References contributed by pal725-17532
- (1998). Interdisciplinarity in science and technology. Paris: OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57(2), 155–171.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., & Di Costa, F. (2010). University-industry research collaboration: A model to assess university potential. Higher Education, 62(2), 163–181.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629–643.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Di Costa, F., & Solazzi, M. (2009). University–industry collaboration: A bibliometric examination. Technovation, 29(6–7), 498–507.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Adams, J., Jackson, L., & Marshall, S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of interdisciplinary research. Report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England. Leeds, UK: Evidence Ltd.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Allen, T.J., & Fustfeld, A.R. (1975). Research laboratory architecture and the structuring of communications. R&D Management, 5(2), 153–164.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004). International partnerships for knowledge in business and academia: A comparison between Europe and the USA. Technovation, 24, 517–528.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bjerregaard, T. (2010). Industry and academia in convergence: Microinstitutional dimensions of R&D collaboration. Technovation, 30(2), 100–108.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351–374.
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.
Chompalov, I., Genuth, J., & Shrum, W., (2002). The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy, 31(5), 749–767.
Corley, E.A., Boardman, P.C., & Bozeman B. (2006). Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies. Research Policy, 35(7), 975– 993.
- D’Angelo, C.A., Giuffrida, C., & Abramo, G. (2010). A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in large-scale bibliometric databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 257–269.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & van Oort, F. (2009). The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. Annals of Regional Sciences, 43(2), 721–738.
Huutoniemi, K., Thompson Klein, J., Bruun, H., & Hukkinen, J. (2010). Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39(1), 79–88.
Katz, S.J., &Martin, B.R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.
- Klein, J.T. (2008). Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: A literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S116–S123.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.
Levitt, J.M., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1973–1984.
Leydesdorff, L, & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362.
- Lundberg, J., Tomson, G., Lundkvist, I., Skar, J., & Brommels, M. (2006). Collaboration uncovered: exploring the adequacy of measuring university–industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics, 69(3), 575–589.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31–40.
- Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363–377.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., & Schmoch, U. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203– 222.
Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 54(13), 1237–1249.
Noyons, E.C.M., & Calero-Medina, C. (2009). Applying bibliometric mapping in a high-level science policy context. Scientometrics, 79(2), 261–275. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD].
Palmer, C.L. (1999). Structures and strategies of interdisciplinary science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 242– 253.
- Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421–432.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ponds, R., van Oor, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423–443.
Porter, A.L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745.
Porter, A.L., Roessner, D.J., & Heberger, A.E. (2008). How interdisciplinary is a given body of research? Research Evaluation, 17(4), 273–282.
Qin, J., Lancaster, F.W., & Bryce A. (1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 893–916.
- Rafols, I., &Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity measures and network centralities as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82, 263–287.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rijnsoever, F.J. van, & Hessels, L.K. (2011). Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research policy, 40(3), 463–472.
Rinia, E.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2002). Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics. Scientometrics, 53(2), 241–248.
Sanz, L., Bordons, M., & Zulueta, M.A. (2001). Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: Its measure in three different research areas. Research Evaluation, 10(1), 47–58.
Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425–465.
- Stokols, D., Fuqua, J., Gress, J., Harvey, R., Phillips, K., BaezcondeGarbanati, L., . . . Trochim, W. (2003). Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5(suppl 1), S21–39.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tassey, G. (1991). The functions of technology infrastructure in a competitive economy. Research Policy, 20(4), 345–361.
van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
Wagner, C.S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, selforganization, and the growth of international collaboration in science.
Waltman, L., van Eck, N.J., & Noyons, E.C.M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635.
- Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now