Balasko, Y. (2003). Economies with price-dependent preferences. Journal of economic theory, 109(2):333–359.

  7. Basmann, R. L., Molina, D. J., and Slottje, D. J. (1987). Price-dependent preferences and the fechner-thurstone direct utility function: An exposition. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 143(4):568–594.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Basmann, R. L., Molina, D. J., and Slottje, D. J. (1988). A note on measuring veblen’s theory of conspicuous consumption. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70:531–535.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Beatty, T. K. and Crawford, I. A. (2011). How demanding is the revealed preference approach to demand? American Economic Review, 101(6):2782–95.

  10. Blundell, R., Browning, M., and Crawford, I. (2008). Best nonparametric bounds on demand responses. Econometrica, 76(6):1227–1262.

  11. Bronars, S. G. (1987). The power of nonparametric tests of preference maximization. Econometrica, 55:693–698.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Cherchye, L., Demuynck, T., and De Rock, B. (2017). Transitivity of preferences: when does it matter? Theoretical Economics.

  13. Choi, S., Fisman, R., Gale, D. M., and Kariv, S. (2007). Revealing preferences graphically: an old method gets a new tool kit. The American economic review, 97(2):153–158.

  14. Cornelsen, L., Mazzocchi, M., and Smith, R. (2016). Between preferences and references: On the estimation of asymmetric price elasticities. Mimeo.

  15. Cosaert, S. Revealed preferences for diamond goods. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 7. Dean, M. and Martin, D. (2016). Measuring rationality with the minimum cost of revealed preference violations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(3):524–534.

  16. Deb, R., Kitamura, Y., Quah, J. K.-H., and Stoye, J. (2017). Revealed price preference: Theory and stochastic testing. Mimeo.

  17. DellaVigna, S., Lindner, A., Reizer, B., and Schmieder, J. F. (2017). Reference-dependent job search: evidence from hungary. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4):1969–2018.

  18. Demuynck, T. (2015). Statistical inference for measures of predictive success. Theory and Decision, 79(4):689–699.

  19. Echenique, F., Lee, S., and Shum, M. (2011). The money pump as a measure of revealed preference violations. Journal of Political Economy, 119(6):1201–1223.

  20. Fostel, A., Scarf, H. E., and Todd, M. J. (2004). Two new proofs of afriat’s theorem. Economic Theory, 24(1):211–219.

  21. Gerasimou, G. (2010). Consumer theory with bounded rational preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 46(5):708–714.

  22. Hurwicz, L. and Richter, M. K. (1979). Ville axioms and consumer theory. Econometrica, 47:603–619.

  23. John, R. (2001). The concave nontransitive consumer. Journal of Global Optimization, 20(3):297– 308.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Kőszegi, B. and Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4):1133–1165.

  25. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47.

  26. Keiding, H. and Tvede, M. (2013). Revealed smooth nontransitive preferences. Economic Theory, 54(3):463–484.

  27. Kihlstrom, R., Mas-Colell, A., and Sonnenschein, H. (1976). The demand theory of the weak axiom of revealed preference. Econometrica, 44:971–978.

  28. Martin, R. E. (1986). On judging quality by price: price dependent expectations, not price dependent preferences. Southern Economic Journal, pages 665–672.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Masatlioglu, Y. and Ok, E. A. (2005). Rational choice with status quo bias. Journal of Economic Theory, 121(1):1–29.

  30. Masatlioglu, Y. and Ok, E. A. (2013). A canonical model of choice with initial endowments. Review of Economic Studies, 81(2):851–883.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Nosratabadi, H. (2017). Referential revealed preference theory.

  32. Ok, E. A., Ortoleva, P., and Riella, G. (2015). Revealed p-reference theory. American Economic Review, 105(1):299–321.

  33. Pollak, R. A. (1977). Price dependent preferences. The American Economic Review, 67(2):64–75.

  34. Putler, D. S. (1992). Incorporating reference price effects into a theory of consumer choice. Marketing science, 11(3):287–309.

  35. Quah, J. K.-H. (2006). Weak axiomatic demand theory. Economic Theory, 29(3):677–699.

  36. Salant, Y. and Rubinstein, A. (2008). Choice with frames. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(4):1287–1296.

  37. Samuelson, P. A. (1948). Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Economica, 15(60):243–253.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Samuelson, P. A. (1968). What classical and neoclassical monetary theory really was. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 1(1):1–15.

  39. Selten, R. (1991). Properties of a measure of predictive success. Mathematical Social Sciences, 21(2):153–167.

  40. Sen, A. K. (1971). Choice functions and revealed preference. The Review of Economic Studies, 38(3):307–317.

  41. Shafer, W. J. (1974). The nontransitive consumer. Econometrica, 42:913–919.

  42. Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, 2(28):307–317.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Varian, H. R. (1983). Non-parametric tests of consumer behaviour. The review of economic studies, 50(1):99–110.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Computing Revealed Preference Goodness of fit Measures with Integer Programming. (2023). Demuynck, Thomas ; Rehbeck, John.
    In: ULB Institutional Repository.
    RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/359107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Computing revealed preference goodness-of-fit measures with integer programming. (2023). Demuynck, Thomas ; Rehbeck, John.
    In: Economic Theory.
    RePEc:spr:joecth:v:76:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s00199-023-01489-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Social welfare and the unrepresentative representative consumer. (2023). Jerison, Michael.
    In: Journal of Public Economic Theory.
    RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:5-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Measuring Stochastic Rationality. (2023). Tserenjigmid, Gerelt ; Ok, Efe A.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2303.08202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. (Functional)Characterizations vs (Finite)Tests: Partially Unifying Functional and Inequality-Based Approaches to Testing. (2022). Malhotra, Raghav.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2208.03737.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. A Projection Framework for Testing Shape Restrictions That Form Convex Cones. (2021). Seo, Juwon ; Fang, Zheng.
    In: Econometrica.
    RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:89:y:2021:i:5:p:2439-2458.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Measuring rationality: percentages vs expenditures. (2021). Rehbeck, John ; Allen, Roy.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:91:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11238-020-09791-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Diagnosing Anticompetitive Effects of Vertical Integration by Multiproduct Firms. (2021). Marshall, Guillermo ; Luco, Fernando.
    In: Review of Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:kap:revind:v:59:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11151-021-09823-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Cardinal revealed preference: Disentangling transitivity and consistent binary choice. (2021). Serrano, Roberto ; Aguiar, Victor H.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:94:y:2021:i:c:s0304406820301397.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Computing Revealed Preference Goodness of fit Measures with Integer Programming. (2021). Demuynck, Thomas ; Rehbeck, John.
    In: Working Papers ECARES.
    RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/334880.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Predictive Power in Behavioral Welfare Economics. (2020). Martin, Daniel ; lMartin, Danie ; Bouacida, Elias.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:lan:wpaper:296961902.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. A General Framework for Inference on Shape Restrictions. (2019). Seo, Juwon ; Fang, Zheng.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1910.07689.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Classifying bounded rationality in limited data sets: a Slutsky matrix approach. (2018). Serrano, Roberto ; Aguiar, Victor.
    In: SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association.
    RePEc:spr:series:v:9:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s13209-018-0178-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A non-parametric approach to testing the axioms of the Shapley value with limited data. (2018). Pongou, Roland ; Tondji, Jean-Baptiste ; Aguiar, Victor H.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:111:y:2018:i:c:p:41-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Behavioral Inattention. (2018). Gabaix, Xavier.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13268.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. An Index of Unfairness. (2018). Serrano, Roberto ; Pongou, Roland ; Aguiar, Victor ; Tondji, Jean-Baptiste.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bro:econwp:2018-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Cardinal Revealed Preference, Price-Dependent Utility, and Consistent Binary Choice. (2018). Serrano, Roberto ; Aguiar, Victor.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bro:econwp:2018-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Consumer Theory with Misperceived Tastes. (2018). de Clippel, Geoffroy ; Rozen, Kareen ; DeClippel, Geoffroy .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bro:econwp:2018-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. A Non-Parametric Approach to Testing the Axioms of the Shapely Value with Limited Data. (2017). Pongou, Roland ; Tondji, Jean-Baptiste ; Aguiar, Victor .
    In: UWO Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:uwo:uwowop:20172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Behavioral Inattention. (2017). Gabaix, Xavier.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Predictive Power in Behavioral Welfare Economics. (2017). Martin, Daniel ; lMartin, Danie ; Bouacida, Elias.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01489252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Parametric Recoverability of Preferences. (2016). Zrill, Lanny ; Persitz, Dotan ; Halevy, Yoram.
    In: Microeconomics.ca working papers.
    RePEc:ubc:pmicro:yoram_halevy-2016-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Measuring and decomposing the distance to the Shapley wage function with limited data. (2016). Pongou, Roland ; Aguiar, Victor ; Tondji, Jean-Baptiste.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:73606.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Measuring and Decomposing the Distance to the Shapley Wage Function with Limited Data. (2016). Aguiar, Victor ; Tondji, Jean-Baptiste ; Pongou, Roland.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ott:wpaper:1613e.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-04 08:44:48 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.